Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal ports

Conversion to Complete Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma After Bidirectional Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

This report aims to describe preliminary results concerning secondary resectability after bidirectional chemotherapy for initially unresectable malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM).

METHODS

Between January 2013 and January 2016, 20 consecutive patients treated for diffuse MPM not suitable for upfront surgery received bidirectional chemotherapy associating intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy. Evaluation of the response to chemotherapy was assessed clinically and by laparoscopy.

RESULTS

The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score at staging laparoscopy was 27 (range 15-39). Altogether, 118 intraperitoneal chemotherapy cycles were administered without any specific adverse catheter-related event. Concerning tolerance, 85% of the patients experienced no pain or mild pain during chemotherapy administration. The clinical response rate was 60% after a median of three chemotherapy cycles. At laparoscopic reevaluation, the median PCI was 18 (range 0-35), and a secondary resectability was considered for 55% of the patients. Complete cytoreduction surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was finally achieved for 10 patients (50%), with a median intraoperative PCI score of 14 (range 6-30). After a median follow-up period of 18 months, the 2-year overall survival rate was 83.3% for the patients treated by CRS followed by HIPEC and 44% for the patients treated by bidirectional chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Bidirectional chemotherapy is a promising, well-tolerated treatment capable of increasing the resection rate for selected patients with diffuse MPM initially considered as unresectable or borderline resectable. For patients with definitively unresectable disease, bidirectional chemotherapy achieves a higher clinical response rate.

Safety and Effectiveness of Percutaneously Inserted Peritoneal Ports Compared to Surgically Inserted Ports in a Retrospective Study of 87 Patients with Ovarian Carcinoma over a 10-Year Period

PURPOSE

Placement of peritoneal ports has become a favorable technique for direct chemotherapy infusion in treating peritoneal metastases from ovarian cancer. We aim to outline an approach to the percutaneous insertion of peritoneal ports and to characterize success and complication rates compared to surgically inserted ports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis was collected from 87 patients who had peritoneal port insertion (28 inserted surgically and 59 percutaneously) for treatment of peritoneal metastases from ovarian cancer from July 2004 to July 2014. Complications were classified according to the SIR Clinical Practice Guidelines as major or minor.

RESULTS

Technical success rates for surgically and percutaneously inserted ports were 100 and 96.7 %, respectively (p = 0.44), with the two percutaneous failures successful at a later date. There were no major complications in either group. Minor complication rates for surgically versus percutaneously inserted ports were 46.4 versus 22.0 %, respectively (p = 0.02). The infection rate for surgically inserted versus percutaneously inserted ports was 14.3 and 0 %, respectively (p = 0.002). The relative risk of developing a complication from percutaneous peritoneal port insertion without ascites was 3.4 (p = 0.04). For percutaneously inserted ports, the mean in-room procedure time was 81 ± 1.3 min and mean fluoroscopy time was 5.0 ± 4.5 min.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneously inserted peritoneal ports are a safe alternative to surgically inserted ports, demonstrating similar technical success and lower complication rates.