The Relation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Type and Position on Continued Hearing Preservation

Scala Tympani Volume Influences Initial 6-Month Hearing Preservation With Lateral Wall Electrode Arrays

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of scala tympani (ST) volume, cochlear duct length (CDL), and angular insertion depth (AID) on low-frequency hearing preservation for cochlear implant (CI) recipients of lateral wall electrode arrays.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified 45 adult CI recipients of 24-, 28-, or 31.5-mm lateral wall electrode arrays with preoperative unaided hearing thresholds ≤45 decibel hearing level (dB HL) at 250 Hz. All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative computed tomography to evaluate cochlear morphology and electrode array position. A linear mixed effects model evaluated effects of ST volume, CDL, AID, preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA; 125, 250, and 500 Hz), age at surgery, and biological sex on the postoperative change in LFPTA at activation and 6 months post-activation.

RESULTS

There were significant main effects of ST volume (p = 0.044), age (p = 0.028), and biological sex (p = 0.003), indicating better low-frequency hearing preservation for CI recipients with larger ST volumes, younger age at surgery, and female biological sex. Although CDL positively correlated with ST volume (r = 0.74, p < 0.001), there was no significant main effect of CDL (p = 0.367). A broad range in AID of the most apical electrode contact was observed (301.4°-681.8°); however, there was no significant main effect of AID on low-frequency hearing preservation (p = 0.700).

CONCLUSIONS

During the initial 6 months following implantation, intrinsic factors such as cochlear morphology may have a greater impact on low-frequency hearing preservation than apical positioning of a flexible lateral wall electrode array when using soft surgical techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 135:1781-1787, 2025.

Cochlear Implantation in a Patient with Intractable Tinnitus: A Case Report of an Endoscope-Assisted Approach

Preservation of residual hearing and vestibular function is a crucial factor in cochlear implantation (CI), especially in patients with residual low-frequency hearing thresholds. We report a case of a patient who underwent unilateral endoscope-assisted CI with a challenging surgical view following rigorous posterior tympanotomy. A 53-year-old male presented with left-sided intractable tinnitus due to sudden sensorineural hearing loss that had occurred 10 years prior. Due to the abnormal location of the round window (RW), which was far more posterior and inferior than usual and impeded insertion of the electrode using the conventional RW approach, endoscope-assisted CI was performed. Pure-tone audiometry at 3 months after CI revealed satisfactory hearing thresholds. Furthermore, there was alleviation of the left-sided tinnitus, which was indicated by a marked decrease in both the subjective visual analog scale loudness and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory scores. With proper indications, we strongly recommend applying the RW approach with endoscopic assistance over conventional bony cochleostomy for the preservation of low-frequency hearing thresholds in cases where RW visualization is insufficient following posterior tympanotomy.

Recent advances in Otology: Current landscape and future direction

Hearing is an essential sensation, and its deterioration leads to a significant decrease in the quality of life. Thus, great efforts have been made by otologists to preserve and recover hearing. Our knowledge regarding the field of otology has progressed with advances in technology, and otologists have sought to develop novel approaches in the field of otologic surgery to achieve higher hearing recovery or preservation rates. This requires knowledge regarding the anatomy of the temporal bone and the physiology of hearing. Basic research in the field of otology has progressed with advances in molecular biology and genetics. This review summarizes the current views and recent advances in the field of otology and otologic surgery, especially from the viewpoint of young Japanese clinician-scientists, and presents the perspectives and future directions for several topics in the field of otology. This review will aid next-generation researchers in understanding the recent advances and future challenges in the field of otology.

Predicting Acoustic Hearing Preservation Following Cochlear Implant Surgery Using Machine Learning

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to train and test supervised machine-learning classifiers to predict acoustic hearing preservation after CI using preoperative clinical data.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective predictive modeling study of prospectively collected single-institution CI dataset.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-five patients from a REDCap database including 761 patients >18 years who underwent CI and had audiometric testing preoperatively and one month after surgery were included. The primary outcome variable was the lowest quartile change in acoustic hearing at one month after CI using various formulae (standard pure tone average, SPTA; low-frequency PTA, LFPTA). Analysis involved applying multivariate logistic regression to detect statistical associations and training and testing supervised learning classifiers. Classifier performance was assessed with numerous metrics including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC).

RESULTS

Lowest quartile change (indicating hearing preservation) in SPTA was positively associated with a history of meningitis, preoperative LFPTA, and preoperative SPTA. Lowest quartile change in SPTA was negatively associated with sudden hearing loss, noise exposure, aural fullness, and abnormal anatomy. Lowest quartile change in LFPTA was positively associated with preoperative LFPTA. Lowest quartile change in LFPTA was negatively associated with tobacco use. Random forest demonstrated the highest mean classification performance on the validation dataset when predicting each of the outcome variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning demonstrated utility for predicting preservation of residual acoustic hearing in patients undergoing CI surgery, and the detected associations facilitated the interpretation of our machine-learning models. The models and statistical associations together may be used to facilitate improvements in shared clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:926-936, 2024.

A Multicenter Comparison of 1-yr Functional Outcomes and Programming Differences Between the Advanced Bionics Mid-Scala and SlimJ Electrode Arrays

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a difference in hearing outcomes or stimulation levels between Advanced Bionics straight and precurved arrays.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review across three implant centers.

SETTING

Tertiary centers for cochlear and auditory brainstem implantation.

