Can a brief psychological expectancy intervention improve postoperative pain? A randomized, controlled trial in patients with breast cancer

"Powerful placebo": A teaching and learning concept addressing placebo and nocebo effects in competency-based communication training

Aim

Placebo and nocebo effects are based on expectations that are formed by how doctors communicate and can influence the efficacy of medical treatment. Given the implications for doctor-patient communication and the learning objectives listed in NKLM 2.0, we herein present a novel teaching and learning concept to impart competency-based knowledge about placebo and nocebo effects.

Method

The teaching and learning concept was piloted with N=324 third-semester medical students. It combines a self-guided, small-group component to gather communication strategies and apply them in a video-recorded conversation, followed by a classroom-based session to reflect on and discuss the videos and to learn basic scientific and theoretical knowledge. The evaluation involved written feedback from the students and lecturers (structure/process) and an analysis of the videos (students' learning success). To supplement this, the overall course evaluation was included since this new teaching concept was not specifically evaluated by the students.

Results

Course structure and process were rated positively. The active involvement of the students in the subject matter and the balance between theoretical, scientific and practical content was emphasized positively. Analysis of the learning success showed that the students were able to effectively transfer the knowledge gained about placebo and nocebo effects to conversational situations.

Conclusion

The topic of placebo/nocebo is optimally suited to teach communication skills with its many links to knowledge, translational approaches and added value for medical practice. When doing this, video-recorded conversations appear to be an effective tool to achieve learning objectives. This teaching and learning strategy offers possibilities for expanding communication curricula.

Preoperative Anxiolysis and Treatment Expectation (PATE Trial): open-label placebo treatment to reduce preoperative anxiety in female patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery - study protocol for a bicentric, prospective, randomized-controlled trial

One of the most common concerns of patients undergoing surgery is preoperative anxiety, with a prevalence of up to 48%. The effects of preoperative anxiety continue beyond the preoperative period and are associated with more severe postoperative pain and poorer treatment outcomes. Treatment options for preoperative anxiety are often limited as sedatives cause side effects and their efficacy remains controversial. Placebo research has shown that optimization of positive treatment expectations, as can be achieved through placebo administration and education, has clinically relevant effects on preoperative anxiety, pain and treatment outcomes. As the administration of masked placebos raises ethical questions, clinical studies have increasingly focused on the use of open, non-deceptive placebo administration (open-label placebo, OLP). The use of OLPs to reduce preoperative anxiety and modify clinically relevant postoperative outcomes has not yet been investigated. This bicentric, prospective, randomized-controlled clinical trial (PATE Trial; German Registry for Clinical Studies DRKS00033221), an associated project of the Collaborative Research Center (CRC) 289 "Treatment Expectation", aims to alleviate preoperative anxiety by optimizing positive treatment expectations facilitated by OLP. Furthermore, this study examines a potential enhancement of these effects through aspects of observational learning, operationalized by a positive expectation-enhancing video. In addition, patient's perspective on the self-efficacy and appropriateness of OLPs prior to surgery will be assessed. To achieve these objectives, female patients will be randomized into three groups before undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery. One group receives the OLP with a positive rationale conveyed by a study physician. A second group receives the same intervention, OLP administration and rationale provided by a physician, and additionally watches a video on OLP presenting a satisfied patient. A third group receives standard treatment as usual (TAU). Outcome measures will be effects on preoperative anxiety and postoperative experience, particularly visceral and somatic postoperative pain. As the non-deceptive administration of placebos; when indicated; may yield positive outcomes without side effects, and as current treatment of preoperative anxiety is limited, evidence from clinical placebo research has the potential to improve outcomes and patient experience in the surgical setting.

