Accuracy of Computer-Guided Flapless Implant Surgery in Fully Edentulous Arches and in Edentulous Arches With Fresh Extraction Sockets

Comparison of accuracy between two different drill designs for static computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study

BACKGROUND

Although several different design methods have been proposed, limited research is available regarding how design features impact accuracy and performance. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of implant site location between two different drilling systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) in vitro study, each featuring a unique drill stabilization configuration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty models were fabricated simulating a patient with maxillary partial tooth missing. Each model included two single-tooth gap (STG) situations; two extraction socket sites; and a distal extension situation. Experimental models were categorized into two distinct groups, group A: a sleeve-in-sleeve system with a metal sleeve embedded in the surgical guide; group B: an integrated sleeve-on-drill system without a metal sleeve. The deviations in shoulder, tip, depth, and angular were measured. Date were analyzed using the Scheirer-Ray-Hare test (P ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

The deviation of shoulder, tip and angular in group B were significantly lower than group A. When using an integrated sleeve-on-drill system, the remaining deviation values in extraction sockets were significantly higher than those in the STG situation and the distal extension situation, with the exception of depth deviation. However, there is no significant difference between STG situation and distal extension situation.

CONCLUSION

In comparison to the sleeve-in-sleeve system with a metal sleeve in the surgical guide, the accuracy of an integrated sleeve-on-drill system without a metal sleeve was higher. The accuracy of implantation in extracted sockets was significantly lower than that in healing sites.

Accuracy of the over-preparation technique in implant surgery in the maxillary anterior region: an in vitro study

BACKGROUND

In the maxillary anterior region, differences in bone density along the drilling path can impact the accuracy of implant placement despite the use of a surgical guide. Hence, the aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the accuracy of implant placement using the over-preparation technique in different drilling environments in the maxillary anterior region.

METHODS

Three experimental models (a, b, and c) were designed and fabricated to simulate the following drilling environments (n = 60 each): unhealed bone, less dense bone, and dense bone after tooth extraction. The models were subjected to implant cavity preparation and placement using the over-preparation technique (group OPT) and conventional surgical guide technique (group CGT). Differences between the actual positions and the planned positions of the implants were calculated.

RESULTS

The deviations of the implants in the group OPT in Model a and Model b were significantly smaller than those in the group CGT (P < 0.05). Among the group OPT, Model c presented with the smallest deviation, followed by Model b and Model a (P < 0.05), and the CGT group showed the same trend.

CONCLUSIONS

In the maxillary anterior region, differences in bone density along the drilling path can adversely affect the accuracy of implant placement. These discrepancies can be significantly minimized using the over-preparation technique.

Accuracy of Implant Guided Surgery in Fully Edentulous Patients: Prediction vs. Actual Outcome-Systematic Review

Objectives: Examine deviations between the digitally planned and actual implant positions in clinical studies using static fully guided surgical guides. Identify potential associated factors and strategies to minimize their likelihood. Materials and Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA checklist. The literature search was conducted in the PubMed® and Scopus® databases up to February 2024 following the PICOS search strategy. Clinical trials conducted between 2013 and 2024, evaluating the accuracy of static fully guided surgical guides placed in fully edentulous patients, were included. The studies had to assess at least two of the following parameters: angular deviation, cervical deviation, apical deviation, and depth deviation. Results: Out of the 298 articles initially searched, six randomized clinical trials and three clinical trials were included. All but one article used mucosa-supported guides; the remaining one used bone-supported guides. Apical deviations were more significant than cervical deviations, and implants tended to be placed too superficially. The greatest mean deviations were 2.01 ± 0.77 mm for cervical and 2.41 ± 1.45 mm for apical deviations, with the largest angular deviation recorded at 4.98 ± 2.16°. Conclusions: The accuracy of the surgical guide is influenced by various factors, including the technique of image acquisition and subsequent planning, guide support methods, and the adopted surgical protocol. Apical deviations are influenced by cervical and angular deviations. Additionally, deviations were more pronounced in the mandible. Further studies with similar methodologies are necessary for a more precise assessment of the different factors and for establishing safety margins.

