Computed Tomography-Guided Interstitial High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in the Local Treatment of Primary and Secondary Intrathoracic Malignancies

Interstitial High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Combined with External Beam Radiation Therapy for Dose Escalation in the Primary Treatment of Locally Advanced, Non-Resectable Superior Sulcus (Pancoast) Tumors: Results of a Monocentric Retrospective Study

Objectives: To analyze the results of interstitial (IRT) high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) in the primary treatment of patients with unresectable superior sulcus tumors (SST) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Methods: Between 2013 and 2023, seven patients with unresectable SST were treated with combined BT and EBRT with or without concomitant chemotherapy. The patients' median age was 64 years (range, 49-79 years) and median tumor volume was 146.8 cm3 (range, 29.3-242.3 cm3). A median BT dose of 8 Gray (Gy) (range, 5-10 Gy) was prescribed and delivered in a single fraction. A median EBRT dose of 54 Gy (range, 30-59 Gy) was prescribed and administered normofractionated (single dose: 1.8 Gy). Results: We report the results of seven patients with SST treated with combined BT and EBRT and followed for a median of 38 months. The overall clinical response rate was 83.33% with five out of six patients achieving local control, while one out of six (16.66%) showed local and general progression. No deaths were attributed to the treatment itself; rather, one patient died during the course of therapy as a result of systemic progression. The most common radiation-related adverse events were grade I-II fatigue and mild paresthesia. No severe toxicity (CTCAE ≥ III°) was observed with interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) BT combined with EBRT. Conclusions: For patients with unresectable superior sulcus tumors, interstitial HDR BT in combination with EBRT is a feasible treatment option that offers the potential for local control and long-term survival. The findings of this study should be validated in a larger patient cohort.

Percutaneous high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for non-resectable, chemo resistant malignant lesion of lung and liver

PURPOSE

To explore the feasibility and efficacy of interstitial brachytherapy application for nonresectable and chemo-resistant malignant liver and lung lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Percutaneous high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR ISBT) was applied in nine lesions of seven middle-aged patients with advanced carcinoma (five patients with liver lesion and two patients with lung lesion). All patients were surgically ineligible. All patients had already received systemic chemotherapy. Under computed tomography (CT) guidance (for lung lesion) or ultrasonography (USG) guidance (for liver lesion), a single stainless steel brachytherapy needle was inserted percutaneously in patients with lesion size ≤4 centimeter (cm) and multiple needles were inserted in patients of lesion size >4cm. A single dose of 15 Gy to 20 Gy with HDR ISBT was prescribed at the periphery of the lesion. The needles were removed just after treatment. Patients were kept under observation for 24 h after treatment.

RESULTS

The median size of the lesion was 6.5 cm. In all the cases of liver lesion, more than 75% shrinkage of tumor volume in follow-up at 6 mo was observed. It was more than 50% for lung lesion. None of the patients had developed significant complications as on the median follow up period of 15 mo (ranges 3-27 mo).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous CT-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy is a minimally invasive, safe, and feasible treatment option with minimal complication for inoperable, chemo resistant, advanced cancers with encouraging treatment outcomes.

Stereotactic Ablative Brachytherapy: Recent Advances in Optimization of Radiobiological Cancer Therapy

Brachytherapy (BT), a type of focal anti-cancer radiotherapy, delivers a highly focused radiation dose to localized tumors, sparing surrounding normal tissues. Recent technological advances have helped to increase the accuracy of BT and, thus, improve BT-based cancer treatment. Stereotactic ablative brachytherapy (SABT) was designed to improve the ablative effect of radiation, which was achieved via improved image guidance, and calculation of ablative dose, shorter treatment duration, and better organ preservation. Recently collected data characterized SABT as having the potential to cure various early-stage cancers. The method provides higher tumor control rate levels that were previously achievable only by surgical resection. Notably, SABT is suitable for application with unresectable malignancies. However, the pathological assessment of SABT irradiated tumors is limited due to difficulties in specimen acquisition. Prostate, lung, liver, and gynecological cancers are the most commonly reported SABT-treated malignancies. This study will give an overview of SABT, focusing on the advances in SABT optimization, and provide insights on the future benefits of the combined application of SABT with cancer immunotherapies.

