Racial disparities in surgical outcomes after mastectomy in 223 000 female breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study

Safety of Combined Versus Isolated Cosmetic Breast Surgery and Abdominoplasty: Insights from a Multi-institutional Database

INTRODUCTION

Abdominoplasty and breast surgery are popular cosmetic procedures, often performed as stand-alone or combined procedures. However, the safety of combining these surgeries remains poorly understood.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the ACS-NSQIP database spanning 2008-2021, focusing on patients who underwent isolated cosmetic breast surgery, isolated cosmetic abdominoplasty, or the combination of both. We evaluated four primary outcomes: general complications (reoperation, readmission, mortality), surgical complications, medical complications, and overall complications (general + surgical + medical). Further analysis considered the specific type of cosmetic breast surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 7865 female patients were identified, of whom 20.5% underwent isolated abdominoplasty, 65.3% cosmetic breast surgery, and 14.2% combined abdominoplasty with concurrent cosmetic breast surgery. Combined surgery was associated with a significantly higher risk of reoperations (OR 2.07; p = 0.04) compared to abdominoplasty alone. However, there was no significant difference in overall complications (OR 1.17; p = 0.40), surgical complications (OR 0.72; p = 0.26), or medical complications (OR 0.97; p = 0.91) between these two groups. Comparing combined to isolated cosmetic breast surgery, there was a higher risk of overall complications (OR 1.70; p = 0.04) and medical complications (OR 5.30; p < 0.0001) but no significant difference in general complications (OR 1.40; p = 0.33) or surgical complications (OR 0.85; p = 0.73).

CONCLUSION

Combining breast surgery with abdominoplasty increases the risk of reoperations but does not elevate the risk of surgical or medical complications. However, patients seeking combined surgeries are more likely to experience adverse events than those seeking isolated cosmetic breast surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Preventive Paradox? Postoperative Outcomes After Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) with direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction is becoming increasingly important in breast cancer prevention. While the oncological benefits of RRM-DTI are well documented, there is a paucity of studies investigating its perioperative safety.

METHODS

The ACS-NSQIP database (2008-2022) was queried to identify all patients who underwent RRM-DTI. Outcomes of interest included 30-day occurrence of reoperation, readmission, and surgical and medical complications. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 1019 patients were included, with a mean age and BMI of 42.8 ± 10.9 years and 25.7 ± 5.8 kg/m², respectively. Complications occurred in 142 (14.0%) cases, with 103 (10.1%) reoperations and 51 (5.0%) readmissions. 62 (6.3%) surgical complications were recorded, the majority of which were superficial incisional infection (n = 19; 1.9%) and organ space infections (n = 19; 1.9%). Medical complications were rare (n = 13; 1.3%). Multivariable analyses revealed that higher BMI was significantly associated with any (OR:1.06, P < .0001), surgical (OR:1.08, P < .0001), and medical complications (OR:1.08, P = .04). Patients with bleeding disorders were at a significantly higher risk of any complications (OR:5.5, P = .03), while outpatient setting (OR:1.9, P = .03) and corticosteroid use (OR:6.6, P = .01) were identified as independent predictors of surgical complications.

CONCLUSION

The risk of adverse events following RRM-DTI should not be underestimated, with a 30-day complication rate of 14%. Higher BMI, bleeding disorders, outpatient setting, and corticosteroid use were identified as risk factors. These findings underscore the need for thorough preoperative risk stratification, patient counseling, and health optimization to optimize surgical outcomes.

Disparities in Breast Cancer Treatment and Reconstruction Among Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Women: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NHPI) women experience significant disparities in breast cancer treatment and outcomes, including lower rates of postmastectomy reconstruction, higher refusal rates of radiation therapy, and delays in surgical care. These disparities contribute to poorer survival and increased complications compared to other racial/ethnic groups. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to quantify these disparities and assess their impact on breast cancer outcomes in NHPI women.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases was conducted to identify studies reporting on breast cancer surgery, reconstruction, radiation therapy refusal, and surgical delays for NHPI women. Thirteen studies, encompassing a total of 5 546 918 patients, were included, and meta-analyses were performed to pool odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) for key outcomes using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics. Thematic analysis was also conducted to explore cultural and structural factors influencing treatment disparities.

