National Trends in Extended Procedures for Ovarian Cancer Debulking Surgery

Perspectives of gynecologic oncology fellowship training and preparedness for practice

We aimed to examine the preparedness of recent gynecologic oncology fellowship graduates for independent practice.We conducted a web-based survey study using REDCap targeting Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) members who graduated gynecologic oncology fellowship within the last six years. The survey included 52 items assessing fellowship training experiences, level of comfort in performing core gynecologic oncology surgical procedures and administering cancer-directed therapies. Questions also addressed factors driving participants' selection of fellowship programs, educational experience, research and preparedness for independent practice. A total of 296 participants were invited to complete the survey. Response rate was 42% with n = 124 completed surveys included for analysis. The highest ranked factor for fellowship selection was fit with program 36% (n = 45). Upon completing fellowship, most were uncomfortable performing ureteral conduit formation 84% (n = 103), ureteroneocystostomy 77% (n = 94), exenteration 68% (n = 83), splenectomy 67% (n = 83) and lower anterior resection 41% (n = 51). Most were comfortable managing intraoperative complications 85% (n = 104) and standard cancer staging procedures (range: 61%-99%). Majority were comfortable providing cancer directed therapies with chemotherapy 99% (n = 123), immunotherapy 84% (n = 104), and poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors 97% (n = 120). Upon completing fellowship, 77% (n = 95) report having mentorship that met their expectations during fellowship and 94% (n = 116) felt they were ready for independent practice. Majority of fellowship graduates were prepared for independent practice and felt comfortable performing routine surgical procedures and cancer directed treatment. However, most are not comfortable with ultra-radical gynecologic oncology procedures. Maximizing surgical opportunities during fellowship training and acquiring early career mentorship may help.

Should We Abandon Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer? A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the gynaecological malignancy with the highest mortality and diagnosis often occurs in its advanced stages. Standard treatment in these cases is based on complete cytoreductive surgery with adjuvant intravenous chemotherapy. Other types of treatment are being evaluated to improve the prognosis of these patients, including intraperitoneal chemotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy. These may improve survival or time to relapse in addition to intravenous chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis is to determine whether treatment with intravenous chemotherapy remains the gold standard, or whether the addition of intraperitoneal chemotherapy has a benefit in overall survival (OS) and disease-free interval (DFS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was carried out in Pubmed and Cochrane, selecting clinical studies and systematic reviews published in the last 10 years. Statistical analysis was performed using the hazard ratio measure in the RevMan tool.

RESULTS

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy shows a benefit in OS and DFS compared with standard intravenous chemotherapy. The significant differences in OS (HR: 0.81 CI 95% 0.74-0.88) and in DFS (HR: 0.81 CI 95% 0.75-0.87) are statistically significant (p < 0.00001). There were no clinical differences in toxicity and side-effects.

CONCLUSION

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is an option that improves OS and DFS without significant toxicity regarding the use of intravenous chemotherapy alone. However, prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal dose and treatment regimen that will maintain the benefits while minimising side effects and toxicity and the profile of patients who will benefit most from this treatment.

A three protein signature fails to externally validate as a biomarker to predict surgical outcome in high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer

Introduction

For patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, complete surgical cytoreduction remains the strongest predictor of outcome. However, identifying patients who are likely to benefit from such surgery remains elusive and to date few surgical outcome prediction tools have been validated. Here we attempted to externally validate a promising three protein signature, which had previously shown strong association with suboptimal surgical debulking (AUC 0.89, accuracy 92.8%), (Riester, M., et al., (2014)).

Methods

238 high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer samples were collected from patients who participated in a large multicentre trial (ICON5). Samples were collected at the time of initial surgery and before randomisation. Surgical outcome data were collated from prospectively collected study records. Immunohistochemical scores were generated by two independent observers for the three proteins in the original signature (POSTN, CXCL14 and pSmad2/3). Predictive values were generated for individual and combination protein signatures.

