Growing Vestibular Schwannomas: What Happens Next?

Early Translabyrinthine Surgery for Small- and Medium-Sized Vestibular Schwannomas: Consecutive Cohort Analysis of Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Reappraisal of the role of translabyrinthine (TLAB) surgery in small- and medium-sized vestibular schwannomas (VSs).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 330 consecutive patients diagnosed between 1973 and 2019 with small- and medium-sized VS up to 20 mm in the extrameatal portion submitted to surgical treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

VS removal through microscopic TLAB approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Facial nerve function according to the House-Brackmann scale at 12-month follow-up, postoperative complications and entity of tumor resection assessed with postoperative MRI. A comparative analysis of outcomes between two groups of patients was further conducted, according to tumor size: Group A, small-sized (intrameatal or ≤10 mm extrameatal tumors) and Group B, medium-sized VSs (extrameatal between 11 and 20 mm).

RESULTS

Complete tumor removal was achieved in all cases. The overall complication rate was 5.5%, being cerebrospinal fluid leak the most frequent. Patients with small-sized VS (n = 121) presented a significantly better facial nerve function than patients with medium-sized tumors (n = 209), showing House-Brackmann Grades I to II in 92.6% versus 73.6% of cases, respectively ( p < 0.001). A nearly 4.5-fold higher risk of poor facial nerve function at 12 months affects patients with medium-sized tumors (odds ratio, 4.473; 95% confidence interval, 2.122-9.430; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In the current scenario of multioptional VS management, when hearing preservation is not feasible, early TLAB approach as first-line treatment for small-sized VSs showed favorable results. Factors supporting such proactive surgical treatment include long-term definitive cure, no major complications, good facial nerve outcomes, and the possibility of simultaneous hearing rehabilitation with a cochlear implant.

Spontaneous shrinkage of vestibular schwannoma

Background:

“Watch, wait, and rescan” (WWR) has an established place as a successful management option for a significant proportion of vestibular schwannomas (VS) as an alternative to microsurgical removal or stereotactic radiotherapy. VS may grow slowly and continuously, followed by stagnation or even shrinkage. We present two case reports of spontaneous shrinkage of VS along with a review of the literature.

Case Description:

A 29-year-old female presented with a progressive history of visual blurring and intermittent diplopia over 2 months. A 29 mm of maximum intracranial diameter (ICD) VS with secondary obstructive hydrocephalus was diagnosed. The patient underwent a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt with resolution of her symptoms and opted for initial WWR management. Interval scanning between 2007 and 2014 showed progressive reduction in the maximum ICD together with reduction in the degree of central tumor enhancement. Maximum ICD at most recent follow up was 22 mm. A 28-year-old female was referred with right sensorineural deafness. A right VS of maximum ICD of 27 mm was diagnosed. Initial WWR management was planned after discussion. Serial imaging showed an initial increase in the size of the tumor followed by progressive reduction in size. The most recent follow up showed a maximum ICD of 20 mm.

Conclusion:

Early WWR management can be associated with spontaneous shrinkage of VS over time. Prospective clinical study of larger numbers of such cases using the UK VS database may help to identify predictive factors for the spontaneous regression of VS.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery versus Natural History in Patients with Growing Vestibular Schwannomas

Objective To describe our experience with stereotactic radiosurgery and its efficacy on growing tumors, and then to compare this result with the natural history of a similar cohort of non-radiation-treated lesions. Study Design A retrospective chart review and cohort comparison. Methods The long-term control rates of patients having undergone radiosurgery were collected and calculated, and this population was then compared with a group of untreated patients from the same period of time with growing lesions. Results A total of 61 patients with growing vestibular schwannomas treated with radiosurgery were included. After a mean of 160 months, we observed a control rate of 85.2%. When compared with a group of 36 patients with growing tumors who were yet to receive treatment (previously published), we found a corrected control rate or relative risk reduction of only 76.8%. Conclusion Radiosurgery for growing vestibular schwannomas is less effective than previously reported in unselected series. Although radiosurgery still has a role in managing this disease, consideration should be given to the actual efficacy that may be calculated when the natural history is known. We hope other centers will similarly report their experience on this cohort of patients.

Conservative management of vestibular schwannomas of 15 to 31 mm intracranial diameter

Objective:

To study the natural course of vestibular schwannomas 15 to 31 mm in diameter.

Methods:

A retrospective study of 45 patients conservatively managed with interval scanning was performed. Outcome measures were: changes in tumour size, clinical features and hearing. A tumour was considered to be growing if it increased in size by more than 2 mm.

Results:

Initial tumour sizes ranged from 15 to 31 mm, with a mean (± standard deviation) diameter of 20.1 ± 4.3 mm. The duration of follow up ranged from 6 months to 14 years (median, 3 years). Tumours grew in 11 cases (24.4 per cent), remained stable in 30 cases (66.7 per cent) and regressed in 4 cases (8.9 per cent). The overall mean tumour growth rate was 0.9 ± 2.2 mm per year; in growing tumours, it was 3.6 ± 2.9 mm per year.

Conclusion:

Outcomes were similar to those reported for smaller tumours. These findings suggest that patients with medium or moderately large tumours can be safely offered an initial period of conservative management before intervention is considered.

The approach to the patient with incidentally diagnosed vestibular schwannoma

With the increasing prevalence and decreasing cost of MRI scans, incidental discovery of vestibular schwannoma (VS) has become more common. Scarce literature exists regarding management of the tumors in those patients with incidentally discovered VSs, and clear guidelines for management do not exist. In this review, the authors examine the available literature for insights into management of incidentally diagnosed VS and provide an algorithm for their management.

Growth of untreated vestibular schwannoma: a prospective study

Object

Small vestibular schwannomas (VSs) are often conservatively managed and treated only upon growth. Growth is usually reported in mm/year, but describing the growth of a 3D structure by a single diameter has been questioned. As a result, VS growth dynamics should be further investigated. In addition, baseline clinical parameters that could predict growth would be helpful. In this prospective study the authors aimed to describe growth dynamics in a cohort of conservatively managed VSs. They also compared different growth models and evaluated the ability of baseline parameters to predict future growth.

Methods

Between 2000 and 2006, 178 consecutive patients with unilateral de novo small-sized VSs identified among the Norwegian population of 4.8 million persons were referred to a tertiary care center and were included in a study protocol of conservative management. Tumor size was defined by MR imaging–based volume estimates and was recorded along with clinical data at regular visits. Mixed-effects models were used to analyze the relationships between observations. Three growth models were compared using statistical diagnostic tests: a mm/year–based model, a cm3/year–based model, and a volume doubling time (VDT)-based model. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine a cutoff for the VDT-based model for distinguishing growing and nongrowing tumors.

Results

A mean growth rate corresponding to a VDT of 4.40 years (95% CI 3.49–5.95) was found. Other growth models in this study revealed mean growth rates of 0.66 mm/year (95% CI 0.47–0.86) and 0.19 cm3/year (95% CI 0.12–0.26). Volume doubling time was found to be the most realistic growth model. All baseline variables had p values > 0.09 for predicting growth.

Conclusions

Based on the actual measurements, VDT was the most correct way to describe VS growth. The authors found that a cutoff of 5.22 years provided the best value to distinguish growing from nongrowing tumors. None of the investigated baseline predictors were usable as predictors of growth.