Forensic Mental Health Nurses' Experiences of Clinical Supervision

Characteristics of Clinical Supervision for Mental Health Nurses: A Survey Study Using the MCSS-26

AIM(S)

To describe the characteristics and perceived effectiveness of clinical supervision mental health nurses are receiving and further explore any statistical correlations between the perceived effectiveness and satisfaction with the supervisee, supervisor and supervision characteristics.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

An online survey was distributed to nurses working in public mental health services in Victoria, Australia. A universal recruitment approach was used, and 422 nurses participated in the survey. Of these, 220 nurses who are participating in clinical supervision were eligible for the MCSS-26 survey.

DATA SOURCE

A licensed MCSS-26 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Mental health nurses in the studied environment were likely to receive individual supervision from a senior mental health nurse, with the most common frequency being monthly for 31-60 min, and half receiving it within their workplace location. Half of the participants chose their own supervisor. Our findings indicate that nurses who engage in clinical supervision outside of their immediate workplace and receive individual supervision from a nurse of the same grade perceive higher effectiveness. We also found that clinical nurses may find it most difficult to engage in effective clinical supervision due to time constraints.

CONCLUSION

This study uniquely contributes to the current clinical supervision literature by reporting the uptake and detailed characteristics of supervision, a facet often overlooked in existing research.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

This study reported the characteristics of the supervision, supervisor and the supervisee that are associated with the effective clinical supervision. These insights can lead to tailored implementation strategies that consider the specific roles and settings of nurses.

REPORTING METHOD

CROSS (Sharma et al. 2021).

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Clinical supervision experience of nurses in or transitioning to advanced practice: A systematic review

AIMS

To systematically explore the clinical supervision (CS) experience for nurses transitioning to advanced practice.

DESIGN

A qualitative systematic review using Joanna Briggs Institute meta-aggregation following an a priori protocol published on PROSPERO (CRD42023426658).

DATA SOURCES

Qualitative studies obtained from Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Emcare and ERIC databases and ProQuest dissertations and theses for peer-reviewed, published and unpublished studies from inception to July 2023.

REVIEW METHODS

Two authors conducted data screening and abstraction. Quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool and reporting followed the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research checklist for systematic reviews.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies contributed to five synthesized findings: CS that is beneficial requires structure and commitment, trusting relationships are foundational for learning, lifting burdens and preventing burnout, learning through reflection, critical thinking and feedback and barriers to CS.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides a meaningful exploration of CS to support nurses transitioning to advanced practice. Well-structured supervision offers a safe space to share work-related concerns and develop an advanced practitioner identity. Sharing experiences helps alleviate work-related burdens and reduce professional isolation and burnout.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION

Peer-support networks are vital for successful transition to advanced practice.

IMPACT

This review highlighted the impact of effective supervisory relationships in forming professional identity and possible links with nursing retention.

PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No direct patient contributions are included as it forms part of a research degree.

Factors that influence the clinical supervision implementation for nurses: A scoping review

AIMS

The aim of this review is to identify and map the evidence available on the factors that influence the implementation of clinical supervision for nurses.

DESIGN

The scoping review was conducted and reported following the JBI methodology for scoping reviews.

DATA SOURCES

Searches were conducted on MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases on 28 March 2023.

REVIEW METHODS

A total of 1398 studies were imported into Covidence for screening. Researchers screened the papers according to the inclusion criteria. Empirical studies in English focusing on the implementation of clinical supervision for nurses were included, without year restrictions. Data from 16 studies were extracted and organized according to the constructs within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains: intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of individuals, and process.

RESULTS

When compared with the CFIR constructs, it was found that the influence of the outer setting on implementation was less explored in the literature. Most of the reviewed data highlighted recurring factors, particularly logistical challenges of nursing work such as shift work and lack of control over work time. Organizational culture and managerial support were also identified as significant factors in the implementation. Another significant challenge in implementation was the variety in clinical supervision's design, purpose, and application, despite sharing the same label, leading to questions about whether studies are implementing the same practice.

CONCLUSION

Policy documents should clearly define both the design and purpose of clinical supervision, beyond just its conceptual definition. Greater emphasis on equitable implementation of clinical supervision is necessary to prevent perpetuating existing inequalities. We conclude that implementation of such complex interventions is not linear, and the implementation strategies need to align with expected implementation challenges.

IMPACT

The advantage of using the implementation framework lies not only in observing what exists as a form of evidence but also in identifying what is underdeveloped. Healthcare services and policy developers can utilize our review to recognize and address potential challenges in introducing, modifying, scaling up, or sustaining their clinical supervision implementation.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

[It] Does Harden a Person Working in Such a Stressful Environment: U.S. Correctional Nurses Share Spillover Effects of Their Work

BACKGROUND

The United States makes up 4.4% of the world's population but nearly a quarter of the world's incarcerated population. Despite caring for nearly 2 million incarcerated persons and managing their unique needs, little is known about how this work spills over and affects the nurses who work in correctional settings.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This descriptive study aimed to (a) examine write-in answers regarding correctional nurse perceptions of how their work impacts their health and their home lives and (b) explore correctional nurse responses for how to improve the work environment to better support their well-being.

METHOD

The researchers compiled and analyzed qualitative data from a cross-sectional study where U.S. correctional nurses ( N = 270) completed an online survey. Manifest content analysis was used to analyze optional write-in data.

RESULTS

Approximately 41% ( n = 111) of participants answered qualitative questions. Participants were primarily White (77.3%) and non-Hispanic or Latino (88.7%), working in prisons (65.8%), and employed by the state (63.8%) as registered nurses (70%). Three major themes emerged: (a) "personal impact": increased stress and burnout, overwhelming work hours, and emotional and physical effects; (b) "social relationships and family impacts": withdrawn, strained homelife, and uncertainty; and (c) "need for change": improved staffing, reduced mandatory overtime, and better support from management.

CONCLUSIONS

Correctional organizations may consider ways to support the well-being of their nurses through adequate staffing, flexible scheduling, decreased mandatory overtime, and hiring effective nurse managers as key members of the correctional team.

The experience of nurses moving into forensic mental health employment: A qualitative study

While forensic mental health has seen considerable growth over the last two decades, little is known about the experience of registered nurses working in these environments. This study used a qualitative descriptive approach and interviewed 11 registered nurses to explore the interpersonal experiences of transition into a forensic mental health hospital. The data revealed three themes. 'Observing what's safe' examined nurses' ability to maintain safety in the context of inconsistent practices among colleagues. 'Navigating cliques and divisions' focused on nurses' sense of belonging and adapting to professional and personal groups. Finally, 'gaining management support' reflected nurses' experiences of engagement with management. This study provides new insight into nurses' experience of adapting to employment in forensic mental health settings and highlights the importance of positive support strategies for workplace transition.