1
|
Willink CY, Jenniskens SFM, Klaassen NJM, Stommel MWJ, van Laarhoven CJHM, Fütterer JJ, Nijsen JFW. Development of an Intratumoral Holmium Microsphere Injection Method in Ex Vivo Human Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Preclinical Feasibility Study. Cancers (Basel) 2025; 17:1028. [PMID: 40149361 PMCID: PMC11941289 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17061028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2025] [Revised: 03/14/2025] [Accepted: 03/17/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Patients diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have a poor prognosis. Local therapy may enhance tumor control and increase resectability. Intratumoral injection of radioactive holmium-166 microspheres presents a promising and minimally invasive treatment with multimodality imaging capabilities (SPECT, CT, MRI). However, holmium-166 microspheres are not commonly used for intratumoral injections, and PDAC is notorious for its high intratumoral pressure. This study developed an intratumoral injection method with nonradioactive holmium-165 microspheres in ex vivo human PDAC specimens using a novel injection system for suspension homogenization. METHODS An injection system was developed and validated in a laboratory setting. Thereafter, intratumoral injections in surgically removed ex vivo PDACs were performed, and parameters were established to optimize feasibility, defined by the ability to inject and control the microsphere distribution. Also, injection limitations and cutoff values were determined. The distribution was assessed by visual confirmation, CT, MRI, ultrasound, and histopathology. RESULTS With a validated injection system, intratumoral injections were performed in ten ex vivo PDAC samples. Feasible injection guidelines include but are not limited to ultrasound or CT needle guidance, a maximum injection volume of <20.0% from the tumor volume, ≤3 needle positions, and an injection volume of 0.3-1.0 mL per needle position. CONCLUSIONS Intratumoral injection of holmium-165 microspheres in ex vivo pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was feasible with adherence to injection parameters necessary for effective intratumoral deposition and minimal leakage. The injection system and parameters developed here provide a foundation for future studies on holmium-166 microsphere injections in pancreatic cancer patients, with the aim to improve local tumor control as a part of a multimodal therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Coen Ysbrand Willink
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, Postbox 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands (J.F.W.N.)
| | - Sjoerd Franciscus Maria Jenniskens
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, Postbox 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands (J.F.W.N.)
| | - Nienke Johanna Maria Klaassen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, Postbox 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands (J.F.W.N.)
| | - Martijn Willem Jan Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, Postbox 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jurgen J. Fütterer
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, Postbox 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands (J.F.W.N.)
| | - Johannes Frank Wilhelmus Nijsen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, Postbox 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands (J.F.W.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Willink CY, Jenniskens SFM, Klaassen NJM, Stommel MWJ, Nijsen JFW. Intratumoral injection therapies for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: systematic review. BJS Open 2023; 7:zrad052. [PMID: 37254902 PMCID: PMC10230443 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pancreatic cancer has one of the worst prognoses of all cancers. Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer have a 12.7-20.2 per cent chance of receiving curative surgery after induction systemic chemotherapy. Intratumoral injection therapies have been studied as complementary treatment options for improved local tumour control. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of intratumoral injection therapies, their safety, and oncological outcome in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for articles written in English up to 28 November 2022. All study designs involving at least five patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer who were treated with an intratumoral injection therapy were included. Critical appraisal of the included studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS After evaluation of the 1680 articles yielded by the systematic search, 52 studies treating 1843 patients were included. Included intratumoral injection treatment modalities comprised iodine-125 (125I) seed brachytherapy (32 studies, 1283 patients), phosphorus-32 (32P) microbrachytherapy (5 studies, 133 patients), palladium-103 (103Pd) seed brachytherapy (2 studies, 26 patients), immunotherapy (9 studies, 330 patients), and chemotherapy (4 studies, 71 patients). Overall survival ranged between 7.0 and 16.0 months for 125I, 5.2 and 15.5 months for 32P, 6.9 and 10.0 months for 103Pd, 5.8 and 13.8 months for immunotherapy, and 9.0 and 16.2 months for chemotherapy. Severe complication (greater than or equal to grade III complications using Clavien-Dindo classification) rates were 6.2 per cent for 125I, 49.2 per cent for 32P, 15 per cent for 103Pd, 57.9 per cent for immunotherapy, and 0 per cent for chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Five intratumoral injection therapies are described and an overview is reported. Some intratumoral injection therapies for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer seem safe, although 32P microbrachytherapy and immunotherapy require additional evidence. Currently available data are insufficient to provide firm conclusions regarding the added value to survival. The potential advantage of intratumoral injection therapies complementary to conventional care should be studied in well designed RCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Coen Ysbrand Willink
