Intratympanic Diltiazem-Chitosan Hydrogel as an Otoprotectant Against Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity in a Mouse Model

Hearing loss during chemotherapy: prevalence, mechanisms, and protection

Ototoxicity is an often-underestimated sequela for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, with an incidence rate exceeding 50%, affecting approximately 4 million individuals worldwide each year. Despite the nearly 2,000 publications on chemotherapy-related ototoxicity in the past decade, the understanding of its prevalence, mechanisms, and preventative or therapeutic measures remains ambiguous and subject to debate. To date, only one drug, sodium thiosulfate, has gained FDA approval for treating ototoxicity in chemotherapy. However, its utilization is restricted. This review aims to offer clinicians and researchers a comprehensive perspective by thoroughly and carefully reviewing available data and current evidence. Chemotherapy-induced ototoxicity is characterized by four primary symptoms: hearing loss, tinnitus, vertigo, and dizziness, originating from both auditory and vestibular systems. Hearing loss is the predominant symptom. Amongst over 700 chemotherapeutic agents documented in various databases, only seven are reported to induce hearing loss. While the molecular mechanisms of the hearing loss caused by the two platinum-based drugs are extensively explored, the pathways behind the action of the other five drugs are primarily speculative, rooted in their therapeutic properties and side effects. Cisplatin attracts the majority of attention among these drugs, encompassing around two-thirds of the literature regarding ototoxicity in chemotherapy. Cisplatin ototoxicity chiefly manifests through the loss of outer hair cells, possibly resulting from damages directly by cisplatin uptake or secondary effects on the stria vascularis. Both direct and indirect influences contribute to cisplatin ototoxicity, while it is still debated which path is dominant or where the primary target of cisplatin is located. Candidates for hearing protection against cisplatin ototoxicity are also discussed, with novel strategies and methods showing promise on the horizon.

Tannic acid inhibits pain mediators, inflammation and oxidative stress in mice exposed to glyphosate-based herbicide

Chronic exposure to glyphosate-based herbicide (Gly) has been associated with neurological disorders. Tannic acid (TA) is an antioxidant with attenuating action against neuroinflammation-associated conditions. This study evaluated the effect of Gly on pain perception alongside antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory actions of TA in Gly-exposed mice. Male Swiss mice were randomly divided into six groups (n=8): control (distilled water 0.2 ml/kg), Gly (Gly 500 mg/kg), Pre-TA + Gly (TA 50 mg/kg pre-treatment, afterwards Gly-administered), TA + Gly (TA 50 mg/kg and Gly co-administered), Pre-AA + Gly (ascorbic acid (AA) 10 mg/kg pre-treatment, afterwards Gly-administered), and AA + Gly (AA 10 mg/kg and Gly co-administered). Mechanical, thermal, and chemical pain were evaluated six weeks post vehicle/drugs administrations orally, followed by brain biochemical measurements. TA treatment alleviated Gly-induced hyperalgesia in similar version to the values of control and AA groups by increasing significantly (p < 0.05) nociceptive thresholds. Moreover, TA-treatment significantly decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) and pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) levels, significantly increased anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, IL-4, and TGF-1β) levels, and antioxidant enzymes, catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities compared to Gly-treated mice (p < 0.05). Conclusively, TA treatment exerted antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory actions, possibly through its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory actions in Gly-exposed mice. Notably, TA pre-treatment showed a better response than TA and Gly co-administration. We propose the potential neuroprotective and ameliorative functions of TA in Gly-induced hyperalgesia. This merits further clinical research into protective roles of TA against pesticide-related conditions.

