Health inequities in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Association of Racial Residential Segregation and Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health such as residential segregation have been identified as drivers of disparities in health outcomes; however, this has been understudied for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We sought to examine whether there were differences in survival to discharge and survival with good neurological outcome, as well as likelihood of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, using validated measures of racial, ethnic, and economic segregation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study using data from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival data set. The primary predictor for this study was the Index of Concentration at the Extremes. The primary outcomes were survival to discharge and survival with good neurological status.

RESULTS

During the study period, 626 264 had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and patients had a mean age of 62 years (SD 17.2 years). In multivariable models, we observed an increased likelihood of survival to discharge and survival with good neurological outcome for those patients residing in more highly segregated predominately White population and higher-income census tracts as compared with more highly segregated and lower-income Black and Hispanic/Latinx population census tracts. We found that the magnitude of this disparity was 24% for the outcome of survival to discharge as compared with reference (relative risk,1.24 [95% CI, 1.20-1.28]).

CONCLUSIONS

This research suggests that areas impacted by residential and economic segregation are important targets for both public policy interventions as well as addressing disparities in care across the chain of survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Is there an association between 30-day mortality from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and deprivation levels within Hampshire? A retrospective cohort study

Introduction

People who live in population-dense areas, work in routine occupations, originate from a non-white background, have lower education attainment and experience a greater level of deprivation have an increased risk of suffering an OHCA and are less likely to receive bystander CPR. This study seeks to understand if these observed inequalities result in reduced survival by examining the relationship between deprivation and survival at 30 days at a UK single county level.

Methods

30-day survival from non-traumatic OHCA in adults over 18 years of age in Hampshire from local ambulance service data (Jan 2019 - March 2023) was combined with indices of multiple deprivation (IMD) based on the home postcode. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed, through bidirectional stepwise regression, to evaluate the effect of deprivation on 30-day survival. Separate models were developed to consider non-linear relationships before a final model incorporated learning from previous iterations.

Results

Overall, 4184 patients were included in the final analysis, with 437 (10%) surviving to 30 days. Age of OHCA patients varied significantly between IMD deciles (p < 0.01), with a trend to younger patients in more deprived deciles. Univariable regression found no relationship between deprivation and survival. However, after controlling for age, sex, shockable rhythm and bystander CPR, increasing deprivation was associated with reduced survival (OR: 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09). Other significant predictors were age, shockable rhythm and bystander CPR.

Conclusion

Increasing deprivation was associated with a reduced 30-day survival after accounting for other measured variables.

Community Disparities in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Prehospital Antiarrhythmic Practices

OBJECTIVES

Antiarrhythmic administration is an important treatment for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with a shockable rhythm, but a minimal amount is known about disparities in such antiarrhythmic practices. We sought to investigate the association between community race/ethnicity and prehospital antiarrhythmic administration for OHCA.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of a national prehospital database, National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS), linked to Census data. We included OHCAs with a shockable rhythm from 2018 to 2021. We stratified patients based on majority (>50%) ZIP code race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White (White), non-Hispanic Black (Black), and Hispanic/Latino). We then created two cohorts: (1) patients with a shockable rhythm at any point to study differences in antiarrhythmic administration rates, and (2) patients with an initial shockable rhythm to analyze differences in time to antiarrhythmic administration. For patients with a shockable rhythm at any point, we used logistic regressions to evaluate the association of community race to antiarrhythmic administration. For patients with an initial shockable rhythm, we compared the time from emergency medical services (EMS) dispatch to the first antiarrhythmic administration.

RESULTS

Of 763,944 cardiac arrests, 311,499 had a shockable rhythm during the OHCA, and 237,838 had an initial shockable rhythm. For patients with a shockable rhythm at any point, majority White (33.0%) received antiarrhythmics at a higher rate than majority Black (28.9%; aOR 0.9, 95%CI 0.8-0.9) and majority Hispanic/Latino (27.8%; aOR 0.8 95%CI 0.7-0.8). For patients with an initial shockable rhythm, the time to antiarrhythmic for White (median 19.6 min, IQR 15.00-26.28 min) was lower than for Black (median 20.5 min, IQR 16.33-26.35 min, p < 0.01) but higher than Hispanic/Latino (median 18.0 min, IQR 14.33-23.42 min, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

While antiarrhythmic administration rate was lower for minority communities and time to antiarrhythmic was higher for Black OHCAs, time to antiarrhythmic administration was lower for Hispanic/Latino OHCAs.

