Robotic totally endoscopic multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting: procedure development, challenges, results

Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Patient-Level Data

OBJECTIVE

The standard approach for coronary artery bypass grafting is open surgery. Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass has emerged as an alternative for selected patients. This meta-analysis sought to evaluate clinical outcomes with this emerging technique.

METHODS

A PRISMA-compliant search was performed up to December 14, 2022, in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Cochrane. Time-to-event data were reconstructed using Kaplan-Meier curves from source literature.

RESULTS

A total of 2,774 patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease underwent totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass in 18 eligible studies. The mean patient age was 63.2 ± 12.3 years, and 77.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72.2% to 82.4%) of the included patients were males. The mean operative time was 304.2 ± 155 min, whereas the mean internal mammary artery takedown time was 38.3 ± 18.4 min. Of the patients, 4.7% (95% CI: 1.6% to 9.1%) required conversions to open surgery. The 30-day complication rate was 5.9% (95% CI: 1.2% to 13.1%), whereas late complications developed in 4.8% (95% CI: 1.9% to 8.5%) of the patients. Freedom from major adverse cardiac events was 93.4% (95% CI: 85.3% to 94.8%) and 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates were 95.2%, 83.2%, and 81.7%, respectively. Reintervention was required in 3.3% (95% CI: 2.3% to 4.4%) of the cohort within a mean follow-up of 42.5 ± 27.8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass may be a safe and viable alternative for selected patients with coronary artery disease. Long-term follow-up will help define the place of robotic endoscopic treatment in the armamentarium of myocardial revascularization.

Consensus statement-graft treatment in cardiovascular bypass graft surgery

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is and continues to be the preferred revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel disease. Graft selection has been shown to influence the outcomes following CABG. During the last almost 60 years saphenous vein grafts (SVG) together with the internal mammary artery have become the standard of care for patients undergoing CABG surgery. While there is little doubt about the benefits, the patency rates are constantly under debate. Despite its acknowledged limitations in terms of long-term patency due to intimal hyperplasia, the saphenous vein is still the most often used graft. Although reendothelialization occurs early postoperatively, the process of intimal hyperplasia remains irreversible. This is due in part to the persistence of high shear forces, the chronic localized inflammatory response, and the partial dysfunctionality of the regenerated endothelium. "No-Touch" harvesting techniques, specific storage solutions, pressure controlled graft flushing and external stenting are important and established methods aiming to overcome the process of intimal hyperplasia at different time levels. Still despite the known evidence these methods are not standard everywhere. The use of arterial grafts is another strategy to address the inferior SVG patency rates and to perform CABG with total arterial revascularization. Composite grafting, pharmacological agents as well as latest minimal invasive techniques aim in the same direction. To give guide and set standards all graft related topics for CABG are presented in this expert opinion document on graft treatment.

Revascularization strategies for patients with established chronic coronary syndrome

Coronary artery disease is the most common type of cardiovascular disease, leading to high mortality rates worldwide. Although the vast majority can be treated effectively and safely by medical therapy, revascularization strategies remain essential for numerous patients. Outcomes of both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting improve in a rapid pace, resulting from technical innovation and ongoing research. Progress has been achieved by technical improvements in coronary stents, optimal coronary target and graft selection, and the availability of minimally invasive surgical strategies. Besides technical progress, evidence-based patient-tailored decision-making by the Heart Team is the basic precondition for optimal outcome. The combination of fast innovation and long-term clinical evaluations creates a dynamic field. Research outcomes should be carefully interpreted according to the techniques used and the trial's design. Therefore, more and more trial outcomes suggest that revascularization strategies should be tailored towards the specific patient. Although the European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery guidelines on myocardial revascularization date from 2018 and a large variety of trial outcomes on revascularization strategies in chronic coronary syndrome have been published since, we aim to provide an updated overview within this review.

