Offset analgesia identifies impaired endogenous pain modulation in pediatric chronic pain disorders

Methods to discriminate between nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic in children & adolescents: A systematic review of psychometric properties and feasibility

The aim of this systematic review was to identify and critically analyse the tools available for categorising pain as nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic pain in children and adolescents. Studies were included if they (i) included children and adolescents with a mean age of 0-24 years old, (ii) examined assessment tools that categorise pain as nociceptive, neuropathic or nociplastic, and (iii) examined the psychometric properties of the tools. Sensitive searches were conducted in five online databases in March 2024. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias and quality by two authors using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. The search yielded 26 studies for 11 tools. No assessment tool had evidence for all nine recommended psychometric properties. Quantitative Sensory Testing, a tool used to identify signs and symptoms of nociplastic and neuropathic pain, was the most studied tool and had moderate evidence for construct validity, criterion validity and reliability. Three self-reported questionnaires, the Self-reported Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS), Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI) and PainDETECT, had moderate evidence for construct validity and show promise as preliminary tools to identify possible neuropathic or nociplastic pain. However, they had low specificity when used in isolation. All assessment methods would benefit from further psychometric evaluation and validation in children and adolescents. PERSPECTIVE: This systematic review highlights the limited validation of pain assessment tools for children and adolescents. While Quantitative Sensory Testing and self-reported questionnaires show promise in identifying pain mechanisms, their applicability remains uncertain. Further psychometric validation is crucial to improve pain assessment and guide personalized treatment in young populations.

Characterization of pain and somatization and its relationship with psychopathology in early onset psychosis

BACKGROUND

Early onset psychosis (EOP) frequently presents with a severe clinical phenotype and poor long-term prognosis. Clinical experience suggests that individuals with EOP have abnormal pain and somatosensory processing, yet relative to adult-onset psychosis, pain and somatic sensory processing in EOP have rarely been studied.

METHODS

The history of two characteristic patients is described to illustrate clinical presentations of pain in EOP patients. Furthermore, 31 patients with EOP were studied with self-reported questionnaires informing on pain severity, pain catastrophizing, central sensitization, and somatization. Structured clinical interviews were administered to confirm Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 EOP diagnosis and the patient's dimensions of psychopathology were measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS).

RESULTS

Out of 31 EOP patients, 22 reported distressing pain, where higher pain severity corresponded with greater BPRS total and affectivity and resistance subscale scores. The degree of psychopathology was associated (N = 31; p < 0.05, FDR-corrected) with the magnitude of pain catastrophizing, central sensitization, and somatization. Multivariate analysis revealed relationships (N = 31; p < 0.05, FDR-corrected) between BPRS subscale (negative symptoms and activation) scores with somatization severity. The observed associations occurred independent of antipsychotic medication usage as quantified by chlorpromazine equivalent doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain and somatosensory symptoms could be a frequent cause of distress in patients with EOP and their severity associated with the degree of psychopathology. Future studies should determine if treating pain and somatic symptoms in EOP patients can lead to better control of psychosis as well as improve quality of life.

Is the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) associated with quantitative sensory testing (QST)? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Central sensitization (CS) involves an amplification of neural processing within the central nervous system that can result in widespread pain patterns and hypersensitivity to stimuli. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) and various quantitative sensory testing (QST) methods purport to assess clinical markers of CS. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize and quantify the associations between total CSI scores and QST measures from previous studies. A systematic search identified 39 unique studies that were deemed eligible for the systematic review and 33 studies for meta-analyses (with 3314 subjects and 154 effect sizes), including five QST modalities: conditioned pain modulation, temporal summation, pressure pain threshold, heat pain threshold, and cold pain threshold. The meta-analysis yielded statistically significant CSI-QST correlations in total subject samples for all five QST modalities. The strongest associations were identified between CSI scores and pain threshold testing, especially pressure pain threshold, in which 51% of effects sizes, from 29 studies and 3071 subjects, were determined to be in a medium to large range.

Preoperatively assessed offset analgesia predicts acute postoperative pain following orthognathic surgery

OBJECTIVES

High intensity and longer duration of acute postoperative pain are generally associated with a higher risk of developing chronic postoperative pain. Therefore, it is important to identify the preoperative predictors for acute postoperative pain. Preoperative evaluation of offset analgesia (OA) and the Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS) may be potential predictors for acute postoperative pain. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between preoperative OA, PCS, and acute postoperative pain following orthognathic surgery.

METHODS

Thirty patients (19 females) scheduled to undergo orthognathic surgery were included in this study. OA and PCS were evaluated preoperatively, and the patients reported their postoperative pain intensity using the visual analogue scale [0-100 mm] until it reached zero (number of days with pain). OA was induced on the dominant forearm via three consecutive painful heat pulses delivered for 5 s (T1=46 °C), 5 s (T2=47 °C), and 20 s (T3=46 °C). Subsequently, the associations between OA, PCS, and the number of days with pain were analysed.

