Value of T1-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cholesteatoma Detection

Recent advances in Otology: Current landscape and future direction

Hearing is an essential sensation, and its deterioration leads to a significant decrease in the quality of life. Thus, great efforts have been made by otologists to preserve and recover hearing. Our knowledge regarding the field of otology has progressed with advances in technology, and otologists have sought to develop novel approaches in the field of otologic surgery to achieve higher hearing recovery or preservation rates. This requires knowledge regarding the anatomy of the temporal bone and the physiology of hearing. Basic research in the field of otology has progressed with advances in molecular biology and genetics. This review summarizes the current views and recent advances in the field of otology and otologic surgery, especially from the viewpoint of young Japanese clinician-scientists, and presents the perspectives and future directions for several topics in the field of otology. This review will aid next-generation researchers in understanding the recent advances and future challenges in the field of otology.

Imaging of Pathologies of the Temporal Bone and Middle Ear: Inflammatory Diseases, Their Mimics and Potential Complications-Pictorial Review

Imaging of the temporal bone and middle ear is challenging for radiologists due to the abundance of distinct anatomical structures and the plethora of possible pathologies. The basis for a precise diagnosis is knowledge of the underlying anatomy as well as the clinical presentation and the individual patient's otological status. In this article, we aimed to summarize the most common inflammatory lesions of the temporal bone and middle ear, describe their specific imaging characteristics, and highlight their differential diagnoses. First, we introduce anatomical and imaging fundamentals. Additionally, a point-to-point comparison of the radiological and histological features of the wide spectrum of inflammatory diseases of the temporal bone and middle ear in context with a review of the current literature and current trends is given.

Localization Evaluation of Primary Middle Ear Cholesteatoma With Fusion of Turbo Spin-Echo Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and High-Resolution Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to evaluate the application of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging (TSE-DWI) fusion imaging for localization of middle ear cholesteatomas.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with clinically suspected middle ear cholesteatomas were enrolled prospectively. Ear TSE-DWI and HRCT scans were performed using a postprocessing workstation to generate a TSE-DWI-CT fusion image. Subsequently, all the enrolled patients received surgical treatment. According to the STAM system (difficult access sites [S], the tympanic cavity [T], the attic [A], and the mastoid [M]), the agreement between the localization of lesions evaluated by HRCT, TSE-DWI, and TSE-DWI-CT fusion images and the intraoperatively recorded localization were computed using Cohen κ statistic.

RESULTS

Based on the pathological results, the enrolled patients were divided into a cholesteatoma (n = 50) and a noncholesteatoma group (n = 36). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for diagnosis of cholesteatoma with TSE-DWI-CT fusion imaging was identical to that using the TSE-DWI images (0.924 vs 0.924, P > 0.05), but was significantly higher than that with HRCT imaging (0.924 vs 0.767, P = 0.0005). Furthermore, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of TSE-DWI-CT fusion imaging for cholesteatomas were 96.0% and 88.9%, respectively. Depending on whether the cholesteatoma extended to the mastoid, TSE-DWI-CT fusion imaging demonstrated good agreement with the intraoperative record for localization of lesions (κ = 0.808) and had a high accuracy of localization by the STAM system.

CONCLUSIONS

Turbo spin-echo-DWI-CT fusion images have a very high diagnostic value for the preoperative localization of cholesteatomas.

Non-echo Planar Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Detection of Recurrent or Residual Cholesteatoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Studies

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with suspected recurrent cholesteatoma who underwent non-echo planar imaging (non-EPI) using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with surgery as the reference standard. We searched Medline, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane database for diagnostic test accuracy studies. The following prespecified subgroup analyses were performed: patient age, number of radiologists interpreting MRI, study design, and risk of bias. We used a bivariate model using a generalized linear mixed model to pool accuracies. Of the 460 records identified, 32 studies were included, of which 50% (16/32) were low risk of bias. The overall pooled sensitivity was 92.2% (95% CI 87.3-95.3%), and specificity was 91.7% (85.2-95.5%). The positive likelihood ratio was 11.1 (4.5-17.8), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.09 (0.04-0.13). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 130.3 (20.5-240). Heterogeneity was moderate on visual inspection of the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve. Subgroup analyses showed prospective studies reporting higher accuracies (p=0.027), which were driven by higher specificity (prospective 93.1% (88.4-96.0%) versus retrospective 81.2% (81.0-81.4%)). There was no difference in subgroups comparing patient age (p=0.693), number of radiologists interpreting MRI (p=0.503), or risk of bias (p=0.074). No publication bias was detected (p=0.98). In conclusion, non-EPI is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic test able to identify recurrent cholesteatomas of moderate to large sizes. This test can be considered a non-invasive alternative to second-look surgery.

