Retinal vein occlusion: genetic predisposition and systemic risk factors

PON1, APOE and SDF-1 Gene Polymorphisms and Risk of Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Case-Control Study

Numerous studies have tried to evaluate the potential role of thrombophilia-related genes in retinal vein occlusion (RVO); however, there is limited research on genes related to different pathophysiological mechanisms involved in RVO. In view of the strong contribution of oxidative stress and inflammation to the pathogenesis of RVO, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the association of inflammation- and oxidative-stress-related polymorphisms from three different genes [apolipoprotein E (APOE), paraoxonase 1 (PON1) and stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1)] and the risk of RVO in a Greek population. Participants in this case-control study were 50 RVO patients (RVO group) and 50 healthy volunteers (control group). Blood samples were collected on EDTA tubes and genomic DNA was extracted. Genotyping of rs854560 (L55M) and rs662 (Q192R) for the PON1 gene, rs429358 and rs7412 for the APOE gene and rs1801157 [SDF1-3'G(801)A] for SDF-1 gene was performed using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. Multiple genetic models (codominant, dominant, recessive, overdominant and log-additive) and haplotype analyses were performed using the SNPStats web tool to assess the correlation between the genetic polymorphisms and the risk of RVO. Binary logistic regression analysis was used for the association analysis between APOE gene variants and RVO. Given the multifactorial nature of the disease, our statistical analysis was adjusted for the most important systemic risk factors (age, hypertension and diabetes mellitus). The dominant genetic model for the PON1 Q192R single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the association analysis revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between the RVO group and the control group. Specifically, after adjusting for age and hypertension, the PON1 192 R allele (QR + RR) was found to be associated with a statistically significantly higher risk of RVO compared to the QQ genotype (OR = 2.51; 95% CI = 1.02-6.14, p = 0.04). The statistically significant results were maintained after including diabetes in the multivariate model in addition to age and hypertension (OR = 2.83; 95% CI = 1.01-7.97, p = 0.042). No statistically significant association was revealed between the other studied polymorphisms and the risk of RVO. Haplotype analysis for PON1 SNPs, L55M and Q192R, revealed no statistically significant correlation. In conclusion, PON1 192 R allele carriers (QR + RR) were associated with a statistically significantly increased risk of RVO compared to the QQ homozygotes. These findings suggest that the R allele of the PON1 Q192R is likely to play a role as a risk factor for retinal vein occlusion.

Highlights on Genetic Polymorphism Associated with Thromboembolic Risk; Implications in Ophthalmic and Autoimmune Disorders—A Review

The present paper explores genetic polymorphism and its association with thromboembolic retinal venous disorders, such as central/hemi-retinal vein occlusion, as well as possible correlations with other ocular findings, such as closed angle glaucoma, but also with autoimmune general disorders. In this review, we are highlighting the importance of establishing a correspondence between all of the above, since they all have complex etiopathogeneses; sometimes, when all coexist together, they could generate effects that may be very difficult to manage. There are studies supporting that genetic polymorphism, such as the variant MTHFR A1298C, may increase the risk for developing glaucoma, especially in the heterozygote model. Being aware of all these aspects may prove to be useful in patients with several associated diseases, as a combined effort between several medical specialties may prove to the benefit of these patients. Our review, completed with an exemplifying clinical case, shows that it is necessary to raise awareness of all aspects of a complex medical situation, including the genetic one, of a patient being at risk for thromboembolic episodes, for preventing them or managing them promptly and properly in the future.

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms as risk factors for retinal venous occlusive disease: A literature review

The role of polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a theme of discussion since the first reports of RVO in patients with MTHFR C677T mutation and without classic acquired risk factors for retinal vascular disease. The association between MTHFR polymorphisms and RVO has been studied over the last 20 years producing conflicting results. This review aims to summarize the literature concerning the role MTHFR polymorphisms as risk factors for RVO.

Molecular Analysis of Prothrombotic Gene Variants in Venous Thrombosis: A Potential Role for Sex and Thrombotic Localization