RESULTS

The median duration of postoperative pain was 10.3 days. Multiple linear regression analysis showed a significant (p=0.0019) predictive value of OA (p=0.008) for the number of days with pain. The PCS-magnification component was positively correlated with the number of days with pain (R=0.369, p=0.045), with no predictive values of PCS-total and PCS-subscale scores observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative evaluation of OA may be a new individualised, predictive tool for the number of days with acute postoperative pain following orthognathic surgery; hence, a possible biomarker for the patient's vulnerability to developing chronic postoperative pain.

ETHICAL COMMITTEE NUMBER

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Meikai University (A1624, A2113).

TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER

This study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) Clinical Trial (Unique ID: UMIN000026719, UMIN000046957).

Pain-Related Stigma and Its Associations With Clinical and Experimental Pain Severity in Youth With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions

OBJECTIVE

Many children with chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions experience stigma which can have negative downstream consequences. This study compares ratings of clinical pain (current pain intensity and pain interference), experimental pain (temporal summation, cold water tolerance, and cold pain intensity), and pain-related stigma among three groups of youth with rheumatic conditions. The relations among ratings of pain-related stigma and pain variables were explored.

METHODS

Eighty-eight youth aged 8-17 years with a diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA = 32), juvenile fibromyalgia (JFM = 31), or non-specific chronic pain (NSCP = 25) completed measures of clinical pain ratings (average 7-day pain intensity, day of assessment pain (DoA), and pain interference), experimental pain (cold pain tolerance, cold pain intensity, and temporal summation of mechanical pain), and pain-related stigma. Data analysis compared pain-related stigma and pain ratings across the three groups and examined the relations among pain-related stigma and pain ratings.

RESULTS

Youth with JFM reported higher ratings of clinical pain and pain-related stigma than their counterparts with NSCP or JIA. However, there were no differences in experimental pain. Pain-related stigma was associated with greater ratings of pain interference, particularly for those with JIA and NSCP. Pain-related stigma was also associated with greater average daily pain intensity but not DoA.

CONCLUSION

Youth with medically unexplained pain report greater stigma and worse pain than their peers; thus, robust assessment of pain in this population is necessary. Future work should longitudinally explore the impact of pain-related stigma on pain outcomes and treatment responses.

Do "central sensitization" questionnaires reflect measures of nociceptive sensitization or psychological constructs? A systematic review and meta-analyses

ABSTRACT

Central sensitization (CS) is defined as an increased nociceptive responsiveness due to sensitization of neurons in the central nervous system, usually the result of prolonged nociceptive input or a disease state associated with noxious inputs (eg, polyarthritis). The concept of CS has recently been adopted in clinical assessments of chronic pain, but its diagnosis in humans may now include a wide range of hypervigilant responses. The purpose of this review is to ascertain whether self-report questionnaires linked with CS are associated with enhanced nociceptive responses or whether they measure sensitivity in a broader sense (ie, emotional responses). According to our published, PROSPERO-registered review protocol (CRD42021208731), a predefined search of studies that involve the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) or Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ), correlated with either nociceptive sensory tests or emotional hypervigilance was conducted on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Correlations between the CSI or PSQ with our primary outcomes were extracted and meta-analysed. A review of 66 studies totalling 13,284 participants found that the CSI (but not the PSQ) strongly correlated with psychological constructs: depression, anxiety, stress, pain catastrophising, sleep, and kinesiophobia. The CSI and PSQ showed weak or no correlations with experimental measures of nociceptive sensitivity: pain thresholds, temporal summation, or conditioned pain modulation. The PSQ did, however, correlate strongly with phasic heat and tonic cold pain tests. The studies reviewed did not provide sufficient evidence that self-report measures reflect a canonical understanding of CS. The CSI more closely reflects psychological hypervigilance than increased responsiveness of nociceptive neurons.

Unique features of central neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis: Results of a cluster analysis

Background

Central neuropathic pain (CNP) is an excruciating condition, prevalent in up to a third of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Identifying CNP among MS patients is particularly challenging considering the ample comorbid chronic pain conditions and sensory disturbances entailed by the disease. The aim was to identify sensory features unique to CNP beyond those of chronic pain and MS.

Methods

Participants were 112 MS patients: 44 with a diagnosis of CNP, 28 with a diagnosis of chronic musculoskeletal pain (MSP), and 40 pain free. Participants underwent testing of thermal and mechanical thresholds, thermal grill illusion (TGI), pain adaptation (PA), and offset analgesia (OA), and chronic pain was characterized. A two‐step cluster analysis was performed, and the association between the cluster membership and the clinical group membership (CNP, MSP, pain free) was evaluated.

