Body Mass Index as a Moderator of Treatment Response to Ketamine for Major Depressive Disorder

Does BMI matter when treating depression with esketamine? A retrospective analysis of real-world data

OBJECTIVE

Intranasal (IN) esketamine was approved as a therapy for treatment-resistant depression in March 2019. There continues to be interest in the field to better understand factors associated with response to treatment. The aim of the current study is to assess the association between BMI and response to esketamine.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients treated with intranasal esketamine at the Yale Interventional Psychiatry Service between January 2015 and May 2023. The primary outcome was the association between BMI (ctegorized as obese vs. non-obese) and response to treatment (≥50 % improvement) by Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Statistical models, including generalized linear mixed-effects models were employed.

RESULTS

A total of 190 patients met criteria for inclusion in the study, out of which 34.2 % were categorized as obese. Patients with obesity were significantly more likely to respond to esketamine treatment (RR = 1.63; p = 0.033) compared to non-obese patients. No linear association between BMI and treatment response was observed when BMI was treated as a continuous variable (RR = 1.02, p = 0.163).

CONCLUSION

Obesity appears to be associated with a higher response rate to intranasal esketamine treatment for depression. Although the underlying mechanisms of this association are still unknown, increased body fat may prolong the presence of lipid-soluble compounds such as ketamine/esketamine or their active metabolites.

Ketamine for unipolar depression: A systematic review of efficacy and safety

BackgroundUnipolar depression is a prevalent mental health disorder with persistent, treatment-resistant symptoms. Traditional antidepressants take weeks to show effects, underscoring the need for faster alternatives. Ketamine, originally an anaesthetic, has emerged as a rapid-acting antidepressant.ObjectiveThis systematic review evaluates ketamine's efficacy and safety in unipolar depression.MethodsA literature search (January 2000-May 2024) in PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library included RCTs, CCTs, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and observational studies on ketamine or esketamine in formally diagnosed individuals. Study characteristics, interventions, outcomes, and adverse events were analyzed, with quality and bias assessments.ResultsAcross 44 studies, ketamine significantly reduced depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation within hours, particularly in treatment-resistant cases, with effects lasting up to 1 week. Common side effects included transient dissociation, elevated blood pressure, nausea, and dizziness, while long-term safety remains uncertain.ConclusionsKetamine shows promise as a rapid antidepressant for treatment-resistant unipolar depression. However, long-term safety and optimal treatment protocols require further research. Careful clinical integration with monitoring is recommended.

Association of intravenous ketamine with change in depressive symptoms in a large integrated health care system

OBJECTIVE

Racemic ketamine intravenous treatments (KIT) are widely used in community clinics for treatment resistant depression (TRD), but we lack studies on symptom improvement during standardized delivery to clinically complex patients with TRD. We aimed to assess depression symptom change for patients receiving standardized KIT for TRD in a large integrated health care delivery system relative to similar patients receiving standard medication management.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study (n = 570), depression symptom change measured by the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) was examined in 143 adults with TRD receiving 0.5mg/kg 40-minute KIT infusion twice weekly for 3 weeks from 01/01/2018 to 12/31/2022 and 427 contemporaneous patients with medication management (MM) matched on variables including sex, race, age, and baseline depression symptom score. We excluded patients with major neurocognitive disorder, schizophrenia, or pregnancy.

RESULTS

The KIT group was more likely to achieve depression response (PHQ-9 reduction >50 %) compared to MM (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]= 1.72, 95 % CI = 1.17 - 2.53; P = 0.006). The KIT group (8 % vs 5 %) was more likely to achieve depression remission (i.e. PHQ-9 < 5); however, the adjusted risk with KIT vs MM was not statistically significant. Baseline depression symptoms were associated with higher depression symptoms at follow up, as were co-occurring anxiety and personality disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

KIT was significantly associated with depression response and symptom improvement compared to MM. Clinicians should consider comorbid personality disorder, anxiety disorders, and baseline depression severity as potential predictors of KIT and other treatment response in TRD.