PATIENTS

One hundred fifteen pediatric and 205 adult cochlear implants (CIs) were reviewed. All patients were implanted under the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2009 guidelines with a HiRes Ultra SlimJ or Mid-Scala electrode array.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Hearing preservation after implantation, as well as CI-only listening scores for Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentences were compared 1 year after implantation. Stimulation levels for threshold and comfort levels were also compared 1 year after implantation.

RESULTS

Hearing preservation was significantly better with the SlimJ compared with the Mid-Scala electrode array. Bamford-Kowal-Bench outcomes were not significantly different between the two arrays in any listening condition. Stimulation levels were not different between arrays but did vary across electrode contacts. At least one electrode was deactivated in 33% of implants but was more common for the SlimJ device.

CONCLUSION

Modern straight and precurved arrays from Advanced Bionics did not differ in hearing performance or current requirements. Although hearing preservation was possible with both devices, the SlimJ array would still be the preferred electrode in cases where hearing preservation was a priority. Unfortunately, the SlimJ device was also prone to poor sound perception on basal electrodes. Further investigation is needed to determine if deactivated electrodes are associated with electrode position/migration, and if programming changes are needed to optimize the use of these high-frequency channels.

A new paradigm of hearing loss and preservation with cochlear implants: Learnings from fundamental studies and clinical research

In 2010 Cochlear initiated a coordinated preclinical research program to identify the factors and underlying mechanisms of acoustic hearing loss following cochlear implantation and device use. At its inception the program was structured around several major hypotheses implicated in the loss of acoustic hearing. The understanding of causes evolved over the course of the program, leading to an increased appreciation of the role of the biological response in post-implant hearing loss. A systematic approach was developed which mapped the cochlear implant journey along a timeline that considers all events in an individual's hearing history. By evaluating the available data in this context, rather than by discrete hypothesis testing, causative and associated factors may be more readily detected. This approach presents opportunities for more effective research management and may aid in identifying new prospects for intervention. Many of the outcomes of the research program apply beyond preservation of acoustic hearing to factors important to overall cochlear health and considerations for future therapies.

Speech Recognition Performance Differences Between Precurved and Straight Electrode Arrays From a Single Manufacturer

OBJECTIVE

Precurved cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays have demonstrated superior audiometric outcomes compared with straight electrodes in a handful of studies. However, previous comparisons have often failed to account for preoperative hearing and age. This study compares hearing outcomes for precurved and straight electrodes by a single manufacturer while controlling for these and other factors in a large cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Two hundred thirty-one adult CI recipients between 2015 and 2021 with cochlear (Sydney, Australia) 522/622 (straight) or 532/632 (precurved) electrode arrays.

INTERVENTIONS

Postactivation speech recognition and audiometric testing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Speech recognition testing (consonant-nucleus-consonant word [CNCw] and AzBio) was collected at 6 and 12 months postactivation. Hearing preservation was characterized by a low-frequency pure-tone average shift, or the change between preoperative and postoperative low-frequency pure-tone average.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-one patients (253 ears) with 6-month and/or 12-month CNCw or AzBio testing were included. One hundred forty-nine (59%) and 104 (41%) ears were implanted with straight and precurved electrode arrays, respectively. Average age at implantation was 70 years (interquartile range [IQR], 58-77 y). There was no significant difference in mean age between groups. CNCw scores were significantly different ( p = 0.001) between straight (51%; IQR, 36-67%) and precurved arrays (64%; IQR, 48-72%). AzBio scores were not significantly different ( p = 0.081) between straight (72%; IQR, 51-87%) and precurved arrays (81%; IQR, 57-90%). Controlling for age, race, sex, preoperative hearing, and follow-up time, precurved electrode arrays performed significantly better on CNCw (b = 10.0; 95% confidence interval, 4.2-16.0; p < 0.001) and AzBio (b = 8.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-16.0;, p = 0.014) testing. Hearing preservation was not different between electrodes on adjusted models.

CONCLUSION

During the study period, patients undergoing placement of precurved electrode arrays had significantly higher CNC and AzBio scores than patients receiving straight electrodes, even after controlling for age, preoperative hearing, and follow-up time.

PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GAP AND EDUCATIONAL NEED

Understanding the difference in audiometric outcomes between precurved and straight electrode arrays will help to guide electrode selection.

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

To understand differences in speech recognition scores postoperatively by electrode array type (precurved versus straight).

DESIRED RESULT

To demonstrate a difference in hearing performance postoperatively by electrode type.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

INDICATE IRB OR IACUC

Approved by the Institutional IRB (090155).

Robotics and cochlear implant surgery: goals and developments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cochlear implantation (CI) is a viable option for patients with severe sensorineural hearing loss. Advances in CI have focused on minimizing cochlear trauma to improve hearing preservation outcomes, and in doing so expanding candidacy to patients with useful cochlear reserve. Robotics holds promise as a potential tool to minimize intracochlear trauma with electrode insertion, improve surgical efficiency, and reduce surgical complications. The purpose of this review is to summarize efforts and advances in the field of robotic-assisted CI.

RECENT FINDINGS

Work on robotics and CI over the past few decades has explored distinct surgical aspects, including image-based surgical planning and intraoperative guidance, minimally invasive robotic-assisted approaches mainly through percutaneous keyhole direct cochlear access, robotic electrode insertion systems, robotic manipulators, and drilling feedback control through end effector sensors. Feasibility and safety have been established and many devices are undergoing clinical trials for clinical adoption, with some having already achieved approval of national licensing bodies.

SUMMARY

Significant work has been done over the past two decades that has shown robotic-assisted CI to be feasible and safe. Wider clinical adoption can potentially result in improved hearing preservation and quality of life outcomes to more CI candidates.