Quantitative profiling of cochlear synaptosomal proteins in cisplatin-induced synaptic dysfunction

The disruption of ribbon synapses in the cochlea impairs the transmission of auditory signals from the cochlear sensory receptor cells to the auditory cortex. Although cisplatin-induced loss of ribbon synapses is well-documented, and studies have reported nitration of cochlear proteins after cisplatin treatment, yet the underlying mechanism of cochlear synaptopathy is not fully understood. This study tests the hypothesis that cisplatin treatment alters the abundance of cochlear synaptosomal proteins, and selective targeting of nitrative stress prevents the associated synaptic dysfunction. Auditory brainstem responses of mice treated with cisplatin showed a reduction in amplitude and an increase in latency of wave I, indicating cisplatin-induced synaptic dysfunction. The mass spectrometry analysis of cochlear synaptosomal proteins identified 102 proteins that decreased in abundance and 249 that increased in abundance after cisplatin treatment. Pathway analysis suggested that the dysregulated proteins were involved in calcium binding, calcium ion regulation, synapses, and endocytosis pathways. Inhibition of nitrative stress by co-treatment with MnTBAP, a peroxynitrite scavenger, attenuated cisplatin-induced changes in the abundance of 27 proteins. Furthermore, MnTBAP co-treatment prevented the cisplatin-induced decrease in the amplitude and increase in the latency of wave I. Together, these findings suggest a potential role of oxidative/nitrative stress in cisplatin-induced cochlear synaptic dysfunction.

Evaluating calcium channel blockers and bisphosphonates as otoprotective agents in cochlear implantation hearing preservation candidates

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate potential effects of calcium channel blockers (CCB) and bisphosphonates (BP) on residual hearing following cochlear implantation.

METHODS

Medications of 303 adult hearing preservation (HP) candidates (low frequency pure tone average [LFPTA] of 125, 250, and 500 Hz ≤80 dB HL) were reviewed. Postimplantation LFPTA of patients taking CCBs and BPs were compared to controls matched by age and preimplantation LFPTA.

RESULTS

Twenty-six HP candidates were taking a CCB (N = 14) or bisphosphonate (N = 12) at implantation. Median follow-up was 1.37 years (range 0.22-4.64y). Among subjects with initial HP, 29% (N = 2 of 7) CCB users compared to 50% (N = 2 of 4) controls subsequently lost residual hearing 3-6 months later (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.04-4.32, p = 0.58). None of the four BP patients with initial HP experienced delayed loss compared to 50% (N = 2 of 4) controls with initial HP (OR = 0.00, 95% CI = 0.00-1.95, P = 0.43). Two CCB and one BP patients improved to a LFPTA <80 dB HL following initial unaided thresholds that suggested loss of residual hearing.

DISCUSSION

There were no significant differences in the odds of delayed loss of residual hearing with CCBs or BPs.

CONCLUSION

Further investigation into potential otoprotective adjuvants for maintaining residual hearing following initial successful hearing preservation is warranted, with larger cohorts and additional CCB/BP agents.

Intratympanic injection of hydrogel nanodrug for the prevention and treatment of sensorineural hearing loss

Safe and efficient drug delivery to the inner ear has always been the focus of prevention and treatment of sensorineural deafness. The rapid development of nanodrug delivery systems based on hydrogel has provided a new opportunity. Among them, thermo-sensitive hydrogels promote the development of new dosage form for intratympanic injection. This smart biomaterial could transform to semisolid phase when the temperature increased. Thermo-sensitive hydrogel nanodrug delivery system is expected to achieve safe, efficient, and sustained inner ear drug administration. This article introduces the key techniques and the latest progress in this field.

Calcium Channel Blockers and the Risk of Sensorineural Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate calcium channel blockers as a potential prophylactic agent for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).Patients: We used a retrospective cohort of US veterans treated by the Veteran's Affairs healthcare system. Patients were included in the study if 1) they were diagnosed with high blood pressure; 2) had no previous diagnosis of SNHL; 3) were prescribed a calcium channel blocker after diagnosis or as a control cohort, patients who had no antihypertensive medication use.

INTERVENTION

Patients were categorized into mutually exclusive cohorts by their antihypertensive medication exposure: calcium channel blocker exposed and no antihypertensive medication exposure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Incident SNHL was defined as an inpatient or outpatient record with diagnosis codes international classification of diseases (ICD)-9-CM 389.1 or ICD-10-CM H90, H90.41, H90.42, H90.A21, H90.A22. An audiology or otolaryngology clinic visit was required for patients with an outpatient diagnosis of SNHL.

