Treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis: how should we manage the disease?

The role of endoscopy in eosinophilic esophagitis: from diagnosis to therapy

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has arisen as a common disorder in current clinical and endoscopic gastroenterology practice. Areas covered: A comprehensive review of the literature to summarize and update different aspects related with the use of endoscopy in the diagnostic workout and treatment of pediatric and adult EoE patients is conducted. Expert commentary: Endoscopic features in EoE are frequently subtle, so were inadverted in some initial reports of the disease. Literature has described a wide number of EoE-associated features, systematized in the EREFS classification, which standardized the grade and severity of exudates, rings, edema, furrows, and strictures. The insufficient reliability of these features to predict eosinophilic inflammation still makes biopsies essential in diagnosing or monitoring EoE. EoE causes half of the food impactions requiring endoscopy; food impaction leads to EoE diagnosis in up to half of cases. Long term consequences of EoE include esophageal remodeling leading to strictures and narrowing, thus impairing symptoms and needs dilation. Recognizing the risks from dilation in EoE required carrying out a safe technique to avoid the high complication rate reported in the early literature. Endoscopic dilation should be considered in patients with esophageal narrowing and dysphagia/food impaction unresponsive to diet or drugs-based anti-inflammatory treatment.

Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for eosinophilic esophagitis using the AGREE II instrument

BACKGROUND

High-quality evidence-based clinical practice guidelines can guide diagnosis and treatment to optimize outcomes. We aimed to systematically review the quality of international guidelines on eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).

METHODS

MEDLINE and Scopus databases were searched for appropriate guidelines up to 2016. Two gastroenterologists and two methodologists independently evaluated the documents using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument.

RESULTS

Amongst the 25 records initially retrieved, four guidelines developed by recognized scientific organizations met inclusion criteria. AGREE II results varied widely across domains, but none achieved an overall assessment score of over 60%. Scope and purpose (61.82 ± 19.24%), clarity of presentation (57.13 ± 40.56%) and editorial independence (93.75 ± 1.69%) showed the highest mean rating, whereas stakeholder involvement (28.82 ± 11.19%), rigor of development (32.29 ± 12.02%) and applicability (21.62 ± 7.14%) did not reach quality thresholds. Intraclass correlation coefficients for agreement was excellent among appraisers (0.903), between gastroenterologists and methodologists (0.878) and for each individual guideline (0.838 to 0.955).

CONCLUSION

Clinical practice guidelines for EoE vary significantly in quality, are invariably limited and currently, none can be 'strongly recommended'.

Value of microarray allergen assay in the management of eosinophilic oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a disorder characterised by oesophageal dysfunction and, histologically, by eosinophilic inflammation. Although treatment, which includes dilatations, oral corticosteroids and restrictive diets, is often effective, choosing the foods to be eliminated from the diet is difficult.

OBJECTIVE

Component resolved diagnostic by microarray allergen assay may be useful in detecting allergens that might be involved in the inflammatory process.

METHODS

We studied 67 patients with EoE, diagnosed clinically and histologically by endoscopic biopsy. CRD analysis with microarray technology was carried out in the 67 EoE patients, 50 patients with pollen allergy without digestive symptoms, and 50 healthy controls.

RESULTS

Allergies were not detected by microarray in only seven of the 67 patients with EoE. Controls with pollen allergy showed sensitisation to different groups of pollen proteins without significant differences. In EoE patients with response to some allergens, the predominant allergens were grasses group 1 and, in particular, nCyn d 1 (Cynodon dactylon) or Bermuda grass pollen in 59.5%, followed by lipid transfer proteins (LTP) of peach (19.40%), hazelnut (17.91%) and Artemisia (19.40%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with EoE, sensitisation to plant foods and pollen is important. The proteins most frequently involved are nCyn d 1 and lipid transfer proteins, hazelnuts and walnuts. After one year of an array-guided exclusion diet and pollen-specific immunotherapy in the case of high levels of response, patients with EoE showed preliminary significant improvements.

