Derived and Displayed Power Consumption, Flow, and Pulsatility Over a Range of HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Device Settings

How well do we understand pulsatility in the context of modern ventricular assist devices?

BACKGROUND

Modern ventricular assist devices (VADs) use a continuous flow design. It has been suggested that a lack of pulsatility contributes to a range of adverse outcomes including pump thrombus, gastrointestinal bleeding and stroke. To better assess the role of pulsatility in these adverse events, we first require a clear definition of 'pulsatility' in the setting of a severely impaired ventricle and a modern continuous flow VAD.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted to elucidate the understanding of pulsatility in modern VAD literature. Search engines used included PUBMED, EMBASE and the Cochrane library. Articles were appraised on three aspects: Whether they mentioned pulsatility; whether they mentioned which pulsatility measure was used and finally which methodology was used to obtain the value.

RESULTS

Of 354 articles reviewed, only 13 met our broad inclusion criteria. Of these articles, the most cited measure was pulsatility index (PI) - used by 11 of the publications. The methodology used to obtain the value was not uniform and five articles did not clearly state it. Other measures included pulse pressure and surplus haemodynamic energy. The majority of articles did not directly discuss pulsatility in the setting of patient-pump interaction.

CONCLUSION

Most publications did not provide a definition for pulsatility. In those that did, the most common measure was PI. Measuring PI was not standardised. Few papers addressed the impact of intrinsic ventricular function and arterial compliance on pulsatility. We suggest that future publications adopt a uniform definition which encompasses both patient and pump characteristics.

A Stepwise Approach to Left Ventricular Assist Device Pump Thrombosis

AIM

Pump thrombosis (PT) is a detrimental complication of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. There is no consensus on optimal PT treatment. The aim of this study was to present a treatment strategy for patients with PT.

METHOD

The hospital records of patients who underwent isolated LVAD implantation between May 2013 and October 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Pump thrombosis was suspected in the setting of impaired flow/power parameters and haemolysis. Protocols for the management of suspected PT varied by patient presentation. Parameters that increased the PT risk were investigated by dividing the patients into two groups according to the presence of PT. Preoperative and operative data were analysed.

RESULTS

Pump thrombosis was observed in 20 of 81 patients. All patients with PT presented elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels and higher power and/or low-/high-flow alarm at admission. All patients were treated initially with intravenous unfractionated heparin infusion; three patients did not require further treatment, one patient died due to sudden cardiac arrest, and three patients underwent urgent surgery for LVAD exchange. Thirteen (13) patients received tissue plasminogen activator infusion; eight were discharged without any signs of thrombosis, and three were bridged to transplant. One (1) major bleeding event leading to death was observed. Freedom from second PT was found in 91% cases at 6 months and in 68.2% at 1 year. We found that a larger left ventricle and the type of pump determined the risk of PT.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose thrombolytic therapy should be considered as a feasible treatment option for patients with PT.

Noncardiac surgery in patients with a left ventricular assist device

Left ventricular assist devices are implanted in patients with chronic left heart failure refractory to maximal medical therapy. These devices were initially meant as bridge-to-transplant therapy, but with technological advances they are now also used as destination therapy. With improved survival, many patients with implanted devices need noncardiac surgery. We present three representative cases of noncardiac surgery in such patients to highlight the issues involved in their management. We also review the contemporary literature on various aspects of perioperative management. Anesthesia for noncardiac surgery in these patients was initially the domain of cardiac anesthesiologists, but with an increasing number of such patients needing surgery, general anesthesiologists are frequently tasked to provide anesthetic care. An understanding of left ventricular assist device physiology and issues unique to these patients is essential for safe management of these cases.

Fine-tuning management of the Heart Assist 5 left ventricular assist device with two- and three-dimensional echocardiography

Introduction:

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a viable therapy for patients with severe end-stage heart failure, providing effective haemodynamic support and improved quality of life. The Heart Assist 5 (Micromed Cardiovascular Inc, Houston, TX) continuous-flow LVAD has been on the market in Europe since May 2009.