Results

When assessed individually, none of the proteins showed any evidence of predictive affinity for suboptimal surgical outcome in our cohort (AUC POSTN 0.55, pSmad 2/3 0.53, CXCL 14 0.62). The combined signature again showed poor predictive ability with an AUC 0.58.

Conclusions

Despite showing original promise, when this protein signature is applied to a large external cohort, it is unable to accurately predict surgical outcomes. This could be attributed to overfitting of the original model, or differences in surgical practice between cohorts.

Lifestyle and personal factors associated with having macroscopic residual disease after ovarian cancer primary cytoreductive surgery

OBJECTIVE

The presence of macroscopic residual disease after primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) is an important factor influencing survival for patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC). More research is needed to identify factors associated with having macroscopic residual disease. We analyzed 12 lifestyle and personal exposures known to be related to ovarian cancer risk or inflammation to identify those associated with having residual disease after surgery.

METHODS

This analysis used data on 2054 patients with advanced stage HGSC from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. The exposures were body mass index, breastfeeding, oral contraceptive use, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate use, endometriosis, first-degree family history of ovarian cancer, incomplete pregnancy, menopausal hormone therapy use, menopausal status, parity, smoking, and tubal ligation. Logistic regression models were fit to assess the association between these exposures and having residual disease following PCS.

RESULTS

Menopausal estrogen-only therapy (ET) use was associated with 33% lower odds of having macroscopic residual disease compared to never use (OR = 0.67, 95%CI 0.46-0.97, p = 0.033). Compared to nulliparous women, parous women who did not breastfeed had 36% lower odds of having residual disease (OR = 0.64, 95%CI 0.43-0.94, p = 0.022), while there was no association among parous women who breastfed (OR = 0.90, 95%CI 0.65-1.25, p = 0.53).

CONCLUSIONS

The association between ET and having no macroscopic residual disease is plausible given a strong underlying biologic hypothesis between this exposure and diagnosis with HGSC. If this or the parity finding is replicated, these factors could be included in risk stratification models to determine whether HGSC patients should receive PCS or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and HIPEC for Advanced Ovarian Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: Italian PSM Oncoteam Evidence and Study Purposes

Ovarian cancer is the eighth most common neoplasm in women with a high mortality rate mainly due to a marked propensity for peritoneal spread directly at diagnosis, as well as tumor recurrence after radical surgical treatment. Treatments for peritoneal metastases have to be designed from a patient's perspective and focus on meaningful measures of benefit. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), a strategy combining maximal cytoreductive surgery with regional chemotherapy, has been proposed to treat advanced ovarian cancer. Preliminary results to date have shown promising results, with improved survival outcomes and tumor regression. As knowledge about the disease process increases, practice guidelines will continue to evolve. In this review, we have reported a broad overview of advanced ovarian cancer management, and an update of the current evidence. The future perspectives of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology (SICO) are discussed conclusively.

Frailty is independently associated with worse outcomes and increased resource utilization following endometrial cancer surgery

OBJECTIVE

Frailty has been associated with poorer surgical outcomes and is a critical factor in procedural risk assessment. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of frailty on surgical outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Patients undergoing inpatient gynecologic surgery for endometrial cancer were identified using the 2005-2017 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. The Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty-defining diagnosis indicator was used to designate frailty. Multivariate regression models were used to assess the association of frailty with postoperative outcomes and resource use.

RESULTS

Of 339 846 patients, 2.9% (9868) were considered frail. After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, frailty was associated with a four-fold increase in inpatient mortality (adjusted OR (aOR) 4.1; p<0.001), non-home discharge (aOR 5.2; p<0.001), as well as increased respiratory (aOR 2.6; p<0.001), neurologic (aOR 3.3; p<0.001), renal (aOR 2.0; p<0.001), and infectious (aOR 3.2; p<0.001) complications. While frail patients exhibited increased mortality with age, the rate of mortality in this cohort decreased significantly over time. Compared with non-frail counterparts, frail patients had longer lengths of stay (7.6 vs 3.4 days; p<0.001) and increased hospitalization costs with surgical admission ($25 093 vs $13 405; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty is independently associated with worse surgical outcomes, including increased mortality and resource use, in women undergoing surgery for endometrial cancer. Though in recent years there have been improvements in mortality in the frail population, further efforts to mitigate the impact of frailty should be explored.

