1
|
Walia A, Ortmann AJ, Lefler S, Holden TA, Puram SV, Herzog JA, Buchman CA. Electrocochleography-Based Tonotopic Map: I. Place Coding of the Human Cochlea With Hearing Loss. Ear Hear 2025; 46:253-264. [PMID: 39233326 PMCID: PMC11649476 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Due to the challenges of direct in vivo measurements in humans, previous studies of cochlear tonotopy primarily utilized human cadavers and animal models. This study uses cochlear implant electrodes as a tool for intracochlear recordings of acoustically evoked responses to achieve two primary goals: (1) to map the in vivo tonotopy of the human cochlea, and (2) to assess the impact of sound intensity and the creation of an artificial "third window" on this tonotopic map. DESIGN Fifty patients with hearing loss received cochlear implant electrode arrays. Postimplantation, pure-tone acoustic stimuli (0.25 to 4 kHz) were delivered, and electrophysiological responses were recorded from all 22 electrode contacts. The analysis included fast Fourier transformation to determine the amplitude of the first harmonic, indicative of predominantly outer hair cell activity, and tuning curves to identify the best frequency (BF) electrode. These measures, coupled with postoperative imaging for precise electrode localization, facilitated the construction of an in vivo frequency-position function. The study included a specific examination of 2 patients with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD), with preserved cochlear function as assessed by present distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, to determine the impact of sound intensity on the frequency-position map. In addition, the electrophysiological map was recorded in a patient undergoing a translabyrinthine craniotomy for vestibular schwannoma removal, before and after creating an artificial third window, to explore whether an experimental artifact conducted in cadaveric experiments, as was performed in von Békésy landmark experiments, would produce a shift in the frequency-position map. RESULTS A significant deviation from the Greenwood model was observed in the electrophysiological frequency-position function, particularly at high-intensity stimulations. In subjects with hearing loss, frequency tuning, and BF location remained consistent across sound intensities. In contrast, ANSD patients exhibited Greenwood-like place coding at low intensities (~40 dB SPL) and a basal shift in BF location at higher intensities (~70 dB SPL or greater). Notably, creating an artificial "third-window" did not alter the frequency-position map. CONCLUSIONS This study successfully maps in vivo tonotopy of human cochleae with hearing loss, demonstrating a near-octave shift from traditional frequency-position maps. In patients with ANSD, representing more typical cochlear function, intermediate intensity levels (~70 to 80 dB SPL) produced results similar to high-intensity stimulation. These findings highlight the influence of stimulus intensity on the cochlear operational point in subjects with hearing loss. This knowledge could enhance cochlear implant programming and improve auditory rehabilitation by more accurately aligning electrode stimulation with natural cochlear responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Walia
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Amanda J. Ortmann
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Shannon Lefler
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Timothy A. Holden
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Sidharth V. Puram
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jacques A. Herzog
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Craig A. Buchman
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu GS, Cooperman SP, Neves CA, Blevins NH. Estimation of Cochlear Implant Insertion Depth Using 2D-3D Registration of Postoperative X-Ray and Preoperative CT Images. Otol Neurotol 2024; 45:e156-e161. [PMID: 38270174 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To improve estimation of cochlear implant (CI) insertion depth in postoperative skull x-rays using synthesized information from preoperative CT scans. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Ten adult cochlear implant recipients with preoperative and postoperative temporal bone computed tomography (CT)scans and postoperative skull x-ray imaging. INTERVENTIONS Postoperative x-rays and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) from preoperative CTs were registered using 3D Slicer and MATLAB to enhance localization of the round window and modiolus. Angular insertion depth (AID) was estimated in unmodified and registration-enhanced x-rays and DRRs in the cochlear view. Linear insertion depth (LID) was estimated in registered images by two methods that localized the proximal CI electrode or segmented the cochlea. Ground truth assessments were made in postoperative CTs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Errors of insertion depth estimates were calculated relative to ground truth measurements and compared with paired t t ests. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess inter-rater reliability of two reviewer's measurements of AID in unmodified x-rays. RESULTS In postoperative x-rays, AID estimation errors were similar with and without registration enhancement (-1.3 ± 20.7° and -4.8 ± 24.9°, respectively; mean ± SD; p = 0.6). AID estimation in unmodified x-rays demonstrated strong interrater agreement (ρ = 0.79, p < 0.05) and interrater differences (-15.0 ± 35.3°) comparable to estimate errors. Registering images allowed measurement of AID in the cochlear view with estimation errors of 14.6 ± 30.6° and measurement of LID, with estimate errors that were similar between proximal electrode localization and cochlear segmentation methods (-0.9 ± 2.2 mm and -2.1 ± 2.7 mm, respectively; p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS 2D-3D image registration allows measurement of AID in the cochlear view and LID using postoperative x-rays and preoperative CT imaging. The use of this technique may reduce the need for postimplantation CT studies to assess these metrics of CI electrode position. Further work is needed to improve the accuracy of AID assessment in the postoperative x-ray view with registered images compared with established methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George S Liu
