Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Gastric Neoplasms in the Elderly

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Elderly Patients

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are prevalent in elderly patients. Endoscopic resection has become popular for treating small (≤5 cm) gastric GISTs. However, little is known about the outcomes of endoscopic resection in elderly patients.

Aim

To assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection for small (≤5 cm) gastric GISTs in elderly patients (≥65 years old).

Methods

A total of 260 patients (265 lesions) with gastric GISTs treated via endoscopic resection from January 2011 to May 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 65 patients were ≥65 years old (elderly group), and 195 patients were <65 years old (nonelderly group). Clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative complications, and tumor recurrence rates between the two age groups were compared.

Results

A total of 260 patients with primary small (≤5 cm) gastric GISTs were treated with endoscopic resection. The median ages of the elderly and nonelderly groups were 68 (range 65-83) years and 55 (range 32-64) years, respectively. Elderly patients showed a higher incidence of comorbidities compared with nonelderly patients (61.5% versus 32.3%s, respectively; p < 0.001). All elderly patients and 99.0% of nonelderly patients underwent en bloc resection; only two nonelderly patients received piecemeal resection. No significant differences were found regarding postoperative complications or tumor recurrence rates between the two groups.

Conclusions

Although elderly patients had more comorbidities than nonelderly patients, both groups had similar postoperative complications and recurrence rates. We suggest that endoscopic resection performed by experienced endoscopists is safe and effective for treating small (≤5 cm) gastric GISTs in elderly patients.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery in elderly patients with early gastric cancer of relative indication for endoscopic resection

OBJECTIVES

Surgery is recommended for early gastric cancer (EGC) beyond the endoscopic resection (ER)-indication for the risk of lymph node metastasis; however, ER may be chosen as a "relative ER-indication" considering age and comorbidities. This study aimed to compare outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) only and surgery (primary surgery and additional surgery after non-curative ESD) among elderly patients with relative ER-indication EGC and to further assess prognostic factors.

METHODS

Outcomes of ESD and surgery (417 cases; 114 ESD, 303 surgery) in elderly patients (≥75 years) with relative ER-indication EGC were retrospectively analyzed. Prognostic factors were also examined.

RESULTS

During the observation period (median; ESD, 34 months; surgery, 61 months), 29% of ESD and 35% of surgery patients died, including 4% and 5% from gastric cancer (GC), respectively. ESD showed lower overall survival (OS) than surgery (P = 0.027) but comparable disease-free survival (P = 0.916). OS-associated factors were age and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in males (age ≥79, hazard ratio [HR] 2.21, P = 0.001; PNI <45, HR 2.06, P = 0.031) and age in females (age ≥82, HR 4.06, P = 0.004). Treatment was not a prognostic factor in either subgroup. Pathological category ≥pT1b2 (submucosal invasion ≥500 µm) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were significantly associated with GC death (mortality: ≥pT1b2, 7.7%, P = 0.002; LVI, 10.1%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly patients with relative ER-indication EGC, ESD may have comparable long-term efficacy to surgery, and treatment selection had a minor contribution to OS. For patients with poor preoperative prognostic factors, diagnostic ESD may be performed first, followed by additional surgery based on pathological results.

The Modified eCura System for Identifying High-Risk Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer Resected by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used for early gastric cancer (EGC) in patients without lymph node metastasis (LNM). Prediction of LNM after ESD is important to determine prognosis in patients with EGC. In this regard, the eCura system was applied to predict LNM after noncurative ESD for EGC. This study aimed to identify risk factors for LNM and improve the accuracy of the eCura system for predicting the risk of LNM after ESD. Methods: A total of 150 patients who underwent noncurative resection of EGC by ESD were retrospectively enrolled at five institutions in Japan. All patients underwent additional surgery with lymph node resection after ESD. The risk factors for LNM among clinicopathological parameters were examined and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff point for predicting high LNM risk using the modified eCura system. Results: Of 150 patients, 19 (13%) had LNM. In the multivariate analysis, lymphatic invasion, and tumor size >30 mm were independent risk factors for LNM. Using a cutoff score of ≥4 for predicting high risk based on the eCura system, the rate of LNM was significantly higher in the high-risk group (4–7 points) than in the low-risk group (0–3 points) (odds ratio 12.0, 95% confidence interval 3.7–54.2, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: An eCura score ≥4 may improve the prediction of LNM risk after ESD in patients with EGC in the intermediate-risk group (2–4 points) of the eCura system, suggesting better treatment strategies for patients. Further prospective and long-term follow-up studies are needed to validate the efficacy of the modified system.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer in Elderly vs. Non-Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to review the applicability and complications rate associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer in elderly patients.