The quest for optimal ketamine dosing formula in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence indicates that intravenous ketamine is effective in managing treatment-resistant unipolar and bipolar depression. Clinical studies highlight its favorable efficacy, safety, and tolerability profile within a dosage range of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg based on actual body weight. However, data on alternative dosage calculation methods, particularly in relation to body mass index (BMI) and therapeutic outcomes, remain limited.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of an open-label study aims to evaluate dose calculation strategies and their impact on treatment response among inpatients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) (n = 28). The study employed the Boer and Devine formulas to determine lean body mass (LBM) and ideal body weight (IBW), and the Mosteller formula to estimate body surface area (BSA). The calculated doses were then compared with the actual doses administered or converted to a dosage per square meter for both responders and non-responders.

RESULTS

Regardless of treatment response, defined as a reduction of 50% in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, the use of alternative ketamine dosing formulas resulted in underdosing compared to the standardized dose of 0.5 mg/kg. Only two participants received higher doses (102.7% and 113.0%) when the Devine formula was applied.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that ketamine dosing formulas, alternative to the standardized 0.5 mg/kg based on body weight, may lead to underdosing and potentially impact outcome interpretation. To enhance dosing accuracy, future studies should consider incorporating body impedance analysis and waist-to-hip ratio measurements, as this study did not account for body composition.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous ketamine treatment in Japanese patients with treatment-resistant depression: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

AIM

Although the antidepressant effect of ketamine on treatment-resistant depression (TRD) has been frequently reported in North American and European countries, evidence is scarce among the Asian population. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous ketamine in Japanese patients with TRD.

METHODS

In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, 34 Japanese patients with TRD were randomized to receive either intravenous ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) or placebo, administered over 40 min, twice a week, for 2 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included changes in other depressive symptomatology scores and remission, response, and partial response rates. We also examined the association between baseline clinical demographic characteristics and changes in the MADRS total score.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat analysis indicated no significant difference in the decrease in MADRS total score between the groups (-8.1 ± 10.0 vs -2.5 ± 5.2, t[32] = 2.02, P = 0.052), whereas per-protocol analysis showed a significant reduction in the ketamine group compared to the placebo group (-9.1 ± 10.2 vs -2.7 ± 5.3, t[29] = 2.22, P = 0.034). No significant group differences were observed in other outcomes. Adverse events were more frequent in the ketamine group than in the placebo group, and no serious adverse events were reported. A higher baseline MADRS total score and body mass index were associated with a greater reduction in the MADRS total score.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous ketamine outperformed placebo in Japanese patients with TRD who completed the study, suggesting that ketamine could alleviate depressive symptoms of TRD across diverse ethnic populations.

Personalized use of ketamine and esketamine for treatment-resistant depression

A large and disproportionate portion of the burden associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) is due to treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Intravenous (R,S)-ketamine (ketamine) and intranasal (S)-ketamine (esketamine) are rapid-acting antidepressants that can effectively treat TRD. However, there is variability in response to ketamine/esketamine, and a personalized approach to their use will increase success rates in the treatment of TRD. There is a growing literature on the precision use of ketamine in TRD, and the body of evidence on esketamine is still relatively small. The identification of reliable predictors of response to ketamine/esketamine that are easily translatable to clinical practice is urgently needed. Potential clinical predictors of a robust response to ketamine include a pre-treatment positive family history of alcohol use disorder and a pre-treatment positive history of clinically significant childhood trauma. Pre-treatment versus post-treatment increases in gamma power in frontoparietal brain regions, observed in electroencephalogram (EEG) studies, is a promising brain-based biomarker of response to ketamine, given its time of onset and general applicability. Blood-based biomarkers have shown limited usefulness, with small-effect increases in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) being the most consistent indicator of ketamine response. The severity of treatment-emergent dissociative symptoms is typically not associated with a response either to ketamine or esketamine. Future studies should ensure that biomarkers and clinical variables are obtained in a similar manner across studies to allow appropriate comparison across trials and to reduce the signal-to-noise ratio. Most predictors of response to ketamine/esketamine have modest effect sizes; therefore, the use of multivariate predictive models will be needed.

