Exploring Vestibular/Ocular and Cognitive Dysfunction as Prognostic Factors for Protracted Recovery in Sports-Related Concussion Patients Aged 8 to 12 Years

Multidomain Predictors of Protracted Recovery following Concussion among 5- to 9-Year-Old Patients: A Preliminary Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine which components from a multidomain assessment best predict protracted recovery in pediatric patients with a concussion.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort of patients aged 5-9 years who presented within 21 days of concussion to a specialty clinic were categorized into normal (≤30 days) and protracted (>30 days) recovery. Participants provided demographic and medical history information, and completed the Child Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5 symptom report and balance assessment, the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screen-Child (VOMS-C), and the Pediatric Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing. Univariate logistic regressions (LR) were used to inform a follow-up forward stepwise LR to identify the best predictors of protracted recovery. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the area under the curve (AUC) was used to identify which predictors retained from the LR model best discriminated recovery.

RESULTS

The final sample included 68 patients (7.52 ± 2.3 years; 56% male), 36 (52.9%) with normal and 32 (47.1%) with protracted recovery. Results of the LR to identify protracted recovery were significant (P < .001) and accounted for 39% of the variance. The model accurately classified 78% of patients, with days to first clinic visit (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4; P = .003) and positive VOMS-C findings (OR, 8.32; 95% CI, 2.4-28.8; P < .001) as significant predictors. A receiver operating characteristic analysis of the AUC of this 2-factor model discriminated protracted from normal recovery (AUC, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.92; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Days to first clinic visit and positive findings on the VOMS-C were the most robust predictors of protracted recovery after concussion in young pediatric patients.

The Ability of Vestibular and Oculomotor Screenings to Predict Recovery in Patients After Concussion: A Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review was to investigate if a positive vestibular or oculomotor screening is predictive of recovery in patients after concussion.

DATA SOURCES

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to search through PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and hand searches of included articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Two authors evaluated all articles for inclusion and assessed their quality using the Mixed Methods Assessment Tool.

DATA EXTRACTION

After quality assessment was completed, the authors extracted recovery time, vestibular or ocular assessment results, study population demographics, number of participants, inclusion and exclusion criteria, symptom scores, and any other outcomes of assessments reported in the included studies.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Data were critically analyzed by 2 of the authors and categorized into tables regarding the ability of researchers of each article to answer the research question. Many patients who have vision, vestibular, or oculomotor dysfunction appear to have longer recovery times than patients who do not.

CONCLUSIONS

Researchers routinely reported that vestibular and oculomotor screenings are prognostic of time to recovery. Specifically, a positive Vestibular Ocular Motor Screening test appears to consistently predict longer recovery.

When should an athlete retire or discontinue participating in contact or collision sports following sport-related concussion? A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the scientific literature regarding factors to consider when providing advice or guidance to athletes about retirement from contact or collision sport following sport-related concussion (SRC), and to define contraindications to children/adolescent athletes entering or continuing with contact or collision sports after SRC.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, SPORTSDiscus, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched systematically.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies were included if they were (1) original research, (2) reported on SRC as the primary source of injury, (3) evaluated the history, clinical assessment and/or investigation of findings that may preclude participation in sport and (4) evaluated mood disturbance and/or neurocognitive deficits, evidence of structural brain injury or risk factors for increased risk of subsequent SRC or prolonged recovery.

RESULTS

Of 4355 articles identified, 93 met the inclusion criteria. None of the included articles directly examined retirement and/or discontinuation from contact or collision sport. Included studies examined factors associated with increased risk of recurrent SRC or prolonged recovery following SRC. In general, these were low-quality cohort studies with heterogeneous results and moderate risk of bias. Higher number and/or severity of symptoms at presentation, sleep disturbance and symptom reproduction with Vestibular Ocular Motor Screen testing were associated with prolonged recovery and history of previous concussion was associated with a risk of further SRC.

CONCLUSION

No evidence was identified to support the inclusion of any patient-specific, injury-specific or other factors (eg, imaging findings) as absolute indications for retirement or discontinued participation in contact or collision sport following SRC.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022155121.

Vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS) score for identification of concussion in cases of non-severe head injury: A systematic review

Background

and importance Each year, 1.4 million patients attend a UK ED with a head injury. Mild traumatic brain injury affects up to 300/100 000 admitted patients/year and a greater number of non-admitted patients. Identifying those patients with a head injury that have concussion, and of those, which will have a prolonged recovery, is critical for discharge planning. The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening test (VOMS) has been reported as a useful “sideline tool” to evaluate for sports-related concussion (SRC). VOMS has been assessed for utility primarily for predicting in head-injured, which cases will have concussion, and secondarily in predicting in concussed patients, which will have prolonged recovery. Originally described in 2014, VOMS has not been subject to systematic review or meta-analysis, with regard to its predictive performance for concussion.

Objective

To assess the state of VOMS evidence for dichotomously classifying concussion status in patients with non-severe head injury

Design

Systematic review.

Setting and participants

Studies comprising the review enrolled ambulatory head-injured adults and children, usually from sports-related settings, in Europe or the USA.

Exposure

VOMS.

Outcome measures

Presence of concussion, presence of prolonged recovery in concussed patients

Main results

The review identified 17 studies, characterized by a wide variety of specific approaches to administering and scoring VOMS. While VOMS showed promise as a screening tool for concussion, marked study heterogeneity precluded generation of a pooled effect estimate for VOMS performance.

Conclusion

VOMS is potentially useful as a concussion screening tool. Available evidence from the SRC arena suggests sensitivity ranging from 58–96%, with specificity 46−92%. Directions for future VOMS research should include evaluation of standardized administration and scoring, potentially of a simpler VOMS (with fewer components), in a general head-injured population. Further analysis of precisely defined VOMS application may be useful to determine the proper place of VOMS screening for the head-injured.

Comparison of Prescribed Physical Therapy to a Home Exercise Program for Pediatric Sports-Related Concussion Patients

The purpose of this retrospective chart review was to compare sports-related concussion (SRC) recovery time in protracted recovery (≥28 days) patients who were prescribed physical therapy (PPT) with those who were only provided a home exercise program (HEP). We hypothesized PPT would be associated with shorter recovery times relative to HEP. Associations were evaluated with multivariable zero-truncated negative binomial regressions. Among the 48 (30.2%) PPT and 111 (69.8%) HEP patients, the majority were female (57.9%), the mean age was 15.3 ± 1.4 (PPT) and 14.2 ± 2.8 (HEP), and time to clinic was a median 6.0 (IQR = 3.0–27.0; PPT) and 7.0 (IQR = 3.0–23.0; HEP) days. After adjusting for demographic (age, sex) and clinical measures (concussion history, convergence, VOMS, PCSS score, and days to clinic), PPT unexpectedly was associated with 1.21 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.41) additional recovery days compared with HEP. One reason for this could be related to patients adhering to the number of a priori prescribed PT sessions which may or may not have aligned with the patient’s symptom resolution. Future research should explore this hypothesis while aiming to evaluate the effect of PPT versus HEP using a randomized design. If confirmed, these findings are encouraging for patients who could not otherwise access or afford specialty rehabilitation.