Neuromuscular adaptations to experimentally induced pain in the lumbar region: systematic review and meta-analysis

Effects of experimentally induced lumbar nociception on trunk motor control in the rat during locomotion

Nociception resulting in pain perception might be one of the factors contributing to the motor control changes in people with low-back pain. However, limited evidence exists regarding the effects of acute pain on trunk motor control during locomotion. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of hypertonic saline induced nociception on trunk movement and back muscle activity during locomotion in a rat model. Spine and pelvis kinematics, EMG signals from bilateral multifidus (MF) and medial longissimus (ML) muscles of the rats were collected during treadmill locomotion before and after hypertonic saline (5.8%) injection into the MF. We found that both the locomotion and EMG patterns remained unchanged after hypertonic saline injection. No significant changes were found in stride duration, pelvic, lumbar and spine angle changes, variability, or movement asymmetry. The overall EMG activation patterns and intermuscular coordination remained unchanged after hypertonic saline injection and there was synchronized activation of bilateral MF muscles with two peaks per stride cycle, and alternating activation of left and right ML. The only significant effects of hypertonic saline injection were the decrease in the normalized peak amplitude of the left MF and EMG variability in right ML, no effects were detected in other EMG outcomes or muscles. These results suggest that the changes in EMG activity reflect localized neuromuscular response to nociception rather than broader alterations in control of locomotion.

Does pain influence control of muscle force? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In the presence of pain, whether clinical or experimentally induced, individuals commonly show impairments in the control of muscle force (commonly known as force steadiness). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we synthesized the available evidence on the influence of clinical and experimental pain on force steadiness.

DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT

MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL Plus and Web of Science databases were searched from their inception to 19 December 2023, using MeSH terms and pre-selected keywords related to pain and force steadiness. Two independent reviewers screened studies for inclusion and assessed their methodological quality using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa risk of bias tool.

RESULTS

In total, 32 studies (19 clinical pain and 13 experimental pain) were included. Meta-analyses revealed reduced force steadiness in the presence of clinical pain as measured by the coefficient of variation (CoV) and standard deviation (SD) of force (standardized mean difference; SMD = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.31-1.28 and SMD = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.11-1.11). These findings were supported by moderate and low strength of evidence respectively. In the presence of experimental pain, meta-analyses revealed reductions in force steadiness when measured by the CoV of force but not by the SD of force (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.01-0.99; and SMD = 0.44, 95% CI = -0.04 to 0.92), each supported by very low strength of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This work demonstrates that pain, particularly clinical pain, impairs force steadiness. Such impairments likely have clinical relevance and could become targets for treatment when managing people experiencing musculoskeletal pain.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This systematic review and meta-analyses enhances our understanding of motor impairments observed in people experiencing musculoskeletal pain. It underscores the significance of incorporating force steadiness assessment when managing individuals experiencing musculoskeletal pain. Additionally, it suggests that future research should explore the potential benefits of force steadiness training in alleviating patients' symptoms and enhancing their functional performance. This could potentially lead to the development of innovative therapeutic approaches for individuals suffering from musculoskeletal pain.

The Effect of Experimentally Induced Pain in the Cervical, Shoulder, or Orofacial Regions on Cervical Neuromuscular and Kinematic Features: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

In this systematic review, we synthesize the literature investigating the effect of experimentally induced pain in the cervical, shoulder, or orofacial regions on cervical neuromuscular and kinematic features. Databases were searched up to November 1, 2023. A total of 29 studies using hypertonic saline injection (n = 27) or glutamate injection (n = 2) as experimental pain models were included. Meta-analyses revealed reduced upper trapezius activation during shoulder flexion/abduction when pain was induced in the upper trapezius (standardized mean difference: -.90, 95% confidence interval: [-1.29; -.51]), splenius capitis (-1.03 [-1.44; -.63]), and supraspinatus (-.63 [-1.25; -.01]), but not in the subacromial space (.22 [-.16; .60]). Furthermore, experimentally induced pain caused a caudal redistribution of activation within the upper trapezius (.96 [.58; 1.34]) but did not change the mediolateral distribution (.11 [-.22; .42]). None of these adaptations persisted after pain resolution. Low-quality evidence supported the absence of an effect of experimental pain on upper trapezius muscle activation during manual dexterity and cervical flexion/extension tasks, as well as on cervical flexor and extensor muscle activation during cervical and jaw tasks. Inconsistent and limited evidence, attributed to the large heterogeneity of task and outcomes, precluded drawing meaningful conclusions about the effects of experimentally induced pain in the cervical region on cervical kinematics. Overall, cervical muscle activation tended to decrease in response to experimentally induced pain, and the decrease of muscle activation depended on the location of the painful stimulus. These adaptations are only partially representative of muscle activation patterns observed in clinical populations. PERSPECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed a reduced or unchanged muscle activation during experimental pain in the cervical, shoulder, or orofacial regions, depending on the task and location of nociceptive stimulation. There was inconsistent evidence on cervical kinematics. These findings enhance our understanding of neuromuscular adaptations to acute experimental pain.