The differential orbitofrontal activity and connectivity between atypical and typical major depressive disorder

OBJECTIVE

Atypical major depressive disorder (MDD) is a distinct subtype of MDD, characterized by increased appetite and/or weight gain, excessive sleep, leaden paralysis, and interpersonal rejection sensitivity. Delineating different neural circuits associated with atypical and typical MDD would better inform clinical personalized interventions.

METHODS

Using resting-state fMRI, we investigated the voxel-level regional homogeneity (ReHo) and functional connectivity (FC) in 55 patients with atypical MDD, 51 patients with typical MDD, and 49 healthy controls (HCs). Support vector machine (SVM) approaches were applied to examine the validity of the findings in distinguishing the two types of MDD.

RESULTS

Compared to patients with typical MDD and HCs, patients with atypical MDD had increased ReHo values in the right lateral orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and enhanced FC between the right lateral OFC and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), and between the right striatum and left OFC. The ReHo in the right lateral OFC and the significant FCs found were significantly correlated with body mass index (BMI) in all groups of participants with MDD. The connectivity of the right striatum and left OFC was positively correlated with the retardation scores in the atypical MDD group. Using the ReHo of the right lateral OFC as a feature, we achieved 76.42% accuracy to differentiate atypical MDD from typical MDD.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that atypical MDD might be associated with altered OFC activity and connectivity. Furthermore, our findings highlight the key role of lateral OFC in atypical MDD, which may provide valuable information for future personalized interventions.

Pre-adolescence repeat exposure to sub-anesthetic doses of ketamine induces long-lasting behaviors and cognition impairment in male and female rat adults

In pre-adolescence, repeated anesthesia may be required for therapeutic interventions. Adult cognitive and neurobehavioral problems may result from preadolescent exposure to anesthetics. This study examined the long-term morphological and functional effects of repeated sub-anesthetic doses of ketamine exposure on male and female rat adults during pre-adolescence. Weaned 48 pre-adolescent rats from eight mothers and were randomly divided into four equal groups: control group and the ketamine group of males and females (20 mg/kg daily for 14 days); then animals received care for 20-30 days. Repeated exposure to sub-anesthetic doses of ketamine on cognitive functions was assayed using Social discrimination and novel object tests. Besides, an elevated plus maze and fear conditioning apparatus were utilized to determine exploratory and anxiety-like behavior in adults. Toluidine blue stain was used to evaluate the number of dead neurons in the hippocampus, and the effects of ketamine on synaptic plasticity were compared in the perforant pathway of the CA1 of the hippocampus. Our study indicates that repeated exposure to sub-anesthetic doses of ketamine during pre-adolescence can result in neurobehavioral impairment in male and female rat adulthood but does not affect anxiety-like behavior. We found a significant quantifiable increase in dark neurons. Recorded electrophysiologically, repeat sub-anesthetic doses of ketamine resulted in hampering long-term potentiation and pair pulse in male adult animals. Our results showed that repeated exposure to sub-anesthetic doses of ketamine during pre-adolescence can induce hippocampus and neuroplasticity changes later in adulthood. This study opens up a new line of inquiry into potential adverse outcomes of repeated anesthesia exposure in pre-adolescent rats.

