Analgosedation in Critically Ill Adults Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Treatment of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pneumonia Complicated with Severe ARDS: A Case Report

This paper utilizes a retrospective analysis to examine the diagnostic and therapeutic processes for a patient afflicted with immune-related pneumonia, which was complicated by severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and was triggered by Tirellizumab following a surgical procedure for a pulmonary malignancy. The patient exhibited unimproved oxygenation levels, which resulted from the implementation of a lung protective ventilation strategy through invasive mechanical ventilation during the early stages of treatment. Consequently, we opted to perform veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Complications such as catheter-related infection, hemolysis, and membrane thrombosis occurred during the period under investigation. After the implementation of awake VV-ECMO, there were still difficulties in withdrawing the ventilator, and the disease was identified again and clearly diagnosed as immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonia. Finally, after standardized treatment, the patient exhibited improvement. For patients with severe ARDS who have received invasive mechanical ventilation, It is imperative to standardize lung protective ventilation strategies, and to allow prone position ventilation under specific conditions. In cases where oxygenation remains unimproved, the selection of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) should be guided by cardiac function, with a concomitant understanding of the associated complications and management strategies. Furthermore, it is essential to thoroughly assess the benefits and drawbacks of awake ECMO, and to develop the capacity to discern diseases associated with fever and lung shadow for the purpose of precise treatment.

Managing Refractory Hypoxemia in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Obese Patients with Veno-Venous Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Narrative Review

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) is a life-saving intervention for severe respiratory failure unresponsive to conventional therapies. However, managing refractory hypoxemia in morbidly obese patients poses significant challenges due to the unique physiological characteristics of this population, including hyperdynamic circulation, elevated cardiac output, and increased oxygen consumption. These factors can limit the effectiveness of vvECMO by diluting arterial oxygen content and complicating oxygen delivery. Refractory hypoxemia in obese patients supported by vvECMO often stems from an imbalance between ECMO blood flow and cardiac output. Hyperdynamic circulation exacerbates the recirculation of oxygenated blood and impairs the efficiency of oxygen transfer. To address these challenges, a stepwise, individualized approach is essential. Strategies to reduce oxygen consumption include deep sedation, neuromuscular blockade, and temperature control. Cardiac output modulation can be achieved through beta-blockers and cautious therapeutic hypothermia. Optimizing oxygen delivery involves improving residual lung function; high positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation guided by esophageal pressure monitoring; prone positioning; and adjustments to the ECMO circuit, such as using dual oxygenators, larger membranes, or additional drainage cannulas. This review highlights the interplay of physiological adaptations and technical innovations required to overcome the challenges of managing refractory hypoxemia in obese patients during vvECMO. By addressing the complexities of high cardiac output and obesity, clinicians can enhance the effectiveness of vvECMO and improve outcomes for this high-risk population.

Level of sedation in patients with COVID-19 supported with ECMO: A comparative analysis of the critical care consortium international database

BACKGROUND

Liberation from sedation may be beneficial for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome supported by veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Currently, there is limited evidence to support this approach. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the 90-day patient mortality of different sedation strategies in COVID-19 patients supported with VV ECMO.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational sub-study of the COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium database including COVID-19 patients supported with VV ECMO. Two cohorts were compared: high sedation patients who received neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) throughout ECMO and low sedation patients who did not receive NMBA consistently. Patients' level of sedation during ECMO was also considered. The primary outcome was 90-day in-hospital mortality and was assessed using cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

224 low and 104 high sedation patients were included. Pre-ECMO respiratory condition prior was similar between groups, except for the ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to inspired fraction of oxygen, which was lower in the high sedation group at 93 [61-130] than the low sedation group at 106 [69-140]. No difference was observed in disease severity scores between cohorts. Low sedation patients had longer ECMO runs, more circuit changes, but lower infectious and hemorrhagic complications. Higher sedation was associated with a hazard ratio for death of 3.23 (95% CI 2.16-4.83) compared to low sedation.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced sedation in COVID-19 ECMO patients is feasible and may be associated with improved survival and reduced complications compared to continuous paralysis, albeit with longer ECMO runs.

Neurological Monitoring and Management for Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients: Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Consensus Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Critical care of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with acute brain injury (ABI) is notable for a lack of high-quality clinical evidence. Here, we offer guidelines for neurological care (neurological monitoring and management) of adults during and after ECMO support.

METHODS

These guidelines are based on clinical practice consensus recommendations and scientific statements. We convened an international multidisciplinary consensus panel including 30 clinician-scientists with expertise in ECMO from all chapters of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). We used a modified Delphi process with three rounds of voting and asked panelists to assess the recommendation levels.

RESULTS

We identified five key clinical areas needing guidance: (1) neurological monitoring, (2) post-cannulation early physiological targets and ABI, (3) neurological therapy including medical and surgical intervention, (4) neurological prognostication, and (5) neurological follow-up and outcomes. The consensus produced 30 statements and recommendations regarding key clinical areas. We identified several knowledge gaps to shape future research efforts.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of ABI on morbidity and mortality in ECMO patients is significant. Particularly, early detection and timely intervention are crucial for improving outcomes. These consensus recommendations and scientific statements serve to guide the neurological monitoring and prevention of ABI, and management strategy of ECMO-associated ABI.

Neurological monitoring and management for adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients: Extracorporeal Life Support Organization consensus guidelines

BACKGROUND

Critical care of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with acute brain injury (ABI) is notable for a lack of high-quality clinical evidence. Here, we offer guidelines for neurological care (neurological monitoring and management) of adults during and after ECMO support.

