Preoperative assessment of patients for lung cancer surgery:

3D-Quantitated Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography: Impact on intended Management Compared to Lung Perfusion Scan in Marginal Candidates for Pulmonary Resection

OBJECTIVES

Based on previous studies, single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) has been proven more accurate and reproducible than planar lung perfusion scintigraphy to assess lobar perfusion. However, the impact of 3D-quantitated SPECT/CT on intended management in functionally marginal candidates for pulmonary resection is unknown. The evaluation of this impact was the main aim of this study.

METHODS

Consecutive candidates for lung resection underwent preoperative evaluation according to ERS/ESTS Algorithm and underwent preoperative lung perfusion imaging. The lobar contribution to the total lung perfusion was estimated using established planar scintigraphic methods and 3-dimensional quantitative SPECT/CT method (CT Pulmo3D and xSPECT-Quant, Siemens). The difference in estimated lobar perfusion with resulting changes in predicted postoperative (ppo) lung function and extent of lung resection were analyzed to reveal possible changes in operability. In-hospital outcome was assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty patients (46 females) were enrolled. The mean age (±SD) of patients was 68 ± 9 years, target lesions were in upper lobes in 57.7% and in lower lobes in 33.5%. The median FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) was 70.5% (IQR 52-84) and median DLCO (diffusion capacity of lung for carbon monoxide) was 56.6% [47.1-67.4]. The planar posterior oblique method, compared to 3D-quantitated SPECT/CT, underestimated the perfusion of upper lobes by a median difference of 5% (right [2-9], left [2.5-8]; P = <.0001), while it overestimated the perfusion of lower lobes (left by 4% [2-7], right by 6% [2-9]; P = <.0001). In contrast to planar scintigraphy-based evaluation, 4 patients (3.3%), all with upper lobe lesions, were classified as inoperable when 3D-quantitated SPECT/CT was used for calculation of the ppo lung function.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients with upper lobe lesions, 3D-quantitated SPECT/CT would have changed the treatment strategy from operable to inoperable. Importantly, postoperative mortality in this particular subgroup was disproportionally high. 3D-quantitated SPECT/CT shall be further evaluated as it might improve preoperative risk stratification in functionally marginal candidates.

Additional Postoperative Radiotherapy Prolonged the Survival of Patients with I-IIA Small Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis of the SEER Database

Purpose

Complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy are recommended as the standard strategy for patients with stage I-IIA small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, the role of additional postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in treatment remains controversial.

Methods

Patients with stage I-IIA SCLC undergoing surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Stage I-IIA, defined as T1-2N0M0, was recalculated according to the 8th AJCC TNM staging system. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to identify the therapeutic impact of PORT. Univariate Cox hazards regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were utilized for primary screening of prognostic variables for I-IIA SCLC disease. A nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) was constructed based on the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, evaluated with area under the curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis, and validated with bootstrap resampling.

Results

Our results demonstrated that compared with no PORT, PORT significantly prolonged the median OS (8.58 vs. 5.17 years, HR = 0.61 [0.39–0.96], P = 0.032) and median cancer-specific survival (11.33 vs. 8.08, HR = 0.47 [0.27–0.82], P = 0.0086) after PSM. The 5-year OS rate was 61.56% vs. 46.60%. Five variables including age at diagnosis, gender, T stage, surgical type, and PORT were elucidated to impact on prognosis and included in a nomogram to predict 3-/5-/10-year OS probability. The area under the curve values were 0.72, 0.71, and 0.81, respectively. The nomogram also exhibited satisfactory accuracy and clinical usefulness.

Conclusion

PORT was verified to improve the OS of patients with T1-2N0M0 SCLC after surgery and chemotherapy. A prognostic nomogram was developed and validated for OS prediction for these patients.

Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation for marginal-function lung cancer patients

Background This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation in lung cancer patients undergoing pulmonary resection surgery with marginal lung function. Methods Short-term outcomes of 42 patients with forced expiratory volume in 1 s < 1.6 L who underwent lung resection between 01/2006 and 12/2010 were reviewed retrospectively. They were divided into group A (no preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation) and group B (receiving pulmonary rehabilitation). In group B, a second set of pulmonary function tests was obtained. Results There were no significant differences in terms of sex, age, race, pathologic stage, operative procedure, or smoking years. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide in group A was 1.40 ± 0.22 L and 10.28 ± 2.64 g∙dL-1 vs. 1.39 ± 0.13 L and 10.75 ± 2.08 g∙dL-1 in group B. Group B showed significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 s from 1.39 ± 0.13 to 1.55 ± 0.06 L ( p = 0.02). Mean intensive care unit stay was 6 ± 5 days in group A vs. 9 ± 9 days in group B ( p = 0.22). Mean hospital stay was 10 ± 4 days in group A vs. 14 ± 9 days in group B ( p = 0.31). There was no significant difference in morbidity or mortality between groups. Conclusion Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation can significantly improve forced expiratory volume in 1 s in some marginal patients undergoing lung cancer resection. However, it does not improve length of stay, morbidity, or mortality.

International comparison of preoperative testing and assessment protocols and best practices to reduce surgical care costs: a systematic literature review

PURPOSE

Health care institutions in many Western countries have developed preoperative testing and assessment guidelines to improve surgical outcomes and reduce cost of surgical care. The aims of this chapter are to (1) summarize the literature on the effect of preoperative testing on clinical outcomes, efficiency, and cost; and (2) to compare preoperative testing guidelines developed in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH

We reviewed the literature from 1975 to 2014 for studies and preoperative testing guidelines.

FINDINGS

We identified 29 empirical studies and 8 country-specific guidelines for review. Most studies indicate that preoperative testing is overused and comes at a high cost. Guidelines are tied to payment only in one country studied. This is the most recent review of the literature on preoperative testing and assessment with a focus on quality of care, efficiency, and cost outcomes. In addition, this chapter provides an international comparison of preoperative guidelines.