Predicting non-response to ketamine for depression: An exploratory symptom-level analysis of real-world data among military veterans

Ketamine helps some patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD), but reliable methods for predicting which patients will, or will not, respond to treatment are lacking. Herein, we aim to inform prediction models of non-response to ketamine/esketamine in adults with TRD. This is a retrospective analysis of PHQ-9 item response data from 120 patients with TRD who received repeated doses of intravenous racemic ketamine or intranasal eskatamine in a real-world clinic. Regression models were fit to patients' symptom trajectories, showing that all symptoms improved on average, but depressed mood improved relatively faster than low energy. Principal component analysis revealed a first principal component (PC) representing overall treatment response, and a second PC that reflects variance across affective versus somatic symptom subdomains. We then trained logistic regression classifiers to predict overall response (improvement on PC1) better than chance using patients' baseline symptoms alone. Finally, by parametrically adjusting the classifier decision thresholds, we identified optimal models for predicting non-response with a negative predictive value of over 96 %, while retaining a specificity of 22 %. Thus, we could identify 22 % of patients who would not respond based purely on their baseline symptoms. This approach could inform rational treatment recommendations to avoid additional treatment failures.

Change in neurocognitive functioning in patients with treatment-resistant depression with serial intravenous ketamine infusions: The Bio-K multicenter trial

This nonrandomized, multicenter, open-label clinical trial explored the impact of intravenous (IV) ketamine on cognitive function in adults (n = 74) with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Patients received three IV ketamine infusions during the acute phase and, if remitted, four additional infusions in the continuation phase (Mayo site). Cognitive assessments using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) were conducted at baseline, end of the acute phase, and end of the continuation phase (Mayo site). Results showed a significant 53 % (39/74) remission rate in depression symptoms after the acute phase. In adjusted models, baseline language domain score was associated with a higher odd of remission (Odds Ratio, 1.09, 95 % CI = 1.03-1.17, p = 0.004) and greater improvement in MADRS at the end of the acute phase (β =-0.97; 95 % CI, -1.74 to -0.20; P = 0.02). The likelihood of remission was not significantly associated with baseline immediate or delayed memory, visuospatial/constructional, or attention scores. In the continuation phase, improvements in immediate and delayed memory and attention persisted, with additional gains in visuospatial and language domains. Limitations included an open-label design, potential practice effects, and ongoing psychotropic medication use. Overall, the study suggests cognitive improvement, not deterioration, associated with serial IV ketamine administrations for TRD. These findings encourage future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods to examine any potential for deleterious effect with recurrent ketamine use for TRD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03156504.

Clinical outcomes in the biomarkers of ketamine (Bio-K) study of open-label IV ketamine for refractory depression

OBJECTIVE

We conducted an open-label clinical trial ("Bio-K") using IV ketamine for treatment-resistant depression to identify biomarkers linked to remission. Here, we report the clinical efficacy and side effect outcomes of Bio-K.

METHODS

Across 4 US sites, 75 patients ages 18-65 with treatment-refractory unipolar or bipolar depression received 3 IV ketamine infusions over an 11-day period. Key exclusion criteria were psychotic symptoms, significant substance abuse, unstable medical conditions, and any use of cannabis. Pre-existing antidepressant medication was maintained. Primary outcome was remission as measured by Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), with secondary outcome of 50 % reduction in Beck Suicide Scale score. Safety monitoring and varying durations of infusions were also key parameters.

RESULTS

Using remission as MADRS score <10, after 3 infusions 52 % achieved remission, with 67 % achieving response. Of those achieving response after a single infusion, 66 % (22 of 33) reached remission after 3 infusions, while 40 % (16 of 40) non-responders after the first infusion went on to achieve remission after 3 infusions. Only 20 % of non-responders after 2 infusions achieved remission. Most (81 %) participants had significant suicidal ideation at baseline; of these, two-thirds (67 %) experienced at least a 50 % reduction in suicidality. Side effects were minimal. Uniquely, we had three different types of infusion categories, with individuals receiving: (1) slow (100-min) infusions only or (2) regular (40-min) infusions only or (3) a mix of infusion durations. These three infusion groups showed comparable safety and efficacy. Exploration of clinical factors revealed no link between BMI, age, or gender to remission.