- Stanford University, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 801 Welch Road, Stanford, CA 94305
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nix EP, Thompson NJ, Brown KD, Dedmon MM, Selleck AM, Overton AB, Canfarotta MW, Dillon MT. Incidence of Cochlear Implant Electrode Contacts in the Functional Acoustic Hearing Region and the Influence on Speech Recognition with Electric-Acoustic Stimulation. Otol Neurotol 2023; 44:1004-1010. [PMID: 37758328 PMCID: PMC10840620 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the incidence of electrode contacts within the functional acoustic hearing region in cochlear implant (CI) recipients and to assess its influence on speech recognition for electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) users. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS One hundred five CI recipients with functional acoustic hearing preservation (≤80 dB HL at 250 Hz). INTERVENTIONS Cochlear implantation with a 24-, 28-, or 31.5-mm lateral wall electrode array. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Angular insertion depth (AID) of individual contacts was determined from imaging. Unaided acoustic thresholds and AID were used to calculate the proximity of contacts to the functional acoustic hearing region. The association between proximity values and speech recognition in quiet and noise for EAS users at 6 months postactivation was reviewed. RESULTS Sixty percent of cases had one or more contacts within the functional acoustic hearing region. Proximity was not significantly associated with speech recognition in quiet. Better performance in noise was observed for cases with close correspondence between the most apical contact and the upper edge of residual hearing, with poorer results for increasing proximity values in either the basal or apical direction ( r14 = 0.48, p = 0.043; r18 = -0.41, p = 0.045, respectively). CONCLUSION There was a high incidence of electrode contacts within the functional acoustic hearing region, which is not accounted for with default mapping procedures. The variability in outcomes across EAS users with default maps may be due in part to electric-on-acoustic interference, electric frequency-to-place mismatch, and/or failure to stimulate regions intermediate between the most apical electrode contact and the functional acoustic hearing region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan P Nix
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Nicholas J Thompson
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kevin D Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Matthew M Dedmon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - A Morgan Selleck
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Michael W Canfarotta
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Margaret T Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hollis ES, Canfarotta MW, Dillon MT, Rooth MA, Bucker AL, Dillon SA, Young A, Quinones K, Pillsbury HC, Dedmon MM, O’Connell BP, Brown KD. Initial Hearing Preservation Is Correlated With Cochlear Duct Length in Fully-inserted Long Flexible Lateral Wall Arrays. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:1149-1155. [PMID: 33859134 PMCID: PMC8373638 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To characterize the relationship between cochlear duct length (CDL) and initial hearing preservation among cochlear implant recipients of a fully inserted 31.5 mm flexible lateral wall electrode array. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING Tertiary academic referral center. PATIENTS Adult cochlear implant recipients who presented preoperatively with unaided hearing detection thresholds of ≤ 65 dB HL at 125 Hz and underwent cochlear implantation with a 31.5 mm flexible lateral wall array. INTERVENTION Cochlear implantation with a hearing preservation surgical approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Computed tomography was reviewed to determine CDL. Hearing preservation was characterized by the shift in low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA; 125, 250, and 500 Hz), and shift in individual unaided hearing detection thresholds at 125, 250, and 500 Hz. RESULTS Nineteen patients met the criteria for inclusion. The mean CDL was 34.2 mm (range: 30.8-36.5 mm). Recipients experienced a mean LFPTA shift of 27.6 dB HL (range: 10-50 dB HL). Significant, negative correlations were observed between CDL and smaller threshold shifts at individual frequencies and LFPTA (p ≤ 0.048). CONCLUSION A longer CDL is associated with greater likelihood of preserving low-frequency hearing with long arrays. Low-frequency hearing preservation is feasible with fully inserted long flexible arrays within the initial months after cochlear implantation. Preoperative measurement of CDL may facilitate a more individualized approach in array selection to permit optimal cochlear coverage while enhancing hearing preservation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily S. Hollis
- UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael W. Canfarotta