Sutureless versus Hand-Sewn Coronary Anastomoses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Sutureless coronary anastomotic devices are intended to facilitate minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS-CABG) by easing and eventually standardizing the anastomotic technique. Within this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to determine patency and to evaluate safety outcomes for the sutureless anastomoses.

METHODS

CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched from database start till August 2021 in a predefined search strategy combining the key concepts: 'coronary artery bypass grafting', 'sutureless coronary anastomoses', and 'hand-sewn coronary anastomoses' by the Boolean operation 'AND'. Study characteristics, patient demographics, interventional details, and all available outcome data were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed on patency at longest follow-up. Safety outcomes were presented.

RESULTS

A total of eleven trials towards six sutureless anastomotic devices were included, comprising 3724 patients (490 sutureless and 3234 hand-sewn). There was no significant difference in patency at a mean follow-up duration of 546.3 (range 1.5-2691) days, with a risk ratio of 0.77 (95% CI 0.55-1.06). MACE was reported in 4.5% sutureless and 3.9% hand-sewn patients, including all-cause mortality (resp. 1.3 vs. 1.9%), myocardial infarction (resp. 1.6 vs. 1.7%), and coronary revascularization (resp. 1.8 vs. 0.5%). Incomplete hemostasis occurred in 24.8% of the sutureless anastomoses. Intra-operative device failure forced conversion to hand-sewn or redo-anastomosis in 5.8% of the sutureless cases.

CONCLUSION

Based on the systematic review and meta-analysis including six devices, we conclude that sutureless coronary anastomotic devices appear safe and effective when used by well-trained and dedicated surgical teams.

Review of the differences in outcomes between males and females after revascularization

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to compare outcomes of males and females undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), off-pump CABG (OPCAB), minimally invasive direct CABG (MIDCAB), and robotic total endoscopic CABG (TECAB).

RECENT FINDINGS

Females demonstrated increased rates of morbidity and mortality post PCI and CABG. In studies that performed risk adjustments, these differences were reduced. Although inferior outcomes were observed for females in some measures, generally outcomes between males and females were comparable post OPCAB, MIDCAB, and TECAB.

SUMMARY

Previous literature has demonstrated that females undergoing coronary revascularization experience inferior postoperative outcomes when compared to their male counterparts. The discrepancies between males and females narrow, but do not disappear when preoperative risks are accounted for and when considering minimally invasive approaches such as MIDCAB, OPCAB, and TECAB. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery has demonstrated numerous benefits with reduced morbidity, mortality, and shorter recovery times. In patients with increased comorbidities, minimally invasive approaches confer a greater advantage. As females often fall within this category, it is paramount that the diagnosis and referral process be optimized to account for preoperative differences to provide the most beneficial approach if the disparity between the sexes is to be addressed.

Review of Contemporary Techniques for Minimally Invasive Coronary Revascularization

Minimally invasive coronary revascularization techniques aim to avoid median sternotomy with its associated complications, while facilitating recovery and maintaining the benefits of surgical revascularization. The 3 most common procedures are minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting, totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass, and hybrid coronary revascularization. For a variety of reasons, including cost and technical difficulty, not many centers are routinely performing minimally invasive coronary revascularization. Nevertheless, many studies have assessed the safety and efficacy of each of these procedures in different clinical contexts. Thus far results have been promising, and with the evolution of procedural techniques, these approaches have the potential to redefine coronary revascularization in the future. This review highlights the current state of minimally invasive coronary revascularization techniques by exploring their benefits, identifying barriers to their adoption, and discussing future potential paradigms.