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Nienke Johanna Maria Klaassen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Willem Jan Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Frank Wilhelmus Nijsen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Logan K, Pearson F, Kenny RP, Pandanaboyana S, Sharp L. Are older patients less likely to be treated for pancreatic cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 80:102215. [PMID: 35901624 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is the seventh commonest cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Although prognosis is poor, both surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy improve survival. However, it has been suggested that not all pancreatic cancer patients who may benefit from treatment receive it. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the existence of age-related inequalities in receipt of first-line pancreatic cancer treatment. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and grey literature were searched for population-based studies investigating treatment receipt, reported by age, for patients with primary pancreatic cancer from inception until 4th June 2020, and updated 5th August 2021. Studies from countries with universal healthcare were included, to minimise influence of health system-related economic factors. A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken comparing likelihood of treatment receipt in older versus younger patients. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted. Eighteen papers were included; 12 independent populations were eligible for meta-analysis. In most studies, < 10% of older patients were treated. Older age (generally ≥65) was significantly associated with reduced receipt of any treatment (OR=0.14, 95% CI 0.10-0.21, n = 12 studies), surgery (OR=0.15, 95% CI 0.09-0.24, n = 9 studies) and chemotherapy as a primary treatment (OR=0.13, 95% CI 0.07-0.24, n = 5 studies). The effect of age was independent of methodological quality, patient population or time-period of patient diagnosis and remained in studies with confounder adjustment. The mean quality score of included studies was 6/8. Inequalities in receipt of healthcare interventions across social groups is a recognised concern internationally. This review shows that older age is significantly, and consistently, associated with non-receipt of treatment in pancreatic cancer. However, there are risks and side-effects associated with pancreatic cancer treatment. Further research on what influences patient and professional treatment decision-making is required to better understand these apparent inequalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsty Logan
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona Pearson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Ryan Pw Kenny
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom; HPB and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Linda Sharp
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Knetki-Wróblewska M, Kowalski DM, Olszyna-Serementa M, Krzakowski M, Szołkowska M. Thymic epithelial tumors: Do we know all the prognostic factors? Thorac Cancer 2021; 12:339-348. [PMID: 33386778 PMCID: PMC7862797 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thymic epithelial tumors constitute a morphologically and clinically diverse group of rare neoplasm of the anterior mediastinum. METHODS Here, we present an analysis of 188 patients diagnosed with primary thymic tumors between 1995 and 2015. The prognostic value of selected clinical and morphological factors was assessed in relation to overall survival and recurrence-free survival. RESULTS The risk of recurrence increased significantly in thymic carcinoma diagnosis (P = 0.0036), co-occurrence of other diseases, and weight loss (P = 0.0012 and 0.0348, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that the most important independent risk factor for disease recurrence was clinical stage IV (P = 0.0036). A total of 63 patients (33.5%) died. In the univariate analysis, the following factors were considered as independent prognostic factors for overall survival: clinical stage (P < 0.0001), histological type (P < 0.0001), lymph node involvement (P < 0.001), WHO performance status 2 (P < 0.0001), anemia (Hb <9.5 g/dL; P = 0.0002), leucocytosis (>12.5 G/L; P = 0.0011), LDH level (>185 U/L; P < 0.0001), concomitant diseases (P = 0.0012) and weight loss (P < 0.0001).The strongest independent risk factor for death was stage IV disease (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The results confirmed a fairly good prognosis for patients with thymic epithelial tumors. Clinical stage was the most important prognostic factor, but, some additional clinical factors may also have prognostic value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Knetki-Wróblewska
- Department of Lung Cancer and Chest Tumours, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Dariusz M Kowalski
- Department of Lung Cancer and Chest Tumours, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marta Olszyna-Serementa
- Department of Lung Cancer and Chest Tumours, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maciej Krzakowski
- Department of Lung Cancer and Chest Tumours, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Małgorzata Szołkowska
