Self-identified Black Race as a Risk Factor for Intraocular Pressure Elevation and Iritis Following Prophylactic Laser Peripheral Iridotomy

Practice Patterns and Sociodemographic Disparities in the Clinical Care of Anatomical Narrow Angles in the United States

PURPOSE

To assess treatment and visit patterns among patients with newly diagnosed anatomical narrow angle (ANA) and identify sociodemographic factors associated with disparities in care.

DESIGN

Retrospective practice pattern evaluation study.

METHODS

A total of 263,422 patients diagnosed with ANA between 2007 and 2019 were identified in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart. Inclusion was limited to newly diagnosed ANA, defined as (1) continuous enrollment during a 2-year lookback period and 1-year study period from first diagnosis; (2) diagnosis by an ophthalmologist or optometrist; and (3) no history of pseudophakia, ANA treatments, or prior primary angle closure glaucoma diagnosis. Outcome measures were treatment with laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI), cataract surgery, or intraocular pressure-lowering medications and number of eye care visits. Logistic and Poisson regression were performed to assess factors associated with treatment and eye care visits, respectively.

RESULTS

Among 52,405 eligible cases, 27.7% received LPI, 13.9% received drops, and 15.1% received cataract surgery. Odds of LPI were higher in Asians and Hispanics (odds ratio [OR] ≥ 1.16, P < .001). Non-Whites had higher odds of drops (OR ≥ 1.19, P < .001), but Hispanics had lower odds of cataract surgery (OR = 0.79, P < .001). The mean number of eye care visits was 2.6±2.1 including the day of diagnosis. Older age and treatment were associated with higher rates of eye care visits (rate ratio > 1.15, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

More than a quarter of patients with newly diagnosed ANA receive treatment with LPI. Racial minorities are more likely to receive ANA-specific treatments but less likely to receive cataract surgery. These differences may reflect racial differences in disease severity and the need for clearer practice guidelines in ANA care.

Patterns and Disparities in Recorded Gonioscopy During Initial Glaucoma Evaluations in the United States

PURPOSE

To assess patterns in gonioscopy during initial glaucoma evaluations in the United States.

DESIGN

Retrospective, case-control study.

METHODS

Patients undergoing initial glaucoma evaluation between 2009-2020 were identified in the Optum Clinformatics DataMart. Initial evaluation was defined as follows: (1) glaucoma suspect, anatomical narrow angle (ANA), or primary/secondary glaucoma diagnosed by an ophthalmologist; (2) continuously observable during a 36-month lookback period; (3) no history of glaucoma medications, laser, or surgical procedures; and (4) optical coherence tomography (OCT) or visual field performed within 6 months of initial diagnosis. Logistic regression models were developed to identify factors associated with no record of gonioscopy based on Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes.

RESULTS

Among 198,995 patients, 20.4% and 29.5% had recorded gonioscopy on the day of diagnosis or within 6 months, respectively. On multivariable analysis, odds of recorded gonioscopy within 6 months of initial evaluation was lower (P < .001) among non-Hispanic Whites (OR=0.84) but similar for Blacks (OR=1.02) and Hispanics (OR=0.96) compared with Asians. Age ≥60 years (OR<0.82), pseudophakia/aphakia (OR=0.58), or residence outside of the Northeast region (OR=0.66-0.84) conferred lower odds of recorded gonioscopy (P < .001). Angle closure glaucoma (OR=0.85), secondary glaucoma (OR=0.31), or open angle glaucoma/suspect (OR=0.12/0.24, respectively) patients were less likely to have recorded gonioscopy compared to ANA patients (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

More than 70% patients undergoing initial glaucoma evaluation in the United States do not have a record of gonioscopy, especially elderly, non-Hispanic White, and pseudophakic patients in non-Northeast regions. This pattern does not conform to current practice guidelines and could contribute to misdiagnosed disease and suboptimal outcomes.