Evidence-Based Guideline on the Prevention and Management of Perioperative Pain for Breast Cancer Peoples in a Low-Resource Setting: A Systematic Review Article

Background

Breast surgery for breast cancer is associated with significant acute and persistent postoperative pain. Surgery is the primary type of treatment, but up to 60% of breast cancer patients experience persistent pain after surgery, and 40% of them develop acute postmastectomy pain syndrome. Preoperative stress, involvement of lymph nodes while dissecting, and the postoperative psychological state of the patients play vital roles in managing the postoperative pain of the patients. The objective of this study is to develop evidence-based guideline on the prevention and management of perioperative pain for breast cancer surgical patients.

Methods

An exhaustive literature search was made from PubMed, Cochrane Review, PubMed, Google Scholar, Hinari, and CINAHIL databases that are published from 2012 to 2022 by setting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After data extraction, filtering was made based on the methodological quality, population data, interventions, and outcome of interest. Finally, one guideline, two meta-analyses, ten systematic reviews, 25 randomized clinical trials and ten observational studies are included in this review, and a conclusion was made based on their level of evidence and grade of recommendation.

Results

A total of 38 studies were considered in this evaluation. The development of this guideline was based on different studies performed on the diagnosis, risk stratification and risk reduction, prevention of postoperative pain, and treatments of postoperative pain.

Conclusion

The management of postoperative pain can be categorized as risk assessment, minimizing risk, early diagnosis, and treatment. Early diagnosis is the mainstay to identify and initiate treatment. The perioperative use of a nonpharmacological approach (including preoperative positive inspirational words and positive expectation) as an adjunct to the intraoperative regional anesthetic technique with general anesthesia with proper dosage of the standard pharmacological multimodal regimens is the first-line treatment. For postoperative analgesia, an extended form of intraoperative regional technique, nonpharmacologic technique, and NSAIDs can be used with the opioid-sparing anesthesia technique.

Nocebo effects in visceral pain: concept and design of the experimental randomized-controlled pain study 'NoVis'

The role of psychological factors in the pathophysiology and treatment of chronic visceral pain in disorders of gut-brain interactions (DGBI) is increasingly appreciated. Placebo research has underscored that expectations arising from the psychosocial treatment context and from prior experiences shape treatment responses. However, effects of negative expectations, i.e., nocebo effects, as they are likely crucial elements of DGBI patients' clinical reality, have thus far only rarely been investigated in the context of visceral pain, with untapped potential for improved prevention and treatment. The experimental randomized-controlled pain study "NoVis," carried out within the Collaborative Research Center (CRC) 289 ("Treatment Expectation"), aims to close gaps regarding the generation and persistence of nocebo effects in healthy volunteers. It is designed to elucidate effects of negative expectations in a multiple-threat paradigm with intensity-matched rectal distensions and cutaneous thermal stimuli, allowing to test nocebo effects in the visceral and somatic pain modalities. Negative expectations are experimentally induced by elements of doctor-patient communication (i.e., instruction) and/or by surreptitious amplification of symptom intensity (i.e., experience/learning) within a treatment context. Accordingly, the repeated measures between-subject design contains the between-group factors "treatment instruction" (negative vs. control) and "treatment experience" (negative vs. control), with volunteers randomized into four experimental groups undergoing several pain stimulation phases (repeated factor). This allows to compare the efficacy of instruction vs. experience, and more importantly, their combined effects on the magnitude of negative expectations and their impact on pain responses, which we expect will be greatest for the visceral modality. After a Baseline, short-term effects are assessed during a test phase accomplished on study day 1 (Test-1 Phase). To explore the persistence of effects, a second test phase is accomplished 1 week later (Test-2 Phase). Effects of negative expectations within and across pain modalities are assessed at the subjective and objective levels, with a focus on psychophysiological and neuroendocrine measures related to stress, fear, and anxiety. Since nocebo effects can play a considerable role in the generation, maintenance, or worsening of chronic visceral pain, and may even constitute risk factors for treatment failure, knowledge from experimental nocebo research has potential to improve treatment outcomes in DGBI and other clinical conditions associated with chronic visceral pain.

