Erlotinib-based perioperative adjuvant therapy for a case of unresectable stage IIIA (N2) nonsmall cell lung cancer

Rescue Surgery after Immunotherapy/Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Initially Unresectable Lung Cancer

Simple Summary

Locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been considered for a long time as an unresectable disease. Chemotherapy was considered the only therapeutic option for these conditions and the results were unsatisfactory. Recent advances in biology and immunology have led to the use of personalized treatments by using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which produce significant and durable treatment responses. Large trials explored the utility of TKIs and ICIs in neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings, showing good results in terms of radiological response and long-term outcomes. Retrospective case series in patients with the previously unresectable disease who received treatment with TKIs, or ICIs showed important clinical changes that consider the possibility of pulmonary resection of the residual disease. They showed an overall feasibility for pulmonary resection but also raised concerns about the technical challenges. In the present study, we analyzed and reported the surgical and long-term outcomes of patients with initial unresectable, locally advanced, or oligometastatic NSCLC who were treated with TKIs or ICIs achieving a clinical downstaging so as to re-enter resectability.

Abstract

Background: We report the outcomes for unresectable patients with locally advanced or oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) or immunotherapy who achieved a clinical downstaging so as to re-enter resectability. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, surgical, and pathological data of 42 patients with histologically proven, inoperable NSCLC who received rescue surgery after a good response to TKI or immunotherapy between March 2014 and December 2021. Results: Of 42 patients, 39 underwent pulmonary resection with therapeutic intent (three explorative thoracotomies). There were 26 males, with a median age of 64 years (range, 41–78 years). Twenty-three patients received TKIs and 19 immunotherapies. Anatomic resection was performed in 97.4% of resected patients (38/39) including 30 lobectomies, one right upper sleeve lobectomy, five pneumonectomies, one tracheal sleeve pneumonectomy, and one bilobectomy; a patient underwent wedge resection. Of 10 procedures attempted via a robotic approach, two required conversion to thoracotomy. No intraoperative morbidity/mortality occurred. The median operative time was 190 (range, 80–426) minutes; estimated blood loss was 200 mL (range, 35–780 mL). Morbidity occurred in 13/39 (33.3%). The median length of hospital stay was 6.5 days (range, 4–23 days). Pathologic downstaging was 74.4% (29/39). With a median follow-up of 28.7 months, the 5-year disease-free interval was 46.5%, and the 5-year overall survival was 66.0%; 32/39 patients (82.1%) are alive, 10 with the disease. Conclusions: Lung resection for suspected residual disease after immunotherapy or TKIs is feasible, with encouraging pathological downstaging. Surgical operation may be technically challenging due to the presence of fibrosis, but significant morbidity appears to be rare. Outcomes are encouraging, with reasonable survival during the short-interval follow-up.

Pathological Complete Response after Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor Followed by Salvage Surgery for Clinical Stage IV Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma with Continuous Low Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio: A Case Report

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a crucial role in the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, most patients fail this treatment after a limited period. We here report a patient with a pathological complete response after treatment with ICI for stage IV pulmonary adenocarcinoma. A 73-year-old man was referred to our hospital because of hoarseness. A roentgenogram and chest CT scan revealed a huge (78-mm diameter) pulmonary tumor in the right upper lobe and a tumor with cavitation in the left lower lobe. A CT scan also showed enlarged upper mediastinal lymph nodes (LNs). Transbronchial lung biopsy of the tumors showed adenocarcinomas in both. The tumor in the right upper lobe was considered to be the primary with mediastinal LNs metastasis and that in the left lower lobe a pulmonary metastasis. The disease was determined to be cT4N2M1a stage IVA. He was treated with first-line chemotherapy comprising cisplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab for 6 cycles. However, 6 months after initial treatment, the primary and metastatic tumors enlarged, and he was treated with second-line anti-programed death 1 therapy for 7 months with a partial response. 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) revealed weak accumulation of FDG in the primary tumor only with no accumulation in the left pulmonary metastasis or mediastinal lymph node (LNs), despite the LNs still being enlarged. He was diagnosed as having ycT1bN0M0 stage IA2 disease and underwent right upper lobectomy. Postoperative pathological findings revealed that cancer tissues had been replaced by scar tissue and that CD4-positive T cells, rather than CD8-positive T cells, were predominant. It was also noted that he had a lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) during immunotherapy than before immunotherapy and after surgery. He was diagnosed to be ypT0N0M0 stage 0 (Ef.3). His postoperative course was uneventful, and he remained well for 12 months after surgery with no further treatment. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with ICIs for advanced NSCLC may be a promising modality, even for clinical stage IV disease, in the near future. Furthermore, NLR during immunotherapy may be a promising biomarker of ICIs treatment.