Prehospital critical care beyond advanced life support for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review

Aim

To assess the clinical outcomes of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest attended by prehospital critical care teams compared to non-critical care teams.

Methods

This review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO and the eligibility criteria followed a PICOST framework for ILCOR systematic reviews. Prehospital critical care was defined as any provider with enhanced clinical competencies beyond standard advanced life support algorithms and dedicated dispatch to critically ill patients. MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to 20 April 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool and the certainty of evidence by the GRADE approach. Meta-analyses of pooled data from studies at moderate risk of bias were performed using a generic inverse-variance with random-effects.

Results

The search returned 6,444 results and 17 articles were included, reporting 1,192,158 patients. Three studies reported traumatic patients and one reported paediatric patients. All studies were non-randomised and 15 were at moderate risk of bias. Most studies included prehospital physicians (n = 16). For adult non-traumatic patients, the certainty of evidence was low and prehospital critical care was associated with improved survival to hospital admission (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.35-2.82), survival to hospital discharge (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.10-1.63), survival at 30 days (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.38-1.75), and favourable neurological outcome at 30 days (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.19-1.84). Prehospital critical care was also associated with improved outcomes for traumatic and paediatric patients and the certainty of evidence was very low.

Conclusion

Attendance of prehospital critical care teams to patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with improved outcomes.

Examining the association between ethnicity and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest interventions in Salt Lake City, Utah

Aims

Previous research has reported racial disparities in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) interventions, including bystander CPR and AED use. However, studies on other prehospital interventions are limited. The primary objective of this study was to investigate race/ethnic disparities in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) interventions: EMS response times, medication administration, and decisions for intra-arrest transport. The secondary objective was to evaluate differences in the provision of Bystander CPR (CPR) and application of AED.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from the Salt Lake City Fire Department (2010-2023). We included adults 18 years or older with EMS-treated OHCA. Race/ethnicity was categorized as White people, Asian people, Black people, Hispanic people, and others. We employed multivariable regression analysis to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and the outcomes of interest.

Results

Unadjusted analyses revealed no significant differences across ethnic groups in EMS response, medication administration, bystander CPR, or intra-arrest transport decisions. However, significant ethnic disparities were observed in Automated External Defibrillator (AED) utilization, Black people having the lowest rate (6.5%) and Asian people the highest (21.8%). The adjusted analysis found no significant association between race/ethnicity and all OHCA intervention measures, nor between race/ethnicity and survival outcomes.

Conclusions

Our multivariable analysis found no statistically significant association between race/ethnicity and EMS response time, epinephrine administration, antiarrhythmic medication use, bystander CPR, AED intervention, or intra-arrest transport. These results imply regional variations in ethnic disparities in OHCA may not be consistent across all areas, warranting further research into disparities in other regions and additional influential factors like neighborhood conditions and socioeconomic status.

Knowledge and barriers of out of hospital cardiac arrest bystander intervention and public access automated external defibrillator use in the Northeast of England: a cross-sectional survey study

Intervention by members of the public during an out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHAC) including resuscitation attempts and accessible automated external defibrillator (AED) has been shown to improve survival. This study aimed to investigate the OHCA and AED knowledge and confidence, and barriers to intervention, of the public of North East England, UK. This study used a face-to-face cross-sectional survey on a public high street in Newcastle, UK. Participants were asked unprompted to explain what they would do when faced with an OHCA collapse. Chi-Square analysis was used to test the association of the independent variables sex and first aid trained on the participants' responses. Of the 421 participants recruited to our study, 82.9% (n = 349) reported that they would know what to do during an OHCA collapse. The most frequent OHCA action mentioned was call 999 (64.1%, n = 270/421) and 58.2% (n = 245/421) of participants reported that they would commence CPR. However, only 14.3% (n = 60/421) of participants spontaneously mentioned that they would locate an AED, while only 4.5% (n = 19/421) recounted that they would apply the AED. Just over half of participants (50.8%, n = 214/421) were first aid trained, with statistically more females (57.3%, n = 126/220) than males (43.9%,  n = 87/198) being first aiders (p = 0.01 χ2 = 7.41). Most participants (80.3%, n = 338/421) knew what an AED was, and 34.7% (n = 326/421) reported that they knew how to use one, however, only 11.9% (n = 50/421) mentioned that they would actually shock a patient. Being first aid trained increased the likelihood of freely recounting actions for OHCA and AED intervention. The most common barrier to helping during an OHCA was lack of knowledge (29.9%, n = 126/421). Although most participants reported they would know what to do during an OHCA and had knowledge of an AED, low numbers of participants spontaneously mentioned specific OHCA and AED actions. Improving public knowledge would help improve the public's confidence of intervening during an OHCA and may improve OHCA survival.