Background: Requests to test for thrombophilia in the clinical context are often not evidence-based. Aim: To define the role of a series of prothrombotic gene variants in a large population of patients with different venous thromboembolic diseases. Methods: We studied Factor V Leiden (FVL), FVR2, FII G20210A, Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T and A1298C, beta-fibrinogen -455 G>A, FXIII V34L, and HPA-1 L33P variants and PAI-1 4G/5G alleles in 343 male and female patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), 164 with pulmonary embolism (PE), 126 with superficial vein thrombosis (SVT), 118 with portal vein thrombosis (PVT), 75 with cerebral vein thrombosis (CVT) and 119 with retinal vein thrombosis (RVT), and compared them with the corresponding variants and alleles in 430 subjects from the general population. Results: About 40% of patients with DVT, PE and SVT had at least one prothrombotic gene variant, such as FVL, FVR2 and FII G20210A, and a statistically significant association with the event was found in males with a history of PE. In patients with a history of PVT or CVT, the FII G20210A variant was more frequent, particularly in females. In contrast, a poor association was found between RVT and prothrombotic risk factors, confirming that local vascular factors have a key role in this thrombotic event. Conclusions: Only FVL, FVR2 and FII G20210A are related to vein thrombotic disease. Other gene variants, often requested for testing in the clinical context, do not differ significantly between cases and controls. Evidence of a sex difference for some variants, once confirmed in larger populations, may help to promote sex-specific prevention of such diseases.

Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for retinal vein occlusion: A meta-analysis

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common etiology for vision loss. There is contrasting evidence on the association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and the risk of RVO. We performed a meta-analysis of published articles before October 31, 2019, to estimate a pooled odds ratio for the association between DM and RVO, including central and branch RVO by a fixed or random effects model. We identified 37 publications from 38 studies (1 publication was from 2 studies), published between 1985 and 2019. In total, 148,654 cases and 23,768,820 controls were included in this meta-analysis. The results of pooled analysis for all 37 publications (or 38 studies) showed a significant association between DM and the risk of RVO (OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.43-1.99). Subgroup analysis indicated that DM was significantly associated with CRVO (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.29-3.03, I = 67.9%), but not significantly associated with BRVO (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.95-1.56, I = 64.1%). In conclusion, the result of present meta-analysis suggested that DM is a risk factor for RVO. More well-designed studies on the relationship between RVO and DM should be undertaken in the future.

Correlation between PAI-1 rs1799889 polymorphism and venous thromboembolism: A meta-analysis of 48 case-control studies

BACKGROUND

We performed this meta-analysis to better assess the relationship between plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) rs1799889 polymorphism and the risk of venous thromboembolism.

METHOD

Eligible studies were searched in PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and CNKI. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULT

A total of 48 studies with 14,806 participants were analyzed. No positive results were detected in overall analyses. Further subgroup analyses revealed that the PAI-1 rs1799889 polymorphism was significantly associated with the risk of venous thromboembolism in Caucasians and East Asians. When we stratified available data according to type of disease, we found that the PAI-1 rs1799889 polymorphism was significantly correlated with the risk of DVT. No any other positive results were observed in overall and subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that the PAI-1 rs1799889 polymorphism may serve as a potential biological marker for venous thromboembolism in Caucasians and East Asians.

Genetic correlation between Prothrombin G20210A polymorphism and retinal vein occlusion risk

The aim of this study was to perform an updated meta-analysis to quantitatively investigate the association between G20210A polymorphism of Prothrombin gene and the risk of retinal vein occlusion (RVO), based on the available publications with inconsistent results. We utilized the Stata software to perform the heterogeneity test, association test, Begg's and Egger's tests, and sensitivity analysis. We searched three on-line databases (PubMed, Embase, and WOS) and obtained a total of 422 articles. Based on our selection criteria, 24 case-control studies were finally enrolled in this overall meta-analysis; a subgroup analysis by the factors ethnicity, control source, and RVO type was done. Through the association test of overall meta-analysis, we did not observe a significant difference between RVO cases and controls under the A vs G (allele) (z=1.49, P=0.137), A vs G (carrier) (z=1.42, P =0.155), GA vs GG (z=1.50, P=0.135), and GA+AA vs GG (z=1.50, P=0.135). Furthermore, we observed similar negative results in the association test of subgroup analysis (all P>0.05). Heterogeneity, Begg's, and Egger's tests excluded the presence of high heterogeneity and publication bias. Statistically stable results were observed in the sensitivity analyses. Based on integrated analysis of the current evidence, Prothrombin gene G20210A polymorphism is likely unrelated to the risk of RVO.

Factor V G1691A is associated with an increased risk of retinal vein occlusion: a meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the association between the Factor V G1691A polymorphism and the risk of retinal vein occlusion (RVO). This analysis included 37 studies involving 2,510 cases and 3,466 controls. Factor V G1691A was associated with an increased risk of RVO in the allele, heterozygote, dominant, and carrier models (PA < 0.001, odds ratios >1), but not the homozygote or recessive models (PA > 0.05). Similar results were observed in a meta-analysis of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and when comparing Caucasian subgroups to population-based controls. These data demonstrate that the G/A genotype of Factor V G1691A is associated with an increased risk of RVO/CRVO in a Caucasian population.