Minimally invasive and robotic coronary artery bypass grafting-a 25-year review

During the mid-1990s cardiac surgery started exploring minimally invasive methods for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and has over a 25-year period developed highly differentiated and less traumatic operations. Instead of the traditional sternotomy mini-incisions on the chest or ports are placed, surgery on the beating heart is applied, sophisticated remote access heart lung machine systems as well as videoscopic units are available, and robotic technology enables completely endoscopic approaches. This review describes these methods, reports on the cumulative intra- and postoperative outcome of these procedures, and gives an integrated view on what less invasive coronary bypass surgery can achieve. A total of 74 patient series published on the topic between 1996 and 2019 were reviewed. Six main versions of minimal access and robotically assisted CABG were applied in 11,135 patients. On average 1.3±0.6 grafts were placed and the operative time was 3 hours 42 min ± 1 hour 15 min. The procedures were carried out with a hospital mortality of 1.0% and a stroke rate of 0.6%. The revision rate for bleeding was 2.5% and a renal failure rate of 0.9% was noted. Wound infections occurred at a rate of 1.2% and postoperative hospital stay was 5.6±2.2 days. It can be concluded that less invasive and robotically assisted versions of coronary bypass grafting are carried out with an adequate safety level while surgical trauma is significantly reduced.

Angiographic patency after robotic beating heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting facilitated by automated distal anastomotic connectors

OBJECTIVES

Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) on the beating heart has been facilitated in our experience using distal coronary anastomotic connectors. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed graft patency in all robotic TECAB patients who underwent formal angiography at our current institution over a 5-year period.

METHODS

Between July 2013 and June 2018, 361 consecutive patients underwent robotic beating-heart TECAB. Of these patients, 121 had a follow-up angiogram, which assessed graft patency. Eighty-four patients had an angiogram as part of planned hybrid procedures and 37 patients underwent an unplanned angiogram for clinical indications. Retrospective analysis of angiographic patency and clinical outcomes was performed.

RESULTS

The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality was 1.8%. Single-vessel bypass was performed in 40 (33%) patients and multivessel grafting in 81 (67%). Average flow (ml/min) and pulsatility index in the grafts was 74.7 ± 39.1 and 1.42 ± 0.52, respectively. The number of grafts evaluated was 204 (130 left internal mammary artery and 74 right internal mammary artery grafts). The median time to angiography was 1.0 and 16.0 months and graft patency was 98% and 91% in the hybrid and non-hybrid groups, respectively. Overall graft patency was 95.6% (left internal mammary artery = 96%; right internal mammary artery = 93%). Left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery graft patency was 97%. Clinical follow-up was available for 316 (88%) patients at mean 22.5 ± 15.1 months. Freedom from major adverse cardiac events at 2 years was 92%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this consecutive series of patients undergoing formal angiography after robotic single and multivessel TECAB, we found satisfactory graft patency and 2-year clinical outcomes. Longer-term follow-up is warranted.

Does Intolerance of Single-Lung Ventilation Preclude Robotic Off-Pump Totally Endoscopic Coronary Bypass Surgery?

Objective

Robotic off-pump totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) usually requires isolated single (right) lung ventilation to adequately expose the surgical site. However, in some patients, persistent oxygen desaturation may occur and conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) or sternotomy may be necessary. We reviewed the characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients who did not tolerate single-lung ventilation during TECAB surgery.

Methods

After Institutional Review Board approval we reviewed 440 patients undergoing robotic TECAB at our institution between July 2013 and April 2019. Patients were separated into 2 groups based on their ability to tolerate single-lung ventilation during the procedure. Group 1 included patients able to tolerate single-lung ventilation and Group 2 were patients who required double-lung ventilation to tolerate the procedure. Early and mid-term outcomes were compared.

Results

Group 2 (121 patients) had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores, higher body mass index, and more triple-vessel disease than Group 1 (319 patients). Group 2 had more bilateral internal mammary artery use, multivessel grafting, and longer operative times. One patient underwent conversion to sternotomy and 5 required CPB (all in Group 1). Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were longer in Group 2. Observed/expected mortality did not differ between groups (1.06% in Group 2 vs 0.4% in Group 1; P = 0.215). At mid-term follow-up, cardiac-related/overall mortality and freedom from major adverse cardiac events were similar.

Conclusions

In our cohort, intolerance of single-lung ventilation did not preclude robotic off-pump TECAB. Double-lung ventilation is feasible during the procedure and may prevent conversions to sternotomy or use of CPB, resulting in excellent early and mid-term outcomes.

Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: current status and future prospects

Introduction: Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB) can only be performed in a reproducible manner using robotic technology. This operation has been developed for more than 20 years seeing three generations of surgical robots. TECAB can be carried out beating heart but also on the arrested heart. Single and multiple grafts can be placed and TECAB can be combined with percutaneous coronary intervention in hybrid procedures.Areas covered: This review outlines indications for the procedure, the surgical technique, and the postoperative care. Intra- and postoperative results as available in the literature are reported. Further areas focus on technological development, training methods, learning curves as well as on cost. Finally, we give an outlook on the potential future of this operation.Expert opinion: Robotic TECAB represents a complex, sophisticated but safe, and over-the-years grown procedure. Even though results seem to be in line with conventional coronary surgery worldwide adoption still has been slow probably due to procedure times, costs and learning curves. Main advantages of TECAB are minimized surgical trauma and subsequent reduction of postoperative healing time. With the current introduction of new robotic devices, a new era of procedure development is on its way.

Minimally invasive surgical approaches to left main and left anterior descending coronary artery revascularization are superior compared to first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents: a network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

There are a number of minimally invasive approaches to revascularization of coronary artery disease that involve the left main or proximal left anterior descending artery; however, studies to date provide mixed results.

METHODS

A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to compare early and late postoperative outcomes between percutaneous coronary intervention with first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs), off-pump coronary artery bypass and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) in patients with involvement of left main or left anterior descending disease.

RESULTS

A total of 37 studies with 31 728 patients were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in early mortality rates, strokes or myocardial infarctions (MIs). The long-term all-cause mortality rate was equivalent between the groups. Patients who had off-pump coronary artery bypass had fewer late MI compared with those who had first-generation DES (DES1) [odds ratio (OR) 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.72] and MIDCAB (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.17-0.97) and reduced late target vessel revascularization compared with DES1 (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.09-0.32) and second-generation DES (DES2) (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.72). The rate of late major adverse cardiac events was lower with off-pump coronary artery bypass compared with that with DES1 (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.26-0.43) and DES2 (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.90). The rate of late major adverse cardiac events with MIDCAB was lower than that with DES1 (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.31-0.62) as was that with DES2 compared with DES1 (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39-0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical approaches to left main or proximal left anterior descending disease remain superior to first- or second-generation DES in terms of long-term freedom from MI and target vessel revascularization as well as improved overall long-term survival. Conflicting rates of late MI and target vessel revascularization in patients who underwent MIDCAB suggest disease in alternate vessels that may best be approached via hybrid techniques.

Benefit of Robotic Beating-Heart Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass in Octogenarians

OBJECTIVE

An important advantage of robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) is early functional recovery, in which fragile patients like octogenarians (age >80 years) benefit most. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and feasibility of TECAB in octogenarians.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing TECAB from July 2013 to September 2017 at our institution. Perioperative outcomes of octogenarian patients and that of younger patients were compared.

RESULTS

Of 308 patients who underwent TECAB, 28 patients (9.1%) were octogenarians (mean age 83.8 ± 3.0 years). Octogenarians had a higher rate of hypertension and atrial fibrillation compared to younger patients. TECAB was successfully performed without conversion to any larger incisions in octogenarians. Mean operative time (299 ± 83 minutes vs 281 ± 89 minutes, P = 0.309) and the rate of multivessel bypass (60.7% vs 58.2%, P = 0.798) were similar between octogenarians and younger patients. New atrial fibrillation was observed more frequently in octogenarians compared to younger patients (35.7% vs 18.6%, P = 0.031). Mean length of hospital stay was similar between the 2 groups (octogenarians: 3.9 ± 1.8 days vs younger patients: 3.5 ± 3.0 days, P = 0.475). Twenty-two octogenarians (78.6%) were discharged directly to home. In-hospital mortality was zero in octogenarians.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic beating-heart TECAB had favorable results in octogenarians with acceptable morbidity and mortality and excellent short length of stay similar to younger patients.