CONCLUSIONS

The consistency of outcomes across 4 clinical sites and across multiple instruments, suggests high acute efficacy and safety of IV ketamine for serious depressive episodes. Duration of infusion did not alter outcomes. Meaningfully, 40 % of non-responders after a single infusion did reach remission subsequently, while only 20 % of non-responders after 2 infusions achieved remission, suggesting early response is suggestive for eventual remission. Our data on varying ketamine infusion duration adds novel insights into the clinical administration of this new treatment for refractory and severe patients. Our limitations included a lack of a control group, necessitating caution about conclusions of efficacy, balanced by the utility of reporting "real-world" outcomes across multiple clinical sites. We could also not separately analyze results for bipolar disorder due to small numbers. Together, the Bio-K clinical results are promising and provide significant sample sizes for forthcoming biological markers analyses.

Exploring Predictors of Ketamine Response in Adolescent Treatment-Resistant Depression

Objective: Ketamine has proved effective as a rapid-acting antidepressant agent, but treatment is not effective for everyone (approximately a quarter to a half of patients). Some adult studies have begun to investigate predictors of ketamine's antidepressant response, but no studies have examined this in adolescents with depression. Methods: We conducted a secondary data analysis of adolescents who participated in a randomized, single-dose, midazolam-controlled crossover trial of ketamine for adolescents with treatment-resistant depression. We examined the relationship between 19 exploratory demographic and clinical variables and depression symptom improvement (using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) at 1 and 7 days postinfusion. Results: Subjects who had fewer medication trials of both antidepressant medications and augmentation treatments were more likely to experience depression symptom improvement with ketamine. Subjects with shorter duration of their current depressive episode were more likely to experience depression symptom improvement with ketamine. Subjects currently being treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor medications, and not being treated with serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor medications, also experienced greater symptom improvement with ketamine. When receiving the midazolam control, less severe depressive symptoms, as measured by the Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS) (but not MADRS), and a comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnosis were associated with increased response. Conclusions: Findings should be viewed as preliminary and exploratory given the small sample size and multiple secondary analyses. Identifying meaningful predictors of ketamine response is important to inform future therapeutic use of this compound, however, considerably more research is warranted before such clinical guidance is established. The trial was registered in clinicaltrials.gov with the identifier NCT02579928.

Pharmacotherapy: Ketamine and Esketamine

Ketamine and esketamine have rapid-onset antidepressant effects and may be considered for the management of treatment-resistant depression. Intranasal esketamine has regulatory approval in the United States and European Union. Intravenous ketamine is often administered off-label as an antidepressant, though no standard operating procedures exist. Repeated administrations and the use of a concurrent standard antidepressant may maintain antidepressant effects of ketamine/esketamine. Possible adverse effects of ketamine and esketamine include psychiatric, cardiovascular, neurologic and genitourinary effects, and the potential for abuse. The long-term safety and efficacy of ketamine/esketamine as antidepressants require further study.

Biomarkers of ketamine's antidepressant effect: An umbrella review

Ketamine is a NMDA receptor antagonist that has a rapid acting antidepressant effect with high efficacy in treatment-resistant patients. Ketamine is a beneficial antidepressant for many individuals with depression, but not all of the patients respond, and some even exhibit symptom deterioration. The discovery of repeatable and mechanistically relevant biomarkers would address a major gap in treatment response prediction. Numerous potential peripheral biomarkers have been reported, but their current utility is unclear. We conducted an umbrella review to evaluate the biomarkers of ketamine's antidepressant effect in individuals with depression. PubMed and copus were searched using terms appropriate to each area of research, from their inception until July 2022. Five systematic reviews and meta analyses including 108 studies with 4912 participants were included. Blood-based and neuroimaging biomarkers were investigated. The results of this review indicate that ketamine can produce an anti-inflammatory effect and decrease at least one inflammatory marker following administration. Data from neuroimaging studies demonstrated that the cingulate cortex is the key locus of ketamine's action. The majority of the blood-based, neuroimaging, and neurophysiological investigations reviewed herein indicate ketamine induced normalization of major depressive disorder pathogenesis via synaptic plasticity and functional connectivity. Currently, no biomarker/biosignature is sufficiently validated for clinical utility, but several are promising. Now that ketamine is more widely available, biomarker discovery and replication should be attempted in larger, real-world populations.

