The Power of Combining the Machines

Custodiol cardioplegia for temporary mechanical circulatory support

Several patients requiring biventricular mechanical circulatory support in the acute setting will not be candidates for less invasive advanced heart failure therapies not requiring median sternotomy. Temporary biventricular assist device may provide reliable short term support bridging patients to recovery or further advanced treatments. However, this exposes patients to increased risk of reoperation due to bleeding and further exposure to blood products. This article outlines the practical details necessary in performing this technique while minimizing potential complications.

Perioperative temporary mechanical circulatory support with Impella in cardiac surgery patients

BACKGROUND

The benefits of perioperative mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in cardiac surgery patients are still uncertain. This study aims to review early outcomes of perioperative temporary MCS using the Impella device in cardiac surgery patients.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-center analysis in cardiac surgery patients presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) in whom Impella was used for perioperative temporary MCS, either as single device therapy or as left ventricular (LV) venting strategy for concomitant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECPELLA). Study outcomes were 30-day mortality and occurrence of complication composite outcome.

RESULTS

Between 2016 and 2019, a total of 33 consecutive patients were supported with Impella (single-device therapy in 19 [57.6%] patients and ECPELLA in 14 [42.4%] patients). The 30-day mortality of Impella-alone and ECPELLA groups was 15.8% and 50.0% (P=0.03). The 30-day mortality according to pre-, intra-, and postoperative implantation was 12.5%, 60.0%, and 28.6% (P=0.04), and it was significantly lower in those patients in whom a left ventricular assist device was implanted in comparison to all other surgical procedures (P<0.01). The complication composite outcome occurred more frequently after axillary implantation compared to femoral Impella (P=0.05) due to higher stroke rates (P=0.03). Bleeding requiring surgical re-exploration was more frequent in the ECPELLA than in the Impella-alone group (1 [3.0%] vs. 5 [15.1%]; P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary MCS with Impella is associated with high complication and mortality rates. However, preoperative use of Impella as single-device temporary MCS is associated with lower mortality rates and is a reasonable alternative as a bridge-to-decision strategy for acutely decompensated patients.