A Modified Shortened Administration Schedule for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Irinotecan and Cisplatin in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy can help predict long-term survival in patients with cervical cancer

It is still controversial whether cervical cancer patients with clinical responses after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) have a better long-term survival or not. This study was designed to investigate the effect of the clinical response on the disease-free survival (DFS) of cervical cancer patients undergoing NACT. A total of 853 patients from a retrospective study were used to evaluate whether the clinical response was an indicator for the long-term response, and 493 patients from a prospective cohort study were used for further evaluation. The survival difference was detected by log-rank test, univariate and multivariate Cox regression and a pooled analysis. The log-rank test revealed that compared with non-responders, the DFS of responders was significantly higher in the retrospective data (P = 0.007). Univariate Cox regression showed that the clinical response was an indicator of long-term survival in the retrospective study (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.18-2.85, P = 0.007). In a multivariate Cox model, the clinical response was still retained as an independent significant prognostic factor in the retrospective study (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.01-2.50, P = 0.046). The result was also validated in the prospective data with similar results. These findings implied that the clinical response can be regarded as an independent predictor of DFS.

The detection of sentinel lymph nodes in laparoscopic surgery for uterine cervical cancer using 99m-technetium-tin colloid, indocyanine green, and blue dye

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to determine the feasibility and detection rates and clarify the most effective combination of injected tracer types for sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in uterine cervical cancer in patients who have undergone laparoscopic surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

A total of 119 patients with cervical cancer underwent SLN biopsy at radical hysterectomy using three types of tracers. The various factors related to side-specific detection rate, sensitivity, and false negative (FN) rate were analyzed.

RESULTS

The SLN detection rates using 99m-technetium ((99m)Tc)-tin colloid, indigo carmine, and indocyanine green (ICG) were 85.8%, 20.2%, and 61.6%, respectively. The patients with ≥2-cm-diameter tumors and those who received NAC had lower detection rates than those with <2-cm-diameter tumors (75.7% vs. 91.5%, p<0.01) and those who did not receive NAC (67.9% vs. 86.3%, p<0.01), respectively. Laparoscopic procedures had a higher detection rate than laparotomy (100.0% vs. 77.1%, p<0.01). No factors significantly affected the sensitivity; however, the patients with ≥2-cm-diameter tumors (86.0% vs. 1.4%, p<0.01), NAC (19.4% vs. 2.2%, p<0.01), and those who underwent laparotomy (7.4% vs. 0%, p<0.01) had an unfavorable FN rate.

CONCLUSION

Among the examined tracers, (99m)Tc had the highest detection of SLN mapping in patients with uterine cervical cancer. Patients with local advanced cervical cancer with/without NAC treatment might be unsuited for SLN mapping. SLN mapping is feasible and results in an excellent detection rate in patients with <2-cm-diameter cervical cancer. Laparoscopic surgery is the best procedure for SLN detection in patients with early-stage disease.

The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: A randomized multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to evaluate the toxicity and curative effect of irinotecan plus cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for stage Ib2, IIa2, and IIb cervical cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 219 patients were randomly assigned to two groups: 109 patients were treated with 1-2 cycles of chemotherapy (NACT group), and 110 patients in the control group were treated directly with surgery (DS group). Patients in the NACT group were randomly assigned to two groups: 50 patients were treated with irinotecan plus cisplatin followed by surgery (IP group), and 59 patients were treated with paclitaxel plus cisplatin followed by surgery (TP group). Patients with pathological recurrence risk factors received post-operative radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Survival analysis revealed no significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) between the NACT and DS groups. Analysis of clinicopathologic factors showed that the lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and deep stromal invasion rates were significantly lower in the NACT group. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and grade 3/4 diarrhea were both higher in the IP group than in the TP group. DFS and OS were similar in the IP and TP groups. Univariate analysis showed that LVSI was the only factor associated with DFS.

CONCLUSION

NACT did not improve overall survival but did reduce the number of patients who received post-operative radiotherapy. NACT consisting of irinotecan plus cisplatin for cervical cancer showed similar efficacy and higher toxicity compared with the use of paclitaxel plus cisplatin, although the toxicity was tolerable.

The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in different histological types of cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is different among cervical cancer types, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and non-SCC, including adenocarcinoma of the cervix (ACC) and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Springerlink and CNKI for studies published between Jan 1987 and Sep 2012 and evaluated the studies published in English and Chinese on NACT and cervical carcinoma based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Because there was a relative lack of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we included 2 RCTs and 9 observational studies in our analysis. Meta-analysis was applied to calculate the efficacy of NACT in different histological types of cervical cancer with 95% confidence intervals. The risk of bias was assessed by Begg's adjusted rank correlation test and Egger's regression asymmetry tests.

RESULTS

As many as 11 articles, 2 RCTs and 9 observational studies, were selected according to the eligibility criteria for a total of 1559 participants. For the short-term efficacy of NACT, either in terms of CR+PR or CR only, there was no difference between SCC and non-SCC when the data were pooled (P>0.05) in stratified studies based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (P>0.05) or histological type (P>0.05) or in observational studies (P>0.05). Nevertheless, SCC was associated with a higher short-term response rate than non-SCC in RCTs [6.57 (95%CI 1.72-25.12) in CR+PR]. For the long-term outcome of NACT, patients with SCC experienced a significant 5-year overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS) when compared to patients with non-SCC in pooled [1.47 (95%CI 1.06-2.06)] and observational studies [1.96 (95%CI 1.61-2.38)] other than RCTs (P>0.05). Moreover, this difference was especially obvious when the subgroup analysis was restricted to patients in stages above IIB [2.06 (95%CI 1.79-2.36)] rather than in stages IB-IIB [1.33 (95%CI 0.99-1.79)].

CONCLUSION

Although no significant differences exist in the short-term efficacy of NACT, the histological type may be used to predict the long-term efficacy of NACT in patients with cervical cancer, especially those with FIGO stages above IIB.