Robotic Beating Heart Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass in Higher-Risk Patients: Can It be Done Safely?

OBJECTIVE

Patients with a high Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) predicted risk of mortality undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery are known to have worse outcomes. Less invasive approaches have been shown to improve morbidity and mortality for these patients. In this study, we examined perioperative outcomes in higher-risk patients undergoing robotic totally endoscopic beating heart coronary artery bypass surgery.

METHODS

The STS predicted risk of mortality was reviewed for patients undergoing robotic totally endoscopic beating heart coronary artery bypass surgery at our institution between January 2013 and May 2017. We identified a higher-risk cohort (n = 50) and compared them to a lower-risk cohort (n = 220) during the same period. The higher-risk group was formed from patients with the 50 highest STS scores. Perioperative data were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

There were 50 patients in the higher-risk group (mean STS score = 7.05 ± 4.9, mean age = 73 years) and 220 patients in the lower-risk group (mean STS score = 0.89 ± 0.6, mean age = 64 years). The higher-risk group had significantly greater rates of renal insufficiency, peripheral vascular disease, and lower ejection fraction. The incidence of postoperative re-exploration for bleeding, stroke, myocardial infarction, and prolonged ventilation was similar. Perioperative blood transfusion and hospital length of stay were greater in the higher-risk group. Mortality was lower in the higher-risk group (0% vs 1.8% P = 0.045). Cardiac-related mortality was similar at midterm follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that beating heart totally endoscopic beating heart coronary artery bypass surgery can be performed in patients with a higher STS predicted risk of mortality with excellent outcomes. Further studies are warranted to evaluate long-term results of totally endoscopic beating heart coronary artery bypass surgery in this challenging group of patients.

Long-Term Clinical and Computed Tomography Angiographic Follow-up After Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

OBJECTIVE

Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting was shown to be feasible and safe, with excellent clinical and angiographic mid-term results. Data on long-term outcome are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the long-term rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and left internal mammary artery patency rate in patients undergoing arrested heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

From 2001 to 2012, a total of 208 arrested heart-totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting patients were prospectively included. Mean ± SD age was 58.8 ± 9.4 years, and mean ± SD Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 0.5 ± 0.5%. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, re-percutaneous coronary intervention, re-coronary artery bypass graft, and target vessel revascularization. Left internal mammary artery patency was assessed using cardiac computed tomography and depicted according to the established Fitzgibbon classification. Mean ± SD follow-up was 6.9 ± 2.3 years.

RESULTS

At 1, 5, and 10 years, survival rate was 100%, 98.3%, and 95.8%, respectively. The freedom from clinical events at 1, 5, and 10 years were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (93.5%, 85.9%, and 83.0%), myocardial infarction (99.0%, 97.4%, and 95.9%), target vessel revascularization (96.0%, 94.3%, and 91.7%), re-percutaneous coronary intervention (94.5%, 91.6%, and 84.2%), and re-coronary artery bypass graft (100%, 99.5%, and 99.5%), respectively. Left internal mammary artery patency rate at 1, 5, and 10 years was 100%, 94.9%, and 88.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Arrested heart-totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting shows excellent clinical long-term results with a left internal mammary artery patency rate comparable with conventional coronary artery bypass graft at 10 years after surgery.

Robotic Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Direct Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcome

OBJECTIVE

Robotic coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was shown to be a safe and feasible method for the treatment of coronary artery disease in highly selected patients. However, long-term outcome data comparing robotic CABG with conventional CABG are still missing. Therefore, we aimed to compare robotic with conventional CABG in terms of perioperative and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Of 2947 consecutive elective patients with coronary artery disease operated at a single center between 2001 and 2013, 280 underwent robotic CABG. After propensity score matching, 134 pairs of robotic versus conventional CABG (age = 62 ± 10 years, log EuroScore = 2.4 ± 2.4% vs. mean ± SD age = 63 ± 10 years, log EuroScore 2.5 ± 1.7%, respectively; all P > 0.05) were formed. The mean ± SD follow-up was 6.6 ± 3.2 years.