Impact of digital technologies on implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

For over three decades, digital technologies have been used in Implant Dentistry, beginning with the introduction of planning software for Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery (S-CAIS). During this time, this field has witnessed the emergence of diverse methodologies and a proliferation of technological advancements. Today, S-CAIS is a widely adopted procedure for the placement of dental implants in both partially and fully edentulous patients, with Dynamic Computer-Assisted Surgery (D-CAIS) and Robotic-Assisted Implant Surgery (RAIS) rapidly gaining attention among dental professionals. The continuous advancements in this arena are not merely indicative of technological progress; they represent a steadfast dedication to refining precision, enhancing efficiency, and fostering innovation with the goal of optimizing patient outcomes in dental implantology.

AIMS

The purpose of the following review is to meticulously examine the spectrum of digital technologies available and to describe their protocols, advantages, and shortcomings as well as to evaluate their accuracy in implant surgery in patients with complete edentulism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A scoping review was performed following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) protocols, leveraging the population, concept, and context (PCC) framework to construct the research question and determine the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-seven records were identified for screening. After applying all the screening criteria, 41 articles were included for review and qualitative data analysis.

DISCUSSION

S-CAIS, D-CAIS, and RAIS were identified as the main technologies for computer assisted implant surgery. Their applications, characteristics, protocols and levels of accuracy were compared and described.

CONCLUSION

Taking into consideration the limitations of this study, S-CAIS appears to be the most applied and validated technology in implant surgery for fully edentulous patients followed by D-CAIS and RAIS being these last two promising initiatives in the field. Despite having similar levels of accuracy, the overall comparison showed a slightly higher values in RAIS followed by D-CAIS and S-CAIS.

Accuracy of implant placement with computer-aided static, dynamic, and robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

This systematic review explores the accuracy of computerized guided implant placement including computer-aided static, dynamic, and robot-assisted surgery. An electronic search up to February 28, 2023, was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases using the search terms "surgery", "computer-assisted", "dynamic computer-assisted", "robotic surgical procedures", and "dental implants". The outcome variables were discrepancies including the implant's 3D-coronal, -apical and -angular deviations. Articles were selectively retrieved according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the data were quantitatively meta-analysed to verify the study outcomes. Sixty-seven articles were finally identified and included for analysis. The accuracy comparison revealed an overall mean deviation at the entry point of 1.11 mm (95% CI: 1.02-1.19), and 1.40 mm (95% CI: 1.31-1.49) at the apex, and the angulation was 3.51˚ (95% CI: 3.27-3.75). Amongst computerized guided implant placements, the robotic system tended to show the lowest deviation (0.81 mm in coronal deviation, 0.77 mm in apical deviation, and 1.71˚ in angular deviation). No significant differences were found between the arch type and flap operation in cases of dynamic navigation. The fully-guided protocol demonstrated a significantly higher level of accuracy compared to the pilot-guided protocol, but did not show any significant difference when compared to the partially guided protocol. The use of computerized technology clinically affirms that operators can accurately place implants in three directions. Several studies agree that a fully guided protocol is the gold standard in clinical practice.