Analgesia quality index improves the quality of postoperative pain management: a retrospective observational study of 14,747 patients between 2014 and 2021

BACKGROUND

The application of artificial intelligence patient-controlled analgesia (AI-PCA) facilitates the remote monitoring of analgesia management, the implementation of mobile ward rounds, and the automatic recording of all types of key data in the clinical setting. However, it cannot quantify the quality of postoperative analgesia management. This study aimed to establish an index (analgesia quality index (AQI)) to re-monitor and re-evaluate the system, equipment, medical staff and degree of patient matching to quantify the quality of postoperative pain management through machine learning.

METHODS

Utilizing the wireless analgesic pump system database of the Cancer Hospital Affiliated with Nantong University, this retrospective observational study recruited consecutive patients who underwent postoperative analgesia using AI-PCA from June 1, 2014, to August 31, 2021. All patients were grouped according to whether or not the AQI was used to guide the management of postoperative analgesia: The control group did not receive the AQI guidance for postoperative analgesia and the experimental group received the AQI guidance for postoperative analgesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain (numeric rating scale (NRS) score ≥ 4) and the second outcome was the incidence of total adverse reactions. Furthermore, indicators of AQI were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 14,747 patients were included in this current study. The incidence of moderate-to-severe pain was 26.3% in the control group and 21.7% in the experimental group. The estimated ratio difference was 4.6% between the two groups (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2% to 6.0%; P < 0.001). There were significant differences between groups. Otherwise, the differences in the incidence of total adverse reactions between the two groups were nonsignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the traditional management of postoperative analgesia, application of the AQI decreased the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain. Clinical application of the AQI contributes to improving the quality of postoperative analgesia management and may provide guidance for optimum pain management in the postoperative setting.

[Placebo effects in analgesia : Influence of expectations on the efficacy and tolerability of analgesic treatment]

Expectations of patients influence the perception and neuronal processing of acute and chronic pain and modulate the effectiveness of analgesic treatment. The expectation of treatment is not only the most important determinant of placebo analgesia. Expectations of treatment also influence the efficacy and tolerability of "active" pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of pain. Recent insights into the psychological and neurobiological mechanisms underlying the clinically relevant effects of treatment expectations enable and call for the systematic integration and modulation of treatment expectations into analgesic treatment concepts. Such a strategy promises to optimize analgesic treatment and to prevent or reduce the burden of unwanted side effects and the misuse of analgesics, particularly of opioids. This review highlights the current concepts, recent achievements and also challenges and key open research questions.

The effect of massage therapy on pain after surgery: A comprehensive meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Findings on the usefulness of massage therapy (MT) in postoperative pain management are often inconsistent among studies.

OBJECTIVES

This study's aim is to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to clarify the effects of massage therapy in the treatment of postoperative pain.

METHODS

Three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for RCTs published from database inception through January 26, 2021. The primary outcome was pain relief. The quality of RCTs was appraised with the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. The random-effect model was used to calculate the effect sizes and standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95 % confidential intervals (CIs) as a summary effect. The heterogeneity test was conducted through I². Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were used to explore the source of heterogeneity. Possible publication bias was assessed using visual inspection of funnel plot asymmetry.

RESULTS

The analysis included 33 RCTs and showed that MT is effective in reducing postoperative pain (SMD, -1.32; 95 % CI, -2.01 to -0.63; p = 0.0002; I² = 98.67 %). A similar significant effect was found for both short (immediate assessment) and long terms (assessment performed 4-6 weeks after the MT). Remarkably, we found neither the duration per session nor the dose had an impact on the effect of MT and there seemed to be no difference in the effects of different MT types. In addition, MT seemed to be more effective for adults. Furthermore, MT had better analgesic effects on cesarean section and heart surgery than orthopedic surgery.

LIMITATIONS

Publication bias is possible due to the inclusion of studies in English only. Additionally, the included studies were extremely heterogeneous. Double-blind research on MT is difficult to implement, and none of the included studies is double-blind. There was some heterogeneity and publication bias in the included studies. In addition, there is no uniform evaluation standard for the operation level of massage practitioners, which may lead to research implementation bias.