Outcomes with multi-disciplinary management of central lung tumors with CT-guided percutaneous high dose rate brachyablation

BACKGROUND

Centrally located lung tumors present treatment challenges given their proximity to mediastinal structures including the central airway, esophagus, major vessels, and heart. Therapeutic options can be limited for medically inoperable patients, particularly if they have received previous thoracic radiotherapy. High dose rate (HDR) brachyablation was developed to improve the therapeutic ratio for patients with central lung tumors. The purpose of this study is to report initial safety and efficacy outcomes with this treatment for central lung malignancies.

METHODS

From September 2015 to August 2019, a total of 25 patients with 37 pulmonary tumors were treated with percutaneous HDR brachyablation. Treatment was delivered by a multi-disciplinary team of interventional radiologists, pulmonologists, and radiation oncologists. Twenty-three patients received a median dose of 21.5 Gy (range 15-27.5) in a single fraction, whereas two patients received median dose of 24.75 Gy (range 24-25.5) over 2-3 fractions. Tumor local control (LC) was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Treatment-related toxicities were graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, with adverse events less than 90 days defined as acute, and those occurring later were defined as late. LC, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of 37 treated tumors, 88% were metastatic. Tumor location was central and ultra-central in 24.3% and 54.1%, respectively. Average tumor volume was 11.6 cm³ (SD 12.4, range 0.57-62.8). Median follow-up was 19 months (range 3-48). Two-year LC, PFS, and OS were 96.2%, 29.7%, and 65.5%, respectively. Thirteen of 39 (33.3%) catheter implantation procedures were associated with trace minor pneumothorax requiring no intervention, 1 (2.5%) procedure with minor radiographic pulmonary hemorrhage, and 4 (10.3%) with major pneumothorax requiring chest tube insertions. All procedural complications resolved within 24 h from treatment. Acute grade 1-2 toxicity was identified in 4 patients, whereas none developed late toxicity beyond 90 days of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous HDR brachyablation is a safe and promising treatment option for centrally located primary and metastatic lung tumors. Future comparisons with stereotactic body radiotherapy and other ablative techniques are warranted to expand multi-disciplinary management options.

Computed tomography guided interstitial percutaneous high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the management of lung malignancies. A review of the literature

A growing number of patients with lung cancer are not amenable to surgery due to their age or comorbidities. For this reason, local ablative techniques have gained increasing interest recently in the management of inoperable lung tumors. High-dose-rate percutaneous interstitial brachytherapy, performed under CT-guidance, is a newer form of brachytherapy and is a highly conformal radiotherapy technique. The aim of this study was to describe this method and review the existing literature. Eight articles comprising 234 patients reported toxicity and clinical outcome. The follow-up ranged from 6 to 28 months. Diverse fractionation schemes were reported, with 20 Gy in a single fraction being the most frequently utilized. Toxicity was limited; major pneumothoraces occurred after only 8% of the interventions. Local control rates at one year ranged between 37% and 91%. In conclusion, high-dose-rate percutaneous interstitial brachytherapy is a safe, fast, and efficient treatment option for inoperable lung tumors.

Interstitial single fraction brachytherapy for malignant pulmonary tumours

PURPOSE

Interstitial brachytherapy for pulmonary tumours is an alternative to stereotactic radiotherapy, allowing high conformity despite it being an invasive technique. The aim of the study was the analysis of dose distribution, toxicity and tumour response rates.

METHODS

In the years 2014-2019, 27 patients with pulmonary tumours received 36 interstitial brachytherapies with Ir-192: 11 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, 16 patients with pulmonary metastases of other entities.

RESULTS

Patients were treated with a median (interquartile range) prescription dose of 20 (20-26) Gy in a single fraction. Mean lung dose to the ipsilateral lung was 2.8 (1.6-4.7) Gy. Maximum doses to the heart, oesophagus, thoracic wall and spinal cord were 2.4 (1.8-4.6) Gy, 2.0 (1.2-6.2) Gy, 12.6 (8.0-18.2) Gy and 1.5 (0.6-3.9) Gy. Median survival after treatment was 15 months, with a 1- and 2‑year local control of 84% and 60%. Median overall survival after initial cancer diagnosis was 94 months; 2 years following brachytherapy, 75% of patients with colorectal cancer vs. 37% with other histologies were alive; p = 0.14. In 69% (n = 25), brachytherapy could be performed without acute complications. A self-limiting bleeding occurred in 8% (n = 3), fever in 3% (n = 1), pneumothorax in 17% (n = 6), and pulmonary failure in 3% (n = 1). Patients with > 20 Gy in 95% of planning target volume had higher pneumothorax rates needing intervention (31% vs. 5%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Interstitial brachytherapy for pulmonary tumours is a highly conformal therapy with minimal doses to the organs at risk. For the majority of patients, treatment can be performed without relevant complications in a single fraction with a satisfactory local control.

