Levetiracetam in the Treatment of Epileptic Seizures After Liver Transplantation

Critical care management of acute liver failure

The management of acute liver failure (ALF) in modern hepatology intensive care units (ICU) has improved patient outcomes. Critical care management of hepatic encephalopathy, cerebral edema, fluid and electrolytes; prevention of infections and organ support are central to improved outcomes of ALF. In particular, the pathogenesis of encephalopathy is multifactorial, with ammonia, elevated intra-cranial pressure and systemic inflammation playing a central role. Although ALF remains associated with high mortality, the availability of supportive care, including organ failure support such as plasma exchange, timely mechanical ventilation or continuous renal replacement therapy, either conservatively manages patients with ALF or offers bridging therapy until liver transplantation. Thus, appropriate critical care management has improved the likelihood of patient recovery in ALF. ICU care interventions such as monitoring of cerebral edema, fluid status assessment and interventions for sepsis prevention, nutritional support and management of electrolytes can salvage a substantial proportion of patients. In this review, we discuss the key aspects of critical care management of ALF.

Evaluating the bioequivalence of levetiracetam brand and generic oral tablets available in the Saudi market in vivo

Background

Epilepsy is a common global neurological disorder. About 30% of epileptic patients are managed with anti-epileptic Drugs (AEDs). Since 2000, Levetiracetam (LEV) has been marketed around the world as an AED under the brand name Keppra, and recently more generics are found in the Saudi market as cheaper alternatives. The objective of this study is to evaluate the bioequivalence of LEV brand and generics available in the Saudi market in mice.

Methods

Pharmacokinetics (PK), liver function test, and behavioral studies were conducted for LEV brand and generic in different groups of Blab/c mice.

Results

PK results show a significance difference in PK parameters mostly evidenced with generic 3, then generic 2. The only significant different between Keppra and generic 1 was in T1/2. In addition, Keppra did not significantly increase liver enzymes in comparison to other generics. On the other hand, other generics showed less favorable results in increasing liver enzymes. Keppra reduced the number and intensity of epileptic attacks, had no mortality rate due to epilepsy, and was associated with less sever seizures attacks.

Conclusion

Keppra, the brand form of LEV, has better safety and efficacy profiles in mice compared to 3 generics found in the Saudi market. Therefore, we recommend evaluating the same parameters tested in this study in patients utilizing similar generics and brand to establish the existence of bioequivalence between LEV brand and generics.

Levetiracetam-Induced Hepatic Dysfunction

Although levetiracetam is the antiepileptic of choice in patients after hepatic transplantation and patients with hepatic dysfunction, we report a patient in whom levetiracetam was the most probable cause of hepatic dysfunction. Treatment of this hepatic dysfunction is to have a high degree of suspicion and withdraw the drug at the earliest to prevent morbidity and rarely mortality. Though rare, this is an important unwanted side effect of this highly useful medication.

Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients With Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Liver transplant is currently the most effective option for patients with end-stage liver disease. Seizures are the most common neurologic complication after liver transplant. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome is a neurologic syndrome characterized by lethargy, seizures, visual disturbances, and radiologic findings of edema in the posterior regions of the cerebral hemispheres. Levetiracetam is prescribed for a broad spectrum of seizure types but does not have a specific indication for epilepsy in children after solid-organ transplant. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam in pediatric transplant recipients with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and epilepsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed records of patients treated for epilepsy due to posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome after liver transplant seen at our pediatric neurology clinic between January 2010 and March 2019. Patients were assessed clinically and by neurologic examination, electroencephalography, and cerebral magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Among 134 children who had undergone liver transplant between 2010 and 2019, 10 patients (6 males, 4 females; age range,7-19 y) who were diag-nosed with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and epilepsy were included in the study. All patients received levetiracetam at 20 mg/kg/day. After a mean follow-up of 28.9 months (range, 24-40 mo), 9 patients (90%) attained complete seizure freedom. One patient who had an underlying neurodegenerative disease (hemophagocytic syndrome) other than posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome continued to have seizures under levetiracetam treatment. One patient had a mild adverse reaction (irritability) due to levetiracetam but did not require drug discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, 90% of patients with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome became seizure free with levetiracetam treatment. Our findings suggest that levetiracetam has a favorable efficacy for epilepsy due to posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in pediatric liver transplant recipients with tolerable adverse effects.

Seizures after transplantation

PURPOSE

To summarize information on the history, incidence, clinical manifestation, best treatment, as well as prognosis of seizures in transplant recipients.

METHODS

In October 2017, we searched the literature on PubMed in English with the search terms: "transplantation" AND "seizure", "transplantation" AND "epilepsy", "transplantation"AND "status epilepticus", "immunosuppressant" AND "seizure", "immunosuppressant" AND "epilepsy". Publications not based on new data and original research were not included in this article.

RESULTS

Seizures including generalized seizures, focal seizures and status epilepticus are a common central nervous system complication after transplantation. The incidence of seizures varied between different kinds of transplantations. The reported incidence of seizures was 7%-27% in association with solid organ transplantations and 1.6%-15.4% with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Most of seizures appeared in the early post-transplantation period. Patients often had a favorable prognosis, however, in some conditions, recurrent or intractable seizures may occur.

CONCLUSIONS

The underlying pathogenesis of new-onset seizures or epilepsy in recipients of transplantation needs to be further elucidated. In addition, more information is required from prospective studies and research focusing on therapeutic strategies.