Task-dependent neuromuscular adaptations in low back pain: a controlled experimental study

Introduction

This study investigated the variability in lumbar neuromuscular adaptations to pain, the task dependency of pain adaptations and the effect of these adaptations on motor performance.

Methods

Twenty-four healthy participants performed isometric back extension contractions at 45° and 90° trunk flexion under pain-free and experimental low back pain conditions induced by electrical stimulation. High-density surface electromyography recorded lumbar muscle activation strategies, and force steadiness was measured using a load cell.

Results

While considerable variability in neuromuscular adaptations to lumbar pain was observed among participants, consistent patterns were found between tasks. In the 90° trunk flexion position, both sides exhibited greater magnitudes of pain adaptations for muscle activity redistribution in the mediolateral axis (p < 0.05, 86% increase) and muscle activity amplitude (p < 0.001, 183% increase) compared to the 45° trunk flexion position. A significant negative correlation was found between the magnitude of the mediolateral spatial redistribution of muscle activity and force steadiness on the left side (p = 0.045).

Discussion

These findings highlight the intricate and task-dependent nature of neuromuscular adaptations to pain within lumbar muscles, and points toward a potential trade-off between pain adaptations and performance.

The effect of trunk position and pain location on lumbar extensor muscle recruitment strategies

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of trunk position and experimental lumbar pain location on lumbar extensor muscle recruitment strategies. Nineteen healthy participants (10 men and 9 women), aged 25.3 ± 4.7 yr, performed isometric back extension contractions in three positions (neutral, 45°, and 90° trunk flexion) and under three conditions (no pain, caudal pain, and cranial pain). Lumbar muscle activation strategies were recorded using high-density surface electromyography. The effect of position and pain condition on muscle activity amplitude and spatial redistributions was assessed. Muscle activity amplitude was 43% higher in 45° trunk flexion than in neutral position on both sides (P < 0.05). In the 90° trunk flexion, participants showed a more lateral spatial distribution than in the 45° trunk flexion on the left side (P < 0.01, 5.4 mm difference) and the neutral position on both sides (P < 0.05, 8.2 mm difference). In the 45° trunk flexion, participants exhibited a more lateral spatial distribution compared with the neutral position on the right side (P < 0.05, 3.7 mm difference). A lateral spatial redistribution of muscle activity was observed in the caudal pain condition compared with the no pain condition on the right side (P < 0.05, 3.0 mm difference). Individual responses to pain varied across all variables. Different trunk positions result in different distributions of activation within the lumbar extensor muscles, possibly based on regional mechanical advantage. No clear indication of location-specific pain adaptation and no effect of task-dependent pain adaptation were found, whereas individual-specific adaptations were observed.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Changes in muscle activity amplitude and spatial redistribution of lumbar extensor muscles were observed in different trunk positions, potentially due to changes in their mechanical advantage. The results complement the current pain-adaptation theory by illustrating individual spatial redistributions of activation within lumbar extensor muscles during pain. The study found no clear indication of location-specific pain adaptation and no effect of task-dependent pain adaptation.

The influence of pain and kinesiophobia on motor control of the upper limb: how pointing task paradigms can point to new avenues of understanding

ABSTRACT

People experiencing kinesiophobia are more likely to develop persistent disabilities and chronic pain. However, the impact of kinesiophobia on the motor system remains poorly understood. We investigated whether kinesiophobia could modulate shoulder pain-induced changes in (1) kinematic parameters and muscle activation during functional movement and (2) corticospinal excitability. Thirty healthy, pain-free subjects took part in the study. Shoulder, elbow, and finger kinematics, as well as electromyographic activity of the upper trapezius and anterior deltoid muscles, were recorded while subjects performed a pointing task before and during pain induced by capsaicin at the shoulder. Anterior deltoid cortical changes in excitability were assessed through the slope of transcranial magnetic stimulation input-output curves obtained before and during pain. Results revealed that pain reduced shoulder electromyographic activity and had a variable effect on finger kinematics, with individuals with higher kinesiophobia showing greater reduction in finger target traveled distance. Kinesiophobia scores were also correlated with the changes in deltoid corticospinal excitability, suggesting that the latter can influence motor activity as soon as the motor signal emerges. Taken together, these results suggest that pain and kinesiophobia interact with motor control adaptation.

