Astigmatism prediction in small-incision lenticule extraction

Comparison Between Topographic-Based and Manifest-Based Astigmatism Corrections in the Second (Visumax 800)-Generation Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgery: A Real-World Study

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of astigmatism correction between topographic- and manifest-based methods in individuals who underwent second-generation keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) surgery. Methods: This study was conducted with participants who underwent second-generation KLEx surgery. After exclusion, there were 46 and 43 participants in the manifest and topographic groups, respectively. The main outcomes were postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), and residual astigmatism. The independent T-test and generalized estimate equation were used to investigate differences between the two groups. Results: Three months postoperatively, UDVA was 0.02 ± 0.04 in the manifest group and 0.00 ± 0.06 in the topographic group which also revealed no significant difference (p = 0.155). Also, the SE value in the two groups three months postoperatively was statistically similar (-0.57 ± 0.48D versus -0.63 ± 0.62D, p = 0.574). The final residual astigmatism was -0.26 ± 0.27 in the topographic group which was significantly lower than the -0.51 ± 0.40 in the manifest group (p < 0.001). Moreover, the amplitude of astigmatism change was significantly lower in the topographic group (p = 0.002). In the subgroup analysis, UDVA and residual astigmatism were significantly better in the topographic group than in the manifest group (both p < 0.05). Conclusions: The topographic-based method represents a better astigmatism correction than the manifest-based method in second-generation KLEx surgery, especially in the low astigmatism population.

The outcomes of first-generation (visumax 500) and second-generation (Visumax 800) keratorefractive lenticule extraction surgeries for astigmatism

To evaluate the efficiency, predictability, and residual astigmatism between first- and second-generation keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) surgeries in a prominent astigmatism population. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, and individuals who underwent first- and second-generation KLEx surgeries were enrolled. A total of 31 and 35 eyes were categorized into first and second KLEx groups, respectively. Visual acuity, refraction, topographic parameters, and surgical indices were recorded. Independent t tests were used to compare the postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), and residual astigmatism between the two groups. The difference in UDVA was not significant three months after KLEx surgery (P = 0.509), and the SEs three months after surgery also presented similar values between the two groups (P = 0.552). The first KLEx group demonstrated greater residual astigmatism than did the second KLEx group throughout the three-month follow-up period (all P < 0.05). The values of surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), difference vector (DV), magnitude of error (ME) and correction index (CoI) were significantly better in the second KLEx group via vector analysis (all P < 0.05). Old age, high steep keratometry (K), high topographic cylinder, large angle kappa, and a small optic zone were correlated with greater residual astigmatism in the first KLEx group (all P < 0.05), whereas only a small optic zone was significantly correlated with greater residual astigmatism in the second KLEx group (P = 0.047). The second-generation KLEx is correlated with a lower risk of residual astigmatism.

The Efficiency, Predictability, and Safety of First-Generation (Visumax 500) and Second-Generation (Visumax 800) Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Surgeries: Real-World Experiences

We aimed to evaluate the postoperative visual and refractive outcomes between the first- and second-generation keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) surgeries. A retrospective cohort study was conducted and patients who had received first- and second-generation KLEx surgeries were enrolled. A total of 80 and 80 eyes were categorized into the first and second KLEx groups after exclusion, respectively. The primary outcomes were the postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), and safety indexes. An independent t-test and generalized estimate equation were implemented to compare the primary outcomes between the two groups. After the KLEx surgery, the UDVA showed no significant difference between the two groups throughout the study period (all p > 0.05), and the postoperative SE and safety index were also statistically identical between the two groups during the follow-up interval (all p > 0.05). There was a similar trend of visual recovery between the two groups (aOR: 0.967; 95% CI: 0.892-1.143; p = 0.844), while the amplitude of the SE change was significantly lower in the second KLEx group (aOR: 0.760; 95% CI: 0.615-0.837; p = 0.005). Nine and two unintended initial dissection of the posterior plane (UIDPP) occurred intraoperatively in the first and second KLEx groups, respectively, and the second group showed a lower risk of UIDPP (p = 0.032). In conclusion, the efficiency, predictability, and safety are similar between first- and second-generation KLEx surgeries.

Clinical outcomes of stromal lenticule rotation to correct mixed astigmatism

PURPOSE

To describe a stromal lenticule rotation surgical technique to correct mixed astigmatism and evaluate the initial clinical outcomes of this innovative approach.

METHODS

This retrospective case series included five eyes from five patients with mixed astigmatism that underwent intrastromal lenticule rotation surgery. The eyes were evaluated for uncorrected visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, manifest refraction, central corneal thickness, corneal volume, anterior and posterior K readings, and corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs) (including total HOAs, spherical aberrations, coma, and trefoil) using the Scheimpflug-Placido topographer before and 3 months after surgery. The corneal epithelium and stroma were imaged using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) postoperatively. A paired-sample t-test was used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

Clinical improvement was found in the uncorrected distance visual acuity (0.64 ± 0.11 logMAR vs. 0.20 ± 0.17 logMAR) and spherical and cylindrical diopters (D) (+2.65 ± 1.32 D vs. -0.05 ± 0.51 D and -4.95 ± 0.94 D vs. -1.10 ± 0.78 D, respectively). Anterior flat keratometry readings showed a steep trend (40.65 ± 1.24 D vs. 42.73 ± 0.63 D). Anterior corneal astigmatism decreased from 4.50 ± 0.55 D to 2.05 ± 0.73 D. According to the AS-OCT images, no significant epithelial remodelling was observed postoperatively. Although no significant differences were found among the increased corneal HOAs, the coma and trefoil changed much more than spherical aberrations 3 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results for these five eyes suggest that the autologous stromal lenticule rotation technique is safe and effective; it may be an economical and feasible surgical option for correcting mixed astigmatism.