Resectable IIIA-N2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): In Search for the Proper Treatment

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer accounts for one third of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the time of initial diagnosis and presents with a wide range of clinical and pathological heterogeneity. To date, the combined multimodality approach involving both local and systemic control is the gold standard for these patients, since occult distant micrometastatic disease should always be suspected. With the rapid increase in treatment options, the need for an interdisciplinary discussion involving oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists and radiologists has become essential. Surgery should be recommended to patients with non-bulky, discrete, or single-level N2 involvement and be included in the multimodality treatment. Resectable stage IIIA patients have been the subject of a number of clinical trials and retrospective analysis, discussing the efficiency and survival benefits on patients treated with the available therapeutic approaches. However, most of them have some limitations due to their retrospective nature, lack of exact pretreatment staging, and the involvement of heterogeneous populations leading to the awareness that each patient should undergo a tailored therapy in light of the nature of his tumor, its extension and his performance status.

Erlotinib Versus Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin as Neoadjuvant Treatment of Stage IIIA-N2 EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (EMERGING-CTONG 1103): A Randomized Phase II Study

PURPOSE

To assess the benefits of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors as neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapies in locally advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter (17 centers in China), open-label, phase II, randomized controlled trial of erlotinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC chemotherapy) as neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy in patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations in exon 19 or 21 (EMERGING). Patients received erlotinib 150 mg/d (neoadjuvant therapy, 42 days; adjuvant therapy, up to 12 months) or gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m² plus cisplatin 75 mg/m² (neoadjuvant therapy, two cycles; adjuvant therapy, up to two cycles). Assessments were performed at 6 weeks and every 3 months postsurgery. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1; secondary end points were pathologic complete response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, safety, and tolerability.

RESULTS

Of 386 patients screened, 72 were randomly assigned to treatment (intention-to-treat population), and 71 were included in the safety analysis (one patient withdrew before treatment). The ORR for neoadjuvant erlotinib versus GC chemotherapy was 54.1% versus 34.3% (odds ratio, 2.26; 95% CI, 0.87 to 5.84; P = .092). No pathologic complete response was identified in either arm. Three (9.7%) of 31 patients and zero of 23 patients in the erlotinib and GC chemotherapy arms, respectively, had a major pathologic response. Median PFS was significantly longer with erlotinib (21.5 months) versus GC chemotherapy (11.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.67; P < .001). Observed adverse events reflected those most commonly seen with the two treatments.

CONCLUSION

The primary end point of ORR with 42 days of neoadjuvant erlotinib was not met, but the secondary end point PFS was significantly improved.

Successful Treatment of ROS1-rearranged Lung Cancer Complicated by Hypertrophic Pulmonary Osteoarthropathy with Crizotinib Therapy

Hypertrophic pulmonary osteoarthropathy (HPO) is a paraneoplastic syndrome characterized by digital clubbing, arthritis, and periostitis. Tumor removal usually leads to the resolution of these symptoms. We herein report the efficacy of crizotinib treatment for treating the symptoms of HPO associated with c-ros oncogene 1 receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1)-rearranged lung cancer. A 71-year-old woman presented with a pulmonary tumor and arthritis. She was diagnosed with a ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma [stage IIIB (cT4N2M0) ] with HPO. Crizotinib dramatically reduced the tumor size and resolved the symptoms. After two months of crizotinib treatment, she underwent lobectomy, and a pathological evaluation revealed ypstage IIIA (ypT3a, ypN1). Crizotinib treatment was effective for reducing the tumor size and improving the symptoms of HPO.

