Chronic pain and COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality: a UK Biobank cohort study

SPACO+: a mixed methods protocol to assessing the effectiveness of an educative intervention in patients with Long Covid

BACKGROUND

The management of many chronic diseases requires a multidisciplinary and holistic approach. Long Covid is a recent, poorly understood disease with several symptoms. Most recommendations suggest a multidisciplinary approach. While there are a few programs aimed to the management of Long Covid, to our knowledge very few were assessed. The SPACO + study therefore aims to evaluate an innovative program which combines the methods used in therapeutic education and in personalized multifactorial intervention for management of Long Covid. Here, we present the protocol of our study, which aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention in terms of changes in quality of life at 6 months in comparison with standard clinical practice in patients suffering from Long Covid.

METHODS

To achieve our objectives, we have planned to carry out a prospective, multicentre, two-arm randomized controlled trial with a convergent parallel mixed methods design. Two countries are involved in this study: France and Cameroon. The study concerns patients aged 18 and over, who have been infected with Covid-19. They must also be diagnosed as having Long Covid in accordance with the WHO definition. The number of subjects required for the study is 400 individuals. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group using a dynamic randomization process to ensure balanced group characteristics. The SPACO + program is an educative intervention with individual follow-up by a nurse dedicated to the program. The SPACO + program offers five workshops, two of which are compulsories. Patients take part in the other workshops according to their needs. The program includes an 8 - 10 weeks intervention period. Each session lasts two hours and includes breaks (pacing). The main outcome measure will be quality of life, evaluated through the SF-36. Primary and secondary outcomes, with few exceptions, are assessed before the intervention ("T0"), at 8 weeks ("T1" corresponding to the end of SPACO + program's session period) and then 3 months later ("T2").

DISCUSSION

If the SPACO + program is effective and accepted by professionals and patients, it could be disseminated in other regions to assess its transferability. The medico-economic evaluation will also make it possible to assess the benefits provided.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered under the number NCT05787366 (March 24, 2023). Protocol Version N°3.0 (May 31, 2024).

Association between pain and incident arrhythmias in 422,654 individuals: evidence from the UK Biobank cohort

AIMS

Pain is associated with cardiovascular disease; however, its association with incident arrhythmias is unclear. We assessed associations between different pain characteristics (pain type, chronic pain, chronic widespread pain [chronic widespread pain], chronic musculoskeletal pain [chronic musculoskeletal pain], and number of chronic pain and chronic musculoskeletal pain sites) and incident cardiac arrhythmias, overall and by subtype.

METHODS

The study included 422,654 UK Biobank participants. Pain was ascertained via a touchscreen questionnaire. The outcomes were incident arrhythmias: all cardiac arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation (AF), other (non-AF) cardiac arrhythmias, bradyarrhythmias, and ventricular arrhythmias. Multivariable Cox-proportional regression was used to investigate the associations.

RESULTS

Over a mean (SD) follow-up of 13.19 (1.96) years, 36,860 (8.72%) participants developed arrhythmia. Compared with those without pain, those with chronic localized pain and chronic widespread pain had increased risk of all cardiac arrhythmias (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.17; 1.34, 1.19-1.51), AF (1.09, 1.05-1.14; 1.33, 1.15-1.55), and other cardiac arrhythmias (1.17, 1.12-1.22; 1.41, 1.20-1.66). There was evidence of a dose-relationship between number of chronic pain sites and risk of all cardiac arrhythmias, AF and bradyarrhythmias. Effect estimates were significantly larger among participants aged <60 years than those aged ≥60 years, and larger in women than men.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic pain was associated with cardiac arrhythmias. Whilst causation cannot be assumed in any observational study, there was evidence of both a temporal relationship and dose-relationship. These findings reinforce the need for pain management approaches that include a broad assessment of individuals' risk factors, wider health status, and appropriate vigilance for emerging conditions.