Association between peripheral biomarkers and clinical response to IV ketamine for unipolar treatment-resistant depression: An open label study

BACKGROUND

Major Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide. A cohort of patients do not respond adequately to available antidepressants, leading to treatment-resistant depression (TRD). We evaluated the antidepressant efficacy of an acute intravenous ketamine treatment (0.5 mg/kg) for patients with unipolar TRD, and measured peripheral blood-based biomarkers associated with response to treatment.

METHODS

Fifteen adults diagnosed with TRD completed an open label study of ten infusions of subanesthetic ketamine over four weeks. Out of fifteen patients, blood was collected from eleven patients at three timepoints to analyze peripheral biomarkers in isolated plasma, including IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, BDNF, and irisin. Irisin analysis was completed using an ELISA assay, and the remaining biomarkers were analyzed together simultaneously using a multiplex immunoassay.

RESULTS

Repeated ketamine infusions produced a significant decrease in total average depressive symptoms (MADRS) at all timepoints. Improvements in depressive symptoms were significant at one week, and continued to significantly decrease until two weeks, where it was maintained. Ketamine was generally well tolerated, and we observed improvements in functional impairment, anhedonia, and psychiatric symptoms, with no increases in manic symptoms. Levels of BDNF throughout treatment inversely correlated to decreases in MADRS scores, and higher levels of baseline BDNF predicted mood responses at one- and four weeks.

LIMITATIONS

The study was observational and uncontrolled, with a sample size of 15. Outpatients remained on their course of medications, unless they were pharmacological agents that have previously been identified to block ketamine's effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketamine may be an efficacious and safe pharmacological option for the acute treatment of patients suffering from severe TRD. BDNF has the potential to function as a prognostic biomarker for predicting response to ketamine treatments.

Clinical predictors of depressive symptom remission and response after racemic ketamine and esketamine infusion in treatment-resistant depression

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability worldwide and most people do not achieve symptom remission. Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is characterized by the failure of at least one adequate trial of a major class of antidepressant, with adequate time and dosage. We aimed to identify clinical predictors of depressive symptom remission and response 24 h and 7 days after racemic ketamine and esketamine infusions.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial using ketamine and esketamine in TRD. Individuals diagnosed with MDD according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders version IV and fulfilling TRD criteria were recruited from March 2017 to June 2018. Participants received a single subanesthetic dose of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) or esketamine (0.25 mg/kg) for 40 min. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and symptom remission was defined as a MADRS score ≤7 and response defined as ≥50% reduction in depressive symptom severity, 24 h and 7 days after the infusion. Clinical variables were selected based on previous clinical trials. Stepwise backward logistic regression was used, considering a confidence level of 95%.

RESULTS

61 subjects were included: 39 (63.9%) were females with a mean age of 47.2 ± 14.9. Higher number of therapeutic failures (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.677; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47-0.97) and higher severity of illness (OR = 0.912; 95% CI: 0.83-0.99) were associated with fewer remissions of depressive symptoms 7 days after intervention, and with fewer response in 24 h (OR = 0.583; 95% CI: 0,40; 0,84 and OR = 0.909; 95% CI: 0,83; 0,99, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Number of treatment failures and severity of illness were predictors of fewer remissions and responses of depressive symptoms in this TRD population. Study of predictors of remission may contribute to better selection patients that may benefit from receiving ketamine.

Does body mass index predict response to intravenous ketamine treatment in adults with major depressive and bipolar disorder? Results from the Canadian Rapid Treatment Center of Excellence

BACKGROUND

Higher body mass index (BMI) has been found to predict greater antidepressant response to intravenous (IV) ketamine treatment. We evaluated the association between BMI and response to repeat-dose IV ketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD).