- Department of Pathology, National Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brada LJH, Walma MS, van Dam RM, de Vos-Geelen J, de Hingh IH, Creemers GJ, Liem MS, Mekenkamp LJ, de Meijer VE, de Groot DJA, Patijn GA, de Groot JWB, Festen S, Kerver ED, Stommel MWJ, Meijerink MR, Bosscha K, Pruijt JF, Polée MB, Ropela JA, Cirkel GA, Los M, Wilmink JW, Haj Mohammad N, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Molenaar IQ. The treatment and survival of elderly patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A post-hoc analysis of a multicenter registry. Pancreatology 2021; 21:163-169. [PMID: 33309624 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment options for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) have improved in recent years and consequently survival has increased. It is unknown, however, if elderly patients benefit from these improvements in therapy. With the ongoing aging of the patient population and an increasing incidence of pancreatic cancer, this patient group becomes more relevant. This study aims to clarify the association between increasing age, treatment and overall survival in patients with LAPC. METHODS Post-hoc analysis of a multicenter registry including consecutive patients with LAPC, who were registered in 14 centers of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (April 2015-December 2017). Patients were divided in three groups according to age (<65, 65-74 and ≥75 years). Primary outcome was overall survival stratified by primary treatment strategy. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to adjust for possible confounders. RESULTS Overall, 422 patients with LAPC were included; 162 patients (38%) aged <65 years, 182 patients (43%) aged 65-74 and 78 patients (19%) aged ≥75 years. Chemotherapy was administered in 86%, 81% and 50% of the patients in the different age groups (p<0.01). Median overall survival was 12, 11 and 7 months for the different age groups (p<0.01).Patients treated with chemotherapy showed comparable median overall survival of 13, 14 and 10 months for the different age groups (p=0.11). When adjusted for confounders, age was not associated with overall survival. CONCLUSION Elderly patients are less likely to be treated with chemotherapy, but when treated with chemotherapy, their survival is comparable to younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L J H Brada
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - M S Walma
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R M van Dam
- Dept. of Surgery, Maastricht UMC, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J de Vos-Geelen
- Dept. of Internal Medicine, Div. of Medical Oncology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - I H de Hingh
- Dept. of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Dept. of Epidemiology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - G J Creemers
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - M S Liem
- Dept. of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - L J Mekenkamp
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - V E de Meijer
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - D J A de Groot
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, UMC Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - G A Patijn
- Dept. of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | | | - S Festen
- Dept. of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E D Kerver
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M W J Stommel
- Dept. of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - M R Meijerink
- Dept. of Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - K Bosscha
- Dept. of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - J F Pruijt
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - M B Polée
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - J A Ropela
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, St Jansdal Hospital, Harderwijk, the Netherlands
| | - G A Cirkel
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M Los
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J W Wilmink
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - N Haj Mohammad
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - H C van Santvoort
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Dept. of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I Q Molenaar
- Dept. of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and Meander Medical Center Amersfoort: Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Harvey PR, Baldwin S, Mytton J, Dosanjh A, Evison F, Patel P, Trudgill NJ. Higher volume providers are associated with improved outcomes following ERCP for the palliation of malignant biliary obstruction. EClinicalMedicine 2020; 18:100212. [PMID: 31922117 PMCID: PMC6948226 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Revised: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Relieving malignant biliary obstruction improves quality of life and permits chemotherapy. Outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancratography(ERCP) in inoperable malignant biliary obstruction have been examined in a national cohort to establish factors associated with poor outcomes. METHODS Hospital Episode Statistics include diagnostic and procedural data for all NHS hospital attendances in England. Patients from 2006 to 2017 with a Hepaticopancreaticobiliary (HPB) malignancy who had undergone ERCP were studied. Patients undergoing a potentially curative operation were excluded. Associations between demographics, co-morbidities, unit ERCP volume and mortality were examined by logistic regression. FINDINGS 39,702 patients were included; 49.4% were male; median age was 75 (IQR 66-88)years. Pancreatic cancer was the most common tumour (63.9%). Mortality was 4.1%, 9.7% and 19.1% for 7-day, in hospital and 30-day respectively. On multivariable analysis: men (OR 1.20(95%CI 1.14-1.26), p < 0.001); increasing age quintile 78-83(1.73(1.59-1.89), p < 0.001), >83(2.70(2.48-2.94),p < 0.001); most deprived quintile (1.21(1.11-1.32), p < 0.001); increasing co-morbidity score >20(3.36(2.94-3.84),p < 0.001); small bowel malignancy (1.45(1.22-1.72), p < 0.001), intrahepatic biliary malignancy(1.10(1.03-1.17), p = 0.005) and year of ERCP 2006/07 (1.37(1.22-1.55), p < 0.001) were associated with increased 30-day mortality. Extrahepatic biliary tree cancers (0.67(0.61-0.73), p<0.001), high volume providers of ERCP (>318 annually, 0.91(0.84-0.98), p = 0.01) and high volume of ERCP for malignant obstruction (>40 annually (0.91(0.85-0.98), p = 0.014) were negatively associated with 30-day mortality. Patients were less likely to require a second ERCP in high volume providers (>318, 8.0%) compared to low volume ((<204, 13.4%), p<0.001). INTERPRETATION Short term mortality in patients with malignant biliary obstruction following ERCP was high. 30-day mortality was positively associated with increasing age and co-morbidity, men, deprivation, and earlier year of ERCP and negatively with extrahepatic biliary tree cancer and high volume ERCP providers. FUNDING Internal funding only.
