Use of Supervised Exercise During Recovery Following Sports-Related Concussion

Orthostatic Vital Signs After Sport-Related Concussion: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The 6th International Consensus Statement on Concussion in Sport guidelines identified that measuring autonomic nervous system dysfunction using orthostatic vital signs (VSs) is an important part of the clinical evaluation; however, there are limited data on the frequency of autonomic nervous system dysfunction captured via orthostatic VSs after concussion.

PURPOSE

To compare orthostatic changes in heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between athletes with acute sport-related concussion (SRC) and control athletes.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We compared 133 athletes (mean age, 15.3 years; age range, 8-28 years; 45.9% female) with acute SRC (<30 days after injury) with 100 control athletes (mean age, 15.7 years; age range, 10-28 years; 54.0% female). Given the broad age range eligible for study inclusion, participants were subdivided into child (younger than 13 years of age), adolescent (13-17 years of age), and adult (18 years of age and older) age groups for subanalyses. Participants completed a single standard orthostatic VS evaluation including HR, SBP, and DBP in the supine position then immediately and 2 minutes after standing. Linear regression was used to compare delayed supine-to-standing changes in HR, SBP, and DBP as a continuous variable (ΔHR, ΔSPB, and ΔDBP) between groups, and logistic regression was used to compare patients with positive orthostatic VS changes (sustained HR increase ≥30 beats per minute [bpm], SBP decrease ≥20 mm Hg, and DBP ≥10 mm Hg at 2 minutes) between groups, accounting for age and sex.

RESULTS

Between-group differences were present for delayed ΔHR (18.4 ± 12.7 bpm in patients with SRC vs 13.2 ± 11.0 bpm in controls; P = .002) and ΔSPB (-3.1 ± 6.6 bpm in patients with SRC vs -0.4 ± 6.5 bpm in controls; P = .001), with positive orthostatic HR changes present more frequently in patients with SRC (18% vs 7%; odds ratio, 2.79; P = .027). In the SRC group, a weak inverse relationship was present between age and ΔHR (r = -0.171; P = .049), with positive orthostatic HR findings occurring primarily in the child and adolescent SRC subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with acute SRC had greater orthostatic VS changes compared with controls, the most prominent being sustained HR elevations. Clinical evaluation of autonomic change after SRC via standard orthostatic VS assessment may be a helpful clinical biomarker in the assessment of SRC, especially in children and adolescents.

A controlled early-exercise rehabilitation program commencing within 48 hours of a Sports-Related Concussion improves recovery in UK student-athletes: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Explore if implementing an individualised Sub-Symptom Heart Rate Threshold (SSHeRT) rehabilitation program within 48 hours versus physical rest for 14 days affects recovery following SRC in university-aged student-athletes.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational cohort study.

METHODS

Two UK university-aged student-athlete rugby union cohorts were compared (Physical Rest Group (PRG), n = 140, July 2019-March 2020 and Controlled Early-Exercise Group (CEG), n = 167, July 2021-April 2023). Both groups completed the test battery (Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS), Immediate Post-Concussion and Cognitive Test (ImPACT), Vestibular-Ocular Motor Screening Tool (VOMS)) during pre-season to provide a baseline and within 48 hours, at 4, 8, 14-days post-SRC and at Return to Play (RTP). The PRG (n = 42) physically rested for 14 days as per the nationwide community guidelines. The CEG (n = 52) followed the SSHeRT rehabilitation program. Individual change to baseline was used in all analyses.

RESULTS

The CEG performed better on ImPACT's verbal memory at 4 (PRG; -5.5 (-10.8-0.0), CEG; 1.0 (-2.0-10.5), p = 0.05) and 14 days (PRG; -2.0 (-10.0-3.0), CEG; 4.0 (-1.0-11.0), p = 0.05) and on the VOMS at 4 (PRG; 3.0 (0.0-12.0), CEG; 0.0 (0.0-5.0), p = 0.03, OR; 2.910) and 14-days post-SRC (PRG; 0.0 (0.0-1.0), CEG; 0.0 (0.0-0.0), OR; 5.914). Near point convergence was better at all time points for the CEG. The CEG was 26.7 % more likely to have RTP within 30 days, and 6.7 and 5.1 times more likely to have resumed non-contact and contact academic activities by 4 days.

