Endothelial graft failure after contralateral autologous corneal transplantation

Autologous Contralateral and Ipsilateral Rotational Penetrating Keratoplasty - A Case Series and Mini-Review

Corneal stromal opacities can severely impact visual acuity if they are located in the visual axis. Homologous penetrating keratoplasty (HPK) is usually the preferred surgical option in such clinical circumstances. However, autologous penetrating keratoplasty (APK) could be an immunologically safer alternative. The purpose of this study was to report the surgical technique, indications, and (dis)advantages of ipsilateral rotational and contralateral APK, as well as pre- and postoperative clinical findings of four patients who underwent contralateral APK. In ipsilateral rotational APK, eccentric trephination places the central corneal opacity at the excision edge, whereafter the corneal button is rotated to clear the visual axis. Contralateral APK is suitable for more specific clinical situations with corneal opacity in a functionally much better eye. Clear cornea of the (almost) blind eye suffering from a noncorneal pathology is transplanted to the potentially better seeing eye suffering from a corneal pathology, followed by HPK in the (almost) blind donor eye. After 18 months, potentially better-seeing eyes improved from logMAR 1.3 to 0.6 in visual acuity, with most HPK-treated weaker eyes matching preoperative levels. Considering ipsilateral rotational and contralateral APK before moving on straight towards HPK is crucial in select cases. Autologous contralateral keratoplasty should be preferred for patients with (1) corneal scars in a potentially better seeing eye and (2) a clear cornea in an (almost) blind eye, especially in cases of high risk for graft rejection.

Bilateral autologous penetrating keratoplasty following periorbital necrotising fasciitis

The case report describes a rare instance of a man in his 70s with periorbital necrotising fasciitis (NF) who underwent bilateral autologous penetrating keratoplasty. NF is an acute infection that can lead to severe complications, including vision loss. The patient presented with severe facial swelling and necrosis of the right eyelid, treated with surgical debridement and antibiotics. Post-surgery, he lost vision in the right eye due to compressive optic neuropathy and developed exposure keratopathy, which was managed with tarsorrhaphy. His left eye had poor vision due to herpetic corneal scarring. He met the criteria for a bilateral autologous keratoplasty, transferring his healthy right cornea to his otherwise healthy left eye and the damaged left cornea to the right eye. The surgery was successful, and at 9 months post-operation, the patient achieved improved vision (6/36) and is awaiting contact lens fitting. The report highlights the advantages and considerations of autokeratoplasty over conventional corneal transplants.

An Overview of Corneal Transplantation in the Past Decade

The cornea is a transparent avascular structure located in the front of the eye that refracts light entering the eyes and also serves as a barrier between the outside world and the internal contents of the eye. Like every other body part, the cornea may suffer insult from trauma, infection, and inflammation. In the case of trauma, a prior infection that left a scar, or conditions such as keratoconus that warrant the removal of all or part of the cornea (keratoplasty), it is important to use healthy donor corneal tissues and cells that can replace the damaged cornea. The types of cornea transplant techniques employed currently include: penetrating keratoplasty, endothelial keratoplasty (EK), and artificial cornea transplant. Postoperative failure acutely or after years can result after a cornea transplant and may require a repeat transplant. This minireview briefly examines the various types of corneal transplant methodologies, indications, contraindications, presurgical protocols, sources of cornea transplant material, wound healing after surgery complications, co-morbidities, and the effect of COVID-19 in corneal transplant surgery.

Semi-Autologous Corneal Transplantation with Simultaneous Bilateral Surgery: A Case Report

The present report describes a case of semi-autologous corneal transplantation with bilateral surgery using two operating microscopes simultaneously. An 86-year-old man with history of six prior failed penetrating keratoplasties in his right eye presented with decreased vision. His other eye was deeply amblyopic but had a clear 30-year-old Castroviejo-square graft with an endothelial cell count of 803 cells/mm2. A semi-autologous graft was performed from the left eye to the right. Surgery was performed simultaneously on both eyes by two different surgeons using a standard ophthalmic operating microscope as well as a second ENT microscope. Upon trephination of the right failed corneal graft, vitreous opacities were noted and sent for culture. The semi-autologous tissue was directly transferred from the left eye to the right without any storage in preservation media to avoid endothelial cell loss. The semi-autologous graft remained clear in the immediate postoperative period. However, the vitreous cultures grew coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Despite all efforts, the patient eventually developed a retinal detachment and vision in the right eye decreased to light perception. Autologous penetrating keratoplasty is an option for patients with loss of corneal function in a potentially seeing eye and a clear cornea in a contralateral eye with poor visual potential due to non-corneal disease. This case is unique in that part of the autologous penetrating keratoplasty had an old square graft in the center and corneal transplant surgery was done simultaneously in both eyes. It also highlights chronic indolent endophthalmitis as a potential cause of multiple graft failures.