The clinical utility of the prone hip extension test in the diagnosis of motor control impairments associated with low back pain: A cross-sectional study using motion capture and electromyography

BACKGROUND

The prone hip extension test is used as a clinical tool to diagnose specific motor control impairments that have been identified in individuals with chronic low back pain. However, conventional protocols for performing the test are subjective and lack evidence for their effectiveness. The objective of the current study was to quantify lumbopelvic motion and muscle activation during this test and identify which motor control patterns best distinguish individuals with low back pain from asymptomatic controls.

METHODS

18 individuals with sub-acute or chronic low back pain and 32 asymptomatic controls performed the prone hip extension test while a 3D motion capture system measured lumbar and pelvic movement patterns and an electromyography system measured the muscle activation patterns of the paraspinal, gluteus maximus, and hamstring muscles. A three-stage statistical analysis was performed, the final stage being a stepwise logistic regression analysis aimed at identifying the movement and muscle activation pattern variables that best distinguished the two groups.

FINDINGS

The final regression model included three lumbar kinematic variables and several electromyographic amplitude variables for the gluteus maximus and hamstring muscles during right-sided prone hip extension. The final model correctly classified 86.7 % of the control group and 83.3 % of the low back pain group.

INTERPRETATION

The subject of asymmetrical gluteus maximus and hamstring muscle activation appears to be a potentially interesting area for future research on the utility of the prone hip extension test as a clinical tool in diagnosing motor control impairments associated with low back pain.

Pain-sensorimotor interactions: New perspectives and a new model

How pain and sensorimotor behavior interact has been the subject of research and debate for many decades. This article reviews theories bearing on pain-sensorimotor interactions and considers their strengths and limitations in the light of findings from experimental and clinical studies of pain-sensorimotor interactions in the spinal and craniofacial sensorimotor systems. A strength of recent theories is that they have incorporated concepts and features missing from earlier theories to account for the role of the sensory-discriminative, motivational-affective, and cognitive-evaluative dimensions of pain in pain-sensorimotor interactions. Findings acquired since the formulation of these recent theories indicate that additional features need to be considered to provide a more comprehensive conceptualization of pain-sensorimotor interactions. These features include biopsychosocial influences that range from biological factors such as genetics and epigenetics to psychological factors and social factors encompassing environmental and cultural influences. Also needing consideration is a mechanistic framework that includes other biological factors reflecting nociceptive processes and glioplastic and neuroplastic changes in sensorimotor and related brain and spinal cord circuits in acute or chronic pain conditions. The literature reviewed and the limitations of previous theories bearing on pain-sensorimotor interactions have led us to provide new perspectives on these interactions, and this has prompted our development of a new concept, the Theory of Pain-Sensorimotor Interactions (TOPSMI) that we suggest gives a more comprehensive framework to consider the interactions and their complexity. This theory states that pain is associated with plastic changes in the central nervous system (CNS) that lead to an activation pattern of motor units that contributes to the individual's adaptive sensorimotor behavior. This activation pattern takes account of the biological, psychological, and social influences on the musculoskeletal tissues involved in sensorimotor behavior and on the plastic changes and the experience of pain in that individual. The pattern is normally optimized in terms of biomechanical advantage and metabolic cost related to the features of the individual's musculoskeletal tissues and aims to minimize pain and any associated sensorimotor changes, and thereby maintain homeostasis. However, adverse biopsychosocial factors and their interactions may result in plastic CNS changes leading to less optimal, even maladaptive, sensorimotor changes producing motor unit activation patterns associated with the development of further pain. This more comprehensive theory points towards customized treatment strategies, in line with the management approaches to pain proposed in the biopsychosocial model of pain.

The Role of Back Muscle Dysfunctions in Chronic Low Back Pain: State-of-the-Art and Clinical Implications

Changes in back muscle function and structure are highly prevalent in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Since large heterogeneity in clinical presentation and back muscle dysfunctions exists within this population, the potential role of back muscle dysfunctions in the persistence of low back pain differs between individuals. Consequently, interventions should be tailored to the individual patient and be based on a thorough clinical examination taking into account the multidimensional nature of CLBP. Considering the complexity of this process, we will provide a state-of-the-art update on back muscle dysfunctions in patients with CLBP and their implications for treatment. To this end, we will first give an overview of (1) dysfunctions in back muscle structure and function, (2) the potential of exercise therapy to address these dysfunctions, and (3) the relationship between changes in back muscle dysfunctions and clinical parameters. In a second part, we will describe a framework for an individualised approach for back muscle training in patients with CLBP.