1
|
Abstract
Neurogenic bowel dysfunction ranks as one of the most frequent problems experienced by people with multiple sclerosis (MS); it is one of the first symptoms to appear at disease onset and continues throughout the course of the disease. This review, based on literature searches of Medline and PubMed, examines bowel dysfunction causes and cofactors (ie, impaired mobility, fatigue, depression and anxiety, childbirth) that occur over the course of the disease. Coverage includes management of bowel dysfunction with noninvasive methods, including diet and fluid intake, together with pharmacologic treatments for constipation and fecal incontinence as well as more advanced treatments (ie, biofeedback, abdominal massage, transanal irrigation, posterior tibial nerve stimulation), caregiver-provided treatments and extended care facilities. Bowel dysfunction problems and related cofactors impact quality of life throughout the MS disease course, requiring appropriate interventions to improve and/or maintain the quality of life of the individual with MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elsie E Gulick
- School of Nursing, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA (EEG)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fitzgerald KC, Sand IK, Senders A, Spain R, Giesser B, Sullivan P, Baer DJ, LaRocca N, Zackowski K, Mowry EM. Conducting dietary intervention trials in people with multiple sclerosis: Lessons learned and a path forward. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2019; 37:101478. [PMID: 31704546 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Disease course in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) is heterogeneous. The impact of dietary and nutritional factors on MS prognosis is of interest to both patients and clinicians; differences in diet are hypothesized to contribute to disease evolution over time. However, studying diet, especially in people with MS, introduces methodologic complexity that should be recognized. In this review, we focus on methodological aspects relevant to the conduct of dietary interventions in people with MS, given our experience in leading such studies and the challenges we encountered in the realization of this work. We summarize key aspects of study design and important considerations, regardless of the specifics of the actual study (e.g. the particular diet of interest, target MS population, etc.). We discuss strategies for the design of the intervention as well as the selection of appropriate study endpoints. Finally, we provide an overview of strategies to improve the rigor of conducting dietary studies in people with MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn C Fitzgerald
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600N Wolfe St, Pathology 627, Baltimore MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Ilana Katz Sand
- Corrine Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA.
| | - Angela Senders
- School of Research and Graduate Studies, National University of Natural Medicine, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Rebecca Spain
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Barbara Giesser
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Patrick Sullivan
- Food Components and Health Laboratory, Research United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, USA.
| | - David J Baer
- Food Components and Health Laboratory, Research United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, USA.
| | | | | | - Ellen M Mowry
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600N Wolfe St, Pathology 627, Baltimore MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Das R, Wille L, Zhang L, Chen C, Winchester W, Selimkhanov J, Wykosky J, Apgar JF, Burke JM, Rogge M, Hua F, Vakilynejad M. A quantitative systems pharmacology model of colonic motility with applications in drug development. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 2019; 46:485-498. [DOI: 10.1007/s10928-019-09651-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
4
|
Newsome SD, Aliotta PJ, Bainbridge J, Bennett SE, Cutter G, Fenton K, Lublin F, Northrop D, Rintell D, Walker BD, Weigel M, Zackowski K, Jones DE. A Framework of Care in Multiple Sclerosis, Part 2: Symptomatic Care and Beyond. Int J MS Care 2017; 19:42-56. [PMID: 28243186 PMCID: PMC5315323 DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2016-062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
The Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (CMSC) convened a Framework Taskforce composed of a multidisciplinary group of clinicians and researchers to examine and evaluate the current models of care in multiple sclerosis (MS). The methodology of this project included analysis of a needs assessment survey and an extensive literature review. The outcome of this work is a two-part continuing education series of articles. Part 1, published previously, covered the updated disease phenotypes of MS along with recommendations for the use of disease-modifying therapies. Part 2, presented herein, reviews the variety of symptoms and potential complications of MS. Mobility impairment, spasticity, pain, fatigue, bladder/bowel/sexual dysfunction, cognitive dysfunction, and neuropsychiatric issues are examined, and both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions are described. Because bladder and bowel symptoms substantially affect health-related quality of life, detailed information about elimination dysfunction is provided. In addition, a detailed discussion about mental health and cognitive dysfunction in people with MS is presented. Part 2 concludes with a focus on the role of rehabilitation in MS. The goal of this work is to facilitate the highest levels of independence or interdependence, function, and quality of life for people with MS.