Cellular and molecular immunological mechanisms in eosinophilic esophagitis: an updated overview of their clinical implications

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a pathophysiologically complex disorder driven by distinct, multiple mechanisms involving a large number of cells, molecules, and genes. Associated with food allergy from its initial descriptions, a key role for the Th2-type cytokines IL-5 and IL-13 in recruiting and activating eosinophils has been described. Epithelial cells have been recognized as major effectors in initiating EoE, both through their recruitment of iNKT cells towards the esophageal epithelium, which constitutes a major cytokine source, and through the release of eotaxin-3 and other chemoattractants. Epithelial and mesenchymal-released TSLP is a key regulator for which a connecting role between the adaptive and innate mucosal-associated immune response has been suggested. Finally, activated eosinophil- and mast cell-derived TGF β1 secretion is crucial in EoE-associated tissue remodeling.

Food allergy testing in eosinophilic esophagitis: what the gastroenterologist needs to know

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathologic disease of increasing prevalence in children and adults. The triggering antigen in EoE is often a food that initiates a cascade of Th2-associated interleukins such as interleukin-5 and interleukin-13 and chemokines such as eotaxin-3 as well as esophageal eosinophilia and mastocytosis. Amino acid-based formulas have high efficacy rates in EoE and constitute the first evidence for food-triggered esophageal eosinophilia. Animal models have demonstrated the sufficiency of food antigens in triggering both the inflammatory and remodeling complications of EoE. Food elimination diets that are followed by single food introduction with repeat biopsy have proven the efficacy of empiric and allergy testing based elimination diets in children and adults. Although the ideal allergy test for identifying food antigens in EoE remains to be elucidated, the utility of food skin prick combined with atopy patch testing has been shown in large pediatric cohorts. By comparison, smaller, non-U.S. adult cohorts have not had similar results. Currently, a positive test on food allergy evaluation suggests a food trigger for EoE but does not substitute for biopsy-based tissue evaluation after food removal and reintroduction. The higher rates of food anaphylaxis in children with EoE, potential loss of tolerance to immunoglobulin E-positive foods that can occur with food avoidance, and the high rates of other atopic diatheses in EoE subjects all support the evaluation of EoE subject by an allergist, consideration for allergy testing, and an integrated approach by allergists, gastroenterologists, and pathologists in EoE management.

Treatment of adult eosinophilic esophagitis with diet

BACKGROUND/AIMS

A growing body of research indicates that dietary therapy is an effective treatment option for children with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Its ability to achieve sustained symptomatic and histological responses is comparable to that of topical steroids, but avoids their use and side effects. Recent studies also support dietary therapy as a preferred treatment option for adult patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was carried out to assess the efficacy of the most commonly used dietary interventions in inducing and maintaining disease remission in adult EoE patients as compared with results from pediatric studies.

RESULTS

The only available study assessing exclusive feeding with an elemental diet carried out in adults demonstrated a 94% disease remission rate, comparable to the high efficacy reported in pediatric studies. The major drawbacks of this therapy are poor adherence and a rapid disease recurrence after resumption of a normal diet. Although there is limited data on skin allergy testing-directed food elimination in adult patients, the highest efficacy rates observed do not exceed 26% histological remission. Prospective studies on empirical six-food elimination diets in adults provided efficacy rates comparable to those reported in children, achieving disease remission in approximately 75% of patients. However, specific food triggers can only be identified after documented recurrence of eosinophilic inflammation as determined with repeated endoscopic biopsies. Prolonged avoidance of the offending food(s) produces sustained remission of adult EoE.

CONCLUSIONS

Diet is a feasible therapeutic option for adult EoE patients, providing them with the same effective drug-free alternative as in pediatric patients.