Health inequalities in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and use of automated electrical defibrillators in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes can be improved by strengthening the chain of survival, namely prompt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED). However, provision of bystander CPR and AED use remains low due to individual patient factors ranging from lack of education to socioeconomic barriers and due to lack of resources such as limited availability of AEDs in the community. Although the impact of health inequalities on survival from OHCA is documented, it is imperative that we identify and implement strategies to improve public health and outcomes from OHCA overall but with a simultaneous emphasis on making care more equitable. Disparities in CPR delivery and AED use in OHCA exist based on factors including sex, education level, socioeconomic status, race and ethnicity, all of which we discuss in this review. Most importantly, we discuss the barriers to AED use, and strategies on how these may be overcome.

The Association of Racial Residential Segregation and Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States

Background

Residential segregation has been identified as drivers of disparities in health outcomes, but further work is needed to understand this association with clinical outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We utilized Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) dataset to examine if there are differences in survival to discharge and survival with good neurological outcome, as well as likelihood of bystander CPR, using validated measures of racial, ethnic, and economic segregation.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational study using data from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) dataset to examine associations among adult OHCA patients. The primary predictor was the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE), a validated measure that includes race, ethnicity, and income across three measures at the census tract level. The primary outcomes were survival to discharge and survival with good neurological status. A multivariable modified Poisson regression modeling approach with random effects at the EMS agency and hospital level was utilized.

Results

We identified 626,264 OHCA patients during the study period. The mean age was 62 years old (SD 17.2 years), and 35.7% (n =223,839) of the patients were female. In multivariable models, we observed an increased likelihood of survival to discharge and survival with good neurological outcome for those patients residing in predominately White population census tracts and higher income census tracts as compared to lower income Black and Hispanic/Latinx population census tracts (RR 1.24, CI 1.20-1.28) and a 32% increased likelihood of receiving bystander CPR in higher income census tracts as compared to reference (RR 1.32, CI 1.30-1.34).

Conclusions

In this study examining the association of measures of residential segregation and OHCA outcomes, there was an increased likelihood of survival to discharge, survival with good neurological status, and likelihood of receiving B-CPR for those patients residing in predominately White population and higher income census tracts when compared to predominately Black and/or Hispanic Latinx populations and lower income census tracts. This research suggests that areas impacted by residential and economic segregation are important targets for both public policy interventions as well as addressing disparities in care across the chain of survival for OHCA.

Sex Differences in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival Trends

BACKGROUND

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates have improved over time. This study established whether improvements were similar for women and men, and to what extent resuscitation characteristics or in-hospital procedures contributed to sex differences in temporal trends.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective cohort study included 3386 women and 8564 men from North Holland, the Netherlands, who experienced an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from a cardiac cause in 2005 to 2017. Yearly rates of 30-day survival and secondary outcomes were calculated. Sex differences in temporal trends were evaluated with age-adjusted Poisson regression analysis, including interaction for sex and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest year. Resuscitation characteristics and in-hospital procedures were added to the model, and a spline at 2013 was considered. During the study period, the average 30-day survival was 24.9% in men and 15.7% in women. The 30-day survival rate increased in men (20% to 27.2%; P<0.001) but not in women (15.0% to 11.6%; P=0.40). The increase in the 30-day survival rate was 3% higher per year in men than in women (rate ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.00-1.05]), with a stronger difference after 2013. Men had a larger increase in survival rate to the hospital arrival than women in 2005 to 2013, and, after 2013, an advantage over women in survival rate after hospital arrival. The sex differences were partly explained by differing trends in shockable initial rhythm (eg, adjusted rate ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.99-1.03] for 30-day survival) and provision of in-hospital procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in rates of 30-day survival, survival to hospital arrival, and, after 2013, survival from hospital arrival to 30 days were more beneficial in men than women. The differences in trends were partly explained by shockable initial rhythm and in-hospital procedures.

Outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in immigrants vs natives in Denmark

AIMS

Ethnic disparities subsist in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes in the US, yet it is unresolved whether similar inequalities exist in European countries. This study compared survival after OHCA and its determinants in immigrants and non-immigrants in Denmark.

METHODS

Using the nationwide Danish Cardiac Arrest Register, 37,622 OHCAs of presumed cardiac cause between 2001 and 2019 were included, 95% in non-immigrants and 5% in immigrants. Univariate and multiple logistic regression was used to assess disparities in treatments, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at hospital arrival, and 30-day survival.

RESULTS

Immigrants were younger at OHCA (median 64 [IQR 53-72] vs 68 [59-74] years; p < 0.05), had more prior myocardial infarction (15% vs 12%, p < 0.05), more diabetes (27% vs 19%, p < 0.05), and were more often witnessed (56% vs 53%; p < 0.05). Immigrants received similar bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation rates to non-immigrants, but more coronary angiographies (15% vs 13%; p < 0.05) and percutaneous coronary interventions (10% vs 8%, p < 0.05), although this was insignificant after age-adjustment. Immigrants had higher ROSC at hospital arrival (28% vs 26%; p < 0.05) and 30-day survival (18% vs 16%; p < 0.05) compared to non-immigrants, but adjusting for age, sex, witness status, first observed rhythm, diabetes, and heart failure rendered the difference non-significant (odds ratios (OR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.16 and OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.91-1.20, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

OHCA management was similar between immigrants and non-immigrants, resulting in similar ROSC at hospital arrival and 30-day survival after adjustments.

Ethical considerations in the prehospital treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A multi-centre, qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Prehospital emergency physicians have to navigate complex decision-making in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treatment that includes ethical considerations. This study explores Danish prehospital physicians' experiences of ethical issues influencing their decision-making during OHCA.

METHODS

We conducted a multisite ethnographic study. Through convenience sampling, we included 17 individual interviews with prehospital physicians and performed 22 structured observations on the actions of the prehospital personnel during OHCAs. We collected data during more than 800 observation hours in the Danish prehospital setting between December 2019 and April 2022. Data were analysed with thematic analysis.

RESULTS

All physicians experienced ethical considerations that influenced their decision-making in a complex interrelated process. We identified three overarching themes in the ethical considerations: Expectations towards patient prognosis and expectations from relatives, bystanders, and colleagues involved in the cardiac arrest; the values and beliefs of the physician and values and beliefs of others involved in the cardiac arrest treatment; and dilemmas encountered in decision-making such as conflicting values.

CONCLUSION

This extensive qualitative study provides an in-depth look at aspects of ethical considerations in decision-making in prehospital resuscitation and found aspects of ethical decision-making that could be harmful to both physicians and patients, such as difficulties in handling advance directives and potential unequal outcomes of the decision-making. The results call for multifaceted interventions on a wider societal level with a focus on advance care planning, education of patients and relatives, and interventions towards prehospital clinicians for a better understanding and awareness of ethical aspects of decision-making.

The effect of ethnicity and socioeconomic status on outcomes after resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - Findings from a tertiary centre in South London

Background

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a common cause of morbidity and mortality, and ethnic variation in outcomes is recognised. We investigated ethnic and socioeconomic differences in arrest circumstances, rates of coronary artery disease, treatment, and outcomes in resuscitated OOHCA.

Methods

Patients with resuscitated OOHCA of suspected cardiac aetiology were included in the King's Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry between 1-May-2012 and 31-December-2020.