CONCLUSIONS

SSHeRT is safe, can be used within 48 hours of a SRC and may hasten university-aged student-athletes recovery following an SRC.

The Evaluation and Management of Concussion to Optimize Safe Recovery

Concussion is a mild traumatic brain injury causing temporary neurologic dysfunction. Symptoms following concussion are variable and generally are expected to resolve within about 1 month, but some patients experience persistent and prolonged symptoms. An early return to safe, symptom-limited activity is now favored, using targeted rehabilitation and treatments. Accommodations may be needed to facilitate return-to-school and work following concussion. Athletes should not be cleared for a full return to sport until they have recovered from a concussion and completed a return-to-play progression, in addition to returning to work/school fully.

Consensus statement: An evidence-based review of exercise, rehabilitation, rest, and return to activity protocols for the treatment of concussion and mild traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis and appropriate management of concussion/mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is critical for preventing poor outcomes and minimizing health care burden. Current clinical guidelines for concussion management focus mostly on diagnosis and return to cognitive and physical activity but provide limited guidance on the use of specific therapeutic interventions.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the available evidence on therapeutic interventions for concussion/mTBI and develop an evidence-based consensus statement on the use of these interventions in clinical practice.

LITERATURE SURVEY

A systematic literature search was performed first in 2018 and 2019, and again in 2022, to identify relevant original research on these interventions. A total of 6303 articles were retrieved through the systematic literature search and screened for inclusion. Eighty articles met inclusion criteria and were included in this review and consensus process.

METHODOLOGY

A multispecialty panel was convened to explore management of concussion/mTBI. Interventions evaluated included rest, exercise, rehabilitation, and return to activity (RTA) protocols. Studies were assessed for relevance and methodologic quality and were voted upon to develop an evidence-based consensus statement on the therapeutic appropriateness of these interventions for concussion/mTBI. A meta-analysis was not performed.

SYNTHESIS

There was sufficient evidence to recommend exercise as an appropriate therapy for adolescents with acute concussion/mTBI. In other age groups and for other therapeutic modalities, although some studies demonstrated benefits for some of the interventions, mixed results and study limitations prevented the panel from drawing firm conclusions on the efficacy of those interventions. The panel found evidence of detrimental effects from strict rest and high-intensity physical activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The panel recommended exercise as an appropriate therapy for acute concussion in adolescents. The evidence on other therapeutic interventions for concussion/mTBI remains limited to small randomized controlled trials and observational studies of moderate to low quality. The panel found no strong evidence to support or recommend against the other evaluated interventions but found most interventions to be safe when used judiciously and in consideration of individual patient needs. High-quality randomized studies with sufficient power are needed to evaluate the effects of rest, rehabilitation, and RTA protocols for the management of concussion/mTBI.

Systematic Review of Pre-injury Migraines as a Vulnerability Factor for Worse Outcome Following Sport-Related Concussion

Background

Individuals with migraine disorders may be affected differently by concussions compared to individuals without migraine disorders. Prior studies on this topic have had mixed results. The purpose of this study was to systematically examine clinical outcomes following a sport-related concussion in athletes who have a pre-injury history of migraines.

Methods

All studies published prior to 15 May 2021 that examined pre-injury migraines as a possible predictor of clinical recovery from concussion were included. The search included (i) sport/athlete-related terms, (ii) concussion-related terms, and (iii) diverse predictor/modifier terms. After removing duplicates, 5,118 abstracts were screened, 538 full-text articles were reviewed, and 27 articles were included for narrative synthesis without meta-analysis (n = 25 with unique samples). Risk of bias was assessed using the domain-based Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool.