Collapse
Key Words
- 95% CI, 95% confidence interval
- Cancer
- Chemotherapy
- ERCP
- ERCP, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram
- HES, Hospital Episode Statistics
- ICD10, International Classification of Diseases version 10
- IMD, Index of Multiple Deprivations 2010
- IQR, Interquartile range, OR, Odds ratio
- Mortality
- ONS, Office of National Statistics
- OPCS4, Office of Population Census and Surveys Classification of Interventions and Procedures, version 4
- PTC, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography
- SMR, Standardised mortality rate
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip R Harvey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Simon Baldwin
- Department of Health Informatics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jemma Mytton
- Department of Health Informatics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Amandip Dosanjh
- Department of Health Informatics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Felicity Evison
- Department of Health Informatics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Prashant Patel
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nigel J Trudgill
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Muñoz Martín AJ, Adeva J, Martínez-Galán J, Reina JJ, Hidalgo M. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: metastatic disease. Clin Transl Oncol 2017; 19:1423-1429. [PMID: 28623515 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-017-1690-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Accepted: 05/24/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of choice of metastatic PADC is systemic chemotherapy. In the last decade, there have been significant advances in this area. New combination poli-chemotherapy schemes have shown a significant increase in overall survival and progression-free survival without impairing quality of life. In addition, the value of second-line chemotherapy treatment has consolidated and a new concept called "therapeutic sequencing" has also emerged. The aim of this article is to review the different therapeutic options in metastatic PDAC based on patient's characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Muñoz Martín
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/Doctor Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
| | - J Adeva
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Martínez-Galán
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - J J Reina
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Macarena, Seville, Spain
| | - M Hidalgo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van der Geest LGM, Haj Mohammad N, Besselink MGH, Lemmens VEPP, Portielje JEA, van Laarhoven HWM, Wilmink JHW. Nationwide trends in chemotherapy use and survival of elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Med 2017; 6:2840-2849. [PMID: 29035014 PMCID: PMC5727341 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2017] [Revised: 08/22/2017] [Accepted: 09/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite an aging population and underrepresentation of elderly patients in clinical trials, studies on elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer are scarce. This study investigated the use of chemotherapy and survival in elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. From the Netherlands Cancer Registry, all 9407 patients diagnosed with primary metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma in 2005–2013 were selected to investigate chemotherapy use and overall survival (OS), using Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Over time, chemotherapy use increased in all age groups (<70 years: from 26 to 43%, 70–74 years: 14 to 25%, 75–79 years: 5 to 13%, all P < 0.001, and ≥80 years: 2 to 3% P = 0.56). Median age of 2,180 patients who received chemotherapy was 63 years (range 21–86 years, 1.6% was ≥80 years). In chemotherapy‐treated patients, with rising age (<70, 70–74, 75–79, ≥80 years), microscopic tumor verification occurred less frequently (91‐88‐87‐77%, respectively, P = 0.009) and OS diminished (median 25‐26‐19‐16 weeks, P = 0.003). After adjustment for confounding factors, worse survival of treated patients ≥75 years persisted. Despite limited chemotherapy use in elderly age, suggestive of strong selection, elderly patients (≥75 years) who received chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer exhibited a worse survival compared to younger patients receiving chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia G M van der Geest
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G H Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Valery E P P Lemmens
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johanneke E A Portielje
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.,Foundation of Geriatric Oncology Netherlands (GeriOnNe), Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - J Hanneke W Wilmink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hidalgo M, Álvarez R, Gallego J, Guillén-Ponce C, Laquente B, Macarulla T, Muñoz A, Salgado M, Vera R, Adeva J, Alés I, Arévalo S, Blázquez J, Calsina A, Carmona A, de Madaria E, Díaz R, Díez L, Fernández T, de Paredes BG, Gallardo ME, González I, Hernando O, Jiménez P, López A, López C, López-Ríos F, Martín E, Martínez J, Martínez A, Montans J, Pazo R, Plaza JC, Peiró I, Reina JJ, Sanjuanbenito A, Yaya R, Carrato A. Consensus guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with pancreatic cancer in Spain. Clin Transl Oncol 2017; 19:667-681. [PMID: 27995549 PMCID: PMC5427095 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-016-1594-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 11/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The management of patients with pancreatic cancer has advanced over the last few years. We convey a multidisciplinary group of experts in an attempt to stablish practical guidelines for the diagnoses, staging and management of these patients. This paper summarizes the main conclusions of the working group. Patients with suspected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma should be rapidly evaluated and referred to high-volume centers. Multidisciplinary supervision is critical for proper diagnoses, staging and to frame a treatment plan. Surgical resection together with chemotherapy offers the highest chance for cure in early stage disease. Patients with advanced disease should be classified in treatment groups to guide systemic treatment. New chemotherapeutic regimens have resulted in improved survival. Symptomatic management is critical in this disease. Enrollment in a clinical trial is, in general, recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hidalgo
- Spanish National Cancer Centre, C/Melchor Fernández Almagro, 3, 28029, Madrid, Spain.