Results

Of 526 patients (median age 62.0 years, IQR 21.1, 74.1% male), 414 patients (78.7%) were White, 35 (6.7%) were Asian, and 77 (14.6%) were Black. Black patients had more co-existent hypertension (p = 0.007) and cardiomyopathy (p = 0.003), but less prior coronary revascularisation (p = 0.026) compared with White/Asian patients. There were no ethnic differences in location, witnesses, or bystander CPR, but Black patients had more non-shockable rhythms (p < 0.001). Black patients received less immediate coronary angiography (p < 0.001) and percutaneous coronary intervention (p < 0.001) but had lower rates of CAD (p = 0.004) than White/Asian patients. All-cause mortality at 12 months was highest amongst Black patients, followed by Asian and then White patients (57.1% vs 48.6% vs 41.3%, p = 0.032). In Black patients, excess mortality was driven by higher rates of multi-organ dysfunction but lower cardiac death than White/Asian patients, with cardiac death highest amongst Asian patients (p = 0.009). Socioeconomic status had no effect on mortality, and in a multivariable logistic regression, age, location, witnesses, and Black compared to White ethnicity were independent predictors of mortality, whilst social deprivation was not.

Conclusion

In this single-centre study, Black patients had higher mortality after resuscitated OOHCA than White/Asian patients. This may be in part due to differing underlying aetiology rather than differences in arrest circumstances or social deprivation.

Tackling Health Inequities: A Unique, Asynchronous Course Designed Through Peer-to-Peer Methods

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates the efficacy and feasibility of an asynchronous, peer-to-peer health disparities enrichment course on postbaccalaureate prehealth students' knowledge, behaviors, and reaction to course materials.

INTRODUCTION

Growing awareness of social inequities has prompted educators of prehealth and medical students to explore student education by addressing systemic healthcare issues. This cross-sectional study assessed reactions, learning, and self-reported behavior changes in students after taking the course "Social Determinants, Disparities, and Preparing for the Future of Healthcare" (SDDH).

METHODS

The curriculum was designed by prehealth postbaccalaureate students for their peers. Course goals were to educate participants on social determinants of health and to build cultural and structural competence in their roles as future healthcare professionals. SDDH is an asynchronous, noncredit-bearing, 5-h online course with 10 modules covering various topics. The Kirkpatrick Model was used to assess the effectiveness of the curriculum, alongside qualitative and quantitative analyses of student performance.

RESULTS

Out of the 102 active students in the prehealth program that accepted the invitation to join, 29 students successfully completed the course (rate of completion = 28%). On average, students expressed positive reactions and attitudes toward the course and experienced an observable increase in knowledge assessment scores upon curriculum completion (P-value = .0002). Students' self-reported observations demonstrated sustained behavioral change 3 months after course completion.

CONCLUSION

It is critical to educate prehealth students on health disparities, structural, and cultural competence. A course such as SDDH may help prehealth students build effective communication skills for advocacy and develop an empathetic, patient-centered approach earlier on in their career pursuit. Some barriers to students completing the entire course include its length, uncredited status, and voluntary self-enrollment.

Public attitudes towards bystander CPR and their association with social deprivation: Findings from a cross sectional study in North England

Background

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) is undertaken in only 40% of out of hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) in the UK. Lower rates of BCPR and public access defibrillator (PAD) use have been correlated with lower socio-economic status (SES). The aim of this study was to examine knowledge and attitudes towards BCPR and PAD's using a study specific questionnaire, and to understand how these potentially interact with individual characteristics and SES.

Methods

Cross-sectional study between July-December 2021 across areas of varying SES in North England.

Results

Six hundred and one individuals completed the survey instrument (mean age = 51.9 years, 52.2 % female). Increased age was associated with being less willing to call 999 (p < 0.001) and follow call handler advice (p < 0.001). Female respondents were less comfortable performing BCPR than male respondents (p = 0.006). Individuals from least deprived areas were less likely to report comfort performing CPR, (p = 0.016) and less likely to know what a PAD is for, (p = 0.025). Higher education level was associated with increased ability to recognise OHCA (p = 0.005) and understanding of what a PAD is for (p < 0.001). Individuals with higher income were more likely to state they would follow advice regarding BCPR (p = 0.017) and report comfort using a PAD (p = 0.029).

Conclusion

Individual characteristics such as age and ethnicity, rather than SES, are indicators of knowledge, willingness, and perceived competency to perform BCPR. Policy makers should avoid using SES alone to target interventions. Future research should examine how cultural identity and social cohesion intersect with these characteristics to influence willingness to perform BCPR.