Results

Most studies did not find pre-injury migraines to be associated with concussion outcome, but several of these studies had small or very small sample sizes, as well as other methodological weaknesses. Risk of bias varied greatly across studies. Some of the larger, better-designed studies suggested pre-injury migraines may be a risk factor for worse concussion outcome. Most articles examined pre-injury migraines as an exploratory/secondary predictor of concussion outcome; very few were designed to examine migraine as the primary focus of the study. Migraine history was predominantly based on self-report and studies included minimal information about migraine (e.g., age of onset, frequency/severity, past treatment). Effect sizes were usually not reported or able to be calculated from reported study data.

Conclusion

There is some evidence to suggest that pre-injury migraines may be a vulnerability factor for a worse outcome following concussion, with studies having the lowest risk of bias reporting a positive association. Future studies should focus on improving methodological quality when assessing the relationship between pre-injury migraines and concussion outcome and better characterizing pre-injury migraine status.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019128292, identifier: PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019128292.

Does time since injury and duration matter in the benefits of physical therapy treatment for concussion?

Objective

To determine if there are differences in post-concussion symptom levels depending on 1) when physical therapy treatment is begun after the concussion and 2) the length of treatment.

Method

Retrospective chart review yielded 202 patients who sustained concussions and were referred for physical therapy. Participants/patients were assigned to independent groups based on time elapsed between concussion and physical therapy (0–14, 15–30, 31–60, 61–120, 121–365 days), and on months spent in treatment (1–4). Pre- and post- treatment scores were documented for the following measures: Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT), Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB) using ANOVAs, with a Bonferroni-corrected p-value of p < .005.

Results

All patients demonstrated improvements with treatment, with no significant differences in outcomes for time elapsed since injury (SCAT Symptom Score ( p = .80), SCAT Symptom Severity Score ( p = .97), CISS ( p = .61), DHI ( p = .65), mCTSIB ( p = .13)); or for months in treatment (SCAT Symptom Score ( p = .23), SCAT Symptom Severity Score ( p = .04), CISS ( p = .41), DHI ( p = .37), mCTSIB ( p = .50)).

Conclusions

Improvements were similar for all patients receiving post-concussive physical therapy, regardless of time between injury and treatment onset, and regardless of time spent in treatment. These results may have implications for clinical decision-making and for third party payors’ coverage of post-concussion treatment. Longer periods of treatment may not necessarily be of greater benefit and application of treatment if delayed may also be beneficial. Limitations to the study, such as its retrospective nature, lack of randomization, and convenience sample size are discussed.

Symptom Provocation During Aerobic and Dynamic Supervised Exercise Challenges in Adolescents With Sport-Related Concussion

CONTEXT

Supervised exercise challenges (SECs) have been shown to be safe and beneficial in the early symptomatic period after concussion. Thus far, most in-clinic SECs studied have included a form of basic aerobic exercise only. An SEC that also includes dynamic forms of exercise mimics all steps of a standard return-to-play progression and may enhance the detection of concussion symptoms to guide in-clinic management decisions.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether an SEC that includes a dynamic SEC (DSEC) uncovered symptoms that would not have been identified by an SEC involving an aerobic SEC (ASEC) alone in adolescent patients with sport-related concussion.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Multidisciplinary sport concussion clinic at a tertiary care center.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

A total of 65 adolescent athletes (mean age = 14.9 ± 2.0 years, 72.3% males) who underwent an in-clinic SEC within 30 days of concussion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Presence of pre-exercise symptoms and symptom provocation during the SEC were recorded, with exercise-provoked symptoms categorized as occurring during ASEC or DSEC.

RESULTS

Of the total patient sample, 69.2% (n = 45/65) experienced symptom provocation at some point during the SEC. Symptoms were provoked in 20 patients during the ASEC, whereas 25 completed the ASEC without symptom provocation before becoming symptomatic during the subsequent DSEC and 20 completed the SEC without any symptom provocation. Of the 65 patients in the total sample, 46 were asymptomatic immediately before the SEC. Of these previously asymptomatic patients, 23.9% (n = 11/46) experienced symptom provocation during the ASEC, and an additional 37.0% (n = 17/46) remained asymptomatic during the ASEC but then developed symptoms during the DSEC.

CONCLUSIONS

The ASEC alone may not detect symptom provocation in a significant proportion of concussion patients who otherwise would develop symptoms during a DSEC.