Vulvar High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions and Cancer as a Risk Factor for Anal Cancer: A Review

PAP-HPV Co-Testing in Anal Cancer Screening: An Italian Experience

Background/Objectives: Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) remains a relatively rare form of cancer linked to high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection; however, its incidence has been increasing globally. Anal cytology and HR-HPV testing can identify precursors, though standardized screening guidelines are still lacking. This study aimed to assess the correlation between high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) findings and primary screening results through PAP-HPV co-testing in high-risk patients. Methods: A retrospective, single-center study was conducted collecting data from the joint multidisciplinary anal cancer clinic of Piero Palagi Hospital in Florence (Italy), between August 2019 and September 2022. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of anal cytology, HR-HPV testing, and PAP-HPV co-testing were assessed. Results: In 577 HRAs, histology revealed 31 AIN2+ lesions (5.4%) and 220 AIN1 lesions (38.1%), while 326 (56.5%) were negative. Cytology alone showed a sensitivity of 74.2% and specificity of 63.3% for AIN2+ lesions, while HR-HPV testing alone had a sensitivity of 96.8% and specificity of 38.1%. Co-testing demonstrated 100% sensitivity and a 100% NPV for AIN2+ lesions. Among men who have sex with men (MSM), no significant differences in outcomes were observed between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients, likely reflecting similar high-risk behaviors and effective HIV treatments. Conclusions: Co-testing with anal cytology and HR-HPV testing provides the most reliable screening for high-grade lesions (AIN2+), surpassing the reliability of individual methods. Tailored co-testing strategies are crucial for early detection and effective prevention in high-risk groups.

Changing the paradigm: Elimination - Not only of cervical cancer

The WHO's initiative to eliminate cervical cancer by 2030 does not address the increasing incidence of vulvar, anal, and oropharyngeal cancers linked to high-risk HPV. Currently, the prevention of these three cancers faces various obstacles, such as a lack of specialized screening programs, well-defined management guidelines, and widespread public awareness. Without any interventions, the incidence of these three cancers will likely rise in the upcoming years, increasingly affecting younger individuals. We recommend expanding the WHO's initiative to include vulvar, anal, and oropharyngeal cancers. This involves developing screening and management protocols similar to those for cervical cancer, implementing gender-neutral HPV vaccination programs, establishing clear referral pathways to specialized centers, promoting public awareness, and providing education to healthcare providers and high-risk individuals.

Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Updates From the Last 3 Years

In the last 3 years, new and relevant information has been published on anal cancer and anal precancerous lesions epidemiology, screening, treatment, and vaccination. This information will likely change prevention and treatment strategies for these patients in the upcoming years.

HPV status and HPV16 viral load in anal cancer and its association with clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

The incidence of anal cancer is increasing globally. Evidence-based improvement in early detection and management of this morbid cancer is thus required. In other cancers associated with Human Papillomavirus (HPV), viral status and dynamics, including viral load (VL) has been shown to influence clinical outcome. Our aim was to determine the influence of HPV status and HPV16 VL on the clinical outcomes of anal cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 185 anal cancer lesions were genotyped for HPV. Of the HPV16 positive component, VL was determined using a digital droplet PCR assay. The association of qualitative HPV status and VL (low (<12.3), medium (12.3-57) and high (>57 copies/cell)) on overall survival and hazard of death was assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 185 cases, 164 (88.6%) samples were HPV positive. HPV16 was detected in 154/185 samples (83.2%). HPV positive status was associated with improved overall survival in the univariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) of 0.44, 0.23-0.82, p = 0.01]. When adjusted by age, sex, stage and response to treatment, the association of positive HPV status with improved survival remained (HR 0.24 [0.11-0.55] p < 0.001). High VL was associated with improved overall survival in the univariate analysis with a HR of 0.28 (0.11-0.71, p = 0.007). When adjusted only by age and sex, high VL was associated with better overall survival (HR 0.27, 0.11-0.68 p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

HPV status appears to be independently associated with improved outcomes in anal cancer patients. Moreover, HPV viral load quantification may be informative for further risk stratification and warrants further investigation.

Early Diagnostics of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Simple Summary

The spectrum of vulvar disorders is wide and varies from infections, dermatoses, manifestations of hormonal and systemic conditions to vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) and invasive cancer. It is not always possible to distinguish vulvar lesions on the basis of macroscopical aspects and the distribution of changes. For definite diagnosis of a vulvar lesion, a biopsy is needed. However, in practice, the decision to perform a biopsy is often delayed due to a lack of specificity of symptoms at the early stages of the neoplastic disease. The aim of this article is to provide clinicians, both gynecologists and dermatologists, with the main features of vulvar precancerous lesions, in order to recognize and treat them on time, thus preventing vulvar cancer. Clinical appearance of VIN is variable with significant variations present in color, surface, and topography. Evaluation of all VIN lesions should be conducted very carefully, because an underlying early invasive squamous cancer appears to be present in a significant percentage of patients.

Abstract

The spectrum of vulvar lesions ranges from infective and benign dermatologic conditions to vulvar precancer and invasive cancer. Distinction based on the characteristics of vulvar lesions is often not indicative of histology. Vulvoscopy is a useful tool in the examination of vulvar pathology. It is more complex than just colposcopic examination and presumes naked eye examination accompanied by magnification, when needed. Magnification can be achieved using a magnifying glass or a colposcope and may aid the evaluation when a premalignant or malignant lesion is suspected. It is a useful tool to establish the best location for biopsies, to plan excision, and to evaluate the entire lower genital system. Combining features of vulvar lesions can help prediction of its histological nature. Clinically, there are two distinct premalignant types of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia: HPV-related VIN, more common in young women, multifocal and multicentric; VIN associated with vulvar dermatoses, more common in older women and usually unicentric. For definite diagnosis, a biopsy is required. In practice, the decision to perform a biopsy is often delayed due to a lack of symptoms at the early stages of the neoplastic disease. Clinical evaluation of all VIN lesions should be conducted very carefully, because an underlying early invasive squamous cancer may be present.