Autologous corneal graft for the treatment of deep corneal defects in dogs: 15 cases (2014-2017)

OBJECTIVES

To describe the use of corneal autografts for repair of deep corneal defects in dogs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of clinical records of dogs that received autologous corneal grafts.

RESULTS

Fifteen dogs (16 eyes) of different breed, age and gender were included. Brachycephalic breeds were overrepresented (10/15 dogs). Defects were unilateral in 14 dogs and bilateral in one dog, extended to at least 80% of the stromal thickness in all eyes, with descemetoceles in four eyes and corneal perforations in five eyes. Most ulcers (13/16 eyes) were located centrally. Corneal autografts were harvested from healthy peripheral cornea of the ipsilateral eye. The thickness of the autograft was limited to a set depth of 0.3 mm. The autograft was sutured into a previously debrided ulcer bed with a continuous or simple interrupted suture pattern using absorbable or non-absorbable suture material. Additional interventions included a partial temporary tarsorrhaphy and bandage contact lenses. Postoperatively patients received topical antibiotics and systemic anti-inflammatory drugs, and 12/15 dogs also received systemic antibiotics. Mean follow-up time was 54 days (2 to 462). In all eyes the donor site healed uneventfully with mild, persistent corneal fibrosis. Postoperative complications included autograft keratomalacia, graft dehiscence and corneal pigmentation. No patient required additional surgery. Good structural and functional outcome was accomplished in 14 of 16 eyes.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Autologous corneal grafts provide tectonic support and result in good corneal transparency in selected cases of dogs with deep to perforated corneal ulcerations.

Long-term anatomical and functional outcomes after autokeratoplasty

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of autologous contralateral penetrating keratoplasty (autokeratoplasty).

METHODS

Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were retrospectively performed. Anatomical failure was defined as regraft or graft permanently cloudy at any time during follow-up. Functional failure was defined as the final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) <20/400.

RESULTS

Thirty-one eyes of 31 patients (19 men), with a mean age of 52±18 years (range 15-81 years) were studied during a mean follow-up of 11.3 years (from 13 months to 48 years). At 12 months postoperatively, all the recipient eyes showed a transparent cornea, but 23% showed functional failure. At the final followup, 16 recipient eyes (52%) showed anatomical and functional success. Twenty-three eyes (74%) showed a clear cornea and 68% reached a better BCVA when compared with preoperative measurements. Nevertheless, 13/31 eyes (42%) displayed functional failure. The accumulative probabilities for anatomical success were 100%, 72% and 48% and 77%, 59% and 29% for functional success at 1, 10 and 40 years, respectively. The most common risk factor for failure was progression of previous glaucoma in 50% of the anatomical failures and in 77% of the functional failures.

CONCLUSIONS

Autokeratoplasty could be a successful long-term option in patients having one eye with a clear cornea but with irreversible visual dysfunction and the contralateral eye having favourable visual potential limited only by a completely opacified cornea. Progression of previous glaucoma was the most important risk factor for long-term cornea decompensation and visual functional failure in the sample.

Contralateral Autologous Corneal Transplantation Experience in Mexico City

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to expand the limited knowledge regarding autologous contralateral penetrating keratoplasty.

METHODS

We report the retrospective outcomes of patients who received autokeratoplasty and contralateral opaque corneas in the donor eye at a tertiary care ophthalmology hospital in Mexico City.

RESULTS

Eleven patients received autokeratoplasty and contralateral opaque corneas in the donor eye at our center from 2010 to 2015. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 58 years (range, 35-85 yrs), with 4 female and 7 male patients. There were no surgical or immediate postsurgical complications in the autokeratoplasty eye. However, 1 patient had expulsive hemorrhage in the sightless eye. Follow-up duration ranged from 11 to 65 months (mean, 26 mo). During follow-up, 3 of the autokeratoplasty procedures failed because of endothelial attenuation. Identified known risk factors for failure of the eye with visual potential included the presence of an Ahmed glaucoma drainage device in 7/11 patients (63%), history of glaucoma in 8/11 (72%), past heterologous penetrating keratoplasty in 2/11 (18%), Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome in 1/11 (9%), and 4-quadrant corneal vascularization in 1/11 (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Autokeratoplasty is a good choice in cases having high risk factors and when fresh corneal tissue is not available. This is the largest study describing outcomes of patients who underwent autokeratoplasty. This technique offers no risk of immune rejection and no need for immunosuppression treatment. This study reports a good prognosis in cases having high risk factors for failure.