RESULTS

There was no difference in perioperative mortality (robotic = 0% vs. conventional = 1.5%, P = 0.154), myocardial infarction (robotic = 0% vs. conventional = 2.2%, P = 0.08), and stroke rate (robotic = 0% vs. conventional = 0.7%, P = 0.318) between the groups. Longer cardiopulmonary bypass (robotic = 112 ± 100 minutes vs. conventional = 67 ± 48 minutes, P < 0.0001) and cross-clamp times (robotic = 68 ± 54 minutes vs. conventional = 38 ± 27 minutes, P < 0.0001) were observed in robotic patients. Long-term follow-up yielded equivalent results in terms of survival (1, 5, and 10 years: robotic = 99.3%, 96.9%, and 81.3% vs. conventional = 96.3%, 92.2%, and 82.6%, respectively; log-rank P = 0.187) and freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebral events at 1, 5, and 10 years after procedure (robotic = 90.6%, 77.7%, 70.1% vs. conventional = 94.1%, 82.2%, 66.6%; log-rank P = 0.790).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes of robotic CABG are comparable with conventional CABG for selected patients. Longer operative times of robotic CABG do not influence the excellent long-term outcomes.

Six-month healing of the nonocclusive coronary anastomotic connector in an off-pump porcine bypass model

OBJECTIVE

This pilot study evaluates the anastomotic healing of the Excimer Laser Assisted Nonocclusive Anastomosis coronary connector at 6 months in a porcine off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) model.

METHODS

Left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending coronary artery bypass in two animals and left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending coronary artery and right internal thoracic artery to right coronary artery bypasses in one animal were evaluated intraoperatively and at 6 months. The anastomoses (n = 4) were examined by angiography, intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, scanning electron microscopy, and histology.

RESULTS

At follow-up, all anastomoses (n = 4) were fully patent (FitzGibbon grade A). Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated complete endothelial coverage of the anastomotic surface, and histology showed minimal streamlining intimal hyperplasia. The in vivo intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography acquisitions confirmed histologic findings. Optical coherence tomography demonstrated 0.06-mm intimal coverage of the intraluminal part of the connector along the full circumference of the anastomosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, the Excimer Laser Assisted Nonocclusive Anastomosis coronary connector showed an excellent healing response on the long-term in the porcine OPCAB model. Hence, this new concept might be a potential alternative to hand-sutured anastomosis in (minimally invasive) OPCAB surgery.

Robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery

Robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery has emerged as a feasible and efficient alternative to conventional full sternotomy coronary artery bypass graft surgery in selected patients. This minimally invasive approach using the daVinci robotic system allows fine intrathoracic maneuvers and excellent view of the coronary arteries. Both on-pump and off-pump operations can be performed to treat single and multivessel disease. Hybrid approaches have the potential of offering complete revascularization with the "best of both worlds" from surgery (internal mammary artery anastomosis in less invasive fashion) and percutaneous coronary intervention (least invasive approach). In this article we review the indications, techniques, short and long term results, as well as current developments in totally endoscopic robotic coronary artery bypass operations.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Using an Endoaortic Occlusion System

<p><b>Objectives:</b> We reviewed the initial patient series (n=116) of our institution performing minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n=79), mitral valve surgery (n=1), or atrial septal closure (ASD) procedures (n=26) using an endoaortic occlusion system. With this technique relevant intra-aortic pressures are exerted on the aortic wall during the clamping time. This might lead to late aortic degeneration and aneurysm formation. Our study sought to evaluate postoperative aortic complications and the quality of life (modified SF-12).</p><p><b>Methods:</b> One hundred sixteen patients (56% male; 54 years � 14.5; range 19 years to 77 years) underwent a cardiac procedure using an endoaortic clamp. The endoaortic balloon clamp catheter was used to occlude the ascending aorta at pressures >300 mmHg. Patients were rescheduled for echocardiographic examination after a mean follow-up period of 8.8 years.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The analysis performed among 78 patients showed no incidence of any structural damage to the ascending aorta at the intraoperative position of the endoaortic balloon. The physical and mental summary scores are equal to those of comparable patient groups.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The endoaortic occlusion system causes no damage to the aortic wall. If the system causes any problems, they occur immediately during surgery. Patients treated with this minimally invasive technique exhibited the same quality of life as those undergoing conventional surgery.</p>