METHODS

Databases of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and ScienceDirect were searched till 15^th April 2021. All types of studies comparing ESD in the elderly vs non-elderly were included. Subgroup analysis was conducted for the following groups: ≥80 years vs <80 years, ≥75 years vs < 75 years, and ≥65 years vs <65 years.

RESULTS

17 studies were included. Meta-analysis indicated no statistically significant difference in the en-bloc resection rates (OR: 0.92 95% CI: 0.68, 1.26 I² = 8% p=0.62) and histological complete resection rates (OR: 0.93 95% CI: 0.75, 1.15 I² = 26% p=0.50) between elderly and non-elderly patients. The results were non-significant even on subgroup analysis. Overall, we found a non-significant but a tendency of increased perforation rates in the elderly as compared to non-elderly patients (OR: 1.22 95% CI: 0.99, 1.52 I² = 0% p=0.06). However, there was a significantly increased risk of perforation in elderly patients aged ≥80 years as compared to patients <80 years (OR: 1.50 95% CI: 1.00, 2.24 I² = 3% p=0.05). Bleeding rates were not different in the two groups (OR: 1.07 95% CI: 0.87, 1.32 I² = 19% p=0.52). Pooled analysis indicated a statistically significantly increased risk of pneumonia in elderly patients (OR: 2.52 95% CI: 1.72, 3.70 I² = 7% p<0.00001). Length of hospital stay was reported only by five studies. Meta-analysis indicated no significant difference between the two study groups (MD: 0.67 95% CI: -0.14, 1.48 I² = 83% p=0.10).

CONCLUSION

En-bloc and histological complete resection rates do not differ between elderly and non-elderly patients undergoing ESD for early gastric cancer. Elderly patients have a small tendency of increased risk of perforation with significantly increased rates in the super-elderly (≥80 years of age). The risk of pneumonia is significantly higher in elderly patients but the rates of bleeding do not differ. The certainty of evidence is "very low" and there is a need for high-quality studies taking into account confounding factors to enhance the quality of evidence.

Risk Factors for Bleeding After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Cancer in Elderly Patients Older Than 80 Years in Japan

INTRODUCTION

As the aging of people in a society advances, the number of elderly patients older than 80 years in Japan with gastric cancer continues to increase. Although delayed ulcer bleeding is a major adverse event after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), little is known about characteristic risk factors for bleeding in elderly patients undergoing ESD. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors for delayed bleeding after ESD for gastric cancer in elderly patients older than 80 years.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of delayed bleeding after ESD in 10,320 patients with early-stage gastric cancer resected by ESD between November 2013 and January 2016 at 33 Japanese institutions and investigated risk factors for delayed bleeding in elderly patients older than 80 years.

RESULTS

The incidence of delayed bleeding in elderly patients older than 80 years was 5.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.6%-6.9%, 95/1,675), which was significantly higher than that in nonelderly (older than 20 years and younger than 80 years) patients (4.5%, 4.1%-5.0%, 393/8,645). Predictive factors for ESD-associated bleeding differed between nonelderly and elderly patients. On multivariate analysis of predictive factors at the time of treatment, risk factors in elderly patients were hemodialysis (odds ratio: 4.591, 95% CI: 2.056-10.248, P < 0.001) and warfarin use (odds ratio: 4.783, 95% CI: 1.689-13.540, P = 0.003).

DISCUSSION

This multicenter study found that the incidence of delayed bleeding after ESD in Japanese patients older than 80 years was high, especially in patients receiving hemodialysis and taking warfarin. Management of ESD to prevent delayed bleeding requires particular care in patients older than 80 years.

Association between Charlson comorbidity index and complications of endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasms in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

Although endoscopic resection is safe and effective for gastric epithelial neoplasms, information is limited on its efficacy and safety in extremely elderly patients who have various comorbidities. Further, the relationship between comorbidities and complications of endoscopic resection is not well established. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of gastric epithelial neoplasms in extremely elderly patients.