CONCLUSIONS

MT is effective in reducing postoperative pain in both short and long terms.

The Influence of Preoperative Mood and Treatment Expectations on Early Postsurgical Acute Pain After a Total Knee Replacement

BACKGROUND

Reducing postoperative pain immediately after surgery is crucial because severe postoperative pain reduces quality of life and increases the likelihood that patients develop chronic pain. Even though postoperative pain has been widely studied and there are national guidelines for pain management, the postoperative course is differently from one patient to the next. Different postoperative courses could be explained by factors related to the treatment context and the patients. Preoperative emotional states and treatment expectations are significant predictors of postoperative pain. However, the interaction between emotional states and preoperative treatment expectations and their effect on postoperative pain have not yet been studied. The aim of our study was to identify the interaction between emotional states, treatment expectation and early postsurgical acute pain.

METHODS

In this prospective clinical trial, we enrolled patients who had received a TKR at a German hospital between October 2015 and March 2019. Patients rated their preoperative pain on a numeric rating scale (NRS) 0-10 (0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable), their emotional states preoperatively on the Pain and State of Health Inventory (PHI), their preoperative treatment expectations on the Stanford Expectation of Treatment Scale (SETS), and their postoperative level of pain on a NRS 0-10.

FINDINGS

The questionnaires were completed by 122 patients (57% female). Emotional states predict negative treatment expectation F(6, 108) = 8.32, p < 0.001, with an excellent goodness-of-fit, R² = 0.31. Furthermore, a mediator analysis revealed that the indirect effects and therefore relationship between the emotional states sad (ab = 0.06, 95% CI[0.01, 0.14]), anxious (ab = 0.13, 95% CI[0.04, 0.22]), and irritable (ab = 0.09, 95% CI[0.03, 0.17]) and postoperative pain is fully mediated by negative treatment expectations. Whereas the emotional states tired (ab = 0.09, 95% CI[0.03, 0.17]), dizzy/numb (ab = 0.07, 95% CI[0.01, 0.20]), weak (ab = 0.08, 95% CI[0.03, 0.16] are partially mediated by negative treatment expectations.

CONCLUSION

The relationship between emotional states and postoperative pain is mediated by negative treatment expectations. Therefore, innovative treatment strategies to reduce postoperative pain should focus on eliminating negative treatment expectation through establishing a differentiated preoperative expectation management program that also focuses on emotional states.

[Treatment expectations for postoperative pain]

Hintergrund

Präoperative Behandlungserwartungen haben einen deutlichen Einfluss auf die postoperativen Schmerzen und Behandlungsergebnisse. Positive Erwartungen sind ein wichtiger Mechanismus von Placeboeffekten und negative Erwartungen ein wichtiger Mechanismus von Noceboeffekten.

Fragestellung

Welchen Einfluss haben Behandlungserwartungen, wie werden diese im klinischen Setting erhoben und wie können diese Erkenntnisse in der klinischen Praxis umgesetzt werden?

Material und Methoden

Es wurde eine Literatursuche für klinische Studien mit den Schlagwörtern „expectation“ AND („postoperative“ OR „surgery“) durchgeführt. Ausgewählt wurden alle aktuellen englischen und deutschen Artikel. Zusätzlich wurden die Literaturverzeichnisse der gefundenen Artikel untersucht und mit aufgenommen.

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt 158 Artikel wurden gefunden, von denen 49 Artikel Erwartungen erheben und ein postoperatives Behandlungsergebnis einbeziehen. Die meisten Artikel untersuchen Erwartungen in der Baseline-Erhebung, um nachzuweisen, dass sich Gruppen in Gruppenvergleichen präoperativ nicht voneinander unterscheiden. Die Studien, die den Einfluss von Erwartungen prospektiv untersuchen, verwenden sehr unterschiedliche Messverfahren, um das Konstrukt „Erwartung“ zu erheben. Somit ist ein Vergleich zwischen den Studien schwer möglich. Es gibt wenige Studien, die untersuchen, ob und wie die Erwartungen perioperativ beeinflusst werden können, und die praxisrelevante Interventionen zu deren Veränderung entwickelt haben.