Lessons learned from robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery: risk factors for conversion to median sternotomy

OBJECTIVE

Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass is a minimally invasive alternative to traditional coronary artery bypass surgery via median sternotomy with an associated learning curve. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reasons for conversion to sternotomy.

METHODS

From October 2009 to June 2012, two surgeons at one US academic institution performed 271 consecutive robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass procedures. For all cases, isolated, off-pump left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to left anterior descending coronary artery grafting was planned via a 3- to 4-cm sternal-sparing thoracotomy after robotic internal mammary artery harvest and pericardiotomy.

RESULTS

Conversion to sternotomy occurred in 15 of 271 (5.5%) patients. The most common reason was technical difficulty with the anastomosis, which occurred in 6 (40.0%) patients. Others included LIMA dissection, 2 (13.3%); wrong vessel grafted, 2 (13.3%); ventricular fibrillation and cardiac arrest, 1 (6.7%); equipment malfunction, 1 (6.7%); adhesions, 1 (6.7%); and other. Two underwent emergent conversion. Six underwent multivessel bypass after conversion instead of hybrid coronary revascularization. No mortality occurred among converted patients. Two patients had postoperative myocardial infarction and one had a superficial sternal wound infection. Conversion rate was relatively stable among the four different time quartiles (range, 3.0%-7.4%), although the reasons for conversion were different.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion to sternotomy is an infrequent complication of robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass, most commonly because of technical difficulties during the LIMA harvest and the LIMA to left anterior descending anastomosis. Anatomic and patient variables as well as inherent technical problems with minimally invasive procedures make conversion unavoidable in some patients.

Distal anastomotic patency of the Cardica C-PORT(R) xA system versus the hand-sewn technique: a prospective randomized controlled study in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVES

The C-Port® Distal Anastomosis Systems (Cardica, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA) demonstrated favourable results in feasibility trials. However, distal vein anastomoses created with the C-Port® or C-Port xA® system have never been compared with hand-sewn distal vein anastomoses. The objective of this study was to compare distal end-to-side anastomoses facilitated with the C-Port xA® System with the traditional hand-sewn method.

METHODS

This single-centre prospective randomized controlled study comprised 71 patients (device group n = 35, control group n = 36) who underwent primary elective coronary artery bypass grafting between June 2008 and April 2011. The primary study end-point was 12-month distal anastomotic patency, which was assessed with prospective ECG-gated 256-multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography using a step-and-shoot scanning protocol. For the primary end-point, a per-protocol analysis was used.

RESULTS

In the device group, four (11%) anastomoses were converted to hand-sewn anastomoses, and additional stitches to achieve haemostasis were necessary in 22 (76%) patients. There was no hospital mortality in either group. During the 12-month follow-up, a single death occurred in the Device group and was unrelated to the device. Twenty-nine patients in the device group and 32 in the control group completed 12-month CT coronary angiography. The overall patency of 160 studied distal vein graft anastomoses was 93%. Comparison of the end-to-side target anastomosis showed 12-month patencies of 86 and 88% in the device group and the control group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

According to these preliminary results and despite the limited number of patients, the use of the C-Port xA® System is safe enough to perform distal end-to-side vein graft anastomosis, with respect to 12-month end-to-side distal venous anastomotic patency. Although there are some technical challenges with this device, the incidence of complications is comparable to the traditional hand-sewn technique.