RESULTS

NHPI women had significantly lower odds of receiving postmastectomy reconstruction compared to non-Hispanic White women (pooled OR = 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.96-2.08, I² = 99%). Delays in surgical care were more frequent, with NHPI women being 4.51 times more likely to experience delays (OR = 4.51, 95% CI: 3.82-5.32, I² = 99%). Radiation therapy refusal was notably higher, with a pooled hazard ratio of 3.28 (95% CI: 2.99-3.58, I² = 77%) indicating that NHPI women who refused radiation therapy had more than three times the risk of mortality compared to those who accepted it. Thematic analysis revealed that geographic isolation, limited access to specialized care, and cultural perceptions surrounding cancer treatments, including fear of radiation due to historical trauma, contributed significantly to treatment disparities.

CONCLUSIONS

Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander women face considerable barriers to receiving equitable breast cancer treatment and reconstruction, resulting in worse outcomes compared to other racial/ethnic groups. Efforts to address these disparities must focus on improving access to care, reducing treatment delays, and implementing culturally sensitive interventions. Targeted policies and healthcare system improvements, especially in geographically isolated areas, are critical to improving survival and treatment outcomes for NHPI women.

Racial Disparities in 30 Day Outcomes Following Total Laryngectomy

BACKGROUND

Despite the growing literature on racial disparities in the utilization of total laryngectomy (TL), and survival following the treatment of laryngeal cancers, there is a paucity of research in TL cohorts evaluating disparities in the immediate postoperative setting.

METHODS

In a national multi-institutional cohort, TL cases between 2010 and 2021 were identified using relevant Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Logistic regression analyses investigated the association between race/ethnicity and adverse outcomes within 30 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

This study consisted of 1493 patients who underwent TL with or without radical neck dissection. Black patients underwent free flap and pedicled flap reconstruction more frequently than their counterparts (P = .023) and exhibited a 1.532 times higher odds of surgical complications (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

There are increased rates of surgical complications in Black patients undergoing TL. Given the limited oncologic and socioeconomic variables available through National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, future study of disparate postoperative outcomes in this population is recommended.

Gynecomastia Surgery in 4996 Male Patients Over 14 Years: A Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Trends, Predictive Risk Factors, and Short-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The high prevalence of benign male breast tissue enlargement (gynecomastia) has resulted in a marked increase of gynecomastia cases. While about one third of male adults experience some form of gynecomastia, gynecomastia surgery (GS) outcome research is limited to small study populations and single-center/-surgeon databases. In this study, we aimed to access the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database to identify preoperative risk factors for complications and investigate postoperative outcomes of GS.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we queried the ACS-NSQIP database from 2008 to 2021 to identify male adult patients who underwent GS. Postoperative outcomes involved the occurrence of any, surgical and medical complications, as well as reoperation, readmission, and mortality within a 30-day postoperative time period. Univariable and multivariable assessment were performed to identify risk factors for complications while adjusting for possible confounders.

RESULTS

The study included 4,996 GS patients with a mean age of 33.7 ± 15 years and BMI of 28.2 ± 5.1 kg/m2. White patients constituted 54% (n = 2713) of the cohort, and 27% (n = 1346) were obese. Except for 2020, there was a steady increase in GS cases over the study period. Outpatient surgeries were most common at 95% (n = 4730), while general surgeons performed the majority of GS (n = 3580; 72%). Postoperatively, 91% (n = 4538) of patients were discharged home; 4.4% (n = 222) experienced any complications. Multivariable analysis identified inpatient setting (p < 0.001), BMI (p = 0.023), prior sepsis (p = 0.018), and bleeding disorders (p = 0.047) as independent risk factors for complications.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we analyzed 4996 male adult GS patients from the ACS-NSQIP database, revealing an increased caseload and significant general surgeon involvement. Risk factors like bleeding disorders, inpatient status, and prior sepsis were linked to postoperative complications, while BMI was crucial for predicting adverse events. Overall, our findings may aid in enhancing patient care through advanced preoperative screening and closer perioperative management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The impact of age on outcomes after breast reduction surgery - A multi-institutional data analysis of 40,958 cases

BACKGROUND

Reduction mammoplasty is popular among people of various age groups, yet the impact of age on postoperative outcomes remains debated.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2008-2021) was queried to identify adult female patients who underwent reduction mammoplasty. Patients were categorized into 10-year age brackets (i.e., 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and >70 years). We compared age-dependent 30-day outcomes via confounder-adjusted multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