Accuracy of haptic robotic guidance of dental implant surgery for completely edentulous arches

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The accuracy of single implant placement is critical, as errors may cause problems with vital structures intraoperatively, as well as postoperatively with the prostheses. These issues may be exacerbated in complete-arch edentulous treatments requiring relative accuracy among multiple implants, particularly with prefabricated prosthetic structures.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical study was to determine the accuracy of dental implant placement by using haptic robotic guidance in completely edentulous participants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a prospective single-arm clinical study, 5 qualified participants elected to receive dental implants placed by using haptic robotic guidance to restore either the maxillary or mandibular arch, or both, with complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. Three dual-arch participants and 2 single-arch participants resulted in 38 endosteal dental implants being placed. A virtual preoperative restorative and surgical plan was created before surgery. This plan was matched to the surgical workspace on the day of surgery by using a bone-mounted fiducial splint fabricated from a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan. Intraoperatively, the surgeons maneuvered a handpiece attached to the robotic guidance arm, osteotomies were created with a haptically constrained handpiece, and the implants were placed with 3-dimensional haptic constraints as per the virtual plan. Postoperative CBCT scans allowed the evaluation of the deviations of the actual implant placement relative to the plan.

RESULTS

Twenty-three implants were placed in the mandible and 15 in the maxilla. The mean ±standard deviation global angular deviation was 2.56 ±1.48 degrees, while the crown of the placed implant showed a deviation from the plan of 1.04 ±0.70 mm and the apex of 0.95 ±0.73 mm. The signed depth deviation was 0.42 ±0.46 mm proud. No adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical series for treating completely edentulous patients by using haptic robotic guidance was found to be safe and accurate. While further longer-term clinical studies are necessary to measure outcomes and to assess differences as compared with nonrobotic implementations, haptic robotic preparation appears to confer additional intraoperative advantages over other techniques for treating completely edentulous arches.

The Digital Abutment Check: An Improvement of the Fully Digital Workflow

By using modern digitalization techniques, an existing denture can be digitized and aid the provision of a new implant-supported denture according to a fully digital workflow. This includes fully navigated implant surgery and results in an immediately provided prosthetic restoration. However, even with the current digital workflow, it is challenging to achieve a definitive prosthetic restoration in a single treatment session. In order to achieve a definitive denture in as few treatment sessions as possible, we have implemented the digital abutment test. This test modified the existing data set and determined the final restoration. In the present case, the preexisting maxillary removable complete denture was converted into a fixed immediate restoration using the fully digital workflow. The workflow is divided into two treatment phases, each with three treatment sessions, where part of the second phase involves an innovative digital abutment check. The illustrated case shows an effective use of current digital possibilities. Special attention was also paid to a minimally invasive course of therapy.

A suggested protocol to increase the accuracy of prosthetic phases in case of full-arch model-free fully guided computer-aided implant placement and immediate loading

PURPOSE

The accuracy of fully digital model-free surgical and prosthetic procedures depends on the cumulative effect and interaction of all errors gathered along the entire workflow process. In the present case series, a technique is described that increases the accuracy in the transition from the surgical to the prosthetic phase to reduce the risk of developing prosthetic complications in the case of immediate loading protocols.

METHODS

Overall, 86 dental implants were placed and immediately loaded with definitive prostheses in 11 edentulous patients following computer-guided implant surgery according to a fully digital model-free workflow. The same reference template used to anchor the surgical stent during computer-aided implant placement was used to guide the insertion of the definitive abutments and to seat in the correct position the final screw-retained implant-supported fixed restoration. The template used during all surgical and prosthetic procedures, which served as a stable and reproducible connection between the digital and surgical environments, was finally removed.

RESULTS

Healing proceeded uneventfully in all subjects. The implant survival and success rates were 100% over a minimum follow-up period of 1 year from the prosthetic loading. No biological or prosthetic complications were clinically and radiographically observed up to the last follow-up recall.

CONCLUSION

The use of a reference template used to transfer the digital project to the surgical field increased the accuracy and the integration of the surgical and prosthetic phases during the entire workflow.

Digital workflow for fabricating a verification device for an all-on-4 abutment: A dental technique

The all-on-4 implant concept has been used to overcome anatomic limitations and has been reported to have high success rates. A verification device is commonly used to transfer the position of the angled distal abutment accurately. This article describes a digital workflow for fabricating a verification device to position the angled distal abutment with a hexagon connection during computer-guided flapless surgery.