The Efficacy of DW and T1-W MRI Combined with CT in the Preoperative Evaluation of Cholesteatoma

Objective: This study aims to assess the efficacy of diffusion-weighted (DW) and T1-weighted (T1W) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) (together as DW-T1W-CT) in the preoperative evaluation of the presence and extent of cholesteatoma, which helps determine whether a patient is suitable for transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES). Methods: This retrospective study included 35 patients (18 male and 17 female) aged from 2 to 81 years diagnosed with chronic otitis media with or without cholesteatoma, who had received surgical treatment and a preoperative MRI and HRCT during the period of December 2015 to December 2020 at Cathay General Hospital. We compared the preoperative DW-T1W-CT findings with the intraoperative findings and final pathologic diagnosis. The accurate predictive value was evaluated using the presence of cholesteatoma and its extent. Results: Regarding the efficacy of detecting cholesteatoma, we found a sensitivity of 92% (23/25 cases with cholesteatoma), a specificity of 90% (9/10 cases without cholesteatoma), and an overall accurate predictive value of 91.4% (32/35) by using combined DW-T1W-CT imaging. With regard to evaluating the extent of cholesteatoma, the combined DW-T1W-CT images obtained an accurate predictive value of 84% (21/25 cases of cholesteatoma). Conclusion: Combined DW-T1W-CT has been proven to be a reliable tool in detecting the presence of cholesteatoma. It is also useful in preoperatively depicting the extent of cholesteatoma, which is crucial for determining whether a patient is suitable for TEES, aiding in surgical planning and patient consultation.

Comparison of the Utility of High-Resolution CT-DWI and T2WI-DWI Fusion Images for the Localization of Cholesteatoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cholesteatoma is an aggressive disease that may lead to hearing impairment. This study aimed to compare the utility of high-resolution CT and TSE-DWI fusion images with that of T2WI and TSE-DWI fusion images in the localization of middle ear cholesteatoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-one patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were retrospectively recruited. High-resolution CT, T2WI with fat suppression, and TSE-DWI scans were obtained, and image fusion was performed using a 3D reconstruction postprocessing workstation to form CT-DWI and T2WI-DWI fusion images. The quality of the 2 fused images was subjectively evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale with the horizontal semicircular canal transverse position as the reference. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and the diagnostic efficacies of CT-DWI and T2WI-DWI fusion images in localizing middle ear cholesteatoma were calculated.

RESULTS

The overall quality of T2WI-DWI fusion images was slightly higher than that of CT-DWI fusion images (P < .001), and the semicircular canal was slightly less clear on T2WI-DWI than on CT-DWI (P < .001). No statistical difference was found in the diagnostic confidence between them. In the localization of middle ear cholesteatoma, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of T2WI-DWI fusion images and CT-DWI fusion images were equivalent for involvement of the attic, tympanic cavity, mastoid antrum, and mastoid process, with no statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

T2WI-DWI fusion images could replace CT-DWI in the preoperative selection of surgical options for middle ear cholesteatoma.

Detection of cholesteatoma: 2D BLADE turbo gradient- and spin-echo imaging versus readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging

PURPOSE

This study is to compare the accuracy of 2D BLADE turbo gradient- and spin-echo imaging (TGSE BLADE) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with that of readout-segmented echo-planar (RESOLVE) DWI in the detection of primary and residual/recurrent temporal bone cholesteatoma.

