Potential Factors for Poor Reproducibility of In Vitro Hemolysis Testing

Hemodynamical Evaluation of a New Surgically Implanted Pulsatile Right Ventricular Assist Device Driven by a Conventional Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Console

Severe right heart failure, often overlooked and challenging to manage, has prompted a growing interest in innovative approaches to provide functional support. This study uses experimentation in large porcine models to introduce a novel prototype of a pulsatile mechanical circulatory support device and document its effects when deployed as a right ventricular assist device (RVAD). The pulsatile ventricular assist platform (pVAP), featuring a membrane pump driven by an intra-aortic balloon pump console, actively generates pulsatile flow to propel right ventricular blood into the pulmonary artery. This novel prototype demonstrates promising potential in addressing the challenges of right heart failure management. After preliminary in vitro assessments, the pVAP was tested on seven porcine models in a healthy state and after the induction of right ventricular failure. During the procedure, a set of standard ( ie , standard-of-care) hemodynamic measurements was obtained. Additionally, invasive pressure-volume loop analysis was employed to examine left ventricular hemodynamics. Results indicated that activation of the pVAP during right ventricular failure significantly improved systemic hemodynamics and enhanced left ventricular function. This study sheds light on the potential of the pVAP in managing right heart failure.

Mechanical stress-induced hemolysis of bovine blood is donor-dependent

INTRODUCTION

In vitro hemolysis testing is an essential method for assessing the hemolytic potential of blood pumps, but has poor reproducibility. Further investigations are needed to determine the sources and extent of variability and to find a practical way to reduce the variation.

METHODS

A small volume blood circulating loop driven by a Centrimag pump was established to provide relatively higher hemolysis readouts within a short run time and to be able to sequentially perform multiple repeated hemolysis tests in a working day.

RESULTS

The repeatability with this system was demonstrated as the %RSD at 4.3% for the NIH or MIH from three repeated tests using the same blood. The bovine blood from different randomly selected donors was tested and gave more than a two-fold difference in NIH results (0.077 vs. 0.032 g/100 L) under the same testing conditions and same pump. This wide variation in hemolysis using bovine blood from different donors happened repeatedly. More importantly, it was observed that the difference in hemolysis test results using the blood drawn from the same donor on multiple days was narrow although the native hematocrits varied. The %RSD of NIH values obtained on five different days were 6.8%, 8.4%, 11.5%, and 7.8% for donor-specific blood from donors 1 to 4, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The study results indicate that the mechanical stress-induced hemolysis behavior is donor-dependent. It has been also demonstrated that the reproducibility of in vitro hemolysis testing can be improved when the blood drawn from same donor is used.