Proposals for Changes in the Mountain and Dresler Mediastinal and Pulmonary Lymph Node Map

A Shift in Paradigm: Selective Lymph Node Dissection for Minimizing Oversurgery in Early Stage Lung Cancer

Systematic lymph node dissection has been widely accepted and turned into a standard procedure for lung cancer surgery. In recent years, the concept of "minimal invasive surgery (MIS)" has greatly changed the surgical paradigm of lung cancer. Previous studies revealed that excessive dissection of lymph nodes without metastases had uncertain clinical benefit. Meanwhile, it leads to the elevated risk of postoperative complications including chylothorax and laryngeal nerve injury. In addition, dissection of nonmetastatic lymph nodes may disturb systematic immunity, resulting in the secondary effect on primary tumor or latent metastases. The past decades have witnessed the innovative strategies such as lobe-specific lymph node dissection and selective lymph node dissection. On the basis of evolution of lymph node dissection strategy, we discuss the negative effects of excessive nonmetastatic lymph node dissection and summarize the recent advances in the optimized dissection strategies, hoping to provide unique perspectives on the future directions.

Prevalence and echo features of mediastinal lymph nodes in EUS for non-malignant indications: a prospective study in a Southern European Population

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 Significant heterogeneity in geographic distribution regarding the prevalence of mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN) has been documented in autopsy and computed tomography (CT) studies. Awareness of the local prevalence and characteristics of lymph nodes will be relevant when performing endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for staging of malignant neoplasias. The aims of this study were to document the prevalence and echo features of MLN in patients undergoing EUS for non-malignant extrathoracic disease and to identify predictive factors for the presence of MLN.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 A prospective single-center study was performed over 6 months. Mediastinal stations 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4 L and 2 were systematically evaluated using a linear echoendoscope in all patients undergoing EUS due to benign extrathoracic pathology and without history of oncologic disease. Demographic, clinical and EUS features of the lymph nodes were analysed.

RESULTS

 Seventy-five patients were included: male/female 32/43; mean age, 63 years. The majority of patients (72 %) had lymph nodes in at least one mediastinal station and 88 % of these were found in stations 7 or 4 L. Overall, 133 MLN were identified: 19 % were hypoechogenic, 6 % had a short-axis diameter > 10 mm, and 6 % were round. The prevalence of lymph nodes was higher in smokers (83 % vs 64 %, P  = 0.024), with a higher average number of lymph nodes per patient in this group (2.1 vs 1.6; P  = 0.017). By logistic regression analysis, none of the variables analyzed were independently associated with the presence of MLN.

CONCLUSION

 This prospective Portuguese study documented a higher prevalence of MLN than previously reported in Northern Europe, in patients with no evidence of oncologic disease. This higher prevalence may negatively influence the specificity and positive predictive value for malignancy of MLN (N) staging by EUS.

Change of junctions between stations 10 and 4 in the new International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lymph Node Map: a validation study from a single, tertiary referral hospital experience

BACKGROUND

Some tumors previously staged as N2 disease, using the Mountain-Dresler/American Thoracic Society (MD-ATS) map are staged as N1 per the new International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) lymph node (LN) map. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the IASLC LN map in stratifying prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and LN metastasis in nodal stations 4 or 10.

METHODS

Of 2,086 patients undergoing curative surgical resection for NSCLC, we searched for patients who had LNs harboring cancer cells in nodal stations 10 or 4 (n = 531) and reclassified them into three different subgroups (N1 [N1 according to both the MD-ATS and IASLC maps], in-between [N2 according to the MD-ATS map but N1 by the IASLC map], and N2 [N2 according to both maps]) based on histopathologic results. We compared disease-free survival (DFS) among the three subgroups by using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis.

RESULTS

Of 531 patients, 295 belonged to the N1 group, 66 patients belonged to in-between group, and 170 patients belonged to N2 group, according to the IASLC map. The cumulative DFS rates at 5 years for the N1, in-between, and N2 groups were 47%, 39%, and 29%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, LN ratio was identified as significant independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 2.877; 95% CI, 1.391-5.950; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

The changed definition between N1 and N2 diseases by the IASLC LN map works well, as expected, in stratifying patient prognosis. Positive LN ratio may be more valuable than the nodal stations involved in predicting patient survival in resectable NSCLC.

Prognostic role of station 3A mediastinal nodes for non-small-cell lung cancers

OBJECTIVES

Station 3A nodes have been commonly neglected in surgical practice. This retrospective study collected information on the incidence and risk factors of Station 3A node to ascertain the prognostic role of 3A nodal involvement.