Brachytherapy for lung cancer

Brachytherapy (BT) is a minimally invasive anticancer radiotherapeutic modality where the tumor is directly irradiated via a radioactive source that is precisely implanted in or adjacent to the tumor. BT for lung cancer may be conducted in the form of endobronchial BT and radioactive seed implantation (RSI-BT), mainly for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For patients with early-stage lung cancer who are not suitable for surgery or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), BT may be used as an alternative treatment, and curative results could be achieved in certain patients with cancer confined to the trachea lumen. For patients with locally advanced/metastatic lung cancer, BT could be selectively applied alone or as a boost to EBRT, which could improve the local tumor control and patient's survival. In addition, BT is also useful as a salvage treatment in select patients with locally recurrent/residual lung cancer that failed other treatments (e.g., surgery, chemotherapy, and EBRT). However, clinical outcomes are mainly obtained from retrospective studies. Prospective studies are limited and needed. In recent years, the introduction of modern image guidance, novel radioactive seeds, BT treatment planning systems (BT-TPS), after-loading technique, and three-dimensional printing template (3D-PT) assistance, among others, have potentially improved the clinical outcomes of BT. However, a comprehensive review of BT with newly published literature was lacking. This review is to discuss BT for NSCLC based on recent literature published in PubMed.

Single fraction computed tomography-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary and metastatic lung tumors?

PURPOSE

To provide a pilot dosimetric study of computed tomography (CT)-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for primary and metastatic lung lesions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For nine lung primary and metastasis patients, 3D image-based BRT plan using a single virtual catheter was planned for 34 Gy in single fraction to the gross tumor volume (GTV) + 3 mm margin to account for tumor deformation. These plans were compared to margin-based (MB-) and robustness optimized (RO-) SBRT, assuming the same tumor deformation under real-time tumor tracking. Consistent dose calculation was ensured for both BRT and SBRT plans using the same class of collapsed cone convolution superposition algorithm. Plan quality metrics were compared by Friedman tests and Wilcoxon t-tests.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Brachytherapy plans showed significant higher GTV mean dose compared to MB- and RO-SBRT (122.2 Gy vs. 50.4 and 44.7 Gy, p < 0.05), and better dose gradient index (R50) = 2.9 vs. 4.3 and 8.4 for MB- and RO-SBRT, respectively. Dose constraints per the RTOG 0915 protocol were achieved for all critical organs except chest wall in BRT. All other dose-volume histograms (DVH) metrics are comparable between BRT and SBRT. Treatment delivery time of BRT and SBRT plans significantly increased and decreased with increasing GTV size, respectively. SBRT using advanced MLC tracking technique and non-coplanar VMAT can achieve comparable dosimetric quality to HDR BRT. Whether or not, the significantly higher GTV dose can increase killing of radioresistant tumor cells and offset the effect of tumor reoxygenation in single fraction BRT, requires further clinical investigation.

Dosimetric analysis of rib interference of the CTV during interstitial brachytherapy of lung tumors

Purpose

In interstitial brachytherapy for lung tumors, the placement and alignment of the source needles are influenced by the ribs, which can affect the dose distribution. This study evaluated the change in dose to the target by comparing the dose between the actual interstitial brachytherapy plan (AIBP, what is deliverable due to anatomic constraints), and the virtual interstitial brachytherapy plan (VIBP, pretreatment-modified dose distribution).

Material and methods

AIBPs and VIBPs were designed for 20 lung tumors. The VIBP was designed with uniform spacing between needles, regardless of the presence of ribs. The prescription dose was 30 Gy. The percentage of normal ipsilateral lung volume that received a dose ≥ 5 Gy (V₅), conformity index (COIN), incremental dose percentage (IDP) to the target, and the dose covering 95% (D₉₅) of the clinical target volume (CTV) were calculated.

Results

The V₅ of the VIBPs was significantly smaller than that of the AIBPs (p < 0.01). The mean COIN value was 0.41 ± 0.12 for the AIBPs, which was significantly smaller than the value 0.54 ± 0.12 for the VIBPs (p < 0.01). The D₉₅ of CTV in VIBP-adjusted was greater than that in AIBPs (p < 0.01). The mean IDP was 44% ± 40%. The D_max of the ribs was 20.16 Gy ± 15.76 Gy in AIBPs, and 18.57 Gy ± 15.14 Gy in VIBPs, which was not significantly different (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The regular geometric alignment of needles is important for increasing the target dose and limiting the normal lung dose in interstitial brachytherapy for thoracic tumors. Thus, we recommend that radiation oncologists attempt to achieve the regular alignment of needles during implantation.