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Margaret T. Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Meredith A. Rooth
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | - Allison Young
- Department of Audiology, UNC Health, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Harold C. Pillsbury
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Matthew M. Dedmon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Brendan P. O’Connell
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin D. Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Relationship Between Electrocochleography, Angular Insertion Depth, and Cochlear Implant Speech Perception Outcomes. Ear Hear 2021; 42:941-948. [PMID: 33369942 PMCID: PMC8217403 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Electrocochleography (ECochG), obtained before the insertion of a cochlear implant (CI) array, provides a measure of residual cochlear function that accounts for a substantial portion of variability in postoperative speech perception outcomes in adults. It is postulated that subsequent surgical factors represent independent sources of variance in outcomes. Prior work has demonstrated a positive correlation between angular insertion depth (AID) of straight arrays and speech perception under the CI-alone condition, with an inverse relationship observed for precurved arrays. The purpose of the present study was to determine the combined effects of ECochG, AID, and array design on speech perception outcomes. DESIGN Participants were 50 postlingually deafened adult CI recipients who received one of three straight arrays (MED-EL Flex24, MED-EL Flex28, and MED-EL Standard) and two precurved arrays (Cochlear Contour Advance and Advanced Bionics HiFocus Mid-Scala). Residual cochlear function was determined by the intraoperative ECochG total response (TR) measured before array insertion, which is the sum of magnitudes of spectral components in response to tones of different stimulus frequencies across the speech spectrum. The AID was then determined with postoperative imaging. Multiple linear regression was used to predict consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word recognition in the CI-alone condition at 6 months postactivation based on AID, TR, and array design. RESULTS Forty-one participants received a straight array and nine received a precurved array. The AID of the most apical electrode contact ranged from 341° to 696°. The TR measured by ECochG accounted for 43% of variance in speech perception outcomes (p < 0.001). A regression model predicting CNC word scores with the TR tended to underestimate the performance for precurved arrays and deeply inserted straight arrays, and to overestimate the performance for straight arrays with shallower insertions. When combined in a multivariate linear regression, the TR, AID, and array design accounted for 72% of variability in speech perception outcomes (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A model of speech perception outcomes that incorporates TR, AID, and array design represents an improvement over a model based on TR alone. The success of this model shows that peripheral factors including cochlear health and electrode placement may play a predominant role in speech perception with CIs.
Collapse
|
6
|
Dillon MT, Canfarotta MW, Buss E, O'Connell BP. Comparison of Speech Recognition With an Organ of Corti Versus Spiral Ganglion Frequency-to-Place Function in Place-Based Mapping of Cochlear Implant and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Devices. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:721-725. [PMID: 33625196 PMCID: PMC8935664 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare acute speech recognition with a cochlear implant (CI) alone or electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) device for place-based maps calculated with an organ of Corti (OC) versus a spiral ganglion (SG) frequency-to-place function. PATIENTS Eleven adult CI recipients of a lateral wall electrode array. INTERVENTION Postoperative imaging was used to derive place-based maps calculated with an OC versus SG function. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Phoneme recognition was evaluated at initial activation with consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words presented using an OC versus a SG place-based map. RESULTS For the 9 CI-alone users, there was a nonsignificant trend for better acute phoneme recognition with the SG map (mean 18 RAUs) than the OC map (mean 9 RAUs; p = 0.071, 95% CI [≤-1.2]). When including the 2 EAS users in the analysis, performance was significantly better with the SG map (mean 21 RAUs) than the OC map (mean 7 RAUs; p = 0.019, 95% CI [≤-6.2]). CONCLUSIONS Better phoneme recognition with the SG frequency-to-place function could indicate more natural tonotopic alignment of information compared with the OC place-based map.A prospective, randomized investigation is currently underway to assess longitudinal outcomes with place-based mapping in CI-alone and EAS devices using the SG frequency-to-place function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret T Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
- Division of Speech & Hearing, Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Emily Buss
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dillon MT, Buss E, Rooth MA, King ER, McCarthy SA, Bucker AL, Deres EJ, Richter ME, Thompson NJ, Canfarotta MW, O'Connell BP, Pillsbury HC, Brown KD. Cochlear Implantation in Cases of Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Subjective Benefit, Word Recognition, and Spatial Hearing. Trends Hear 2020; 24:2331216520945524. [PMID: 32808881 PMCID: PMC7586262 DOI: 10.1177/2331216520945524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
