A Plasma-Based, Amiodarone-Impregnated Material Decreases Susceptibility to Atrial Fibrillation in a Post-Cardiac Surgery Model

Pericardial Inflammatory Mediators That Can Drive Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Surgery Patients

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common dysrhythmia that affects a significant number of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Many studies aim to better understand this complex postsurgical complication by analysing circulating biomarkers in patients who develop POAF. More recently, the pericardial space was shown to contain inflammatory mediators that could trigger POAF. In this review we summarise recent studies that examine the immune mediators present in the pericardial space and their potential implications for the pathophysiology of POAF in cardiac surgery patients. Ongoing research in this area should better delineate the multifactorial etiology of POAF, where specific markers may be targeted to reduce the incidence of POAF and improve outcomes for this patient population.

Inflammatory signalling in atrial cardiomyocytes: a novel unifying principle in atrial fibrillation pathophysiology

Inflammation has been implicated in atrial fibrillation (AF), a very common and clinically significant cardiac rhythm disturbance, but its precise role remains poorly understood. Work performed over the past 5 years suggests that atrial cardiomyocytes have inflammatory signalling machinery - in particular, components of the NLRP3 (NACHT-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing 3) inflammasome - that is activated in animal models and patients with AF. Furthermore, work in animal models suggests that NLRP3 inflammasome activation in atrial cardiomyocytes might be a sufficient and necessary condition for AF occurrence. In this Review, we evaluate the evidence for the role and pathophysiological significance of cardiomyocyte NLRP3 signalling in AF. We first summarize the evidence for a role of inflammation in AF and review the biochemical properties of the NLRP3 inflammasome, as defined primarily in studies of classic inflammation. We then briefly consider the broader evidence for a role of inflammatory signalling in heart disease, particularly conditions that predispose individuals to develop AF. We provide a detailed discussion of the available information about atrial cardiomyocyte NLRP3 inflammasome signalling in AF and related conditions and evaluate the possibility that similar signalling might be important in non-myocyte cardiac cells. We then review the evidence on the role of active resolution of inflammation and its potential importance in suppressing AF-related inflammatory signalling. Finally, we consider the therapeutic potential and broader implications of this new knowledge and highlight crucial questions to be addressed in future research.

Systematic review of pre-clinical therapies for post-operative atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a frequent cardiothoracic surgery complication that increases hospital stay, mortality and costs. Despite decades of research, there has been no systematic overview and meta-analysis of preclinical therapies for POAF in animal models.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE from their inception through September 2020 to determine the effect of preclinical POAF therapies on primary efficacy outcomes using a prospectively registered protocol (CRD42019155649). Bias was assessed using the SYRCLE tool and CAMARADES checklist.

RESULTS

Within the 26 studies that fulfilled our inclusion criteria, we identified 4 prevention strategies including biological (n = 5), dietary (n = 2), substrate modification (n = 2), and pharmacological (n = 17) interventions targeting atrial substrate, cellular electrophysiology or inflammation. Only one study altered more than 1 pathophysiological mechanism. 73% comprised multiple doses of systemic therapies. Large animal models were used in 81% of the studies. Preclinical therapies altogether attenuated atrial fibrosis (SMD -2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.95 to -1.22; p < 0.00001; I2 = 47%), AF inducibility (RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.79; p = 0.008; I2 = 39%), and AF duration (SMD -2.19; 95% CI -3.05 to -1.32; p < 0.00001; I2 = 50%). However, all the criteria needed to evaluate the risk of bias was unclear for many outcomes and only few interventions were independently validated by more than 1 research group.

CONCLUSION

Treatments with therapies targeting atrial substrate, cellular electrophysiology or inflammation reduced POAF in preclinical animal models compared to controls. Improving the quality of outcome reporting, independently validating promising approaches and targeting complimentary drivers of POAF are promising means to improve the clinical translation of novel therapies for this highly prevalent and clinically meaningful disease.

Plasma-based biomaterials for the treatment of cutaneous radiation injury

Cutaneous wounds caused by an exposure to high doses of ionizing radiation remain a therapeutic challenge. While new experimental strategies for treatment are being developed, there are currently no off‐the‐shelf therapies for the treatment of cutaneous radiation injury that have been proven to promote repair of the damaged tissues. Plasma‐based biomaterials are biologically active biomaterials made from platelet enriched plasma, which can be made into both solid and semi‐solid forms, are inexpensive, and are available as off‐the‐shelf, nonrefrigerated products. In this study, the use of plasma‐based biomaterials for the mitigation of acute and late toxicity for cutaneous radiation injury was investigated using a mouse model. A 2‐cm diameter circle of the dorsal skin was irradiated with a single dose of 35 Gy followed by topical treatment with plasma‐based biomaterial or vehicle once daily for 5 weeks postirradiation. Weekly imaging demonstrated more complete wound resolution in the plasma‐based biomaterial vs. vehicle group which became statistically significant (p < 0.05) at weeks 12, 13, and 14 postmaximum wound area. Despite more complete wound healing, at 9 and 17 weeks postirradiation, there was no statistically significant difference in collagen deposition or skin thickness between the plasma‐based biomaterial and vehicle groups based on Masson trichrome staining nor was there a statistically significant difference in inflammatory or fibrosis‐related gene expression between the groups. Although significant improvement was not observed for late toxicity, plasma‐based biomaterials were effective at promoting wound closure, thus helping to mitigate acute toxicity.