Iridium-Knife: Another knife in radiation oncology

PURPOSE

Intratarget dose escalation with superior conformity is a defining feature of three-dimensional (3D) iridium-192 (¹⁹²Ir) high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BRT). In this study, we analyzed the dosimetric characteristics of interstitial ¹⁹²Ir HDR BRT for intrathoracic and cerebral malignancies. We examined the dose gradient sharpness of HDR BRT compared with that of linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy, usually called X-Knife, to demonstrate that it may as well be called a Knife.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Treatment plans for 10 patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme or intrathoracic malignancies, five of each entity, treated with X-Knife (stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma multiforme and stereotactic body radiation therapy for intrathoracic malignancies) were replanned for simulated HDR BRT. For 3D BRT planning, we used identical structure sets and dose prescription as for the X-Knife planning. The indices for qualitative treatment plan analysis encompassed planning target volume coverage, conformity, dose falloff gradient, and the maximum dose-volume limits to different organs at risk.

RESULTS

Volume coverage in HDR plans was comparable to that calculated for X-Knife plans with no statistically significant difference in terms of conformity. The dose falloff gradient-sharpness-of the HDR plans was considerably steeper compared with the X-Knife plans.

CONCLUSIONS

Both 3D ¹⁹²Ir HDR BRT and X-Knife are effective means for intratarget dose escalation with HDR BRT achieving at least equal conformity and a steeper dose falloff at the target volume margin. In this sense, it can reasonably be argued that 3D ¹⁹²Ir HDR BRT deserves also to be called a Knife, namely Iridium-Knife.

The potential role of brachytherapy in the irradiation of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review

To review the use of brachytherapy as an adjuvant therapy to reduce recurrences after sublobar resections and as a palliation to patients with inoperable disease. Α review of all published studies was performed to identify the recurrence rate after brachytherapy adjuvant to sublobar resection and assess the palliation of symptoms and the complications of brachytherapy as a palliative treatment. Most of the studies that we found about brachytherapy as an adjuvant therapy to sublobar resection due to patient's poor cardiopulmonary reserve showed that brachytherapy offered low recurrence rate with low toxicity. Ten studies concerning palliative brachytherapy showed improvement of symptoms with good tolerance and good endoscopic response rates. Literature suggests that brachytherapy for inoperable symptomatic disease can be delivered for symptom improvement with acceptable toxicity. Brachytherapy as an alternative treatment option for lung cancer needs more investigation with more prospective trials.

Image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy of head and neck - a case series study

Purpose

The aim of the study was the evaluation of image guided transdermal application of interstitial brachytherapy in patients undergoing repeated irradiation for relapsed local tumor of the head and neck area.

Material and methods

The article describes transdermal application of interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in 4 patients treated due to relapsed local tumor in soft palate, submandibular area, laryngopharynx, as well as pterygoid muscles and maxillary sinus. The application was conducted under continuous computed tomography (CT)-image guidance (CT fluoroscopy). Patients qualified for this type of treatment had neoplastic lesions located deep under the skin surface. Because of their location, access to the lesions was limited, and the risk of damaging the adjacent tissues such as vessels and nerves was high. The following parameters have been evaluated: clinical response using RECIST 1.1, incidence of perisurgical complications using CTCAE 4.0 and the frequency of occurrence of radiotherapy related early morbidity using RTOG.

Results

Various radiation schemes were used, from 3 to 5 fractions of 3.5-5 Gy. The median total dose (D₉₀) was 20.6 Gy. Biologic effective dose (BED) and equivalent 2 Gy (DEQ₂) median doses were 30.4 Gy and 25.3 Gy, respectively. In the follow-up period of 3-7 months (the median value of 3.5 months), 2 patients had partial regression of the disease and in 2 others the neoplastic process was stabilized. None of the patients had serious complications of treatment (of 3^rd degree or higher).

Conclusions

Computed tomography-image guided brachytherapy proved to be a safe method of treatment in patients with local relapse in sites, in which traditional visually controlled application was impossible due to risk of complications. Despite short observation period and small study group, it seems justified to conduct prospective studies for the evaluation of efficacy and safety of CT-image guided brachytherapy.