Association between chronic pain and risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although chronic pain was deleteriously related to single cardiometabolic diseases, the relationship between chronic pain and cardiometabolic multimorbidity remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between chronic pain with the risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study included 452 818 participants who were free of cardiometabolic multimorbidity at baseline. Chronic pain was assessed in diverse anatomical sites including the head, face, neck/shoulder, stomach/abdominal area, back, hip and knee or 'all over the body'. Participants were classified into six groups according to the amount of chronic pain sites: no chronic pain, chronic pain at one, two, three and four or more sites, and those reporting pain 'all over the body'. Cardiometabolic multimorbidity was defined as the occurrence of at least two cardiometabolic diseases, involving type 2 diabetes, ischaemic heart disease and stroke.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 13.7 years, 4445 participants developed cardiometabolic multimorbidity. Compared with individuals without chronic pain, those experiencing chronic pain in four or more sites were associated with a 1.82-fold (HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.61, 2.06) higher risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity. Pain distributed 'all over the body' was associated with a 59% (HR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.30, 1.93) increased risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity Additionally, individuals who had chronic pain in both the head and stomach/abdomen showed the highest risk with cardiometabolic multimorbidity (HR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.60, 2.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that there was an elevated risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity associated with an increased amount of chronic pain sites.

Chronic pain after hospital discharge on patients hospitalized for COVID-19: an observational study

BACKGROUND

There are few studies related to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the prevalence and nature of pain symptoms after hospital discharge, especially in individuals who develop moderate to severe disease forms. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the presence of chronic pain in patients discharged after hospitalization for COVID-19, and the relationship between the presence of chronic pain and intensive care stay, demographics, and risk factors for the worst Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outcome.

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational study was carried out on patients with COVID-19 who recovered after hospitalization. Patients were recruited at the least 3 months after discharge and their hospital's health files were prospected. The variables evaluated were demographics, the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection (considering the need for intensive care), and the presence of chronic pain. The results were shown in a descriptive manner, and multivariate analysis expressed as Odds Ratios (ORs) and respective Confidence Intervals (CIs) for the outcomes studied. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of 242 individuals included, 77 (31.8%) reported chronic pain related to COVID-19, with no correlation with the severity of infection. Female sex and obesity were associated with a higher risk for chronic pain with ORs of 2.69 (Confidence Interval [95% CI 1.4 to 5.0]) and 3.02 (95% CI 1.5 to 5.9). The limbs were the most affected areas of the body.

CONCLUSION

Chronic pain is common among COVID-19 survivors treated in hospital environments. Female sex and obesity are risk factors for its occurrence.

Genetic overlap and causality between COVID-19 and multi-site chronic pain: the importance of immunity

Background

The existence of chronic pain increases susceptibility to virus and is now widely acknowledged as a prominent feature recognized as a major manifestation of long-term coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it is imperative to explore the genetic associations between chronic pain and predisposition to COVID-19.

Methods

We conducted genetic analysis at the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), gene, and molecular levels using summary statistics of genome-wide association study (GWAS) and analyzed the drug targets by summary data-based Mendelian randomization analysis (SMR) to alleviate the multi-site chronic pain in COVID-19. Additionally, we performed a latent causal variable (LCV) method to investigate the causal relationship between chronic pain and susceptibility to COVID-19.

Results

The cross-trait meta-analysis identified 19 significant SNPs shared between COVID-19 and chronic pain. Coloc analysis indicated that the posterior probability of association (PPH4) for three loci was above 70% in both critical COVID-19 and COVID-19, with the corresponding top three SNPs being rs13135092, rs7588831, and rs13135092. A total of 482 significant overlapped genes were detected from MAGMA and CPASSOC results. Additionally, the gene ANAPC4 was identified as a potential drug target for treating chronic pain (P=7.66E-05) in COVID-19 (P=8.23E-03). Tissue enrichment analysis highlighted that the amygdala (P=7.81E-04) and prefrontal cortex (P=8.19E-05) as pivotal in regulating chronic pain of critical COVID-19. KEGG pathway enrichment further revealed the enrichment of pleiotropic genes in both COVID-19 (P=3.20E-03,Padjust=4.77E-02,hsa05171) and neurotrophic pathways (P=9.03E-04,Padjust =2.55E-02,hsa04621). Finally, the latent causal variable (LCV) model was applied to find the genetic component of critical COVID-19 was causal for multi-site chronic pain (P=0.015), with a genetic causality proportion (GCP) of was 0.60.