METHODS

The prospective study population consisted of 58 patients who were underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the evaluation of suspected temporal bone cholesteatoma. Two radiologists independently evaluated the two sequences. Kappa (k) statistics, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and a paired t test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients included, all had histo-pathologically confirmed cholesteatomas. In ≤ 3 mm group (n = 13), TGSE BLADE sequence correctly identified all cases except one that was recorded as equivocal on both sequences because of high signal intensity on T1WI; while on RESOLVE sequences, 6 were positive, 4 were equivocal, and 3 were false negative. For > 3 mm group (n = 45), detection performance was similar between the two sequences. The mean ADC of cholesteatoma on TGSE BLADE DWI was 0.923 × 10^-3 mm²/s, and the mean ADC of cholesteatoma on RESOLVE DWI was 0.949 × 10^-3 mm²/s, with no significant difference in the mean ADC values of cholesteatoma measured on the two sequences (p = 0.9216).

CONCLUSION

TGSE BLADE outperforms RESOLVE in the detection of small temporal bone cholesteatoma ≤ 3 mm.

MRI of middle ear cholesteatoma: The importance of observer reliance from diffusion sequences

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI) in MRI has been developed as an important tool for the detection of cholesteatoma. Various DWI sequences are available. This study aims to evaluate the importance of the observer's reliance level for the detection of cholesteatoma.

METHODS

Forty patients meeting the following criteria were included in the study: (1) chronic otitis media, (2) preoperative MRI including various DWI sequences, and (3) middle-ear surgery. The MRI protocol contained the following sequences: (1) axial and (2) coronal echoplanar imaging (EPI) readout-segmented (RESOLVE) DWI with Trace acquisition and (3) coronal non-EPI half-Fourier acquired single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) DWI. Cholesteatoma diagnosis was based on standard diagnostic criteria for cholesteatoma with DWI. Additionally, the radiologists were asked to grade personal reliance on their diagnosis using a Likert-type scale from 1 = very insecure to 5 = very secure.

RESULTS

Axial and coronal RESOLVE DWI showed a sensitivity of 77.3% and a specificity of 72.2%, respectively. The mean reliance was 3.9 for axial and 3.8 for coronal images. HASTE DWI had a sensitivity/specificity of 81.8%/66.7% with the highest reliance of all evaluated sequences (4.4). Cases with a reliance level of 5 showed a sensitivity/specificity of 100% in all sequences. A reliance level of 5 was given in the axial and coronal RESOLVE DWI in 32.5% of cases and in the HASTE DWI in 57.5%.

CONCLUSION

The evaluated DWI sequences showed comparable results. The reliance level significantly improved the predictor of cholesteatoma disease with MRI techniques.

Non-echoplanar diffusion weighed imaging and T1-weighted imaging for cholesteatoma mastoid extension

OBJECTIVES

A broad mastoid extension limits cholesteatoma resection via a transmeatal approach including endoscopic ear surgery. Therefore, a preoperative diagnosis of mastoid extension is a the most critical factor to determine whether to perform mastoidectomy. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging (non-EPI DWI) and T1-weighted imaging in the evaluation of mastoid extension in cholesteatomas of the middle ear.

METHODS

Patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for pretreatment evaluation before primary surgery for pars flaccida or tensa cholesteatoma, which revealed a high-signal intensity in the mastoid on T2-weighed imaging were retrospectively evaluated. Two board-certified radiologists retrospectively evaluated the extent of cholesteatomas on MRI with non-EPI DWI, non-EPI DWI- and T1-weighted axial imaging. The presence of a high signal intensity on non-EPI DWI or low or high signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging in the mastoid was evaluated. All cases were subclassified as M+ (surgically mastoid extension-positive) or M- (surgically mastoid extension-negative).

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were evaluated. There were 37 M+ cases and 22 M- cases. High-signal intensity on non-EPI DWI exhibited a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.82, whereas partial low-signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging exhibited a sensitivity of 0.84 and specificity of 0.91 for detecting mastoid involvement. Complete high-signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging exhibited a sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.89 for detecting non-involvement of the mastoid. The sensitivity (0.92) and specificity (0.96) of combined non-EPI DWI and T1-weighted imaging evaluation were higher than those of with non-EPI DWI or T1-weighted imaging alone. The interobserver agreement for the presence of high-signal intensity in the mastoid cavity on non-EPI DWI was very good at 0.82, that of a partial low-signal intensity area in the mastoid cavity lesions on T1-weighted imaging was good, at 0.76 and that of complete high-signal intensity in the mastoid cavity lesions on T1-weighted imaging was good, at 0.67.