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA.
| | - R Álvarez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Gallego
- University Hospital of Elche, Elche, Spain
| | - C Guillén-Ponce
- Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Ctra. de Colmenar Viejo km. 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| | - B Laquente
- Institut Català d´Oncologia, Duran y Reynals Hospital, Hospitalet Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Macarulla
- Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Muñoz
- University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Salgado
- University Hospital of Ourense, Ourense, Spain
| | - R Vera
- Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - J Adeva
- University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Alés
- Hospital Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain
| | - S Arévalo
- University Hospital Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - J Blázquez
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
- MD Anderson Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Calsina
- Department of Palliative Care, Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Institut Catalá d´Oncologia, Badalona, Spain
| | - A Carmona
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Morales Messeguer, Murcia, Spain
| | - E de Madaria
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - R Díaz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - L Díez
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - T Fernández
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | - M E Gallardo
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain
| | - I González
- Complejo Hospitalario de Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - O Hernando
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
- University Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Jiménez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Asturias, Spain
| | - A López
- Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain
| | - C López
- Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - F López-Ríos
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Martín
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Martínez
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | | | - J Montans
- Department of Pathology, Centro Anatomopatológico, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Pazo
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Saragossa, Spain
| | - J C Plaza
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Peiró
- Department of Endocrinology, Instituto Catalán de Oncología, Hospital Duran I Reynals, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J J Reina
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Virgen de la Macarena, Seville, Spain
| | - A Sanjuanbenito
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Yaya
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alfredo Carrato
- Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Ctra. de Colmenar Viejo km. 9,100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Joshi S, Cruz E, Rachagani S, Guha S, Brand RE, Ponnusamy MP, Kumar S, Batra SK. Bile acids-mediated overexpression of MUC4 via FAK-dependent c-Jun activation in pancreatic cancer. Mol Oncol 2016; 10:1063-1077. [PMID: 27185392 PMCID: PMC4972654 DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2016.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2016] [Revised: 04/04/2016] [Accepted: 04/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The majority of pancreatic cancer (PC) patients are clinically presented with obstructive jaundice with elevated levels of circulatory bilirubin and alkaline phosphatases. In the current study, we examined the implications of bile acids (BA), an important component of bile, on the pathophysiology of PC and investigated their mechanistic association in tumor-promoting functions. Integration of results from PC patient samples and autochthonous mouse models showed an elevated levels of BA (p < 0.05) in serum samples compared to healthy controls. Similarly, an elevated BA levels was observed in pancreatic juice derived from PC patients (p < 0.05) than non-pancreatic non-healthy (NPNH) controls, further establishing the clinical association of BA with the pathogenesis of PC. The tumor-promoting functions of BA were established by observed transcriptional upregulation of oncogenic MUC4 expression. Luciferase reporter assay revealed distal MUC4 promoter as the primary responsive site to BA. In silico analysis recognized two c-Jun binding sites at MUC4 distal promoter, which was biochemically established using ChIP assay. Interestingly, BA treatment led to an increased transcription and activation of c-Jun in a FAK-dependent manner. Additionally, BA receptor, namely FXR, which is also upregulated at transcriptional level in PC patient samples, was demonstrated as an upstream molecule in BA-mediated FAK activation, plausibly by regulating Src activation. Altogether, these results demonstrate that elevated levels of BA increase the tumorigenic potential of PC cells by inducing FXR/FAK/c-Jun axis to upregulate MUC4 expression, which is overexpressed in pancreatic tumors and is known to be associated with progression and metastasis of PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suhasini Joshi
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, United States
| | - Eric Cruz
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, United States
| | - Satyanarayana Rachagani
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, United States
| | - Sushovan Guha
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, UT Health-UT Health Science Center and Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Randall E Brand
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Moorthy P Ponnusamy
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, United States; Buffett Cancer Center, Omaha, NE 68198, United States; Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Omaha, NE 68198, United States
| | - Sushil Kumar
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, United States.
| | - Surinder K Batra
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, United States; Buffett Cancer Center, Omaha, NE 68198, United States; Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Omaha, NE 68198, United States; Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, United States.
| |
Collapse
|