Statistics commentary series: Commentary #5--can it work or does it work? The difference between efficacy and effectiveness trials

Geriatric pharmacotherapy: Appraising new drugs for neurologic disorders in older patients

New drug development for neurologic disorders has one of the highest attrition rates of all clinical drug developments. This is problematic when, with innovative technology available in so many aspects of life, modern societies expect to have effective treatments for neurodegenerative disorders and mental health conditions that provide something beyond simple symptomatic relief-the expectation is treatment that impacts and mitigates fundamental mechanisms that drive these disorders. The disease burden of neurologic disorders remains extremely high, whereas the proportion of patients receiving effective therapy is relatively low, demonstrating a sizeable unmet medical need. Whether for novel breakthrough therapies or for drugs considered successful, deciding on the basis of clinical trial data whether a particular treatment will be effective for a specific patient is always a leap of faith. However, expertise at reading trial results combined with knowledge of the patient and of his or her disease, together with an understanding of the effect of age on drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, the effect of age on the patient's condition, and the effect of age on the patient's life and outlook will ensure the landing is safe. The focus of this article is to provide such knowledge and thereby optimize this expertise.

A systematic review of community-based parenting interventions for adolescents with challenging behaviours

Parenting skills training is an established means of treating challenging behaviours among young children, but there has been limited research on its efficacy when used to treat challenging adolescent behaviour. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of community-based parenting interventions designed for families with adolescents, as judged in terms of increased knowledge and skills among parents, improvements in adolescent behaviour, and program feasibility within community settings. Results indicated that intervention group parents typically made greater gains than did control group parents on measures of good parenting, with positive flow-on effects to some aspects of challenging adolescent behaviours. Limited evidence suggests that group and individual intervention formats may be equally effective and that there is no advantage to the participation of the target adolescent in the intervention.