CHA2DS2-VASc score and exercise capacity of patients with coronary artery disease participating in cardiac rehabilitation programs

Effectiveness and Safety of Remote Cardiac Rehabilitation for Patients After Acute Coronary Syndrome

Cardiac rehabilitation improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Recently there has been a growing interest in remote cardiac rehabilitation (RCR) programs. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of RCR compared with center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR). This is an observational study including patients after hospital admission for ACS. The study group included patients at low-to-moderate risk for cardiovascular complications who were referred for RCR. The control group included patients at similar risk who participated in CBCR. The primary end points were the improvement of at least 10% to 25% in exercise capacity after 6 months of cardiac rehabilitation. Included were 305 patients who completed 6 months of cardiac rehabilitation. Of them, 107 patients participated in RCR and 198 in CBCR. RCR patients were younger and more frequently males. Improvement of ≥10% in exercise capacity after 6 months was achieved more frequently in patients participating in RCR compared with CBCR (69.3% and 55% respectively, p = 0.03). A similar trend was observed for improvement of ≥25% in exercise capacity after 6 months (33.8% and 22.7% in RCR and CBCR, respectively, p = 0.05). While weight reduction and the increase in muscle mass were similar in the 2 groups, fat percent reduction was significantly greater in the RCR compared with the CBCR (2.5% and 1.4% respectively, p <0.005). We conclude that RCR program is an effective and safe option for low-risk patients after hospital admission for ACS. It enables optimizing the utilization of this important service for patients with coronary artery disease.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac rehabilitation of patients following acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Cardiac rehabilitation improves prognosis and symptoms in cardiac patients. In 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, cardiac rehabilitation services were temporarily suspended between April and August. We aimed to investigate the effect of cardiac rehabilitation suspension during the COVID-19 pandemic on patients' exercise capacity and metabolic parameters.

METHODS

Included were patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation following hospital admission for ACS. Exercise capacity, weight and body fat percentage were compared between baseline, pre- and post-lockdown visits.

RESULTS

A total of 281 patients participated in the cardiac rehabilitation program prior to its suspension. Of them, only 198 (70%) patients returned to the program on its renewal and were included in the analysis. Exercise capacity improved significantly in the pre-lockdown stress test compared to baseline. However, there was a significant decrease in exercise capacity in the post compared to pre-lockdown test (8.1±6.3 and 7.1±2.1 METs in pre- and post-lockdown measurements, respectively, p<0.001). Of the 99 (50%) of patients that demonstrated at least 10% improvement in exercise capacity in the pre-lockdown test, 48(48.5%) patients returned to their baseline values in the post-lockdown test. Post-lockdown assessment demonstrated a significant weight gain (80.3 and 81.1kg, in pre- and post-lockdown measurements, respectively, p<0.001) as well as an increase in visceral fat level and body fat percentage.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac rehabilitation suspension for 4 months during COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant reduction in exercise capacity and increased weight and body fat percent. These findings highlight the importance of remote cardiac rehabilitation services that can continue uninterrupted in times of pandemic.

CHA2DS2-VASc score predicts exercise intolerance in young and middle-aged male patients with asymptomatic atrial fibrillation

Exercise intolerance among the clinical symptoms in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has usually been masked by their adjusted life style. We sought to assess the role of CHA₂DS₂-VASc score to predict exercise intolerance in asymptomatic AF patients, and further examine whether the relationship differs by age and gender. Among the 6,275 participants of the prospective Korean registry of the Comparison study of Drugs for symptom control and complication prevention of Atrial Fibrillation (CODE-AF), 1,080 AF patients who underwent exercise treadmill testing were studied. Exercise intolerance was defined as a peak exercise capacity of 7 metabolic equivalents (METs) or less, and the patients were divided into two groups for the analysis: ≤7 METs (n = 131) and >7 METs (n = 949). Patients with exercise intolerance had a significantly higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc score than those without (3.1 ± 1.3 vs. 2.0 ± 1.5, p < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, a higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc score (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.31–1.81, p < 0.0001), corrected QT interval (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00–1.02, p = 0.026), and increased left atrial volume index (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.03, p = 0.001) were found to be independent predictors of exercise intolerance. The impact of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score on exercise intolerance was significant only in male patients aged <65 years (OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.76–6.19, p < 0.0001). The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score may be a feasible risk assessment tool to predict exercise intolerance, especially in young and middle-aged male patients with asymptomatic AF.