Methods:

We evaluated nine Heart Assist 5 LVAD patients with two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) and transoesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) parameters between December 2011 and December 2013. The pre-operative TTE LVAD evaluations included left ventricular (LV) function and structure, quantification of right ventricular (RV) function and tricuspid regurgitation (TR), assessment of aortic and mitral regurgitation, and presence of patent foramen ovale and intra-cardiac clots. Peri-operative TEE determined the inflow cannula and septum position, and assessed the de-airing process while weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. Post-operative serial follow-up TTE showed the surgical results of LVAD implantation, determined the overall structure and function of the LV, RV and TR, and observed the inflow and outflow cannula position.

Results:

Nine patients who had undergone Heart Assist 5 LVAD implantation and had been followed up for more than 30 days were included in this study. Eight patients had ischaemic cardiomyopathy and one had adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy. Pre-implantation data: the mean age of the patients was 52 ± 13 (34–64) years, mean body surface area (BSA) was 1.8 ± 0.2 (1.6–2.0) m2, mean cardiac index (CI) was 2.04 ± 0.4 (1.5–2.6) l/min/m2, mean cardiac output (CO) was 3.7 ± 0.7 (2.6–4.2) l/min, mean ejection fraction (EF) was 23 ± 5 (18–28)%, and right ventricular fractional area contraction (RVFAC) was 43 ± 9 (35–55)%. One patient had aortic valve replacement (AVR) during the LVAD implantation, and excess current alarms and increased power were suspected to be caused by a possible thrombus. Close follow up with TTE studies were carried out to clear the LV of thrombus formation, and the inflow cannula position was checked to maintain the septum in the midline, so preventing the suction cascade. Four patients were followed up for more than two years, and two were followed up for more than a year. Three patients died due to multi-organ failure. Follow-up speed-change TTE studies of six patients showed that the mean speed was 9 800 ± 600 (9 500–10 400) rpm, and mean CO was 4.7 ± 0.3 (4.3– 5.0) l/min during the three-month post-implant period.

Conclusion:

We believe that TTE can play a major role in managing LVAD patients to achieve optimal settings for each patient. A large series is mandatory for assessment of echocardiographic studies on Heart Assist 5 LVAD.

Postoperative Management for Patients With Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

Mechanical circulatory support devices have been approved as bridge to transplantation, as bridge to recovery, or as destination therapy to treat end-stage heart failure. The perioperative challenges for the anesthesiologist and the intensivist caring for these patients include device-related complications, hemodynamic instability, arrhythmias, right ventricular failure, and coagulopathy. Perioperative management in this high-risk population has a significant impact on patient outcomes. This review focuses immediate postoperative intensive care unit management of device-related complications.

Accuracy of the HVAD Pump Flow Estimation Algorithm

Controller algorithms are an important feature for assessment of ventricular assist device performance. Flow estimation is one algorithm implemented in the HeartWare continuous-flow ventricular assist device pump system. This parameter estimates flow passing through the pump and is calculated using speed, current, and hematocrit. In vitro and in vivo studies were conducted to assess the algorithm accuracy. During in vitro testing, three pumps were tested in four water-glycerol solutions at 37°C with viscosities equivalent to hematocrits of 20, 30, 40, and 50%. By using a linear regression model, a correlation coefficient of >0.94 was observed between measured and estimated flow for all conditions. In vivo studies (n = 9) were conducted in an ovine model where a reference flow probe was placed on the outflow graft and speed was adjusted from 1,800 to 4,000 revolutions per minute. During in vivo experiments, estimated pump flow (mean, minimum, and maximum) was compared with measured pump flow. The best-fit linear regression equation for the data is y = 0.96x + 0.54, r = 0.92. In addition, waveform fidelity was high (r > 0.96) in normal (i.e., nonsuction) cases where flow pulsatility was >2 L/min. The flow estimation algorithm demonstrated strong agreement with measured flow, both when analyzing average waveform magnitude and fidelity.