Surgery in Advanced Ovary Cancer: Primary versus Interval Cytoreduction

Primary debulking surgery (PDS) has remained the only treatment of ovarian cancer with survival advantage since its development in the 1970s. However, survival advantage is only observed in patients who are optimally resected. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has emerged as an alternative for patients in whom optimal resection is unlikely and/or patients with comorbidities at high risk for perioperative complications. The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence to date for PDS and NACT in the treatment of stage III/IV ovarian carcinoma. We systematically searched the PubMed database for relevant articles. Prior to 2010, NACT was reserved for non-surgical candidates. After publication of EORTC 55971, the first randomized trial demonstrating non-inferiority of NACT followed by interval debulking surgery, NACT was considered in a wider breadth of patients. Since EORTC 55971, 3 randomized trials—CHORUS, JCOG0602, and SCORPION—have studied NACT versus PDS. While CHORUS supported EORTC 55971, JCOG0602 failed to demonstrate non-inferiority and SCORPION failed to demonstrate superiority of NACT. Despite conflicting data, a subset of patients would benefit from NACT while preserving survival including poor surgical candidates and inoperable disease. Further randomized trials are needed to assess the role of NACT.

CCNB1, Negatively Regulated by miR-559, Promotes the Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion of Ovarian Carcinoma Cells

Cyclin B1 (CCNB1) is regarded as an oncogene in multiple tumors. This work aims to investigate the expression, function, and related mechanisms of CCNB1 in ovarian carcinoma (OC). Three microarray datasets (GSE14407, GSE18520, and GSE54388) were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and screened for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of OC tissues and normal ovarian tissues. CCNB1 expression in OC tissues and paracancerous tissues was detected by immunohistochemistry. Kaplan-Meier plotter database was utilized to analyze the correlation between CCNB1 expression and the prognosis of OC patients. After the loss-of-function and gain-of-function cell models were established, cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8), bromo-deoxyuridine (BrdU), and transwell experiments were employed to examine the proliferation, migration, and invasion of OC cells, respectively. The targeting relationship between miR-559 and CCNB1 was verified using the dual-luciferase reporter gene experiment. The expressions of CCNB1 mRNA and miR-559 were detected by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Western blot was used to quantify the protein expression of CCNB1. In addition, xenograft nude mouse models were established to examine the effects of CCNB1 on lung metastasis in vivo. CCNB1 expression was markedly increased in OC tissues and cell lines. The overall survival, progression-free survival, and post-progression survival of OC patients with high CCNB1 expression were significantly shorter. OC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion were enhanced by CCNB1 overexpression while CCNB1 knockdown led to opposite effects. MiR-559 expression was remarkably reduced in OC tissues and cell lines, and miR-559 markedly suppressed the malignant characteristics of OC cells. Besides, miR-559 directly targeted the 3' UTR of CCNB1 mRNA and reduced CCNB1 expression at both the mRNA and protein levels. Overexpression of CCNB1 accelerated lung metastasis of OC cells in vivo. CCNB1, of which expression is modulated by miR-559, facilitates proliferation, migration, and invasion of OC cells, therefore, working as a potential therapeutic target of OC. This work provides new insights into the clinical diagnosis and treatment of OC.

Algorithm to Identify Incident Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Cases Using Claims Data

PURPOSE

To create an algorithm to identify incident epithelial ovarian cancer cases in claims-based data sets and evaluate performance of the algorithm using SEER-Medicare claims data.