Significance of the epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status and differences among molecular subgroups in surgically resected lung microinvasive adenocarcinoma

Lung microinvasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) is a newly-defined subtype of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status and clinical significance remain unclear. The present study aimed to determine EGFR mutation characteristics and identify their significance in patients with resected lung MIA. The present study also analyzed clinicopathological differences between EGFR molecular subgroups defined as 19Del and L858R. The present study examined EGFR mutations in 79 consecutive lung MIA resection specimens and compared the differences in clinicopathological features between the EGFR wild-type and mutation groups, as well as between the 19Del and L858R subgroups. EGFR mutations were detected in 60 (75.95%) tumors. The most common mutations were 19Del (28 cases; 35.44%) and L858R (30 cases; 37.97%). Two patients harbored rare mutations and one of them had a concomitant double mutation. EGFR mutations were significantly associated with microinvasion component, thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) expression, intratumoral fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration. Subgroup evaluation indicated that there was a significant association between 19Del and tumor size, maximum diameter of microinvasion, presence of intratumoral fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration. Similar associations were observed for the L858R subgroup, and L858R was associated with TTF-1 expression. In particular, 19Del occurred more frequently in MIA with a smaller size, with a smaller microinvasive area, without TTF-1 expression, and lacking intratumoral fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration. By contrast, L858R was detected more frequently in MIA with entirely different tumor features. In conclusion, the results of the present study indicated that surgically resected MIA cases harboring different EGFR gene statuses exhibit distinct clinicopathological features. Significant differences in pathological features associated with the tumor microenvironment were identified in MIA with 19Del or L858R mutations. Therefore, the present study proposed that MIA should be classified into molecular subgroups based on EGFR mutation subtypes. The molecular sub-classification should be taken into account for prognostic evaluation and clinical management of MIA.

Surgery for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patient after epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor neoadjuvant therapy

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the survival of the advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients underwent salvage surgeries after EGFR-TKI neoadjuvant therapies.

Methods

From 2014 to 2016, 10 patients diagnosed as advanced stage NSCLC (N2 metastasis or great vessels invasion) who responded to EGFR-TKI neoadjuvant therapy were recruited in this study. All patients underwent surgeries and consented the follow-up study.

Results

All patients received successful radical surgeries (complete resection of the tumor with systematic lymphadenectomy). Among them, one patient passed away 7 days post-operatively due to respiratory failure. The pathology of the lesions and the lymph nodes suggested the replacement of tumors by fibrotic tissue, and concentration of focal residual tumors limited in areas of fibrous stroma and lymphocyte infiltration. Adjuvant therapy of EGFR inhibitor gefitinib for at least 6 months was applied to each patient. Each of the patients was followed up with contrasted CT scan, ultrasonography, bronchoscope and tumor markers for at least 8 months (8-30 months, median time: 24 months). The progression-free survival of these patients was 14 months since neoadjuvant therapy.

Conclusions

EGFR-TKI neoadjuvant therapy is feasible and effective, along with surgery may improve the surgical rate and survival of advanced NSCLC patients.

Keywords

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor neoadjuvant therapy (EGFR-TKI neoadjuvant therapy); salvage surgery.

Eventual role of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer

Nonadvanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has a poor long-term survival from surgery or definitive radiation that is minimally improved with induction/adjuvant conventional chemotherapy. EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which provide a significant benefit for molecularly selected EGFR-mutant patients with advanced NSCLC, have been infrequently explored in nonadvanced NSCLC to date. Current published studies reported no significant benefit from adding EGFR-TKI to the induction/adjuvant setting. However, many of them present eventual biases such as unpowered statistics, lack of molecular selection, recruitment of low-risk NSCLC, low sample size or unsuitable control arms. Results, strengths and deficiencies of completed and ongoing trials were fully discussed. Similarly, the selection of patients and control arms, the duration and risks of EGFR-TKI therapies in early-stage NSCLC, the evaluation of response and the diagnosis of EGFR status were considered and analyzed.