Schlussfolgerung

Für eine fundierte Untersuchung der Behandlungserwartung sollten in klinischen Studien valide und reliable Messverfahren verwendet werden. Weitere Studien sollten sich mit Interventionsmöglichkeiten auseinandersetzen, damit Behandlungserwartungen auch in die klinische Standardbehandlung einbezogen werden können.

The Impact of Complications and Pain on Patient Satisfaction

OBJECTIVE

To measure the association between patient-reported satisfaction and regret and clinical outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Patient-reported outcomes are becoming an increasingly important marker of the quality of patient care. It is unclear however, how well patient-reported outcomes adequately reflect care quality and clinical outcomes in surgical patients.

METHODS

Retrospective, population-based analysis of adults ages 18 and older undergoing surgery across 38 hospitals in Michigan between January 1, 2017 and May 31, 2018.

RESULTS

In this study, 9953 patients (mean age 56 years; 5634 women (57%)) underwent 1 of 16 procedures. 9550 (96%) patients experienced no complication, whereas 240 (2%) and 163 (2%) patients experienced Grade 1 and Grade 2-3 complications, respectively. Postoperative pain scores were: none (908 (9%) patients), mild (3863 (40%) patients), moderate (3893 (40%) patients), and severe (1075 (11%) patients). Overall, 7881 (79%) patients were highly satisfied and 8911 (91%) had absolutely no regret after surgery. Patients were less likely to be highly satisfied if they experienced a Grade 1 complication [odds ratio (OR) 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.66], Grade 2-3 complication (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.31-0.62), minimal pain (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64-0.99, moderate pain (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.32-0.49), or severe pain (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.18-0.29). Patients were less likely to have no regret if they experienced a Grade 1 complication (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.70), Grade 2-3 complication (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.60), moderate pain (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.40-0.76), or severe pain (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.16-0.31). The predicted probability of being highly satisfied was 79% for patients who had no complications and 88% for patients who had no pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who experienced postoperative complications and pain were less likely to be highly satisfied or have no regret. Notably, postoperative pain had a more significant effect on satisfaction and regret after surgery, suggesting focused postsurgical pain management is an opportunity to substantially improve patient experiences. More research and patient education are needed for managing expectations of postoperative pain, and use of adjuncts and regional anesthesia.

Acupuncture for Hormone Therapy-Related Side Effects in Breast Cancer Patients: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis

Purpose: To determine the efficacy of acupuncture on the management of hormone therapy-related side effects in breast cancer patients. Methods: Randomized controlled trials of acupuncture versus a control or placebo in breast cancer patients that examined reductions in therapy-related side effects were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library through April 2020. Data on patient symptoms (hot flashes, fatigue, pain, stiffness, and gastrointestinal symptoms), physical capacity, cytokines, and general psychosomatic well-being were analyzed. We evaluated and analyzed the quality of all included studies with the 5.2 Cochrane Handbook standards using Stata software (version 10.0) and Revman software (version 5.2), respectively. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and evaluated the quality of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) approach. Results: The pooled results suggested that acupuncture led to moderate improvements in hot flashes, fatigue, and stiffness. No significant differences were observed in pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, Kupperman index scores, Overall quality of life, tumor necrosis factor levels, and interleukin levels. Conclusions: Evidence for outcome indicators of symptom management were downgraded by the GRADE system for inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision in the included RCTs. Nonetheless, acupuncture is a moderately appropriate alternative therapy for hormone therapy-related side effects in breast cancer patients. However, it still lacks large-sample, multicenter, prospective RCTs. Future research should focus on standardizing comparison groups and treatment methods, be at least single-blinded, assess biologic mechanisms, have adequate statistical power, and involve multiple acupuncturists.