METHODS

We created a five-step algorithm on the basis of clinical expertise to identify incident epithelial ovarian cancer cases using claims data for (1) ovarian cancer diagnosis, (2) receipt of platinum-based chemotherapy, (3) no claim for platinum-based chemotherapy but claim for tumor debulking surgery, (4) removed cases with nonplatinum chemotherapy, and (5) removed patients with prior claims with personal history of ovarian cancer code to exclude prevalent cases. We evaluated algorithm performance using SEER-Medicare claims data by creating four cohorts: incident epithelial ovarian cancer, a 5% random sample of cancer-free Medicare beneficiaries, a 5% random sample of incident nonovarian cancer, and prevalent ovarian cancer cases.

RESULTS

Using SEER tumor registry data as the gold standard, our algorithm correctly classified 89.9% of incident epithelial ovarian cancer cases (cohort n = 572) and almost 100% of cancer-free controls (n = 97,127), nonovarian cancer (n = 714), and prevalent ovarian cancer cases (n = 3,712). The overall algorithm sensitivity was 89.9%, the positive predictive value was 93.8%, and the specificity and negative predictive value were > 99.9%. Patients were more likely to be correctly classified as incident ovarian cancer if they had stage III or IV disease compared with early stage I or II disease (93.5% v 83.7%, P < .01), and grade 1-4 compared with unknown grade tumors (93.8% v 81.4%, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Our algorithm correctly identified most incident epithelial ovarian cancer cases, especially those with advanced disease. This algorithm will facilitate research in other claims-based data sets where cancer registry data are unavailable.

Trends in extent of surgical cytoreduction for patients with ovarian cancer

Purpose

To identify patient and hospital characteristics associated with extended surgical cytoreduction in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database identified women hospitalized for surgery to remove an ovarian malignancy between 2013 and 2017. Extended cytoreduction (ECR) was defined as surgery involving the bowel, liver, diaphragm, bladder, stomach, or spleen. Chi-square and logistic regression were used to analyze patient and hospital demographics related to ECR, and trends were assessed using the Cochran-Armitage test.

Results

Of the estimated 79,400 patients undergoing ovarian cancer surgery, 22% received ECR. Decreased adjusted odds of ECR were found in patients with lower Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) scores (OR 0.61, p<0.001 for ECI 2, versus ECI≥3) or residence outside the top income quartile (OR 0.71, p<0.001 for Q1, versus Q4), and increased odds were seen at hospitals with high ovarian cancer surgical volume (OR 1.25, p<0.001, versus low volume). From 2013 to 2017, there was a decrease in the proportion of cases with extended procedures (19% to 15%, p<0.001). There were significant decreases in the proportion of cases with small bowel, colon, and rectosigmoid resections (p<0.001). Patients who underwent ECR were more likely treated at a high surgical volume hospital (37% vs 31%, p<0.001) over the study period. For their hospital admission, patients who underwent ECR had increased mortality (1.6% vs. 0.5%, p<0.001), length of stay (9.6 days vs. 5.2 days, p<0.001), and mean cost ($32,132 vs. $17,363, p<0.001).

Conclusions

Likelihood of ECR was associated with increased medical comorbidity complexity, higher income, and undergoing the procedure at high surgical volume hospitals. The proportion of ovarian cancer cases with ECR has decreased from 2013–17, with more cases performed at high surgical volume hospitals.

Management of ovarian cancer: guidelines of the Italian Medical Oncology Association (AIOM)

INTRODUCTION

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. Over 5200 new cases of this tumor are diagnosed yearly in Italy, resulting in more than 3600 deaths. In terms of molecular biology, five different ovarian cancer subtypes should be distinguished.

METHOD

This article summarizes the evidence-based guidelines that the Italian Medical Oncology Association (AIOM) has developed with a multidisciplinary panel of experts, including pathologists, gynecologic oncologists, medical oncologists, and radiotherapists, with the support of methodologists, to help clinicians involved in the management of patients with ovarian cancer in their daily clinical practice.