Management of recurrence after initial surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma: a mini-review

Recurrence after surgery in the multimodality therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma is a common problem. As the majority of patients experience not only local but also distant metastases, a systemic treatment strategy in addition to local control measures remains necessary. Nevertheless, none of the chemotherapy regimens have achieved clinical success. Local management modalities such as stereotaxic treatments, cryoablation and redo surgery on the other hand have promising results, but provide palliative outcomes.

ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in Western countries. Over the last 20 years, and the last decade in particular, the clinical outcome for patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) has improved greatly due not only to an increase in the number of patients being referred for and undergoing surgical resection of their localised metastatic disease but also to a more strategic approach to the delivery of systemic therapy and an expansion in the use of ablative techniques. This reflects the increase in the number of patients that are being managed within a multidisciplinary team environment and specialist cancer centres, and the emergence over the same time period not only of improved imaging techniques but also prognostic and predictive molecular markers. Treatment decisions for patients with mCRC must be evidence-based. Thus, these ESMO consensus guidelines have been developed based on the current available evidence to provide a series of evidence-based recommendations to assist in the treatment and management of patients with mCRC in this rapidly evolving treatment setting.

Attitude and practice of brachytherapy in India: a study based on the survey amongst attendees of Annual Meeting of Indian Brachytherapy Society

PURPOSE

We performed a survey amongst attendees of the 4(th) Annual Meeting of Indian Brachytherapy Society to study the patterns of brachytherapy practice and attitude towards brachytherapy use.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A 19-point questionnaire was designed and e-mailed to the attendees immediately after the conference. Descriptive analysis of the responses were done and satisfaction index was used as a tool for evaluation of the program effectiveness. Binomial test was used to assess the difference between distributions of responses and Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess the correlation between responses. P value (2-tailed) of < 0.05 was taken significant for all statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of a total of 202 attendees, 90 responded to the survey (response rate: 44.5%). Seventy-two percent belonged to an academic institute while 28% belonged to non-academic institutes. Eighty-six percent were radiation oncologists and 10% were medical physicists. Eighty-nine percent respondents used high-dose-rate, 14% - pulse-dose-rate, and 13% used low-dose-rate brachytherapy facility. Orthogonal X-rays, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging was used for brachytherapy planning by 56%, 69%, and 14%, respectively. Ninety-three percent of them thought that lack of training is a hurdle in practicing brachytherapy and 92% opined that brachytherapy dedicated meetings can change their perception about brachytherapy. Seventy percent respondents admitted to make some changes in their practice patterns after attending this meeting. Ninety-seven percent of them would like to attend future meetings and 98% felt the need to include live workshops, hands on demonstrations, and video presentations in the scientific programme.

CONCLUSIONS

The survey highlights a positive attitude towards increasing brachytherapy use, and may serve as an important guiding tool in designing teaching and training programmes; thus overcoming the hurdles in successful and widespread use of a quality brachytherapy programme at radiotherapy centers.

Image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy: preliminary outcomes and toxicity of a joint interventional radiology and radiation oncology technique for achieving local control in challenging cases

PURPOSE

To determine the ability of image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy (IG-HDR) to provide local control (LC) of lesions in non-traditional locations for patients with heavily pre-treated malignancies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective series included 18 patients treated between 2012 and 2014 with IG-HDR, either in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT; n = 9) or as monotherapy (n = 9). Lesions were located in the pelvis (n = 5), extremity (n = 2), abdomen/retroperitoneum (n = 9), and head/neck (n = 2). All cases were performed in conjunction between interventional radiology and radiation oncology. Toxicity was graded based on CTCAE v4.0 and local failure was determined by RECIST criteria. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for LC and overall survival.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 11.9 months. Two patients had localized disease at presentation; the remainder had recurrent and/or metastatic disease. Seven patients had prior EBRT, with a median equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) of 47.0 Gy. The median total EQD2s were 34 Gy and 60.9 Gy for patients treated with monotherapy or combination therapy, respectively. Image-guided high-dose rate brachytherapy was delivered in one to six fractions. Six patients had local failures at a median interval of 5.27 months with a one-year LC rate of 59.3% and a one-year overall survival of 40.7%. Six patients died from their disease at a median interval of 6.85 months from the end of treatment. There were no grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities but two patients had serious long term toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate a good one year LC rate of nearly 60%, and a favorable toxicity profile when utilizing IG-HDR to deliver high doses of radiation with high precision into targets not readily accessible by other forms of local therapy. These preliminary results suggest that further studies utilizing this approach may be considered for patients with difficult to access lesions that require LC.