Association of retinal vein occlusion, homocysteine, and the thrombophilic mutations in a Turkish population: A case-control study

PURPOSE

To compare homocysteine and thrombophilic mutations for the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T, factor V Leiden, and prothrombin G20210A between retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and healthy controls in a Turkish population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-nine subjects with RVO were compared for homocysteine status and the MTHFR C677T, prothrombin G20210A, and factor V Leiden mutations with those of 68 healthy controls. Then, the groups were subdivided into two subgroups according to age (less than 50 years old, equal to or more than 50 years old) and were further compared.

RESULTS

Mean plasma level of homocysteine was similar, but the frequency of hyperhomocysteinemia was significantly higher in the RVO group when compared with the control group (22.5% and 8.8%, respectively, p = 0.037). The frequency of all thrombophilic mutations was similar between the groups (p > 0.05). The frequency of all thrombophilic mutations and homocysteine levels was also similar between age subgroups (p > 0.05). Only hyperhomocysteinemia was significantly different between subgroups (p = 0.037); the frequency of hyperhomocysteinemia was significantly different in RVO patients less than 50 years old (22.7%) from that in healthy controls less than 50 years old (11.1%). Two RVO patients (4.1%) with bilateral involvement had MTHFR C677T mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening for thrombophilic mutations such as MTHFR C677T, factor V Leiden, and prothrombin G20210A in RVO patients at all ages seems to be unnecessary and not cost-effective. However, thrombophilic disorders should be screened selectively, focusing on young individuals, especially with bilateral involvement, without additional cardiovascular risk factors, or a family history of thrombosis.

Retinal venous pressure in the non-affected eye of patients with retinal vein occlusions

BACKGROUND

To measure the retinal venous pressure (RVP) in both eyes of patients with unilateral central retinal vein occlusions and to compare these values to controls.

METHODS

The study included 31 patients with unilateral central retinal vein occlusions (CRVO) and 31 controls who were matched by age, sex, and systemic disease. RVP was measured in all patients bilaterally by means of contact lens ophthalmodynamometry, and the RVP measurements of the affected and unaffected eyes of patients were compared to the RVPs of controls. Ophthalmodynamometry is done by applying an increasing pressure on the eye via a contact lens. The minimum force required to induce a venous pulsation is called ophthalmodynamometric force (ODF). The RVP is defined and calculated as the sum of ODF and intraocular pressure (IOP) [RVP = ODF + IOP].

RESULTS

The RVP group means ± SD were as follows: patient's affected eyes (45.0 ± 11.6 mmHg), patient's unaffected eyes (38.0 ± 11.1 mmHg) ,and (17.7 ± 6.7 mmHg) in the eyes of controls. The values of RVP, even in the patients unaffected eyes, were significantly higher than in the eyes of controls (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CRVO, the RVP is increased in both the affected as well as in the unaffected contralateral eye.

Thrombophilic Mutations as Risk Factor for Retinal Vein Occlusion

Background:

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common retinal vein disease and an important cause of blindness and visual morbidity. Many conditions are associated with RVO but the real role of the thrombophilic mutations is still unclear.

Aim:

To evaluate the potential role of thrombophilic mutations in RVO.

Methods:

We have evaluated 113 patients with RVO and compared with 104 volunteer controls. The controls were all healthy blood donors without previous venous thromboembolism episode or arterial thromboembolism episode. All patients were tested for 5 gene variants (here all named as mutations): factor V ( FV) Leiden (G1691A), factor II ( FII; G20210A), 5,1-methylenetetra-hydrofolate reductase ( MTHFR; C677T), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 ( PAI-1; 4G/5G), and angiotensin-converting enzyme ( ACE; Del/Ins). Statistical analysis were performed by the 2-tailed chi-square test.

Results:

Statistical test showed that TT homozygous patients of the MTHFR C677T mutation ( P = .017) and heterozygous GA patients of the FII G20210A mutation ( P = .018) were significantly higher than that in controls. For FV Leiden, even if the values were higher in patients than in controls, P value was not statistically significant. Conversely, for the ACE (Ins/Del) and PAI-1 (4G/5G) mutations, no difference was observed among genotypes of patients with RVO and control participants.

Conclusions:

In our study, the FII G20210A and the MTHFR C677T mutations resulted significantly higher in patients than in controls; in contrast, thrombophilic mutation of FV, ACE, and PAI-1 genes was not statistically correlated with RVO. In spite of having found an association between some thrombophilic mutations and RVO, more studies with a major number of patients are necessary to determine the final role of these gene variants.