Topographic and surgical risk factors for high postoperative residual astigmatism after small incision lenticule extraction in patients with different degrees of myopia: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the possible topographic and surgical risk factors for high postoperative residual astigmatism in patients who undergo small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery and have different myopia degrees.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, and patients who underwent SMILE surgery were enrolled. A total of 80 and 150 eyes from 40 to 75 individuals, respectively, were selected as the low myopia and high myopia groups. The demographic data, visual acuity, refraction, topographic parameters and surgical settings were recorded. Multiple linear regression with interaction tests were performed to survey the risk factors for high postoperative residual astigmatism in each group.

RESULTS

Five (6.25%) and 9 (6.00%) eyes presented with high postoperative residual astigmatism in the low myopia and high myopia groups, respectively, but these differences were not significant (P = 0.569). A steep corneal curvature was correlated with a greater risk of high postoperative residual astigmatism in the low myopia group (P = 0.015), while a higher degree of cycloplegic cylinder power, steeper corneal curvature, greater topographic cylinder power, smaller optic zone and longer incision length were associated with a high rate of postoperative residual astigmatism in the high myopia group (all P < 0.05). In addition, the interaction effects of cycloplegic and topographic cylinder power and longer incision length on the incidence of high postoperative residual astigmatism development were more evident in the high myopia group than in the low myopia group (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A steep corneal curvature correlates with a high risk of high postoperative residual astigmatism after SMILE surgery, and a higher degree of cycloplegic and topographic cylinder and longer incision are associated with high postoperative residual astigmatism in individuals with high myopia.

The Association Between Ocular Residual Astigmatism and the Efficacy of Astigmatism Correction Via Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE)

INTRODUCTION

Astigmatism correction after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery is affected by several factors, including ocular residual astigmatism (ORA), which accounts for the vector difference between refractive and corneal astigmatism. Previous studies revealed the relationship between ORA and astigmatism correction after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). However, in SMILE surgery, no comprehensive study exploring the link between these two variables has been performed. We have therefore assessed the association between ORA and astigmatism correction after SMILE.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-centered study. Patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism who underwent SMILE surgery using the 500-kHz Visumax laser platform and were followed up for at least 3 months were included. Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, such as visual acuity, refractive status and corneal tomography, were recorded. ORA was calculated using Alpins Statistical System for Ophthalmic Refractive Surgery Techniques (ASSORT) Ocular Residual Astigmatism calculator.

RESULTS

A total of 888 eyes (408 eyes from males and 480 eyes from females) from 444 patients (mean age [standard deviation] 32.4 ± 7.1 years) were included in our study. Mean (± SD) preoperative sphere and cylinder were - 5.45 ± 1.98 (range - 10.00-0.00) diopter (D) and - 0.89 ± 0.70 (range - 4.00-0.00) D, respectively. Calculated mean ORA was 0.68 ± 0.35 (range 0.07-3.53) D. Postoperative logMAR uncorrected visual acuity was 0.03 ± 0.31. Mean postoperative sphere and cylinder were - 0.10 ± 0.56 (range - 1.5 to 1.0) D and - 0.51 ± 0.37 (- 1.5 to 0.0) D, respectively. The Pearson correlation test revealed preoperative sphere, steep keratometry (steep-K) and ORA were statistically correlated with the amplitude of astigmatism correction (P < 0.001), and the generalized estimating equations analysis showed that ORA was negatively correlated with the amplitude of astigmatism correction (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study suggest that preoperative higher ORA may be associated with a lower magnitude of astigmatism correction after SMILE surgery in patients with all levels of astigmatism preoperative.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05604872. Registered 3 November 2022-Retrospectively registered. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05604872.

Influence of age on small incision lenticule extraction outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of patient's age at the time of surgery on small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) refractive outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, consecutive, comparative study. We compared the refractive outcomes after myopic SMILE from two groups of patients divided by age (patients ≤35 and ≥40 years old). All eyes were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Main outcome measures were differences on efficacy, safety, predictability and astigmatic changes by vector analysis with ASSORT software between both study groups.

RESULTS

102 matched eyes of 53 patients were included. Preoperatively, we evidenced no differences in the mean SE or astigmatism between groups. However, 6 months postoperatively we observed a significantly worse mean astigmatism (p=0.019), while not regarding SE, in the older population, with a trend towards undercorrection of the refractive cylinder in the ≥40 group. We also observed a statistically significant difference in the efficacy (0.86-1 month and 0.97-6 months in ≥40group vs 0.97-1 month and 1.07-6 months in the ≤35 group; p=0.003) and safety indexes (0.93-1 month and 1.04-6 months in ≥40 group vs 1.0-1 month and 1.11-6 months in the ≤35 group; p=0.008) at 6 months among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-SMILE refractive outcomes in those patients over 40 years of age, although acceptable, are not as good as those obtained in younger patients, showing a significantly lower efficacy and safety indexes, and poorer astigmatic outcomes, with a tendency towards undercorrection. We hypothetise that the increased corneal stroma stiffness in the aged group modifies the post-SMILE corneal stroma remodelling capacity, thus affecting the SMILE refractive and visual response.