METHODS

These guidelines are based on clinical practice consensus recommendations and scientific statements. We convened an international multidisciplinary consensus panel including 30 clinician-scientists with expertise in ECMO from all chapters of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). We used a modified Delphi process with three rounds of voting and asked panelists to assess the recommendation levels.

RESULTS

We identified five key clinical areas needing guidance: (1) neurological monitoring, (2) post-cannulation early physiological targets and ABI, (3) neurological therapy including medical and surgical intervention, (4) neurological prognostication, and (5) neurological follow-up and outcomes. The consensus produced 30 statements and recommendations regarding key clinical areas. We identified several knowledge gaps to shape future research efforts.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of ABI on morbidity and mortality in ECMO patients is significant. Particularly, early detection and timely intervention are crucial for improving outcomes. These consensus recommendations and scientific statements serve to guide the neurological monitoring and prevention of ABI, and management strategy of ECMO-associated ABI.

Post-Cardiac Arrest Care in Adult Patients After Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

OBJECTIVES

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) serves as a lifesaving intervention for patients experiencing refractory cardiac arrest. With its expanding usage, there is a burgeoning focus on improving patient outcomes through optimal management in the acute phase after cannulation. This review explores systematic post-cardiac arrest management strategies, associated complications, and prognostication in ECPR patients.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search from inception to 2023 using search terms such as post-cardiac arrest care, ICU management, prognostication, and outcomes in adult ECPR patients was conducted.

STUDY SELECTION

Selection includes original research, review articles, and guidelines.

DATA EXTRACTION

Information from relevant publications was reviewed, consolidated, and formulated into a narrative review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We found limited data and no established clinical guidelines for post-cardiac arrest care after ECPR. In contrast to non-ECPR patients where systematic post-cardiac arrest care is shown to improve the outcomes, there is no high-quality data on this topic after ECPR. This review outlines a systematic approach, albeit limited, for ECPR care, focusing on airway/breathing and circulation as well as critical aspects of ICU care, including analgesia/sedation, mechanical ventilation, early oxygen/C o2 , and temperature goals, nutrition, fluid, imaging, and neuromonitoring strategy. We summarize common on-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation complications and the complex nature of prognostication and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy in ECPR. Given conflicting outcomes in ECPR randomized controlled trials focused on pre-cannulation care, a better understanding of hemodynamic, neurologic, and metabolic abnormalities and early management goals may be necessary to improve their outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective post-cardiac arrest care during the acute phase of ECPR is paramount in optimizing patient outcomes. However, a dearth of evidence to guide specific management strategies remains, indicating the necessity for future research in this field.

Prevalence of delirium among critically ill patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy: A systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To pool the overall prevalence of delirium among critically ill patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support.

METHODOLOGY

This systematic review and proportional meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guidelines. Six electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to March 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. A random effects model was used to pool the summary prevalence estimates and 95% CIs using the score statistic and the exact binomial method and incorporates the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation of proportions. Sensitivity analyses including subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and outlier detection were carried out.

SETTING

Intensive care units.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of delirium.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies involving 8,580 patients were included for meta-analysis. All studies had a low risk of bias in methodological quality. The pooled prevalence rate of 40.79% [95% CI, 17.58%-66.25%] was observed. The between-study heterogeneity (I2) was 98.28%. The subgroup analysis reveals the pooled prevalence of delirium for veno-arterial (V-A) ECMO, veno-venous (V-V) ECMO, and mixed sample of V-A and V-V ECMO were 63.57% [95% CI, 55.77%-71.04%], 51.84% [95% CI, 37.43%-66.12%] and 35.23% [95% CI, 11.84%-62.95%], respectively. Sample size (p = 0.024) was a significant factor associated with the heterogeneity. No evidence for small-study effects was observed (Egger's test: p = 0.5664).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and proportional meta-analysis reveals a high prevalence of delirium among critically ill patients who received ECMO support.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

The results of this meta-analysis can be epidemiological evidence to inform the awareness of clinicians and researchers in critical care clinical practice and research.

Comparison of Sedation and Analgesia Requirements in Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Versus Non-SARS-CoV-2 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome on Veno-Venous ECMO

BACKGROUND

Increased analgosedation requirements have been described in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support due to unique pharmacokinetic challenges. There is a paucity of data comparing sedation requirements in patients on ECMO for ARDS secondary to SARS-CoV-2 versus other etiologies of respiratory failure.

OBJECTIVE

To compare sedation and analgesia requirements in adult patients with SARS-CoV-2 versus non-SARS-CoV-2 ARDS requiring veno-venous (VV) ECMO support.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients receiving sedation and analgesia on VV-ECMO support. Patients were excluded if cannulated at an outside hospital for greater than 24 hours, expired within 48 hours of ECMO cannulation, or received neuromuscular blocking agents for greater than 7 consecutive days following ECMO cannulation.

RESULTS

We evaluated 108 patients on VV-ECMO support, including 44 with non-SARS-CoV-2 ARDS and 64 with SARS-CoV-2 ARDS. The median daily dexmedetomidine requirements were significantly higher in the SARS-CoV-2 cohort (16.7 vs 13.4 mcg/kg/day, P = 0.03), while the median propofol daily requirements were significantly higher in the non-SARS-CoV-2 cohort (40.3 vs 53.5 mg/kg/day, P < 0.01). There was no difference in daily requirements of opioids, benzodiazepines, and ketamine between groups. Use of adjunct agents to facilitate weaning was significantly higher in the SARS-CoV-2 cohort (78.1% vs 43.2%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Patients with ARDS on VV-ECMO support require multiple analgosedative agents with concomitant use of nonparenteral adjunct agents. Further studies are needed to evaluate optimal analgosedation strategies in patients on ECMO support.