Extending the Frontiers Beyond Thermal Ablation by Radiofrequency Ablation: SBRT, Brachytherapy, SIRT (Radioembolization)

Metastatic spread of the primary is still defined as the systemic stage of disease in treatment guidelines for various solid tumors. This definition is the rationale for systemic therapy. Interestingly and despite the concept of systemic involvement, surgical resection as a local treatment has proven to yield long-term outcomes in a subset of patients with limited metastatic disease, supporting the concept of oligometastatic disease. Radiofrequency ablation has yielded favorable outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal metastases, and some studies indicate its prognostic potential in combined treatments with systemic therapies. However, some significant technical limitations apply, such as size limitation, heat sink effects, and unpredictable heat distribution to adjacent risk structures. Interventional and non-invasive radiotherapeutic techniques may overcome these limitations, expanding the options for oligometastatic patients and cytoreductive concepts. Current data suggest very high local control rates even in large tumors at any given location in the human body. The article focusses on the characteristics and possibilities of stereotactic body radiation therapy, interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy, and Yttrium-90 radioembolization. In this article, we discuss the differences of the technical preferences as well as their impact on indications. Current data is presented and discussed with a focus on application in oligometastatic or cytoreductive concepts in different tumor biologies.

Radiation therapy for early stage lung cancer

Radiation therapy for early stage lung cancer is a promising modality. It has been traditionally used in patients not considered candidates for standard surgical resection. However, its role has been changing rapidly since the introduction of new and advanced technology, especially in tumor tracking, image guidance, and radiation delivery. Stereotactic radiation therapy is one such advancement that has shown excellent local control rates and promising survival in early stage lung cancer. In addition, the toxicity profiles are quite favorable. In addition to stereotactic radiation, advances in brachytherapy techniques have enabled high local control rates in operable patients who receive sublobar resections due to compromised pulmonary function. Isotopes that have been used include iodine-125, palladium-103, and cesium-131. In this review article, the role of radiation therapy in treatment of lung cancer, patient selection, outcomes, toxicity and recent technological advancements are discussed. The radiation therapy techniques described in this article are also being used in the management of locally advanced lung cancers.

[Malignant pleural mesothelioma: comparison of radical pleurectomy und extrapleural pneumonectomy]

The role of surgical resection per se and the type of surgery in the management of multimodality treated malignant pleural mesothelioma remains controversial. Patient selection for either extrapleural pneumonectomy or radical pleurectomy depends not only on the cardiopulmonary status of the patient, tumor stage and intraoperative findings but is also strongly influenced by surgeons' preference, experience and philosophy. The aim of this review is to compare extrapleural pneumonectomy and radical pleurectomy with regard to surgical technique, morbidity, mortality and survival.

The combined treatment of CT-guided percutaneous 125I seed implantation and chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) is a first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a combined treatment consisting of CT-guided percutaneous (125)I seed implantation with GP chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled in a nonrandomized, two-armed clinical trial. Of these patients, 24 received a combination treatment of CT-guided percutaneous (125) I seed implantation and GP (the combo group), while 29 were treated with GP only (the control group).

RESULTS

Patients in the combo group received (125)I seed implantation with prescription dose of 100-140 Gy and a total of 55 cycles of GP, and patients in the control group received a total of 73 cycles of GP. The overall response rate was 79.2% in the combo group and 41.4% in the control group. The median overall survival time was 13.5 ± 1.5 months in the combo group and 9.0 ± 1.8 months in the control group. The progression-free survival time was 8.0 ± 1.2 months in the combo group and 5.0 ± 0.8 months in the control group. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 62.5 and 16.7% in the combo group, respectively, and 41.4 and 13.8% in the control group. The interventional complications in the combo group included 5 cases of pneumothorax and 4 cases of hemoptysis. There were no complications due to radiation pneumonia or radiation esophagitis in the combo group, and no patients had lethal hemoptysis or esophagotracheal fistula. Chemotherapy treatment-related toxicities, including Grade 3/4 myelosuppression and Grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity, were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our initial experience showed that combined CT-guided (125)I radioactive seed implantation and GP chemotherapy are effective and safe for treating advanced NCSLC.