CONCLUSIONS

The signal intensity on non-EPI DWI and T1-weighted imaging of the mastoid could be used to accurately assess the extent of middle ear cholesteatoma, which could facilitate surgical treatment planning.

MRI of the Internal Auditory Canal, Labyrinth, and Middle Ear: How We Do It

MRI is firmly established as an essential modality in the imaging of the temporal bone and lateral skull base. It is used to evaluate normal anatomic structures, evaluate for vestibular schwannomas, assess for inflammatory and/or infectious processes, and detect residual and/or recurrent cholesteatoma. It is also extensively used in pre- and postoperative evaluations, particularly in patients with vestibular schwannomas and candidates for cochlear implantation. Nevertheless, despite the widespread use of MRI for these purposes, many radiologists remain unfamiliar with the complex anatomy and expected imaging findings with such examinations. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the most useful MRI sequences for internal auditory canal and labyrinthine imaging, review the relevant anatomy, and discuss the expected appearances of the most commonly encountered pathologic entities. In addition, the features at pre- and postprocedural MRI will be discussed to help ensure that diagnostic radiologists may be of greatest use to the ordering physicians. © RSNA, 2020.

Surgical mapping of middle ear cholesteatoma with fusion of computed tomography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images: Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic performance in detecting primary cholesteatoma at various anatomical subsites using Computed Tomography (CT), Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DWMRI) and Fusion of CT and DWMRI (Fusion CT-MRI) images.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study of 22 children identified from a prospective database of surgically treated cholesteatoma cases over a five year period. All cases underwent pre-operative CT, non-echo planar DWMRI and Fusion CT-DWMRI, and with clearly documented surgical findings. For each imaging modality, two radiologists scored for the presence or absence of cholesteatoma with confidence levels at different anatomical subsites. The radiologists were blinded to the surgical findings to which their findings were compared.

SETTING

Large Teaching Hospital in London.

PATIENTS

22 children with cholesteatoma confirmed surgically.

INTERVENTION

CT, DWMRI imaging and fusion CT-MRI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Diagnostic performance of subsite localisation of cholesteatoma by CT, DWMRI and fusion CT-MRI imaging with intra-operative findings.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were included (12 women and 10 men). The median age of patients was 11 years. When considering all subsites combined, the result for all imaging methods suggested 'good' agreement between both observers. When all subsites were examined together, all methods had relatively high sensitivity values (87% for CT vs 84% for DWMRI vs 85% for fusion CT-DWMRI). Specificity was highest with fusion CT-DWMRI (46% for CT vs 76% for DWMRI vs 97% for fusion CT-DWMRI), as was accuracy (66% for CT vs 80% for DWMRI vs 91% for fusion).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has demonstrated that fusion CT-DWMRI is superior to DWMRI or CT separately in localizing cholesteatoma at various middle ear cleft subsites and bony relations, making it a valuable tool for surgical planning.

Recent advances in MRI of the head and neck, skull base and cranial nerves: new and evolving sequences, analyses and clinical applications

MRI is an invaluable diagnostic tool in the investigation and management of patients with pathology of the head and neck. However, numerous technical challenges exist, owing to a combination of fine anatomical detail, complex geometry (that is subject to frequent motion) and susceptibility effects from both endogenous structures and exogenous implants. Over recent years, there have been rapid developments in several aspects of head and neck imaging including higher resolution, isotropic 3D sequences, diffusion-weighted and diffusion-tensor imaging as well as permeability and perfusion imaging. These have led to improvements in anatomic, dynamic and functional imaging. Further developments using contrast-enhanced 3D FLAIR for the delineation of endolymphatic structures and black bone imaging for osseous structures are opening new diagnostic avenues. Furthermore, technical advances in compressed sensing and metal artefact reduction have the capacity to improve imaging speed and quality, respectively. This review explores novel and evolving MRI sequences that can be employed to evaluate diseases of the head and neck, including the skull base.

Reliability of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of recurrent cholesteatoma and granulation tissue after intact canal wall mastoidectomy

Objective

To assess the reliability of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating recurrent cholesteatoma from granulation tissue after intact canal wall mastoidectomy.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted of 56 consecutive patients with suspected cholesteatoma recurrence after intact canal wall mastoidectomy who underwent diffusion-weighted imaging and delayed contrast magnetic resonance imaging of the temporal bone. The final diagnosis was recurrence in 38 patients and granulation tissue in 18 patients.