Emerging therapeutic strategies for eosinophilic esophagitis

OPINION STATEMENT

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is recognized as an increasingly common cause of chronic and recurrent esophageal symptoms that significantly impact quality of life and may occasionally result in severe complications in both pediatric and adult patients. The disease is triggered and maintained by exposure to food antigens in most patients, with an additional role proposed for airborne allergens. Different diet-based approaches focused on restricting potentially offending foods have proven to be effective long-term therapies for EoE. Dietary therapy is thus an attractive, yet challenging treatment option that should be considered for all pediatric and adult EoE patients. However, limitations related to food restriction, patient willingness to undergo repeated endoscopies and biopsies, and the variable results of allergy testing imply that dietary management is for the most part currently restricted to highly motivated healthcare providers treating highly motivated patients reluctant to utilize drug-based therapy on a chronic basis. Pharmacological therapies for EoE mainly comprise swallowed topical steroids, especially fluticasone propionate and budesonide, which were originally developed to treat bronchial asthma and are now extensively used "off label" in EoE patients. In fact, topical steroids currently constitute the prevailing therapeutic option and will probably continue to do so in the near future; indeed, several randomized clinical trials are currently underway to test these drugs for approval as the first pharmacological agents for EoE patients. Immunomodulators and several anti-allergic agents must be further assessed as therapeutic alternatives for refractory cases or patients with complications. Endoscopic dilation represents the third pillar in the therapeutic management of EoE patients, since they frequently present reductions in the esophageal caliber as a result of collagen deposition and a progressive fibrous remodeling process promoted by chronic eosinophilic infiltration. Dilation provides at least temporary symptom relief with similar complication rates to esophageal strictures from a different origin. However, although repeated endoscopic dilation has sometimes been used as the sole therapy for EoE, it best constitutes an adjuvant therapy along with dietary or pharmacological-based interventions, especially since dilation has no effect on the underlying esophageal inflammation. Current therapeutic management of EoE varies widely, with physician experience being a major explanatory factor. New evidence from ongoing research on EoE should thus seek to define a common treatment algorithm to optimize EoE patient management.

Eosinophilic oesophagitis: from physiopathology to treatment

Eosinophilic oesophagitis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of the oesophageal mucosa. Food and aero-allergens are involved in its pathogenesis. Dysphagia and food impaction are the dominant symptoms in adult with eosinophilic oesophagitis. However, a wide range of symptoms has been noticed such as chest pain or gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms. Upper gastro-intestinal endoscopy and oesophageal biopsies are crucial for the diagnosis of eosinophilic oesophagitis. Endoscopy might be normal or reveal typical patterns such as rings, furrows, exudates, oedema, and stricture. Two to four biopsies should be performed both in the distal and in the proximal oesophagus, and 15 eosinophils per high power field within the oesophageal epithelium are the minimal threshold to diagnose eosinophilic oesophagitis. Allergy testing is recommended, although its impact to orient treatment remains to be demonstrated. Eosinophilic oesophagitis treatment includes medical treatment, diet and endoscopic dilation. Proton pump inhibitors are the first-line therapy as some eosinophilic oesophagitis phenotypes respond well to proton pump inhibitors. Topical viscous corticosteroids or diet elimination are the treatment of choice. There is no clear evidence in the literature to prefer one to the other. Finally endoscopic dilation should be considered in case of persistent symptomatic stenosis despite medical therapy.

Diagnostic and therapeutic management of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children and adults: results from a Spanish registry of clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic oesophagitis has emerged as a common cause of oesophageal symptoms.

AIMS

To document practice variation in care provided to eosinophilic oesophagitis patients in Spain and to assess adherence to available guidelines.

METHODS

A prospective survey-based registry including data from all patients receiving care from gastroenterologists and allergists throughout Spain was developed.

RESULTS

Data from 705 patients (82% adults, male:female ratio 4.1:1) were collected from 26 Spanish hospitals. 42.7% received care in teaching hospitals. Adults presented dysphagia and food impaction more frequently; vomiting and weight loss predominated in children (p < 0.01). A mean diagnostic delay of 54.7 and 28.04 months was documented for adults and children, respectively. Normal endoscopic exams were reported in 27.6% and directly related to the experience in managing the disease (p < 0.05). Paediatric patients, non-teaching hospitals and greater experience in managing eosinophilic oesophagitis were associated with increased frequency in eosinophil count reports and with taking gastric and duodenal biopsies (p < 0.001). Initial therapy consisted of topical steroids (61.7% of patients), proton pump inhibitors (52.4%), dietary modifications (51.26%) and endoscopic dilation (7.2%). Referrals to allergy units occurred more frequently in teaching hospitals (p = 0.003) where food restrictions generally followed allergy test results (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Availability of facilities and the physician's experience constituted the most important factors in explaining differences in patient management.

