First Experience With a New Thin Lateral Wall Electrode in Human Temporal Bones

Intracochlear Trauma and Local Ossification Patterns Differ Between Straight and Precurved Cochlear Implant Electrodes

HYPOTHESIS

Trauma to the osseous spiral lamina (OSL) or spiral ligament (SL) during cochlear implant (CI) insertion segregates with electrode type and induces localized intracochlear ossification and fibrosis.

BACKGROUND

The goal of atraumatic CI insertion is to preserve intracochlear structures, limit reactive intracochlear tissue formation, and preserve residual hearing. Previous qualitative studies hypothesized a localized effect of trauma on intracochlear tissue formation; however, quantitative studies failed to confirm this.

METHODS

Insertional trauma beyond the immediate insertion site was histologically assessed in 21 human temporal bones with a CI. Three-dimensional reconstructions were generated and virtually resectioned perpendicular to the cochlear spiral at high resolution. The cochlear volume occupied by ossification or fibrosis was determined at the midpoint of the trauma and compared with regions proximal and distal to this point.

RESULTS

Seven cases, all implanted with precurved electrodes, showed an OSL fracture beyond the immediate insertion site. Significantly more intracochlear ossification was observed at the midpoint of the OSL fracture, compared with the -26 to -18 degrees proximal and 28 to 56 degrees distal to the center. No such pattern was observed for fibrosis. In the 12 cases with a perforation of the SL (9 straight and 3 precurved electrodes), no localized pattern of ossification or fibrosis was observed around these perforations.

CONCLUSION

OSL fractures were observed exclusively with precurved electrodes in this study and may serve as a nidus for localized intracochlear ossification. Perforation of the SL, in contrast, predominantly occurred with straight electrodes and was not associated with localized ossification.

Initial Experience With a Recently Developed Lateral Wall Electrode

OBJECTIVE

To review our hearing preservation rates and speech recognition outcomes in patients undergoing cochlear implantation with a recently developed lateral wall electrode.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of all patients, both pediatric and adult, undergoing cochlear implantation with the Advanced Bionics Hifocus™ SlimJ electrode between December 2017 and January 2020. Main outcomes included hearing preservation rates using several definitions, speech recognition testing primarily through Arizona Biosciences (AzBio) and Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) testing, intra- and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Sixty-one ears underwent implantation with the new electrode. Hearing preservation rates were 13.0% to 36.0% depending on the definition used. Speech recognition testing showed significant increases from pre- to postoperative condition (Implant-only AzBio: 24.1 to 48.3, P = .004, binaural AzBio: 46.1 to 65.9, P = .002, Implant-only CNC: 9.7 to 35.1, P < .001, binaural CNC: 29.8 to 59.40, P < .001) with last speech recognition testing occurring an average of 8.8 months postoperatively. The elderly population had the worst hearing preservation rates across all definitions. Five explantations were required due to two infections and three device failures.

CONCLUSION

Hearing preservation rates varied significantly depending on the definition used, but users experienced a significant improvement in speech recognition testing after implantation. More work is needed in the community to standardize the definition of residual hearing and hearing preservation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 2021.

In-Vitro Study of Speed and Alignment Angle in Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertions

OBJECTIVE

The insertion of the electrode array is a critical step in cochlear implantation. Herein we comprehensively investigate the impact of the alignment angle and feed-forward speed on deep insertions in artificial scala tympani models with accurate macro-anatomy and controlled frictional properties.

METHODS

Motorized insertions (n=1033) were performed in six scala tympani models with varying speeds and alignment angles. We evaluated reaction forces and micrographs of the insertion process and developed a mathematical model to estimate the normal force distribution along the electrode arrays.

RESULTS

Insertions parallel to the cochlear base significantly reduce insertion energies and lead to smoother array movement. Non-constant insertion speeds allow to reduce insertion forces for a fixed total insertion time compared to a constant feed rate.

CONCLUSION

In cochlear implantation, smoothness and peak forces can be reduced with alignment angles parallel to the scala tympani centerline and with non-constant feed-forward speed profiles.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results may help to provide clinical guidelines and improve surgical tools for manual and automated cochlear implantation.

Insertion trauma of a new cochlear implant electrode: evaluated by histology in fresh human temporal bone specimens

BACKGROUND

Combining acoustic and electrical stimulation has been successfully used in patients with low-frequency residual hearing. Electrode insertion trauma, such as electrode translocation could result in loss of residual hearing.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is to evaluate the LCI-20PI electrode array insertion trauma to the intra-cochlear structures in fresh human temporal bone specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The LCI-20PI electrode arrays were inserted into scalae tympani through round window membrane in 10 cochleae from ten fresh human cadavers. The intracochlear trauma was evaluated histologically by a scale of 0-4: 0 - no observable trauma, 1 - elevation of basilar membrane, 2 - rupture of basilar membrane or spiral ligament, 3-dislocation into scala vestibuli and 4 - fracture of modiolus or osseous spiral lamina. The insertion depth was measured by radiography.

RESULTS

Histological results revealed no observable trauma in seven specimens; basal membrane elevation and rupture in two specimens; the electrode array misled into scala vestibuli in one specimen. The insertion depth varied from 228° to 288°.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

The insertion of the LCI-20PI electrode arrays caused no trauma in the majority of the fresh temporal bone specimens. No translocation of the electrode arrays from the scala tympani to the scala vestibuli was observed.

Radiological evaluation of a new straight electrode array compared to its precursors

Objective

The aim of this study is to examine electrode array coverage, scalar position and dislocation rate in straight electrode arrays with special focus on a new electrode array with 26 mm in lengths.

Study design

Retrospective study.

Setting

Tertiary academic center.

Patients

201 ears implanted between 2013 and 2019.

Main outcome measures

We conducted a comparative analysis of patients implanted with lateral wall electrode arrays of different lengths (F24 = MED-EL Flex²⁴, F26 = MED-EL Flex²⁶, F28 = MED-EL Flex²⁸ and F31.5 = MED-EL Flex^Soft). Cone beam computed tomography was used to determine electrode array position (scala tympani (ST) versus scala vestibuli (SV), intracochlear dislocation, position of dislocation and insertion angle).

Results

Study groups show no significant differences regarding cochlear size which excludes influences by cochlear morphology. As expected, the F24 showed significant shorter insertion angles compared to the longer electrode arrays. The F26 electrode array showed no signs of dislocation or SV insertion. The electrode array with the highest rate of ST dislocations was the F31.5 (26.3%). The electrode array with the highest rates of SV insertions was the F28 (5.75%). Most of the included electrode arrays dislocate between 320° and 360° (mean: 346.4°; range from 166° to 502°).

Conclusion

The shorter F24 and the new straight electrode array F26 show less or no signs of scalar dislocation, neither for round window nor for cochleostomy insertion than the longer F28 and the F31.5 array. As expected, the cochlear coverage is increasing with length of the electrode array itself but with growing risk for scalar dislocation and with the highest rates of dislocation for the longest electrode array F31.5. Position of intracochlear dislocation is in the apical cochlear part in the included lateral wall electrode arrays.