Concurrent and lagged associations among pain medication use, pain, and negative affect: a daily diary study of people with chronic low back pain

Day-to-day associations between pain intensity and sleep outcomes in an adult chronic musculoskeletal pain population: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

In individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain, a reciprocal relationship between sleep and pain across short and long-term evaluations exists. Sleep influences pain levels, while the level of pain also impairs sleep. However, given the day-to-day variability of both sleep and pain intensity, assessing this relationship within a daily time frame should be considered.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the literature concerning the bidirectional day-to-day relationship between night-time sleep variables and day-time pain intensity in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

METHODS

A systematic search (final search on October 12, 2023) in four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycInfo) identified eligible articles based on pre-defined criteria. Three independent reviewers executed data extraction and risk of bias assessment using the "Quality In Prognosis Studies" tool. The study findings were synthesized narratively.

RESULTS

Eleven articles (1014 study participants; 83 associations) were included. A bidirectional relationship between pain intensity and sleep was found. Nine articles indicated night-time sleep quality to be a more consistent predictor for next day pain intensity than vice versa.

CONCLUSION

Nonetheless the bidirectional day-to-day sleep-pain relationship in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain, results suggest that self-reported sleep quality has a stronger predictive value on pain intensity then vice versa.

Underestimating or Overestimating Improvement in Pain on a Smartphone Pain App: Role of Disability, Negative Affect, and Pain App Engagement

Clinicians often ask people with chronic pain about their perceived benefit from interventions designed to improve their pain. The aim of this study is to identify factors that contribute to underestimating or overestimating perceived changes in daily pain intensity over a month of daily assessments. We examined data from individuals with chronic pain who provided at least 28 daily assessments using a pain app as secondary analyses. Participants provided baseline demographic information and completed questionnaires assessing pain, activity interference, mood, pain disability, and catastrophizing. Using the pain app, they entered daily ratings of pain (0 = none, 10 = worst pain possible) and impressions of perceived day-to-day change (0 = better, 5 = same, and 10 = worse). Two hundred fifty-two (N = 252) subjects with chronic pain met the inclusion criteria of completing at least 28 daily assessments. Those who underestimated their improvement tended to have higher pain intensity at baseline (P < .001), reported greater activity interference and disability (P < .001), and were prone to greater catastrophizing and anxiety and depression (P < .01). People who were more accurate in assessing their improvement engaged less with the app with fewer 2-way messages compared with those who either underestimated or overestimated their improvement and who had more 2-way messaging (P < .05). This longitudinal study suggests that those who report greater levels of catastrophizing and anxiety and depression are more likely to underestimate any improvements in their pain over time but seem to engage more with a pain app. Future research will help in our understanding of what magnitude of perceived change in pain ratings is clinically meaningful. PERSPECTIVE: Those who report greater levels of pain, disability, anxiety, depression, and catastrophizing are most prone to underestimate improvements of their pain over time.