Results

The CNP and MSP groups were similar in most of the chronic pain variables (e.g., severity, location and quality) and MS‐related variables (e.g., type, severity and medication intake). The three created clusters had unique sensory features: (1) ‘Hyposensitivity’ (increased thermal and touch thresholds) characterized the CNP group; (2) ‘Poor inhibition and hyperalgesia’ (worst PA and OA and decreased TGI threshold) characterized the MSP group; and (3) ‘Efficient inhibition’ (best PA and OA, smallest sensory loss) characterized the pain‐free group.

Conclusions

The unique sensory features of CNP and MSP provide insight into their pathophysiology, and evaluating them may increase the ability to provide individually based interventions. Efficient inhibition may protect MS patients from chronic pain.

Significance

Cluster analysis among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) revealed that while central neuropathic pain is associated with thermal and mechanical hypoesthesia, musculoskeletal pain is involved with reduced pain inhibition and hyperalgesia; sensory profiles that provide insights into the mechanisms of these conditions and may promote an individually based pain management.

Development and Feasibility of the Headache-Related Light and Sound Sensitivity Inventories in Youth

Youth with chronic headache disorders often experience sensitivities to light and sound that trigger or exacerbate their headaches and contribute to functional disability. At present, there are no known validated measures for assessing these sensitivities and their impact on functioning in youth with chronic headaches. This pilot study sought to develop and assess the feasibility of measures of headache-related light and sounds sensitivities in youth with chronic headache disorders. The initial item pools were generated via an intensive literature review, an informal quality improvement project, and a panel of experts in chronic pain. Then, youth (n = 20) presenting for clinical evaluation of headaches completed the revised items as well as assessments of the measures’ feasibility and items’ understandability. A subset (n = 2) completed formal cognitive interviews as well. The resulting 20-item Headache-Related Light Sensitivity Inventory (HALSI) and 18-item Headache-Related Sound Sensitivity Inventory (HASSI) for youth assess headache-related sensory sensitivities, as well as related emotional and behavioral responses. Through the iterative incorporation of feedback, these measures appear to be feasible to administer and understandable tools for assessing light and sound sensitivity in youth with chronic headache disorders. Once they are empirically validated, they have the potential to serve as important tools for understanding the patient experience, developing interventions, and assessing treatment response.

Offset analgesia and onset hyperalgesia with different stimulus ranges

A comparison between the effects of offset analgesia and onset hyperalgesia and how these effects relate to the stimulus range of thermal stimulation.

Introduction:

Offset analgesia (OA), a large reduction in pain after a brief increase in intensity of an otherwise stable painful stimulus, has been established by a large body of research. But the opposite effect, onset hyperalgesia (OH), a disproportional hyperalgesic response after a briefly decreased intensity of a painful stimulus, has only been investigated in one previous study.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to induce OA and OH in healthy participants and explore the effects of different stimulus ranges (increase/decrease of temperature) on OA and OH.

Methods:

A total of 62 participants were tested in 2 identical experiments. Offset analgesia and OH conditions included 2 different temperature deviations (±1°C/±2°C) from initial temperature and were compared with a constant temperature (control).

Results:

Offset analgesia was successfully elicited in OA_1°C in experiment 1, and in OA_1°C and OA_2°C in experiment 2. Results indicate a continuous stimulus–response relationship between the stimulus range and the resulting hypoalgesic response. Onset hyperalgesia was only elicited in OH_2°C in experiment 1. Exploratory analysis showed that the lack of OH response in experiment 2 could be explained by sex differences, and that OA and OH responses were only weakly correlated.

Conclusions:

The asymmetry between pain responses after a brief temperature increase and decrease suggests that different mechanisms are involved in the pain responses to increasing and decreasing temperature. This asymmetry may also be explained by high temperatures in OA condition (+1°C/+2°C above baseline) that could be seen as salient “learning signals,” which augment the response to following changes in temperature.

Commentary: Novel Use of Offset Analgesia to Assess Adolescents and Adults with Treatment Resistant Endometriosis-Associated Pain

Background and Objective

Endometriosis, affecting approximately 176 million adults and adolescents worldwide, is a debilitating condition in which uterine tissue grows outside the uterus. The condition costs the US economy approximately $78 billion annually in pain-related disability. By understanding the neural underpinnings of endometriosis-associated pain (EAP) and risk factors for chronification, translational research methods could lessen diagnostic delays and maximize successful pain remediation. This can be accomplished by the novel use of a known method, offset analgesia (OA), to better elucidate the neural mechanisms that may contribute to and maintain EAP. This commentary will provide justification and rationale for the use of OA in the study of EAP.

Conclusion

Utilizing an OA paradigm in patients with endometriosis, especially adolescents, may (1) provide insight into neural mechanisms contributing to pain maintenance, which could capture those at-risk for the transition to chronic pelvic pain, (2) provide a metric for the development of future centrally mediated treatment options for this population, and (3) elucidate the brain changes that result in resistance to treatment and pain chronification.