METHODS

Adults (N = 230) with TRD received four infusions of IV ketamine at a community-based clinic. Changes in symptoms of depression (ie, Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report 16; QIDS-SR16), suicidal ideation (SI; ie, QIDS-SR16 SI item), anxiety (ie, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale), anhedonic severity (ie, Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale), and functioning (ie, Sheehan Disability Scale) following infusions were evaluated. Participants were stratified by BMI as normal (18.0-24.9 kg/m2; n = 72), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2; n = 76), obese I (30-34.9 kg/m2; n = 47), or obese II (≥35.0 kg/m2; n = 35).

RESULTS

Similar antidepressant effects with repeat-dose ketamine were reported between BMI groups (P = .261). In addition, categorical partial response (P = .149), response (P = .526), and remission (P = .232) rates were similar between the four BMI groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings are limited by the observational, open-label design of this retrospective analysis. Pretreatment BMI did not predict response to IV ketamine, which was effective regardless of BMI.

Electroconvulsive therapy and adiposity-related parameters in treatment-resistant depressed patients

Obesity is often accompanied by major depressive disorder (MDD), and vice versa. Latest research findings suggest the body mass index (BMI) to play a role in antidepressant treatment response in general. Our study aims to examine whether adiposity-related parameters such as BMI, glucose homeostasis, or serum lipids are associated with remission to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). A pilot study (PS, n = 9) and a glucose study (GS, n = 29) were conducted. Blood was withdrawn directly before and 15 min (GS) as well as 1 h (PS) after the first ECT and directly before the last one (usually an ECT series comprised up to twelve sessions). BMI was associated with remission in the PS (remitters: M = 28, SD = 2.5; non-remitters: M = 22, SD = 2.08; t(7) = 3.325, p < 0.001, d = 0.24) but not in the GS or when pooled together. Glucose and insulin levels increased significantly after a single ECT session (GS: glucose: F (2,25.66) = 39.04, p < 0.001; insulin: PS: F (2,83) = 25.8, p < 0.001; GS: F (2,25.87) = 3.97, p < 0.05) but no chronic effect was detectable. Serum lipids were neither significantly altered after a single ECT session nor during a whole course of ECT. There was no difference between remitters and non-remitters in insulin, glucose, or serum lipid levels. Our study is lacking the differentiation between abdominal and peripheral fat distribution, and the sample size is small. Unexpectedly, BMI, glucose homeostasis, and lipid serum levels did not differ in patients remitting during ECT. In contrast to recently published studies, we cannot confirm the hypothesis that BMI may have an impact on ECT response.

Ketamine for treatment of mood disorders and suicidality: A narrative review of recent progress

BACKGROUND

Mood disorders are a leading cause of morbidity. Many patients experience treatment-resistant depression (TRD), and suicide rates are rising. Faster-acting and more effective antidepressant medications are needed. Four decades of research has transformed the use of ketamine from an anesthetic to an outpatient treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). Ketamine is a N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist and has been shown to rapidly improve mood symptoms and suicidal ideation by targeting the glutamate system directly.

METHODS

We used the PubMed database to identify relevant articles published until September 1, 2020. We focused on meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and original observational studies. We included relevant studies for depression, MDD, TRD, bipolar disorder, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), suicide, ketamine, and esketamine.

RESULTS

Both racemic ketamine and esketamine have been shown to rapidly treat depression and suicidality. There is evidence that ketamine can be helpful for anxiety and PTSD; however, more research is needed. Intranasal esketamine has been FDA approved to treat depression.

CONCLUSIONS

This narrative review describes the evolution of ketamine to treat mood disorders and suicidality. We provide the evidence supporting recent developments using esketamine as well as unresolved issues in the field, such as dosing and safety.

Age affects temporal response, but not durability, to serial ketamine infusions for treatment refractory depression

RATIONALE

Ketamine is a novel, rapid-acting antidepressant for treatment refractory depression (TRD); however, clinical durability is poor and treatment response trajectories vary. Little is known about which patient characteristics predict faster or more durable ketamine responses. Ketamine's antidepressant mechanism may involve modulation of glutamatergic signaling and long-term potentiation (LTP); these neuroplasticity pathways are also attenuated with older age.