A prospective clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of cochlear implantation in adults with asymmetric hearing loss (AHL). Twenty subjects with mild-to-moderate hearing loss in the better ear and moderate-to-profound hearing loss in the poorer ear underwent cochlear implantation of the poorer hearing ear. Subjects were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-activation. Preoperative performance was evaluated unaided, with traditional hearing aids (HAs) or with a bone-conduction HA. Post-activation performance was evaluated with the cochlear implant (CI) alone or in combination with a contralateral HA (bimodal). Test measures included subjective benefit, word recognition, and spatial hearing (i.e., localization and masked sentence recognition). Significant subjective benefit was reported as early as the 1-month interval, indicating better performance with the CI compared with the preferred preoperative condition. Aided word recognition with the CI alone was significantly improved at the 1-month interval compared with preoperative performance with an HA and continued to improve through the 12-month interval. Subjects demonstrated early, significant improvements in the bimodal condition on the spatial hearing tasks compared with baseline preoperative performance tested unaided. The magnitude of the benefit was reduced for subjects with AHL when compared with published data on CI users with normal hearing in the contralateral ear; this finding may reflect significant differences in age at implantation and hearing sensitivity across cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret T Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Emily Buss
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Meredith A Rooth
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - English R King
- Department of Audiology, UNC Health Care, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Sarah A McCarthy
- Department of Audiology, UNC Health Care, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Andrea L Bucker
- Department of Audiology, UNC Health Care, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Ellen J Deres
- Department of Audiology, UNC Health Care, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
| | - Margaret E Richter
- Division of Speech & Hearing Sciences, Department of Allied Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Nicholas J Thompson
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Michael W Canfarotta
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Brendan P O'Connell
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Harold C Pillsbury
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Kevin D Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Canfarotta MW, Dillon MT, Buchman CA, Buss E, O'Connell BP, Rooth MA, King ER, Pillsbury HC, Adunka OF, Brown KD. Long-Term Influence of Electrode Array Length on Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users. Laryngoscope 2020; 131:892-897. [PMID: 32738069 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS Results from a prospective trial demonstrated better speech recognition for cochlear implant (CI) recipients implanted with a long lateral wall electrode array compared to subjects with a short array after 1 year of listening experience. As short array recipients may require an extended adaptation period, this study investigated whether differences in speech recognition continued through 4 years of CI use. STUDY DESIGN Long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. METHODS Subjects were randomized to receive a MED-EL medium (24 mm) or standard (31.5 mm) array. Linear mixed models compared speech recognition between cohorts with word recognition in quiet and sentence recognition in noise at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 months postactivation. Postoperative imaging and electric frequency filters were reviewed to assess the influence of frequency-to-place mismatch and angular separation between neighboring contacts, a metric associated with peripheral spectral selectivity. RESULTS Long (31.5 mm) array recipients demonstrated superior speech recognition out to 4 years postactivation. There was a significant effect of angular separation between contacts, with more closely spaced contacts associated with poorer speech recognition. There was no significant effect of mismatch, yet this may have been obscured by changes in frequency filters over time. CONCLUSIONS Conventional MED-EL CI recipients implanted with 31.5-mm arrays experience better speech recognition than 24-mm array recipients, initially and with long-term listening experience. The benefit conferred by longer arrays in the present cohort can be partially attributed to more widely spaced electrode contacts, presumably a result of reduced channel interaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Laryngoscope, 131:892-897, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W Canfarotta
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Margaret T Dillon
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Craig A Buchman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A
| | - Emily Buss
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Brendan P O'Connell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Meredith A Rooth
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - English R King
- Department of Audiology, University of North Carolina Health Care, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Harold C Pillsbury
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Oliver F Adunka
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A
| | - Kevin D Brown
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|