Lichen planus is an uncommon cause of nonspecific proximal esophageal inflammation

Background/Aims

Esophageal lichen planus (LP) has been described as a cause of nonspecific esophagitis that may cause dysphagia, but its incidence is unknown. We aimed to estimate the incidence of esophageal LP in a defined geographic region and describe the clinical characteristics of affected patients.

Methods

A histopathology database for a population of 1 million people was searched for all esophageal mucosal biopsy results over an 8-year period. Cases showing inflammation or abnormalities without a diagnosis after three or more biopsies were reviewed for findings of LP.

Results

Of 13,589 esophageal biopsies, only one received a diagnosis of LP. Seven patients (four male; mean age, 59 years; range, 39 to 76 years) were identified as having chronic dysphagia and nonspecific proximal esophagitis for which no diagnosis could be made. All patients had proximal inflammation, and six of seven had full-thickness lymphocytic infiltration. Elongation of the lamina propria papillae was noted in all patients, whereas six patients had parakeratosis and ballooning. Only one patient had findings potentially consistent with, but not sufficient for, a diagnosis of esophageal LP.

Conclusions

Esophageal LP appears to be extremely uncommon in this North American population, and esophageal biopsy alone is likely not sufficient to establish a diagnosis of LP.

Empiric 6-food elimination diet induced and maintained prolonged remission in patients with adult eosinophilic esophagitis: a prospective study on the food cause of the disease

BACKGROUND

Although empiric exclusion from the diet of the 6 food groups most likely to trigger allergies achieves eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) remission in children, data on its prolonged efficacy and effects on adults are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the efficacy of a 6-food elimination diet in inducing and maintaining prolonged remission in patients with adult EoE.

METHODS

Sixty-seven consecutive patients with adult EoE were prospectively recruited and treated exclusively with a diet avoiding cereals, milk, eggs, fish/seafood, legumes/peanuts, and soy for 6 weeks. Subsequent challenge was undertaken by sequentially reintroducing all excluded single foods, followed by endoscopy and biopsies, which were developed every 6 weeks in case of response (eosinophil peak count reduction to <15/high-power field [hpf]). A food was considered a trigger for EoE and removed from the diet if pathologic eosinophilic infiltration (≥15 eosinophils/hpf) reappeared. Food-specific serum IgE measurements and skin prick tests were performed before initiating the diet.

RESULTS

Forty-nine (73.1%) patients exhibited significantly reduced eosinophil peak counts (<15 eosinophils/hpf) before sequential single-food reintroduction. A single offending food antigen was identified in 35.71% of patients, 2 food triggers were identified in 30.95%, and 3 or more food triggers were identified in 33.3%. Cow's milk was the most common food antigen (61.9%), followed by wheat (28.6%), eggs (26.2%), and legumes (23.8%). Prior allergy tests showed no concordance with food-reintroduction challenge results. All patients who continued to avoid the offending foods maintained histopathologic and clinical EoE remission for up to 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

An empiric 6-food elimination diet effectively induced remission of active adult EoE, which was maintained for up to 3 years with individually tailored, limited exclusion diets.

Contribution of endoscopy in the management of eosinophilic esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathological entity characterized by a set of symptoms similar to gastroesophageal reflux disease and eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal epithelium. EoE is an emerging worldwide disease as documented in many countries. Recent reports indicate that EoE is increasingly diagnosed in both pediatric and adult patients although the epidemiology of this new disease entity remains unclear. It is unclear whether EoE is a new disease or a new classification of an old esophageal disorder. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and biopsies with histological examination of esophageal mucosa are required to establish the diagnosis of EoE, verify response to therapy, assess disease remission, document and dilate strictures and evaluate symptom recurrence of EoE. Repeated endoscopies with biopsies are necessary for monitoring of disease progression and treatment efficacy. EGD has a fundamental role in the diagnosis and management of EoE, forming an essential part of the investigation and follow-up of this condition. EoE is now considered a systemic disorder and not only a local condition with an important immunological background. One of the aims of research in EoE is to study non-invasive markers, such as immune indicators found in plasma, that correlate with local presence of EoE in esophageal tissues. Studies over the next few years will provide new information about diagnosis, pathogenesis, endoscopic/histologic criteria, non-invasive markers, novel and more efficacious treatments, as well as establishing natural history. Randomized clinical trials are urgently called for to inform non-invasive diagnostic tests, hallmarks of natural history and more efficacious treatment approaches for patients with EoE. The collaboration between pediatric and adult clinical and experimental studies will be paramount in the understanding and management of this disease.

