Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Current and Investigational Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatments

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel diseases. Position statement of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

The treatment of inflammatory bowel disease has undergone a significant transformation following the introduction of biologic drugs. Thanks to these drugs, treatment goals have evolved from clinical response and remission to more ambitious objectives, such as endoscopic or radiologic remission. However, even though biologics are highly effective, a significant percentage of patients will not achieve an initial response or may lose it over time. We know that there is a direct relationship between the trough concentrations of the biologic and its therapeutic efficacy, with more demanding therapeutic goals requiring higher drug levels, and inadequate exposure being common. Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic medications, along with pharmacokinetic models, provides us with the possibility of offering a personalized approach to treatment for patients with IBD. Over the past few years, relevant information has accumulated regarding its utility during or after induction, as well as in the maintenance of biologic treatment, in reactive or proactive strategies, and prior to withdrawal or treatment de-escalation. The aim of this document is to establish recommendations regarding the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, in different clinical practice scenarios, and to identify areas where its utility is evident, promising, or controversial.

Real-world experience with subcutaneous infliximab: broadening treatment strategies for inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

The first subcutaneous (SC) formulation of infliximab (IFX), CT‑P13 SC, has been approved in Europe and Australia, including for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

AREAS COVERED

We provide a comprehensive overview of available clinical trial and real-world data for IFX SC treatment of IBD, focusing on the potential benefits of switching from IFX intravenous (IV) to IFX SC. We evaluate emerging evidence for IFX SC treatment for difficult-to-treat IBD, use as monotherapy, and suitability for patients receiving escalated IFX IV doses. Therapeutic drug monitoring approaches and patient and healthcare system perspectives on IFX SC are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

IFX SC represents a significant treatment innovation in the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor class after approximately 20 years of IFX IV availability. Evidence suggests that IFX SC is well tolerated and is associated with high patient acceptance and satisfaction. In addition, effectiveness is maintained in patients with stable disease following switch from IFX IV. Switching may be advisable, given the clinical benefits of IFX SC and its potential to improve healthcare service capacity. There are several areas requiring further research, including the role of IFX SC in difficult-to-treat and refractory disease, and the feasibility of IFX SC monotherapy.

Synthetic Pharmacotherapy for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Potential Mechanisms of Action, Efficacy, and Safety

The pharmacological treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) aims to decrease disease activity, progression, systemic compromise, and mortality. Among the pharmacological alternatives, there are chemically synthesized drugs whose efficacy has been evaluated, but which have the potential to generate adverse events that may compromise adherence and response to treatment. Therapy selection and monitoring will depend on patient characteristics and the safety profile of each drug. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the most important synthetic drugs used in the treatment of SLE, including the current treatment options (mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and cyclophosphamide), review their mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, and, most importantly, provide monitoring parameters that should be considered while the patient is receiving the pharmacotherapy.

Exposure-Response Characterization of Tofacitinib Efficacy in Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Results From Phase II and Phase III Induction and Maintenance Studies

Tofacitinib is an oral small molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Relationships between plasma tofacitinib concentration and efficacy were characterized using exposure-response (E-R) models, with demographic and disease covariates evaluated as potential predictors of efficacy. Data were from phase II and III (OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2) induction studies, and a phase III maintenance study (OCTAVE Sustain). Induction studies included 1,355 patients (tofacitinib 0.5, 3, 10, or 15 mg b.i.d. or placebo). The maintenance study included 592 patients (tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg b.i.d. or placebo). E-R models, including induction patients predicted placebo-adjusted remission rates of 6.4% and 12.7% at week 8 for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg b.i.d., respectively; corresponding rates in patients without prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) failure were 12.8% and 20.4%. Estimates to achieve/maintain remission at week 52 of maintenance were 29% and 18% (tofacitinib 5 mg b.i.d.), and 41% and 26% (tofacitinib 10 mg b.i.d.), for patients in remission or not following induction, respectively. During maintenance, patients with prior TNFi failure had lower probability of remission on 5 mg b.i.d. (24.9%) than 10 mg b.i.d. (35.0%). Results indicated tofacitinib 10 mg b.i.d. was an appropriate induction dose but suggested efficacy with 5 mg b.i.d. in patients without prior TNFi failure. Tofacitinib 5 mg b.i.d. was efficacious for maintenance, although patients with prior TNFi failure might see additional benefit on 10 mg b.i.d. Per product labeling, recommended tofacitinib induction dose is 10 mg b.i.d., then maintenance at 5 mg b.i.d. For patients who lose response during maintenance, 10 mg b.i.d. may be considered, limited to the shortest duration. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00787202; NCT01465763; NCT01458951; and NCT01458574.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease treatments

