Food and Drug Administration-Approved Treatments for Acute Bipolar Depression: What We Have and What We Need

Symptom modulation and tolerability of intravenous ketamine in treatment-resistant bipolar depression: A retrospective study

Ketamine's use in treating bipolar depression must account for risks, such as switching to manic episodes or worsening symptoms. This study examines ketamine's impact on depressive symptoms, focusing on 'inner tension,' 'sleep reduction,' and 'suicidal ideation' over four weeks in treatment-resistant bipolar disorder (TR-BD) patients. Fifty-nine patients with TR-BD were treated consecutively with ketamine (avg dose 0.8 mg/kg). Results showed significant reductions in MADRS scores without manic switches. Ketamine was well-tolerated despite polypharmacy. Antidepressant treatment of bipolar depression requires great caution because of the risk of switching to manic-mixed episodes and worsening of symptoms such as internal tension, psychomotor agitation, and suicide risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency and tolerability of intravenous ketamine in patients with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder and a current treatment-resistant depressive episode (TR-BD), with the aim of examining: 1) the risk of manic switches; 2) the effect on global depressive symptoms as measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS); and 3) the specific effects on the MADRS items of internal tension, sleep disturbance, and suicidal ideation over a four-week period. Fiftynine patients with TR-BD (51.4 ± 12.3 years; 30 % female) treated consecutively with intravenous ketamine (mean dose 0.8 mg/kg) were included in this study. No ketamine-treated patient experienced a manic switch during the observation period. A statistically significant decrease (i.e., improvement) in MADRS global score and scores on the Internal Tension, Reduced Sleep, and Suicidal Ideation items was observed from the second week, with no evidence of worsening of the above symptoms. Patient-reported adverse events were generally mild to moderate.

Effect analysis of repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with fluoxetine in the treatment of first-episode adolescent depression

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with fluoxetine in enhancing the early antidepressant response in first-episode adolescent depression cases, providing insights for patient diagnosis and treatment.

Methods

One hundred and thirty-five adolescents experiencing their first depressive episode were randomly assigned to either a sham group treated with fluoxetine or to low or high repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) groups receiving both rTMS and fluoxetine. Therapeutic effects were assessed by comparing changes in Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) scores, cognitive function scores from the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), and Clinical Global Impression-improvement (CGI-I) scores, along with recording adverse reactions.

Results

The total effectiveness rate in the rTMS groups (Low, 95.56%; High, 97.78%) was significantly higher than in the Sham rTMS group (80%) (F = 11.15, P<0.0001). Post-treatment, not only the Low but also the High rTMS group exhibited more significant reductions in HAMD-17 (Low, 21.05; High, 21.45) and CGI-I scores (Low, 3.44; High, 3.60) compared to the Sham rTMS group (HAMD-17, 16.05; CGI-I, 2.57) (two weeks: F = 7.889, P = 0.0006; four weeks: F = 15.900, P<0.0001). Additionally, the two rTMS groups exhibited fewer erroneous responses and persistent errors in the WCST and completed more WCST categorizations than the Sham rTMS group. There was no significant difference in adverse reaction rates between the groups (F=4.421, P=0.0794).

Conclusions

The combination of fluoxetine with rTMS demonstrates enhanced therapeutic effectiveness in treating adolescent depression, effectively controlling disease progression, reducing depressive symptoms, and improving cognitive function, making it a valuable clinical approach.

Selective Orexin Receptor Antagonists as Novel Augmentation Treatments for Major Depressive Disorder: Evidence for Safety and Efficacy From a Phase 2B Study of Seltorexant

There is a large unmet need for effective treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), an often chronic/recurrent disorder that affects 1 in 5 adults during their lifetime in the United States. Clinicians and individuals with MDD often rely on augmentation approaches given the low rate of remission with the initial antidepressant treatment. Therefore, the report by Savitz and colleagues on the safety and efficacy of seltorexant is of great interest because it provides initial evidence for the antidepressant potential of drugs targeting orexin neurotransmission. Findings of this study suggest that seltorexant 20 mg is more effective than placebo, especially in individuals with moderate or insomnia symptoms at baseline. Given that insomnia is a common feature of depression, orexin 2 receptor antagonists may serve as important new treatment alternatives for people with MDD.

Cariprazine and akathisia, restlessness, and extrapyramidal symptoms in patients with bipolar depression

BACKGROUND

Akathisia is a neuropsychiatric syndrome that is commonly related to the use of dopamine receptor antagonists/partial agonists. The characteristics of cariprazine-related akathisia, restlessness, and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) were investigated in patients with bipolar I depression.

METHODS

Akathisia-related data from 3 fixed-dose clinical studies of cariprazine 1.5 mg/d and 3 mg/d in bipolar depression were evaluated in pooled post hoc analyses. Outcomes related to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included incidence, time to onset, time to resolution, severity, discontinuations, and rescue medication use.

RESULTS

The incidence of akathisia was 7.6% for overall cariprazine (1.5 mg/d=5.5%; 3 mg/d=9.6%) and 2.1% for placebo; acute EPS occurred in 4.5% of cariprazine-treated (1.5 mg/d=3.8%; 3 mg/d=5.1%) and 2.1% of placebo-treated patients. Findings were similar for restlessness. Most TEAEs were mild/moderate (>95%), occurred during the first 3 weeks of cariprazine initiation or dose increase, and resulted in few discontinuations (<3%); median time to resolution of an akathisia or EPS TEAE after the last dose of cariprazine was ~1 week. Rescue medication was used by <3% of patients to manage akathisia/EPS events.

LIMITATIONS

Post hoc analyses; no active comparator.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with bipolar depression, the incidence of cariprazine-related akathisia was higher than acute EPS or restlessness, with lower cariprazine doses associated with lower incidences of events. Akathisia and EPS TEAEs occurred early in treatment and were mild/moderate in severity. Few patients with akathisia or acute EPS discontinued treatment. Cariprazine-related akathisia and EPS can be minimized with conservative dosing and titration strategies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01396447, NCT02670538, NCT02670551.

Binge Eating Disorder: A Psychiatrist's Commentary on Clinical Considerations

PURPOSE

Of the 3 major eating disorders, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder (BED), BED is the most common and exists in the practices of most primary care and psychiatric clinicians. However, BED often goes unrecognized and thus untreated.

METHODS

Reviewed in this commentary are the basic elements in the diagnosis of BED, demographic and clinical characteristics, screening options, the importance of comorbidities, pathophysiology, and available treatments.

FINDINGS

Psychological treatments, including cognitive-behavioral therapy, interpersonal therapy, and behavioral weight loss, have been recommended as first-line options and are supported by several different meta-analytic reviews. Lisdexamfetamine is currently the only medication approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of BED. Effect sizes for lisdexamfetamine versus placebo for response, remission, and avoidance of relapse in BED are robust, but its use may be limited by tolerability. This is also the case for topiramate, an anticonvulsant that has been used "off-label" to treat BED.

IMPLICATIONS

Additional medication choices approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of BED are needed. Moving forward, opportunities to leverage modern technology to broaden access to treatment are highly desirable.