Antiepileptic Drugs and Liver Disease

Acute, symptomatic seizures or epilepsy may complicate the course of hepatic disease. Choosing the most appropriate antiepileptic drug in this setting represents a difficult challenge, as most medications are metabolized by the liver. This article focuses on the acute and chronic treatment of seizures in patients with advanced liver disease and reviews the hepatotoxic potential of specific antiepileptic drugs. Newer antiepileptic drugs without, or with minimal, hepatic metabolism, such as levetiracetam, lacosamide, topiramate, gabapentin, and pregabalin should be used as first-line therapy. Medications undergoing extensive hepatic metabolism, such as valproic acid, phenytoin, and felbamate should be used as drugs of last resort. In special circumstances, as in patients affected by acute intermittent porphyria, exposure to most antiepileptic drugs could precipitate attacks. In this clinical scenario, bromides, levetiracetam, gabapentin, and vigabatrin constitute safe choices. For the treatment of status epilepticus, levetiracetam and lacosamide, available in intravenous preparations, are good second-line therapies after benzodiazepines fail to control seizures. Hepatotoxicity is also a rare and unexpected side effect of some antiepileptic drugs. Drugs such as valproic acid, phenytoin, and felbamate, have a well-recognized association with liver toxicity. Other antiepileptic drugs, including phenobarbital, benzodiazepines, ethosuximide, and the newer generations of antiepileptic drugs, have only rarely been linked to hepatotoxicity. Thus physicians should be mindful of the pharmacokinetic profile and the hepatotoxic potential of the different antiepileptic drugs available to treat patients affected by liver disease.

Epilepsy treatment in adults and adolescents: Expert opinion, 2016

INTRODUCTION

There are over twenty anti-seizure medications and anti-seizure devices available commercially in the United States. The multitude of treatment options for seizures can present a challenge to clinicians, especially those who are not subspecialists in the epilepsy field. Many clinical questions are not adequately answered in double-blind randomized controlled studies. In the presence of a knowledge gap, many clinicians consult a respected colleague with acknowledged expertise in the field. Our survey was designed to provide expert opinions on the treatment of epilepsy in adults and adolescents.

METHOD

We surveyed a group of 42 physicians across the United States who are considered experts based on publication record in the field of epilepsy, or a leadership role in a National Association of Epilepsy Centers comprehensive epilepsy program. The survey consisted of 43 multiple-part patient scenario questions and was administered online using Redcap software. The experts provided their opinion on 1126 treatment options based on a modified Rand 9-point scale. The patient scenarios focused on genetically-mediated generalized epilepsy and focal epilepsy. The scenarios first focused on overall treatment strategy and then on specific pharmacotherapies. Other questions focused on treatment of specific patient populations (pregnancy, the elderly, patients with brain tumors, and post organ transplant patients), epilepsy patients with comorbidities (renal and hepatic disease, depression), and how to combine medications after failure of monotherapy. Statistical analysis of data used the expert consensus method.

RESULTS

Valproate was considered a drug of choice in all genetically-mediated generalized epilepsies, except in the population of women of child-bearing age. Ethosuximide was a drug of choice in patient with absence seizures, and levetiracetam was a drug of choice in patients with genetic generalized tonic-clonic seizures and myoclonic seizures. Lamotrigine, levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine were considered drugs of choice for initial treatment of focal seizures. Lamotrigine and levetiracetam were the drugs of choice for women of child-bearing age with either genetic generalized epilepsy or focal epilepsy. Lamotrigine and levetiracetam were the drugs of choice in the elderly population. Lamotrigine was preferred in patients with co-morbid depression. Levetiracetam was the drug of choice in treating patients with hepatic failure, or who have undergone organ transplantation. Compared to the 2005 and 2001 surveys, there was increased preference for the use of levetiracetam and lamotrigine, and decreased preference for the use of phenytoin, gabapentin, phenobarbital and carbamazepine.

DISCUSSION

The study presented here provides a "snapshot" of the clinical practices of experts in the treatment of epilepsy. The experts were very often in agreement, and reached consensus in 81% of the possible responses. However, expert opinion does not replace the medical literature; instead, it acts to supplement existing information. Using the study results is similar to requesting an expert consultation. Our findings suggest options that the clinician should consider to achieve best practice.

Epilepsy After Heart Transplant: A Single Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

Cardiac transplant is the best treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure. Neurologic complications occur at a rate of 30% to 80% in patients undergoing cardiac transplant. Seizures occur at a rate of 2% to 20%. The main causative factors include immunosuppressant drug toxicity, infections, brain lesions, and metabolic disorders. Here, our aim was to determine seizure types and associated conditions in patients undergoing cardiac transplant and to report our treatment experience at our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of 109 patients who underwent cardiac transplant between 2004 and 2016. We recorded demographic data, immunosuppressive treatment, seizure type, cause, recurrence rate, and treatment.

RESULTS

Of 109 patients, 13 had seizures after cardiac transplant. Our study involved 69 adult and 40 pediatric patients. The pediatric patients had an age range of 1 to 17 years, with a mean age of 9.6 years (22 female and 18 male patients). Five pediatric patients had seizures (4 female and 1 male patient). The seizure causes included 2 postarrest hypoxic encephalopathies and 3 posterior reversible encephalopathies. Adult patients ranged from 18 to 63 years old, with a mean age of 42.3 years (54 male and 15 female patients). Eight patients in the adult patient group had seizures (5 female and 3 male patients). Seizure causes were ischemic cerebrovascular events in 2 patients, metabolic disorders in 2, posterior reversible encephalopathies in 3, and postarrest hypoxic brain in 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Seizure is an important complication after cardiac transplant. At our institution, the most common cause of seizure was posterior reversible encephalopathy, with immunosuppressant drugs being responsible.