Informal caring for back pain: overlooked costs of back pain and projections to 2030

Economic impact of informal caring for a person with arthritis in Australia from 2015 to 2030: a microsimulation approach using national survey data

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the economic burden of informal caregivers not in the labour force (NILF) due to caring for a person with arthritis in Australia, with projections of these costs from 2015 to 2030.

DESIGN

Static microsimulation modelling using national survey data.

SETTING

Australia nationwide survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants include respondents to the Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers who are informal carers of a person who has arthritis as their main chronic condition and non-carers.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Estimating the economic impact and national aggregated costs of informal carers NILF to care for a person with arthritis and projecting these costs from 2015 to 2030 in 5-year intervals.

RESULTS

On a per-person basis, when adjusted for age, sex and highest education attained, the difference in average weekly total income between informal carers and non-carers employed in the labour force is $A1051 (95% CI: $A927 to $A1204) in 2015 and projected to increase by up to 22% by 2030. When aggregated, the total national annual loss of income to informal carers NILF is estimated at $A388.2 million (95% CI: $A324.3 to $A461.9 million) in 2015, increasing to $A576.9 million (95% CI: $A489.2 to $A681.8 million) by 2030. The national annual tax revenue lost to the government of the informal carers NILF is estimated at $A99 million (95% CI: $A77.9 to $A126.4 million) in 2015 and is projected to increase 49% by 2030.

CONCLUSION

Informal carers NILF are economically worse off than employed non-carers, and the aggregated national annual costs are substantial. The future economic impact of informal carers NILF to care for a person with arthritis in Australia is projected to increase, with the estimated differences in income between informal carers and employed non-carers increasing by 22% from 2015 to 2030.

Prospective associations of physical fitness with spinal flexibility in childhood: implications for primary prevention of non-specific back pain

Objectives

Early predictors for back pain need to be identified for the development of prevention strategies starting as early as childhood. For this purpose, the relationship between physical fitness and spinal flexibility at the age of six years and its prediction for the development of non-specific back pain (BP) during childhood were analyzed.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study with 4-year follow-up, school children from the Swiss Canton Basel-Stadt, aged 6-8 (2014) at baseline and 10-12 years (2018) at follow-up, were recruited from 26 primary schools (n = 238) within a mandatory evaluation of motor skills. Data for spinal flexibility were collected by use of a hand-held computer-assisted device and physical fitness was assessed by shuttle run performance at both time points. Occurrence of non-specific BP was determined by use of a questionnaire at follow-up.

Results

Children with higher physical fitness at baseline achieved a better spinal flexibility four years later (β [95% CI] 3.75 [2.19-5.3] degree per 1 stage increase, p < 0.001). Higher spinal flexibility by 1 degree at baseline was associated with 2% less odds for non-specific BP at follow-up (OR [95% CI] 0.98 [0.97-0.99] per 1 degree increase, p = 0.032). There was little evidence for a direct association between physical fitness at baseline and development of non-specific BP at follow-up (OR [95% CI] 1.13 [0.96-1.34] per 1 stage increase, p = 0.128).

Conclusion

Fitness performance is associated with the development of better childhood spinal flexibility over four years. Moreover, a better spinal flexibility at baseline was associated with less non-specific BP at follow-up. This study suggests that physical fitness may be a key modulator of spinal flexibility which itself is a main determinant of non-specific BP during childhood development. Further long-term studies are warranted to confirm our assumptions and to prove trajectories into adolescents and adulthood.

The role of telehealth in the care of musculoskeletal pain conditions after COVID-19

The rise of virtual medicine through the use of e-Health technology was accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic and remains a vital part of health care delivery today. Telehealth, a virtual health care delivery system through either electronic or telecommunication technology, may improve the ability to deliver care in resource poor areas or where barriers to access occur. Despite the obvious advantages to telehealth, the efficacy of virtual visits when compared to face-to-face health care interactions is a topic of much debate, especially with regards to areas of medicine which rely heavily on physical examination or demonstration of therapeutic exercises and movements. In this commentary, we review the efficacy of telehealth with a focus on prevention and treatment of musculoskeletal pain conditions, and explore areas for future research.

A review of caregiver costs included in cost-of-illness studies

INTRODUCTION

Economic evaluations typically focus solely on patient-specific costs with economic spillovers to informal caregivers less frequently evaluated. This may systematically underestimate the burden resulting from disease.

AREAS COVERED

Cost-of-illness (COI) analyses that identified costs borne to caregiver(s) were identified using PubMed and Embase. We extracted study characteristics, clinical condition, costs, and cost methods. To compare caregiver costs reported across studies, estimated a single 'annual caregiver cost' amount in 2021 USD.

EXPERT OPINION

A total of 51 studies met our search criteria for inclusion with estimates ranging from $30 - $86,543. The majority (63%, 32/51) of studies estimated caregiver time costs with fewer studies reporting productivity or other types of costs. Caregiver costs were frequently reported descriptively (69%, 35/51), with fewer studies reporting more rigorous methods of estimating costs. Only 27% (14/51) of studies included used an incremental analysis approach for caregiver costs. In a subgroup analysis of dementia-focused studies (n = 16), we found the average annual cost of caregiving time for patients with dementia was $30,562, ranging from $4,914 to $86,543. We identified a wide range in annual caregiver cost estimates, even when limiting by condition and cost type.