Hydroxyethyl starch enhances argatroban-mediated decreases in clot propagation and strength by diminishing thrombin–fibrinogen interactions

An evaluation of monitoring possibilities of argatroban using rotational thromboelastometry and activated partial thromboplastin time

BACKGROUND

Rotational thrombelastometry/thrombelastography with ROTEM and TEG is becoming available bedside in an increasing number of intensive care units, where many patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are treated. The study has been performed in an effort to find out whether ROTEM could be an alternative to activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) when argatroban is used for anticoagulation.

METHODS

Argatroban was added in vitro to a series of citrated whole-blood samples from 10 healthy volunteers to obtain whole-blood concentrations of 0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and 8.0 mg/l. ROTEM and whole-blood aPTT analyses were performed at each argatroban concentration. Correlation analyses were performed using the Spearman correlation analysis.

RESULTS

There was a significant and strong correlation between argatroban concentrations and clotting time (CT in ROTEM analysis with INTEM) (P<0.0001 and r=0.98). Also, the ROTEM time to maximum clot formation velocity (MAXV-t) appeared to have a very strong and highly significant correlation to argatroban concentrations (P<0.0001 and r=0.95). When we studied the correlation between aPTT and CT, we found a highly significant and strong correlation between these two analyses (P<0.0001 and r=0.97), especially so in the clinically relevant therapeutic range up to 100 s aPTT prolongation for HIT patients.

CONCLUSION

A significant and strong correlation was found between argatroban concentrations and several ROTEM parameters. Rotational thrombelastometry/thrombelastography has a potential role in increasing the safety of argatroban anticoagulation in critically ill patients.

Influence of fluid therapy on the haemostatic system of intensive care patients

Haemostatic alterations associated with the use of fluids are related to non-specific dilutional effects and colloid-specific effects, such as acquired von Willebrand syndrome, inhibition of platelet function and fibrin polymerization. Judging by currently available evidence, dextran, hetastarch and pentastarch have a more pronounced impact than tetrastarch, gelatin and albumin. In patients with hypocoagulability, tetrastarch appears to be a suitable volume expander due to its high safety index and volume efficacy. Gelatins have lower inhibitory effects on clot strength compared with tetrastarch, but their volume efficacy is also lower. Dextrans are potent anticoagulants with a high risk for adverse reactions. Albumin has negligible effects on haemostasis, but low volume efficacy and costs limit the use of a blood product as a routine volume replacement fluid. To avoid potential acidosis-induced changes in haemostasis, plasma-adapted carrier solutions may be used instead of saline-based solutions.

Biological and pharmacological aspects of perioperative hemorrhagic complications associated with oral platelet-directed antithrombotic agents. Focus on isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and oral irreversible P2Y(12) receptor antagonists

Coronary arterial bypass grafting (CABG)-the most common heart surgery performed worldwide-is an effective procedure for treating patients with advanced, obstructive atherothrombotic coronary artery disease, prolonging survival in selected high-risk patients. However, CABG is also associated with hemorrhagic complications, which can impact outcome measures such as perioperative morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and health care expenditures. Recent observations have expanded our understanding of the complex process of hemostasis, fostering a more informed view of CABG-associated bleeding complications. Additional research is warranted to determine whether new antithrombotic drug treatment options, such as reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonists among patients with acute coronary syndromes, will favorably impact these clinically relevant complications.

Reducing thrombotic complications in the perioperative setting: an update on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparins are widely used in the perioperative setting. Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious, antibody-mediated complication of heparin therapy that occurs in approximately 0.5%-5% of patients treated with heparin for at least 5 days. An extremely prothrombotic disorder, HIT confers significant risks of thrombosis and devastating consequences on affected patients: approximately 38%-76% develop thrombosis, approximately 10% with thrombosis require limb amputation, and approximately 20%-30% die within a month. HIT antibodies are transient and typically disappear within 3 mo. In patients with lingering antibodies, however, re-exposure to heparin can be catastrophic. In the perioperative setting, heightened awareness is important for the prompt recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of HIT. HIT should be considered if the platelet count decreases 50% and/or thrombosis occurs 5-14 days after starting heparin, with other diagnoses excluded. On strong clinical suspicion of HIT, heparin should be discontinued and a parenteral alternative anticoagulant initiated, even before laboratory confirmation of HIT is obtained. Subsequent laboratory test results may help with the decision to continue with nonheparin therapy or switch back to heparin. Heparin avoidance in patients with current or previous HIT is feasible in most clinical situations, except perhaps in cardiovascular surgery. If the surgery cannot be delayed until HIT antibodies have disappeared, intraoperative alternative anticoagulation is recommended.