Case Report: Disparate flow in HeartMate II patient with extensive left ventricle repair

This case study reports the operative management of a 63-year-old male patient following implantation of the HeartMate II (HMII) left ventricular assist device (LVAD), with a non-compliant left ventricle (LV) and a reduced right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic volume. Intraoperatively, the patient had a thin, fragile LV wall with laminated clot; a ventricular septal defect was encountered during removal of the clot. Along with an aortic valve repair, the LV and the septum were reconstructed with multiple bovine pericardium patches, thus, moderately reducing the RV and LV stroke volume. A difference in cardiac output via a Swan-Ganz catheter (approximately 1.5 l/min) was observed as opposed to the HMII's estimated flow. The result was later replicated and verified ITALIC! in vitrovia the Donovan Mock Circulation System (DMCS), where about 2 l/min lower flow on the HMII system was observed. In conclusion, the HMII flow rate displayed can be inaccurate and should only be used for trending.

Characteristics of the electrocardiogram in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices

BACKGROUND

Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are routinely obtained in patients with advanced congestive heart failure (CHF) before and after surgical implantation with a left-ventricular assist device (LVAD). As the number of patients with CHF is increasing, it is necessary to characterize the changes present in the ECG of patients with LVADs.

METHODS

ECGs of 43 patients pre- and postimplantation of a HeartMate II LVAD were compared to characterize the presence of an LVAD using the following six criteria (LVADS2 ): low limb-lead voltage, ventricular pacing, artifact (electrical), duration of the QRS > 120 milliseconds, ST-elevation in the lateral leads, and splintering of the QRS complex. Additionally, 50 ECGs of non-LVAD patients coded as "lateral myocardial infarction (MI)" and 50 ECGs coded as "ventricular pacing" were chosen at random and scored. Odds ratios were calculated using Fisher's exact test. Logistic regression models were built to predict the presence of an LVAD in all patients.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis of the pre- and post-LVAD ECGs confirmed that all criteria except the "Duration of QRS > 120 milliseconds" characterized the ECG of a patient with an LVAD. Electrical artifact and low limb-lead voltage yielded the greatest association with an LVAD-ECG.

CONCLUSIONS

The ECG of a patient with end-stage CHF significantly changes with LVAD implantation. The LVADS2 criteria provide a framework towards characterizing and establishing a new baseline of the ECG in a patient with a continuous-flow LVAD.

Geometric optimization of a step bearing for a hydrodynamically levitated centrifugal blood pump for the reduction of hemolysis

A hydrodynamically levitated centrifugal blood pump with a semi-open impeller has been developed for mechanical circulatory assistance. However, a narrow bearing gap has the potential to cause hemolysis. The purpose of the present study is to optimize the geometric configuration of the hydrodynamic step bearing in order to reduce hemolysis by expansion of the bearing gap. First, a numerical analysis of the step bearing, based on lubrication theory, was performed to determine the optimal design. Second, in order to assess the accuracy of the numerical analysis, the hydrodynamic forces calculated in the numerical analysis were compared with those obtained in an actual measurement test using impellers having step lengths of 0%, 33%, and 67% of the vane length. Finally, a bearing gap measurement test and a hemolysis test were performed. As a result, the numerical analysis revealed that the hydrodynamic force was the largest when the step length was approximately 70%. The hydrodynamic force calculated in the numerical analysis was approximately equivalent to that obtained in the measurement test. In the measurement test and the hemolysis test, the blood pump having a step length of 67% achieved the maximum bearing gap and reduced hemolysis, as compared with the pumps having step lengths of 0% and 33%. It was confirmed that the numerical analysis of the step bearing was effective, and the developed blood pump having a step length of approximately 70% was found to be a suitable configuration for the reduction of hemolysis.