Conclusions

In this study, we identified several functional genes and underscored the pivotal role of the inflammatory system in the correlation between the paired traits. Notably, heat shock proteins emerged as potential objective biomarkers for chronic pain symptoms in individuals with COVID-19. Additionally, the ubiquitin system might play a role in mediating the impact of COVID-19 on chronic pain. These findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the pleiotropy between COVID-19 and chronic pain, offering insights for therapeutic trials.

Evaluating chronic pain as a risk factor for COVID-19 complications among New York State Medicaid beneficiaries: a retrospective claims analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether chronic pain increases the risk of COVID-19 complications and whether opioid use disorder (OUD) differentiates this risk among New York State Medicaid beneficiaries.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND SUBJECTS

This was a retrospective cohort study of New York State Medicaid claims data. We evaluated Medicaid claims from March 2019 through December 2020 to determine whether chronic pain increased the risk of COVID-19 emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and complications and whether this relationship differed by OUD status. We included beneficiaries 18-64 years of age with 10 months of prior enrollment. Patients with chronic pain were propensity score-matched to those without chronic pain on demographics, utilization, and comorbidities to control for confounders and were stratified by OUD. Complementary log-log regressions estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of COVID-19 ED visits and hospitalizations; logistic regressions estimated odds ratios (ORs) of hospital complications and readmissions within 0-30, 31-60, and 61-90 days.

RESULTS

Among 773 880 adults, chronic pain was associated with greater hazards of COVID-related ED visits (HR = 1.22 [95% CI: 1.16-1.29]) and hospitalizations (HR = 1.19 [95% CI: 1.12-1.27]). Patients with chronic pain and OUD had even greater hazards of hospitalization (HR = 1.25 [95% CI: 1.07-1.47]) and increased odds of hepatic- and cardiac-related events (OR = 1.74 [95% CI: 1.10-2.74]).

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic pain increased the risk of COVID-19 ED visits and hospitalizations. Presence of OUD further increased the risk of COVID-19 hospitalizations and the odds of hepatic- and cardiac-related events. Results highlight intersecting risks among a vulnerable population and can inform tailored COVID-19 management.

Big data, big consortia, and pain: UK Biobank, PAINSTORM, and DOLORisk

Chronic pain (CP) is a common and often debilitating disorder that has major social and economic impacts. A subset of patients develop CP that significantly interferes with their activities of daily living and requires a high level of healthcare support. The challenge for treating physicians is in preventing the onset of refractory CP or effectively managing existing pain. To be able to do this, it is necessary to understand the risk factors, both genetic and environmental, for the onset of CP and response to treatment, as well as the pathogenesis of the disorder, which is highly heterogenous. However, studies of CP, particularly pain with neuropathic characteristics, have been hindered by a lack of consensus on phenotyping and data collection, making comparisons difficult. Furthermore, existing cohorts have suffered from small sample sizes meaning that analyses, especially genome-wide association studies, are insufficiently powered. The key to overcoming these issues is through the creation of large consortia such as DOLORisk and PAINSTORM and biorepositories, such as UK Biobank, where a common approach can be taken to CP phenotyping, which allows harmonisation across different cohorts and in turn increased study power. This review describes the approach that was used for studying neuropathic pain in DOLORisk and how this has informed current projects such as PAINSTORM, the rephenotyping of UK Biobank, and other endeavours. Moreover, an overview is provided of the outputs from these studies and the lessons learnt for future projects.

COVID-19 annual update: a narrative review

Three and a half years after the pandemic outbreak, now that WHO has formally declared that the emergency is over, COVID-19 is still a significant global issue. Here, we focus on recent developments in genetic and genomic research on COVID-19, and we give an outlook on state-of-the-art therapeutical approaches, as the pandemic is gradually transitioning to an endemic situation. The sequencing and characterization of rare alleles in different populations has made it possible to identify numerous genes that affect either susceptibility to COVID-19 or the severity of the disease. These findings provide a beginning to new avenues and pan-ethnic therapeutic approaches, as well as to potential genetic screening protocols. The causative virus, SARS-CoV-2, is still in the spotlight, but novel threatening virus could appear anywhere at any time. Therefore, continued vigilance and further research is warranted. We also note emphatically that to prevent future pandemics and other world-wide health crises, it is imperative to capitalize on what we have learnt from COVID-19: specifically, regarding its origins, the world's response, and insufficient preparedness. This requires unprecedented international collaboration and timely data sharing for the coordination of effective response and the rapid implementation of containment measures.