RESULTS

The most relevant randomized clinical trials regarding surgery, chemotherapy, and molecularly targeted agents (bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors) in early, advanced, and recurrent disease have been critically analyzed. The levels of evidence and strength of recommendation have been reported for any issue.

CONCLUSION

Women with a clinical suspicion of ovarian cancer should be centralized in referral centers. The BRCA test should be requested for all women with nonmucinous and nonborderline tumors, regardless of age and family history. BRCA testing could be preferentially performed on neoplastic tissue. In the presence of a positive tumor test, a genetic test should always be performed on a blood sample to differentiate between germline mutations, which require counseling and genetic testing of family members, and somatic mutations.

Readmissions after ovarian cancer cytoreduction surgery: The first 30 days and beyond

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Postoperative readmissions are often used to assess quality of surgical care. This study compared 30-day vs 31- to 90-day readmission following surgery for ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study of the 2010-2015 Nationwide Readmissions Database characterized 90-day readmissions following cytoreductive surgery for these cancers. Each patient's first postoperative hospitalization was included. Univariate analysis compared patient demographics and reasons for readmission. Multivariable regression identified independent predictors of readmission.

RESULTS

Of an estimated 76 652 patients, 10 264 (13.4%) were readmitted within 30 days, and 6942 (9.1%) between 31 and 90 days. The 30-day readmissions were more frequently associated with postoperative infection, while 31- to 90-day readmissions were more frequently associated with renal or hematologic diagnoses. Predictors of any 90-day readmission included index hospitalization longer than 7 days (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.61 [1.48-1.75], P < .001), extended surgical procedure (AOR 1.41 [1.30-1.53], P < .001), pulmonary circulation disorder (AOR = 1.34 [1.13-1.60], P = .001), and diabetes mellitus (AOR = 1.12 [1.02-1.24], P = .020).

CONCLUSIONS

Readmission rates remain high during the 31- to 90-day postoperative period in ovarian cancer patients, although these readmissions are less frequently related to postoperative complications. Prospective study is merited to optimize surveillance beyond the initial 30 days after ovarian cancer surgery.

National trends in bowel and upper abdominal procedures in ovarian cancer surgery

OBJECTIVES

In the United States, trends in the initial treatment approach for ovarian cancer reflect a shift in paradigm toward the increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trends in surgical cytoreductive procedures in ovarian cancer patients who underwent either primary or interval cytoreductive surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective, population-based study examined patients with stage III/IV ovarian cancer diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2013 identified using SEER-Medicare. Small or large bowel resection, ostomy creation, and upper abdominal procedures were identified using relevant billing codes and compared over time. A 1:1 primary and interval cytoreductive propensity matched cohort was created using demographic and clinical variables. 30-day complications and the use of acute care services were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 5417 women were identified. 34% underwent bowel resections, 16% ostomy creation, and 8% upper abdominal procedures. There was an increase in bowel resections and upper abdominal procedures from 2000 to 2013 in patients who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery. Compared with patients who received primary cytoreduction, patients who underwent interval cytoreductive surgery were less likely to undergo bowel resection (OR=0.50; 95% CI [0.41, 0.61]) or ostomy creation (OR=0.48; 95% CI [0.42, 0.56]). Upper abdominal procedures did not differ between groups. For patients who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery, these procedures were associated with intensive care unit stay (4.6% vs <2%, P<0.01). In both primary and interval cytoreductive surgery patients, the receipt of bowel and upper abdominal procedures was associated with multiple 30-day postoperative complications and higher rates of readmission and emergency room visits.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of upper abdominal procedures in ovarian cancer patients increased from 2000 to 2013. Interval cytoreductive surgery was associated with decreased likelihood of bowel surgery. In matched primary and interval cytoreductive surgery cohorts, the receipt of these procedures were associated with the increased likelihood of postoperative complications and use of acute care services.