Results

Cholesteatoma detection on diffusion-weighted imaging based on two sets of readings had sensitivity of 94.7 and 94.7 per cent, specificity of 94.4 and 88.9 per cent, and accuracy of 94.6 and 92.8 per cent, with good intra-observer agreement (Κ= 0.72,p= 0.001). Cholesteatoma detection on delayed contrast magnetic resonance imaging had sensitivity of 81.6 and 78.9 per cent, specificity of 77.8 and 66.7 per cent, and accuracy of 80.4 and 75.0 per cent, with fair intra-observer agreement (Κ= 0.57,p= 0.001). The mean cholesteatoma diameter on diffusion-weighted imaging was 7.7 ± 1.8 and 7.9 ± 1.8 mm, with excellent intra-observer agreement (Κ= 0.994,p= 0.001).

Conclusion

Diffusion-weighted imaging is a reliable method for differentiating recurrent cholesteatoma and granulation tissue after intact canal wall mastoidectomy.

Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar DWI for the Detection of Cholesteatomas: Correlation with Surgical Validation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

MR imaging has become an important tool for the detection of cholesteatomas of the middle ear. Various diffusion-weighted imaging sequences are available and have shown promising results. This study aimed to evaluate readout-segmented echo-planar DWI for the detection of cholesteatoma and compare the results with surgical validation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients with chronic otitis media (24 females and 26 males; range, 12-76 years of age; mean age, 41 years) who underwent MR imaging before an operation of the middle ear (1-169 days) were included. The MR imaging protocol consisted of axial and coronal readout-segmented echo-planar DWI with b-values of 0 and 1000 s/mm² and 3-mm slice thickness. The readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted images were fused with standard T2-weighted sequences for better anatomic assignment. The results of the MR imaging evaluation were correlated with the results from the operation.

RESULTS

Readout-segmented echo-planar DWI detected 22 of the 25 cases of surgically proved cholesteatoma. It has an accuracy of 92% (95% confidence interval, 80.8%-97.8%), a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 96%, a positive predictive value of 96%, and a negative predictive value of 89%. In 1 case, a positive finding for cholesteatoma with readout-segmented echo-planar DWI could not be proved by histology, and in 3 cases, histology yielded a cholesteatoma that was not detected with MR imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Readout-segmented echo-planar DWI is a promising and reliable MR imaging sequence for the detection and exclusion of cholesteatoma.

The diagnostic accuracy of 1.5 T versus 3 T non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of residual or recurrent cholesteatoma in the middle ear and mastoid

PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND

This study retrospectively compares diagnostic performance of 1.5 T versus 3 T non-echo planar diffusion weighted imaging with or without additional T1 and T2 sequences in the detection of residual and/or recurrent cholesteatoma.

METHODS

Patients with clinically suspected recurrent cholesteatoma or postoperative routine survey MR who subsequently underwent surgical procedure were retrospectively included (135 patients, 164 operated ears) from a large database. Patients underwent 1.5 T (128 ears) or 3 T MRI (36 ears), with non-echo planar DWI, T1 and T2 acquisitions. Two radiologists independently reassessed the images. Definitive surgical diagnosis was used as gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio were evaluated.

RESULTS

According to surgical diagnosis a cholesteatoma was present in 124 of 164 ears, corresponding with a prevalence of 75%. Sensitivity and specificity were lower for 3 T compared to 1.5 T, irrespective of whether additional T1 and T2-weighted sequences were used or not. Diagnostic odds ratios were higher for 1.5 T (34 and 12 for reader 1 and 2, respectively) compared to 3 T (3 and 4 for reader 1 and 2, respectively). Adding T1 and T2 sequences lowers sensitivity but increases specificity.

CONCLUSION

Non-epi DWI for the detection of residual/recurrent cholesteatoma is preferably performed on 1.5 T scanners over 3 T. The use of additional sequences regarding detection of cholesteatoma is debatable as it lowers sensitivity but increases specificity. However, these sequences may also be of use in diagnosing complications and planning surgical procedures in some hospitals.