Acute mesenteric ischaemia

Successful Recanalization of the Superior Mesenteric Artery in Acute Mesenteric Ischemia

   The article describes a clinical case of recanalization of the superior mesenteric artery during acute mesenteric ischemia in an 81-year-old patient who was admitted to the emergency hospital in Ryazan with a clinic for “acute” abdomen. As a result of a diagnostic study, collection of anamnestic data and clinical picture, a diagnosis was made: “Embolism of mesenteric vessels.” Taking into account the early diagnosis (less than 4 hours from the onset of the disease), as well as the extremely complicated somatic status, selective angiography with mesentericography was performed, which revealed the patency of the main trunk of the superior mesenteric artery and complete occlusion of the distal segment of the intestine. Revascularization was performed ischemic area of the superior mesenteric artery. In the postoperative period, positive dynamics was observed, with complete relief of the clinical manifestations of mesenteric ischemia. On the 12th day, the patient was discharged for outpatient treatment under the supervision of a surgeon at her place of residence in satisfactory condition.

Incidence, diagnosis, management and outcome of acute mesenteric ischaemia: a prospective, multicentre observational study (AMESI Study)

BACKGROUND

The aim of this multicentre prospective observational study was to identify the incidence, patient characteristics, diagnostic pathway, management and outcome of acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI).

METHODS

All adult patients with clinical suspicion of AMI admitted or transferred to 32 participating hospitals from 06.06.2022 to 05.04.2023 were included. Participants who were subsequently shown not to have AMI or had localized intestinal gangrene due to strangulating bowel obstruction had only baseline and outcome data collected.

RESULTS

AMI occurred in 0.038% of adult admissions in participating acute care hospitals worldwide. From a total of 705 included patients, 418 patients had confirmed AMI. In 69% AMI was the primary reason for admission, while in 31% AMI occurred after having been admitted with another diagnosis. Median time from onset of symptoms to hospital admission in patients admitted due to AMI was 24 h (interquartile range 9-48h) and time from admission to diagnosis was 6h (1-12 h). Occlusive arterial AMI was diagnosed in 231 (55.3%), venous in 73 (17.5%), non-occlusive (NOMI) in 55 (13.2%), other type in 11 (2.6%) and the subtype could not be classified in 48 (11.5%) patients. Surgery was the initial management in 242 (58%) patients, of which 59 (24.4%) underwent revascularization. Endovascular revascularization alone was carried out in 54 (13%), conservative treatment in 76 (18%) and palliative care in 46 (11%) patients. From patients with occlusive arterial AMI, revascularization was undertaken in 104 (45%), with 40 (38%) of them in one site admitting selected patients. Overall in-hospital and 90-day mortality of AMI was 49% and 53.3%, respectively, and among subtypes was lowest for venous AMI (13.7% and 16.4%) and highest for NOMI (72.7% and 74.5%). There was a high variability between participating sites for most variables studied.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence of AMI and AMI subtypes varies worldwide, and case ascertainment is challenging. Pre-hospital delay in presentation was greater than delays after arriving at hospital. Surgery without revascularization was the most common management approach. Nearly half of the patients with AMI died during their index hospitalization. Together, these findings suggest a need for greater awareness of AMI, and better guidance in diagnosis and management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05218863 (registered 19.01.2022).

Study protocol for TARGET protein: The effect of augmented administration of enteral protein to critically ill adults on clinical outcomes: A cluster randomised, cross-sectional, double cross-over, clinical trial

Background

It is unknown whether increasing dietary protein to 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day as recommended in international guidelines compared to current practice improves outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The TARGET Protein trial will evaluate this.

Objective

To describe the study protocol for the TARGET Protein trial.

Design setting and participants

TARGET Protein is a cluster randomised, cross-sectional, double cross-over, pragmatic clinical trial undertaken in eight ICUs in Australia and New Zealand. Each ICU will be randomised to use one of two trial enteral formulae for three months before crossing over to the other formula, which is then repeated, with enrolment continuing at each ICU for 12 months. All patients aged ≥16 years in their index ICU admission commencing enteral nutrition will be eligible for inclusion. Eligible patients will receive the trial enteral formula to which their ICU is allocated. The two trial enteral formulae are isocaloric with a difference in protein dose: intervention 100g/1000 ml and comparator 63g/1000 ml. Staggered recruitment commenced in May 2022.

Main outcomes measures

The primary outcome is days free of the index hospital and alive at day 90. Secondary outcomes include days free of the index hospital at day 90 in survivors, alive at day 90, duration of invasive ventilation, ICU and hospital length of stay, incidence of tracheostomy insertion, renal replacement therapy, and discharge destination.

Conclusion

TARGET Protein aims to determine whether augmented enteral protein delivery reduces days free of the index hospital and alive at day 90.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621001484831).

Exploring I-FABP, endothelin-1 and L-lactate as biomarkers of acute intestinal necrosis: a case-control study

OBJECTIVE

Acute intestinal necrosis (AIN) is a disease with devastating high mortality. AIN due to obstructed arterial blood flow has a blurred clinical presentation. Timely diagnosis is paramount, and a blood-based biomarker is warranted to increase patient survival. We aimed to assess intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP) and endothelin-1 as diagnostic biomarkers for AIN. To our knowledge, this is the first study exploring endothelin-1 in AIN patients from a general surgical population.

DESIGN

We conducted a single-centre nested case-control study comparing acutely admitted AIN patients to age- and sex-matched non-AIN patients during 2015-2016. I-FABP and endothelin-1 were analysed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. L-lactate levels were also measured in all patients. Cut-offs were estimated using receiver operator characteristic curves, and the diagnostic performance was estimated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

We identified 43 AIN patients and included 225 matched control patients. Median levels of I-FABP, endothelin-1 and L-lactate were 3550 (IQR: 1746-9235) pg/ml, 3.91 (IQR: 3.33-5.19) pg/ml and 0.92 (IQR: 0.74-1.45) mM in AIN patients and 1731 (IQR: 1124-2848) pg/ml, 2.94 (IQR: 2.32-3.82) pg/ml and 0.85 (IQR: 0.64-1.21) mM in control patients, respectively. The diagnostic performances of endothelin-1 and of I-FABP + endothelin-1 combined were moderate. Endothelin-1 alone revealed an AUC of 0.74 (0.67; 0.82). The sensitivity and specificity of endothelin-1 were 0.81 and 0.64, respectively.

CONCLUSION

I-FABP and endothelin-1 are promising biomarkers for AIN, with moderate diagnostic performance compared with the commonly used biomarker L-lactate.

PREREGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05665946.