RESULTS

A total of 1,338,409 patients met the inclusion criteria consisting of 292,981 patients with CCBs (25,614 with verapamil and 267,367 with other CCBs) and 1,045,428 patients with no antihypertensive medication. On average, patients were middle-aged, White men with a body mass index (BMI) of 30+. Cox proportional hazards model estimates from propensity score matched data revealed CCB users had a 23.6% decreased risk of SNHL compared with those with no antihypertensive medication use (hazard ratios [HR] = 0.764; 95% confidence interval = [0.752-0.777]).

CONCLUSION

This analysis found evidence supporting the theory that calcium channel blockers might be a potential prophylactic agent for sensorineural hearing loss. Additional research is warranted.

Local Cisplatin Delivery in Mouse Reliably Models Sensorineural Ototoxicity Without Systemic Adverse Effects

Cisplatin is a lifesaving chemotherapeutic drug with marked ototoxic adverse effects. Cisplatin-induced hearing loss affects a significant part of cancer-surviving patients and is an unmet clinical need with important socioeconomic consequences. Unfortunately, in current preclinical animal models of cisplatin ototoxicity, which are mainly based on systemic delivery, important morbidity is observed, leading to premature death. This methodology not only raises obvious animal welfare concerns but also increases the number of animals used in ototoxicity studies to compensate for dropouts related to early death. To overcome these important limitations, we developed a local delivery model based on the application of a cisplatin solution directly into the otic bulla through a retroauricular approach. The local delivery model reliably induced significant hearing loss with a mean threshold shift ranging from 10 to 30 dB, strongly affecting the high frequencies (22 and 32 kHz). Importantly, mice did not show visible stress or distress indicators and no significant morbidity in comparison with a traditional systemic delivery control group of mice injected intraperitoneally with 10 mg/kg cisplatin, where significant weight loss >10% in all treated animals (without any recovery) led to premature abortion of experiments on day 3. Mass spectrometry confirmed the absence of relevant systemic uptake after local delivery, with platinum accumulation restricted to the cochlea, whereas important platinum concentrations were detected in the liver and kidney of the systemic cisplatin group. A clear correlation between the cochlear platinum concentration and the auditory threshold shift was observed. Immunohistochemistry revealed statistically significant loss of outer hair cells in the basal and apical turns of the cochlea and an important and statistically significant loss of auditory neurons and synapses in all cochlear regions. In conclusion, local cisplatin delivery induces robust hearing loss with minimal morbidity, thereby offering a reliable rodent model for human cisplatin ototoxicity, reducing the number of animals required and showing improved animal welfare compared with traditional systemic models.

Current Strategies to Combat Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity

Cisplatin is widely used for the treatment of a number of solid malignant tumors. However, ototoxicity induced by cisplatin is an obstacle to effective treatment of tumors. The basis for this toxicity has not been fully elucidated. It is generally accepted that hearing loss is due to excessive production of reactive oxygen species by cells of the cochlea. In addition, recent data suggest that inflammation may trigger inner ear cell death through endoplasmic reticulum stress, autophagy, and necroptosis, which induce apoptosis. Strategies have been extensively explored by which to prevent, alleviate, and treat cisplatin-induced ototoxicity, which minimize interference with antitumor activity. Of these strategies, none have been approved by the Federal Drug Administration, although several preclinical studies have been promising. This review highlights recent strategies that reduce cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. The focus of this review is to identify candidate agents as novel molecular targets, drug administration routes, delivery systems, and dosage schedules. Animal models of cisplatin ototoxicity are described that have been used to evaluate drug efficacy and side effect prevention. Finally, clinical reports of otoprotection in patients treated with cisplatin are highlighted. For the future, high-quality studies are required to provide reliable data regarding the safety and effectiveness of pharmacological interventions that reduce cisplatin-induced ototoxicity.