Collapse
|
5
|
Nusrat S, Gulick E, Levinthal D, Bielefeldt K. Anorectal dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. ISRN NEUROLOGY 2012; 2012:376023. [PMID: 22900202 PMCID: PMC3414061 DOI: 10.5402/2012/376023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2012] [Accepted: 05/28/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Constipation and fecal incontinence are common in patients with neuromuscular diseases. Despite their high prevalence and potential impact on overall quality of life, few studies have addressed anorectal dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The goal of this paper is to define the prevalence, pathophysiology, impact, and potential treatment of constipation and incontinence in MS patients. Methods. The PubMed database was searched for English language publications between January 1973 and December 2011. Articles were reviewed to assess the definition of the study population, duration, type and severity of MS, sex distribution, prevalence, impact, results of physiologic testing, and treatments. Results. The reported prevalence of constipation and fecal incontinence ranged around 40%. Anorectal dysfunction significantly affected patients with nearly 1 in 6 patients limiting social activities or even quitting work due to symptoms. Caregivers listed toileting as a common and significant burden. The only randomized controlled trial showed a marginal improvement of constipation with abdominal massage. All other reports lacked control interventions and only demonstrated improvement in individuals with milder symptoms. Conclusion. Anorectal dysfunction is a common manifestation in MS that significantly affects quality of life. Therapies are at best moderately effective and often cumbersome, highlighting the need for simple and more helpful interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanober Nusrat
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15217, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bowel management related quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis: Psychometric evaluation of the QoL-BM measure. Int J Nurs Stud 2011; 48:1066-70. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2010] [Revised: 01/29/2011] [Accepted: 02/01/2011] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
7
|
Gulick EE, Namey M, Halper J. Monitoring my multiple sclerosis: a patient-administered health-assessment scale. Int J MS Care 2011; 13:137-45. [PMID: 24453717 PMCID: PMC3882968 DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073-13.3.137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Optimal health of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) can be promoted by patients' sharing of health information gained through periodic self-monitoring with their health-care providers. The purpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable self-administered scale to obtain information about MS patients' health status and the impact of the disease on their daily lives. We named this scale "Monitoring My Multiple Sclerosis" (MMMS). A cross-sectional survey was conducted of 171 MS patients who completed the MMMS and Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) scales and provided information on their MS disease classification and demographic characteristics. Data analysis included several parametric procedures. Factor analysis of the 26-item MMMS resulted in four factors with satisfactory α reliability coefficients for the total scale (0.90) and factored subscales: Physical (0.85), Relationships (0.80), Energy (0.70), and Cognitive/Mental (0.67). Analysis of variance demonstrated that the total scale and the Physical subscale, but not the Relationships subscale, showed significantly worse functioning for patients with either moderate or severe disability as measured by the PDDS than for patients with mild disability (P < .001). The Cognitive/Mental subscale showed significantly worse functioning for patients with moderate disability than for patients with mild disability (P < .05). However, the Energy subscale showed significantly worse functioning among moderately disabled patients than among severely disabled patients (P < .01). Independent t tests demonstrated that patients classified as having secondary progressive multiple sclerosis had significantly worse scores on the total MMMS (P < .05) and the Physical subscale (P < .001) than those classified as having relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. The MMMS demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity and is recommended for use by MS patients and their health-care providers as a mechanism to promote the sharing of health information, to the benefit of both patients and providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elsie E Gulick
- College of Nursing, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA (EEG); the Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA (MN); and the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers and International Organization of Multiple Sclerosis Nurses, Hackensack, NJ, USA (JH)
| | - Marie Namey
- College of Nursing, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA (EEG); the Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA (MN); and the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers and International Organization of Multiple Sclerosis Nurses, Hackensack, NJ, USA (JH)
| | - June Halper
- College of Nursing, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA (EEG); the Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA (MN); and the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers and International Organization of Multiple Sclerosis Nurses, Hackensack, NJ, USA (JH)
| |
Collapse
|