Recently, biological drugs have played a leading role in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may be useful in maximizing their effectiveness. TDM involves the measurement of serum drug and anti-drug antibodies concentrations as the basis for dosage adjustments or drug conversions to achieve a higher response rate. We believe that concentration thresholds should be individualized based on patients’ disease severity, extent and phenotype, and therapeutic purposes should also be considered, with higher cut-offs mainly needed for endoscopic and fistula healing than for symptomatic remission. Proactive and reactive TDM can help optimize treatment, especially in patients receiving anti-tumour necrosis factor, and guide dose adjustment or drug conversion with lower cost. TDM is a promising approach to achieve precision medicine and targeted medicine in the future.

LC-MS/MS Method for Measurement of Thiopurine Nucleotides (TN) in Erythrocytes and Association of TN Concentrations With TPMT Enzyme Activity

Monitoring concentrations of thiopurine metabolites is used clinically to prevent adverse effects in patients on thiopurine drug therapy. We developed a LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of 6-thioguanine (6-TG) and 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) in red blood cells (RBCs). This method utilizes an automated cell washer for RBC separation from whole blood samples and washing of the separated RBCs. The lower limit of quantification of the method was 0.2 μmol/L for 6-TG (∼50 pmol/8 × 10⁸ RBC) and 4 μmol/L for 6-MMP (∼1,000 pmol/8 × 10⁸ RBC). The total imprecision of the assay was <3.0%. The upper limit of linearity for 6-TG and 6-MMP was 7.5 μmol/L and 150 μmol/L, respectively. The stability of the thiopurine metabolites under pre- and post-analytically relevant conditions was also evaluated. A good agreement was observed between this method and validated LC-MS/MS methods from three laboratories, except for ∼40% low bias for 6-MMP observed in one of the methods. The assessment of the association between 6-TG and 6-MMP concentrations with thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) phenotype and genotype demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the thiopurine metabolite concentrations between the TPMT groups with normal and intermediate activity of 6-MMP (p < 0.0001), while the difference in 6-TG concentrations was statistically not significant (p = 0.096). Among the samples with normal TPMT activity, higher concentrations of 6-MMP (p = 0.015) were observed in pediatric samples than in the samples of adults. No statistically significant differences were observed in the distributions of 6-TG and 6-MMP concentrations among the evaluated genotypes.

Current status and future perspectives on the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of thiopurine metabolites in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Despite new treatment options for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), conventional thiopurines remain a common treatment option for maintaining remission, particularly in non-Westernized countries. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is advised in standard care for optimizing therapy strategies to improve effectiveness, reveal nonadherence and reduce toxicity. Still, the rationale of TDM is debated.

AREAS COVERED

Key insights on TDM of thiopurine metabolites are discussed. The pharmacology of thiopurines is described, emphasizing the interindividual differences in pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacological differences between conventional thiopurines and tioguanine are outlined. Finally, several optimization strategies for thiopurine therapy in IBD are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

TDM has been a useful, but limited, tool to individualize thiopurine therapy. Pharmacokinetic data on the active thiopurine metabolites, derived from measurements in erythrocytes, associated with clinical response only partially predict effectiveness and toxicity. An additional pharmacodynamic marker, such as Rac1/pSTAT3 expression in leukocytes, may improve applicability of TDM in the future.

Proactive versus Reactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Why, When, and How?

BACKGROUND

Up to a third of inflammatory bowel disease) patients show primary nonresponse to antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) biological therapy, and of those who respond, up to 40% develop secondary loss of response (LOR). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) plays a crucial role in assessing patients with LOR to guide therapy by giving more of the drug or switching to a different biological agent. Although reactive TDM is suggested or recommended by the majority of gastroenterology associations, proactive TDM seems to be more controversial.

SUMMARY

In this article, we discuss the updated guidelines on TDM and will also discuss the available data supporting proactive and reactive TDM in patients with Crohn's disease and those with ulcerative colitis using the different available biological agents.

KEY MESSAGES

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a valuable tool to aid in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapy optimization. Reactive TDM is widely accepted in IBD patients with suspected loss of response, especially in those receiving antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents. Proactive TDM is emerging as a reasonable approach to patients initiated on anti-TNF therapy, specifically infliximab and, to some extent, adalimumab, particularly for patients with severe ulcerative colitis and fistulizing Crohn's disease. Similarly, TDM may play a role in patients considering de-escalation from combination therapy. To date, proactive TDM is not widely applied to ustekinumab and vedolizumab and more data are required before this becomes part of clinical practice.