Conservative long-term treatment of children with eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Current treatments of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), including restrictive diets or glucocorticoids, provide only transient improvement. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use in EoE does not lead to histologic improvement; however, the long-term use of PPI on symptoms and prevention of complications has not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of PPI as maintenance therapy in children with EoE.

METHODS

Eosinophilic esophagitis was diagnosed based on initial endoscopic biopsies and persistent eosinophilic inflammation despite PPI therapy. Inclusion criteria included diagnosis of EoE and PPI use as primary maintenance treatment. Patients were excluded if they were treated with dietary or glucocorticoid therapy. Histologic evidence of inflammation as well as degree of subepithelial fibrosis at presentation was compared with most recent biopsies while receiving PPI therapy.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients (30 males and 8 females; average age 6.7 ± 5.4 years) fulfilled inclusion criteria. Duration of follow-up was 3.0 ± 2.4 years. At presentation, vomiting was significantly more frequent in the younger patients, whereas dysphagia occurred more frequently in the older patients. At follow-up, 26 patients were asymptomatic, and the remaining 12 patients' symptoms were significantly improved. No complications of stricture or food impaction were seen. Significant eosinophilic inflammation persisted in 28 patients. No difference in degree of subepithelial fibrosis at diagnosis compared with most recent biopsies. The z-scores of the treated EoE patients significantly improved.

CONCLUSION

Patients with EoE treated with PPIs show an improvement in symptoms and z-scores despite persistent eosinophilic inflammation. PPI treatment may be useful maintenance therapy in children with EoE.

Montelukast was inefficient in maintaining steroid-induced remission in adult eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Leukotriene D4 is produced by and functions as a chemotactic factor for eosinophils. Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is characterized by esophageal eosinophilic infiltration, determining structural changes and dismotility symptoms. Montelukast, a selective leukotriene D4 receptor antagonist, has gained increasing consideration as a therapeutic agent for EoE. However, limited available information has shown that montelukast is not effective in reducing eosinophilic infiltration. Our paper aims at evaluating whether montelukast could be consider as a steroid-sparing therapy by assessing its efficacy in maintaining both clinical and histopathological remission achieved after topical corticosteroids in adult EoE patients.

METHODS

Eleven consecutively diagnosed adult EoE patients were prospectively studied. Esophageal biopsies were obtained before and after a 6-month treatment with fluticasone propionate 400 μg/twice a day. Immediately after that, montelukast 10 mg/day was instituted. A new endoscopy was foreseen after a new 3-month period, or as soon as the patients presented esophageal symptoms. Symptoms were assessed by using a questionnaire before and after fluticasone propionate treatment and after montelukast therapy.

RESULTS

Eosinophils density into the esophageal epithelium and lamina propria was significantly reduced after a 6-month treatment with topical steroids (P = 0.003) and increased to levels similar to baseline level into the first 3 months after treatment with montelukast. Baseline symptom scores significantly decreased after treatment with topical steroids (P = 0.003) and increased again after montelukast therapy, but baseline levels improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Montelukast was not efficient in maintaining the histopathological or clinical response achieved by topical steroids in adult EoE patients.

[Esophageal perforation following a biopsy in a patient with eosinophilic esophagitis]

Eosinophilic esophagitis is an underdiagnosed disease that should be suspected in all patients with dysphagia and food impaction. Although these are the leading symptoms, the clinical and endoscopic spectrum is highly varied. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of endoscopy-related complications in this disorder. Precautions should be maximized in endoscopic examinations to avoid iatrogenic damage. We describe the case of a young patient with esophageal stricture and dysphagia who suffered a perforation following a biopsy.