OBJECTIVE

A retrospective analysis examining the impact of patient age on the speed and durability of ketamine's antidepressant effects in 49 veterans receiving serial intravenous ketamine infusions for TRD.

METHOD

The relationship between age and percent change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) scores was compared across six serial ketamine infusions (twice-weekly for 3 weeks) using a linear-mixed model.

RESULTS

A significant Age-X-Infusion number interaction (F = 3.01, p = .0274) indicated that the relationship between age and treatment response depended on infusion number. Follow-up tests showed that younger age significantly predicted greater clinical improvement at infusion #4 (t = 3.02, p = .004); this relationship was attenuated at infusion #5 (t = 1.95, p = .057) and was absent at infusion #6. Age was not a significant predictor of treatment durability, defined as percent change in BDI-II 3 weeks following infusion #6.

CONCLUSIONS

These data preliminarily suggest that younger age is associated with a faster response over six serial ketamine infusions; by infusion #6 and subsequent weeks of clinical follow-up, age no longer predicts ketamine's antidepressant activity. Age may mediate the speed but not the durability or total efficacy of ketamine treatment, suggesting that dissociable mechanisms may underlie differing aspects of ketamine's antidepressant activity.

Metabolic variables associated with response to cognitive behavioural therapy for depression in females: A Canadian biomarker integration network for depression (CAN-BIND) study

INTRODUCTION

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is an established first-line treatment for depression; however, it remains unclear which factors predict a positive outcome with this approach. Prior work suggests that co-morbid obesity predicts a poorer response to antidepressant medication. The current study examined whether there is an association between weight parameters and improvement of depressive symptoms with CBT.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of data from the "Clinical and Biological Markers of Response to Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression - 6" (CANBIND-6; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02883257) study. Adult participants (n = 41) with a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) or Persistent Depressive Disorder (PDD) were recruited from an outpatient tertiary psychiatric centre in Canada. Participants completed 20 individual sessions of CBT over 16 weeks. The primary measure for treatment outcome was the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at week 16.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven participants completed assessments pre and post CBT. Baseline weight parameters were not correlated with treatment response to CBT in the entire group. There was a significant sex*waist circumference (WC) (B:-1.34; p = 0.004) and sex*body mass index (BMI) interaction (B:-2.03; p:0.009). In female participants, baseline waist circumference, but not BMI, significantly predicted week 16 MADRS after controlling for age and baseline MADRS (B:0.422 p:0.049).

LIMITATIONS

The major limitation of our preliminary finding is the small sample size.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary findings suggest that higher waist circumference may be associated with a better treatment response to CBT for depression in females. This result could be of clinical relevance and warrants further investigation in larger and independent samples.

Synthesizing the Evidence for Ketamine and Esketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression: An International Expert Opinion on the Available Evidence and Implementation

Replicated international studies have underscored the human and societal costs associated with major depressive disorder. Despite the proven efficacy of monoamine-based antidepressants in major depression, the majority of treated individuals fail to achieve full syndromal and functional recovery with the index and subsequent pharmacological treatments. Ketamine and esketamine represent pharmacologically novel treatment avenues for adults with treatment-resistant depression. In addition to providing hope to affected persons, these agents represent the first non-monoaminergic agents with proven rapid-onset efficacy in major depressive disorder. Nevertheless, concerns remain about the safety and tolerability of ketamine and esketamine in mood disorders. Moreover, there is uncertainty about the appropriate position of these agents in treatment algorithms, their comparative effectiveness, and the appropriate setting, infrastructure, and personnel required for their competent and safe implementation. In this article, an international group of mood disorder experts provides a synthesis of the literature with respect to the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ketamine and esketamine in adults with treatment-resistant depression. The authors also provide guidance for the implementation of these agents in clinical practice, with particular attention to practice parameters at point of care. Areas of consensus and future research vistas are discussed.