Phase II study of biomarker-guided neoadjuvant treatment strategy for IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer based on epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status

Background

Neoadjuvant erlotinib and customized adjuvant therapy are appealing but controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of biomarker-guided neoadjuvant treatment strategy in patients with IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stratified by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status.

Findings

Patients with resectable histologically documented stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC were assigned to a neoadjuvant erlotinib arm or a gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) arm based on EGFR mutation status. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Twenty-four patients with IIIA-N2 NSCLC were enrolled in the trial from January 2008 until May 2011. The overall response rate was 41.7 % and the PFS and OS were 7.9 and 23.2 months, respectively, in overall population. The RR was 58.3 % (7/12) for the erlotinib arm with mutant EGFR and 25.0 % (3/12) for the GC arm with wild type EGFR (P = 0.18). Median PFS was 6.9 months versus 9.0 months, respectively (P = 0.071). Median OS was 14.5 months for the erlotinib arm and 28.1 months for the GC arm (P = 0.201). No unexpected toxicities were observed.

Conclusions

The primary endpoint was met and biomarker-guided neoadjuvant treatment strategy in patients with IIIA-N2 NSCLC is feasible. Erlotinib alone in neoadjuvant setting of EGFR mutant population showed an improved response but without survival benefits.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00600587 https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00600587?term=NCT00600587&rank=1

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13045-015-0151-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy for lung cancer

The Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation (LACE) meta-analysis and the meta-analysis of individual participant data reported by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Meta-analysis Collaborative Group in neo-adjuvant setting validated respectively that adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy would significantly improve overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival for resectable NSCLC. However, chemotherapy has reached a therapeutic plateau. It has been confirmed that epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) targeting therapy provides a dramatic response to patients with advanced EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC. Researchers have paid more attention to exploring applications of TKIs to early resectable NSCLCs. Several studies on adjuvant TKI treatment concluded its safety and feasibility. But there existed certain limitations of these studies as inference factors to interpret data accurately: the BR19 study recruited patients among which almost 52% had stage IB and only 15 (3.0%, 15/503) had been confirmed with EGFR-mutant type; retrospective studies performed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) selected EGFR mutant-type NSCLC patients but couldn't avoid inherent defects inside retrospective researches; the RADIANT study revised endpoints from targeting at EGFR immunohistochemistry (IHC)+ and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)+ mutation to only EGFR IHC+ mutation, leading to selective bias; despite that the SELECT study validated efficacy of adjuvant TKI and second round of TKI after resistance occurred, a single-arm clinical trial is not that persuasive in the absence of comparison with chemotherapy. Taking all these limitations into account, CTONG1104 in China and IMPACT in Japan have been conducted and recruiting patients to offer higher level of evidences to explore efficacy of preoperative TKI therapy for early resectable EGFR mutation positive NSCLC patients (confirmed by pathological results of tumor tissue or lymph node biopsy). On the other hand, case reports and several phase II clinical trials with small sample size tried to elbow their way on respect of preoperative TKI treatment and advised that TKI tended to improve response rate. However, no data on survival rate was present. The first phase II study of biomarker-guided neoadjuvant therapy for stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients stratified by EGFR mutation status, sponsored by CSLC0702, showed erlotinib tended to improve response rate, but failed to show benefits of disease-free survival (DFS) or OS. Subsequently, CTONG1103 was designed to investigate efficacy of erlotinib vs. combination of gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) as neoadjuvant treatment in stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC with sensitizing EGFR mutation in exon 19 or 21. All these ongoing trials should be worthy of our expect to provide convincing evidences for customized therapy for patients with resectable NSCLC.