METHODS

A total of 180 consecutive pN2 (stage IIIa) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases who underwent systemic lymphadenectomy and contained Station 3A nodes were enrolled. Survival rates were calculated according to the final pathology of Station 3A lymph node: Station 3A node (+) and Station 3A node (-). Statistical analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Station 3A nodal metastasis was validated in 32 cases, and the incidence of Station 3A node involvement was 17.8%. Station 3A nodes involvement was strongly associated with the metastatic status of Station 4R nodes and histological nature of pulmonary cancer. The overall 3-year survival was 53% and median survival time was 40.6 months. The 3-year survival difference was significant between Station 3A node (-) and Station 3A node (+) (63 vs 22%, χ(2) = 16.426, P < 0.001). Moreover, the overall 3-year survival was closely related with the number of involved nodal zones (χ(2) = 31.156, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed two statistically significant risk factors for survival including metastasis of Station 3A node and the number of positive nodal zones (hazard ratios [HR]: 2.702; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.008-7.242; P = 0.027; and HR: 7.404; 95% CI: 3.263-16.936, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The involvement of Station 3A lymph nodes predicts poor prognosis of right-sided stage pIIIa-N2 NSCLC patients. Therefore, systemic lymphadenectomy for right-sided cancers should include Station 3A nodes when ascertaining a complete resection.

EBUS-TBNA in mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathies and/or masses: an Italian case series

INTRODUCTION

Transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) is an established method to diagnose hilar/mediastinal lymphadenopathies and/or masses. Real-time endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is a method that involves TBNA, and has been shown to increase the diagnostic yield in this context.

OBJECTIVES

A descriptive study has been conducted to test real-time EBUS in the diagnosis of hilar-mediastinal lymphadenopathies/masses with a shorter diameter less then 2.5 cm or with a previous negative 'blind' TBNA.

METHODS

Consecutive patients referred for EBUS-TBNA of hilar/mediastinal lymph nodes were included in the study, when a node or mass was detected on a chest computed tomography scan. The primary end point was the number of successful biopsy specimens. Lymph node stations were classified according to the American Thoracic Society scheme.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients (66 males, 28 females) of mean age 62 years (range: 17-86) underwent EBUS-TBNA: EBUS-TBNA could be performed in all patients. The procedure was diagnostic in 80 patients (89.4%); positive samples were 73 (52 lung cancer, 18 sarcoidosis and 3 tuberculosis), negative samples were 17, inadequate specimens were obtained in four patients (4.25%) and surgically proven false negative results were found in six cases (6.38%). Biopsy specimens were taken from lymph nodes in region 2L (1 case), 2R (5 cases), 4R (20 cases), 4L (7 cases), 7 (47 cases), 10R (9 cases), 10L (2 cases), 11R (6 cases) and 11L (3 cases). Sensitivity was 92.4%, and specificity was 100%. No complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

EBUS-TBNA is a safe and reliable method for sampling mediastinal lymph nodes.

The new lung cancer staging system

The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) has conducted an extensive initiative to inform the revision of the lung cancer staging system. This involved development of an international database along with extensive analysis of a large population of patients and their prognoses. This article reviews the recommendations of the IASLC International Staging Committee for the definitions for the TNM descriptors and the stage grouping in the new non-small cell lung cancer staging system.

The IASLC lung cancer staging project: a proposal for a new international lymph node map in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer

The accurate assessment of lymph node involvement is an important part of the management of lung cancer. Lymph node "maps" have been used to describe the location of nodal metastases. However, discrepancies in nomenclature among maps used by Asian and Western countries hinder analyses of lung cancer treatment outcome. To achieve uniformity and to promote future analyses of a planned prospective international database, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer proposes a new lymph node map which reconciles differences among currently used maps, and provides precise anatomic definitions for all lymph node stations. A method of grouping lymph node stations together into "zones" is also proposed for the purposes of future survival analyses.

Gefitinib: a consideration of cost

Cancer care is one of the most significant healthcare costs in the USA. The National Institute of Health (NIH) estimates healthcare spending at US$171.6 billion (2002), with lung cancer estimated as the diagnosis with the second highest cost. As additional lines of therapy and newer targeted agents are incorporated into the treatment of lung cancer, these costs will further increase. Gefitinib, an EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is well established in Asia for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Although not widely available in the West, encouraging data have recently been reported from a large, global Phase III study of gefitinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. This paper reviews the data supporting the use of gefitinib in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell-lung cancer and considers its potential economic impact, as well as quality-of-life outcomes, compared with cytotoxic chemotherapy.