40,958 female patients (mean age: 41 ± 14 years and mean body mass index: 31 ± 6.1 kg/m²) were identified. Complications occurred in 6.4% (n = 2635) of cases, with 770 (1.9%) and 483 (1.2%) patients requiring reoperation and readmission, respectively. 1706 (4.2%) women experienced surgical complications, whereas medical complications were generally rare (n = 289; 0.7%). Compared with women aged 18-29 years, risks of any, surgical, and medical complications were higher for patients aged 30-39 years (OR: 1.22, p < 0.01; OR: 1.05, p = 0.51; OR: 1.84, p < 0.01), 40-49 years (OR: 1.34, p < 0.01; OR: 1.17, p = 0.04; OR: 1.54, p = 0.03), 50-59 years (OR: 1.45, p < 0.01; OR: 1.31, p < 0.01; OR: 1.78, p < 0.01), 60-69 years (OR: 1.38 years, p < 0.01; OR: 1.29, p = 0.01; OR: 1.71, p < 0.01), and >70 years (OR: 1.25, p = 0.18; OR: 1.01, p = 0.98; OR: 1.86, p = 0.14). Patients aged >30 years were also more likely to require readmissions and reoperations.

CONCLUSION

Patient age significantly affects outcomes after reduction mammoplasty, with the lowest risk in patients aged <30 years. Importantly, the association between age and postoperative morbidity was not linear. These findings can help guide informed decisions, recognizing that while age is a factor, it is not the sole determinant of risk.

Quality of life and satisfaction after breast augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Breast-Q patient-reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

Breast augmentation ranks among the most popular plastic surgery procedures. Yet, reports on post-operative patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction remain conflicting.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Three databases were searched for eligible studies that reported pre-and/or post-operative Breast-Q™ augmentation scores for patient QoL (psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being) and/or satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 39 studies (53 patient cohorts and 18,322 patients) were included in the quantitative synthesis. The pairwise meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in patient-reported psychosocial (MD: +38.10) and sexual well-being (MD: +40.20) as well as satisfaction with breast (MD: +47.88) (all p < 0.00001). Physical well-being improved slightly after breast augmentation (MD: +6.97; p = 0.42). The single-arm meta-analysis yielded comparable results, with Breast-Q™ scores in psychosocial and sexual well-being as well as satisfaction with breast increasing from 37.2, 31.1, and 26.3 to 75.0, 70.6, and 72.7, respectively (all p < 0.00001). Physical well-being improved by 8.1 (75.8 pre-operatively to 83.9 post-operatively; p = 0.17). Subgroup analyses highlighted higher QoL and satisfaction following breast augmentation for purely esthetic purposes and alloplastic mammaplasty. Although patient-reported physical and sexual well-being increased in the long term, psychosocial well-being was the highest in the short term.

CONCLUSION

Patient satisfaction with breast, psychosocial, and sexual well-being increased significantly after breast augmentation. In contrast, patient-reported physical well-being yielded ambivalent results, varying by mammaplasty technique and post-operative follow-up time. Plastic surgeons should be sensitized about our findings to refine eligibility criteria and gain a deeper understanding of the patients' perceived surgical experience.

PROSPERO TRIAL REGISTRATION NO

CRD42023409605.

The significance of timing in breast reconstruction after mastectomy: An ACS-NSQIP analysis

BACKGROUND

A variety of breast reconstruction (BR) options are available. The significance of timing on outcomes remains debated. This study aims to compare complications in breast cancer patients undergoing implant-based and autologous BR immediately after mastectomy or at a delayed time point.

METHODS

We reviewed the ACS-NSQIP database (2008-2021) to identify all female patients who underwent BR for oncological purposes. Outcomes were stratified by technique (implant-based versus autologous) and timing (immediate versus delayed), and included 30-day mortality, reoperation, (unplanned) readmission, and surgical and medical complications.

RESULTS

A total of 21,560 patients were included: 11,237 (52%) implant-based (9791/87% immediate, 1446/13% delayed) and 10,323 (48%) autologous (8378/81% immediate, 1945/19% delayed). Complications occurred in 3666 (17%) patients (implant-based: n = 1112/11% immediate, n = 64/4.4% delayed cohorts; Autologous: n = 2073/25% immediate, n = 417/21% delayed cohorts). In propensity score weighting (PSW) analyses, immediate BR was associated with significantly more complications than delayed BR (p < 0.0001). This was the case for both implant-based and autologous BR, with a greater difference between the two time points noted in implant-based. Confounder-adjusted multivariable analyses confirmed these results.

CONCLUSION

At the 30-day time point, delayed BR is associated with significantly lower complication rates than immediate BR, in both the implant-based and autologous cohorts. These findings are not a blanket recommendation in favor of immediate and/or delayed BR. Instead, our insights may guide surgeons and patients in decision-making and help refine patients' eligibility in a case-by-case workup.