Usefulness of bioimpedance spectroscopy for detection of hypotensive episode during dialysis

Comparative Impact of Isolated Ultrafiltration and Hemodialysis on Fluid Distribution: A Bioimpedance Study

INTRODUCTION

Isolated ultrafiltration (IUF) is an alternative treatment for diuretic-resistant patients with fluid retention. Although hemodialysis (HD) predominantly decreases extracellular water (ECW), the impact of IUF on fluid distribution compared with HD remains unclear.

METHODS

We compared the effect of HD (n = 22) and IUF (n = 10) sessions on the body fluid status using a bioimpedance analysis device (InBody S10).

RESULTS

The total ultrafiltration volume was similar between HD and IUF (HD 2.5 ± 0.3 vs. ICF 2.1 ± 0.3 L/session, p = 0.196). The reduction rate of ECW was significantly higher than that of intracellular water (ICW) after HD (ECW -7.9% ± 0.8% vs. ICW -3.0% ± 0.9%, p < 0.001) and IUF (ECW -5.8% ± 0.9% vs. ICW -3.6% ± 0.8%, p = 0.048). However, the change in the ratio of ECW to total body water in HD was significantly larger than that in IUF (HD -3.2% ± 0.3% vs. ICF -1.1% ± 0.4%, p < 0.001). The reduction rates in serum tonicity (effective osmolality) were higher after HD than after IUF (HD -1.8% ± 0.5% vs. IUF -0.6% ± 0.2%, p = 0.052). Among the components of effective osmolality, the reduction rates of serum K+ and glucose levels after HD were significantly higher than those after IUF (serum K+: HD -30.5% ± 1.6% vs. IUF -0.5% ± 3.8%, p < 0.001; serum glucose: HD -15.4% ± 5.0% vs. IUF 0.7% ± 4.8%, p = 0.026), while the serum Na+ level was slightly and similarly reduced (HD -0.8% ± 0.4% vs. IUF -0.8% ± 0.4%, p = 0.500). The reduction in the osmolal gap value (measured osmolality-calculated osmolarity) was significantly greater after HD sessions than after IUF sessions (HD -12.4 ± 1.4 vs. IUF 2.0 ± 1.0 mOsm/kg, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The extracellular fluid reduction effect of HD is stronger than that of IUF. The different changes in effective osmolality and osmolal gap after HD and IUF sessions may be related to the different effects of HD and IUF on fluid distribution.

A feedback system that combines monitoring of systolic blood pressure and relative blood volume in order to prevent hypotensive episodes during dialysis

Hypotensive Episodes (HEs) are one of the most common complications during dialysis. Occurrence of HEs can be reduced by applying physiological closed loop systems that monitor physiological parameter(s) and adjust dialysis related parameter(s). We developed a physiological closed loop control system (PCLCS) that monitors systolic blood pressure (sysBP) and relative blood volume (RBV) and calculates the net fluid removal (nfr) rate during dialysis. The performance of PCLCS was compared in the laboratory to a feedback system that monitors only RBV (BVFS). A laboratory test setup was developed to test the feedback systems. The test setup simulates nfr-rate and refilling of a patient's intravascular fluid. We studied the impact of the feedback systems PCLCS and BVFS on the number of HEs (sysBP < 90 mmHg), on the variance of sysBP and RBV, on pre to post sysBP and RBV and on the achievement of the nfr-volume. PCLCS allowed 80% less HEs than BVFS (p < 0.001). Variance of sysBP and RBV were reduced by 41.8% and by 52% (p < 0.001), respectively, when using PCLCS. There were no differences between pre to post sysBP nor between pre to post RBV when comparing PCLCS to BVFS. The nfr-volume was achieved by both feedback systems.

Knee-to-knee Bioimpedance Measurements to Monitor Changes in Extracellular Fluid in Haemodynamic-unstable Patients During Dialysis

The feasibility of bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) techniques for monitoring intradialytic changes in body fluids is advancing. The aim of this study was to compare the knee-to-knee (kkBIS) with the traditional whole-body (whBIS) with respect to continuous assessment of fluid volume status in hemodialysis patients. Twenty patients divided into two groups, hemodynamically stable and unstable, were recruited. Bioimpedance data from two different electrodes configurations (hand-to-foot and knee-to-knee) were collected and retrospectively analysed. A good correlation between the two methods with respect to changes in extracellular resistance (R_e) and R_e normalized for ultrafiltration volume (ΔR_e/UFV) with p < 0.001 was observed. The relationship between relative change (%) in ΔR_e and that in patient weight was most notable with kkBIS (4.82 ± 3.31 %/kg) in comparison to whBIS (3.69 ± 2.90 %/kg) in unstable patients. Furthermore, results based on kkBIS showed a reduced ability of the thigh compartments to keep up with the volume changes in the trunk for unstable patients. kkBIS provided a comparable sensitivity to whBIS even in patients at risk of intradialytic hypotension while avoiding the need for the complex implementation imposed by whBIS or other configurations.

Addition of internal electrodes is beneficial for focused bioimpedance measurements in the lung

OBJECTIVE

Bioimpedance measurements such as bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or electrical impedance tomography (EIT) are used in many biomedical applications. While BIS measures and analyzes the impedance in a frequency range at constant electrode positions, EIT aims to reconstruct images of the conductivity distribution from multiple measurements at different electrode positions. Our aim is to add spatial information to tetrapolar BIS measurements by using electrode positions that focus measurements on desired regions of interest. In this paper, we aim to investigate, whether internal electrodes that can be integrated into breathing or gastroesophageal tubes, can improve the local sensitivity of bioimpedance spectroscopy measurements.

APPROACH

We present the results of a simulation study, in which we investigated more than 4 M different electrode configurations on their ability to monitor specific regions of interest (ROI) in the lung. Based on the sensitivity, which describes the impact of a conductivity change on the measured impedance, we define three main criteria which we use to evaluate our simulation results: the selectivity [Formula: see text], which describes the impact of a conductivity change inside the region of interest compared to a conductivity change outside the ROI; the homogeneity [Formula: see text], which describes the distribution of the sensitivity inside the ROI; and the absolute impedance contribution ratio [Formula: see text], which describes the contribution of the ROI to the measured impedance.

MAIN RESULTS

Depending on the region of interest, electrode configurations using internal electrodes are between 9.8 % and 90 % better with respect to these criteria than configurations using external electrodes only.

SIGNIFICANCE

The combination of internal and external electrodes improves the focusing ability of tetrapolar impedance measurements on specific lung regions, which may be especially beneficial for lung monitoring in intensive care.