Outcomes of Hysterectomy Performed by Very Low-Volume Surgeons

OBJECTIVE

To perform a population-based analysis to first examine the changes in surgeon and hospital procedural volume for hysterectomy over time and then to explore the association between very low surgeon procedural volume and outcomes.

METHODS

All women who underwent hysterectomy in New York State from 2000 to 2014 were examined. Surgeons were classified based on the average annual procedural volume as very low-volume surgeons if they performed one procedure per year. We used multivariable models to examine the association between very low-volume surgeon status and morbidity, mortality, transfusion, length of stay, and cost.

RESULTS

Among 434,125 women who underwent hysterectomy, very low-volume surgeons accounted for 3,197 (41.0%) of the surgeons performing the procedures and operated on 4,488 (1.0%) of the patients. The overall complication rates were 32.0% for patients treated by very low-volume surgeons compared with 9.9% for those treated by other surgeons (P<.001) (adjusted relative risk 1.97, 95% CI 1.86-2.09). Specifically, the rates of intraoperative (11.3% vs 3.1%), surgical site (15.1% vs 4.1%) and medical complications (19.5% vs 4.8%), and transfusion (38.5% vs 11.8%) were higher for very low-volume compared with higher volume surgeons (P<.001 for all). Patients treated by very low-volume surgeons were also more likely to have a prolonged length of stay (62.0% vs 22.0%) and excessive hospital charges (59.8% vs 24.6%) compared with higher volume surgeons (P<.001 for both). Mortality rate was 2.5% for very low-volume surgeons compared with 0.2% for higher volume surgeons (P<.001) (adjusted relative risk 2.89, 95% CI 2.32-3.61).

CONCLUSION

A substantial number of surgeons performing hysterectomy are very low-volume surgeons. Performance of hysterectomy by very low-volume surgeons is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk ovarian cancer patients: Role of age

OBJECTIVE

To review a single-center clinical experience with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in a population of frail epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients and investigate the prognostic role of advanced age.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from 102 advanced EOC patients treated with NACT and presenting high perioperative risk. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A, including patients aged 70 years or older; and group B, including patients below 70 years old. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare survival and prognostic factors for survival between the two groups.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients (41.2%) were older than 70 years. Elderly patients were more likely to present comorbidities ( p = 0.0001), poor performance status ( p = 0.04), and multiple indications for NACT ( p = 0.03). They showed a reduced response to NACT, since only 64% of elderly patients underwent surgical debulking (98.3% vs 64.3%, p = 0.001) and, among these, half of them were optimally debulked (79.3% vs 50%, p = 0.01). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly lower in group A (respectively, 9 vs 13 months, p = 0.005, and 21 vs 29 months, p = 0.01). Advanced age, IV stage, presence of ascites, and residual disease >1 cm were significantly associated with a lower PFS. However, when analyzing factors associated with OS, the only significant ones were higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score and residual disease >1 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Age was not found to be a prognostic factor for survival. This highlights the necessity of validated geriatric assessment tools predicting functional age and treatment tolerability to avoid undertreatment of elderly patients.

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Ovarian cancer is mostly diagnosed at advanced stage. Better survival is achieved through complete debulking surgery and chemotherapy. Historically, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been introduced for unresectable disease to decrease tumor load and perform a unique complete surgery. Four randomized control trials have compared primary debulking surgery to NAC, but there is still controversy about the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and questions about its modalities. Areas covered: We made a review of knowledge on benefits of NAC compared to primary debulking chemotherapy, in terms of survival and morbidity, methods of administration, new drugs in early and late phase trials, the selection of patients. Similar survival was observed after NAC and interval debulking surgery or primary debulking surgery. Morbidity of surgery was decreased after interval debulking compared primary debulking surgery. Conventional drugs are carboplatin and paclitaxel. Safety of bevacizumab was evaluated in phase 2 trials associated with conventional drugs. Immunotherapy trials are enrolling patients in phase 1 study. Expert commentary: NAC followed by debulking surgery is the best treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.