METHODS

From October 2008 to December 2017, 4475 consecutive patients underwent endoscopic resection of gastric epithelial neoplasms. Among them, 242 were 75 years or older. We assessed Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) scores, procedural outcomes, and procedure- and sedation-related complications related to endoscopic resection.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 78.7 ± 3.2 years. Of the 242 patients, 124 (51.2%) had low-grade dysplasia and 112 (46.3%) had adenocarcinoma. The most common comorbidity was hypertension (55.4%), followed by diabetes (23.1%). The mean CCI score was 1.67 ± 1.43. Sixty patients (24.8%) had a CCI score ≥ 3. During the procedure, 10 (4.1%) patients had desaturation that recovered by flumazenil use with mask (n = 2) or Ambu bag (n = 3) ventilation. During subsequent admission, atelectasis or pneumonia occurred in 45 (18.6%) patients, post-procedural bleeding in 12 (5.0%), and perforation in 3 (1.2%). Respiratory complications were more common in patients with a CCI score ≥ 3 (20/60, 33.3%) than in those with a CCI score < 3 (25/182, 13.7%, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

CCI score is related to respiratory complications of endoscopic resection in extremely elderly patients. Endoscopic resection must be performed cautiously, particularly in elderly patients with a high CCI score, to prevent respiratory complications.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasia in elderly patients aged 80 years and older

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely used in gastric tumor as a minimally invasive treatment. The efficacy and safety of ESD is still unclear in the elderly who have high frequency comorbidities. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESD for gastric epithelial neoplasia in patients aged 80 years and older.

METHODS

Between March 2013 and July 2017, a total of 438 gastric epithelial neoplasia patients treated with ESD were analyzed. Clinical outcomes including en bloc and complete resection rates, adverse events (AE) related procedure and sedation were compared between the elderly group and the non-elderly group.

RESULTS

Sex, Body Mass Index, medication history and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status did not differ between the two groups. Tumor characteristics except size of resected specimen (elderly vs. non-elderly; 36.5 ± 10.5 vs. 32.3 ± 8.7 mm, p < 0.011) did not differ. There were no significant differences in AE-related sedation. En bloc resection (elderly vs. non-elderly; 100% vs. 98.3%, p = 0.454), and complete resection rate (elderly vs. non-elderly; 93.8% vs. 96.3%, p = 0.471) did not differ significantly between the two groups. Procedure time, hospital stay, AE-related procedure and delayed bleeding were also similar between the two groups. However, procedure time of preventive hemostasis (elderly vs. non-elderly; 10.4 ± 7.7 vs. 7.4 ± 5.2 min, p = 0.040) was significantly higher in the elderly group.

CONCLUSIONS

ESD for gastric epithelial neoplasia is effective and safe in elderly patients ≥ 80 years as in non-elderly patients.

Impact of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients: The latest single center large cohort study with a review of the literature

With the increase in the elderly population, we are witnessing an increase in the rate of patients with underlying diseases and those under treatment with antithrombotic drugs.In this study, we compared the treatment outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and other parameters in the following 3 groups: super-elderly, elderly, and nonelderly.Compared with the other groups, the super-elderly group showed a significantly higher incidence of underlying diseases and the rate of antithrombotic treatment (P < .05). However, we observed no significant difference in the rate of curative resection or incidence of complications among the 3 groups. ESD is a relatively safe technique when performed on super-elderly patients. However, we have identified some cases in the super-elderly group, for which ESD was selected as a minimally invasive treatment for lesions that did not meet the inclusion criteria for open surgery as well as for which follow-up observations were selected rather than additional surgery for noncurative resections.Further investigations concerning ESD are required, focusing on aspects such as indications, additional surgery, and informed consent of the patient or family, particularly when ESD is performed for super-elderly patients.

Elderly patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) receive less treatment irrespective of performance score or comorbidity - A retrospective multicentre study in a large cohort of GIST patients

OBJECTIVE

Although gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) predominantly occur in older patients, data on treatment patterns in elderly GIST patients are scarce.

METHODS

Patients registered in the Dutch GIST Registry (DGR) from January 2009 until December 2016 were included. Differences in treatment patterns between elderly (≥75 years) and younger patients were compared. Multivariate analyses were conducted using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Data of 145 elderly and 665 non-elderly patients were registered (median age 78 and 60 years respectively). In elderly patients, performance score (WHO-PS) and age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) were significantly higher (p < 0.05; p < 0.001), and albumin level significantly lower (p = 0.04). Hundred-and-nine (75.2%) elderly and 503 (75.6%) non-elderly patients had only localised disease. Surgery was performed in 57% of elderly versus 84% of non-elderly patients (p = 0.003, OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.11-0.63). No differences in surgery outcome or complications were found. Thirty-eight percent of elderly with an indication for adjuvant treatment did receive imatinib versus 68% of non-elderly (p = 0.04, OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.23-0.95). Thirty-six elderly and 162 non-elderly patients had metastatic disease. Palliative imatinib was equally given (mean dose 400 mg) and adverse events were mostly minor (p = 0.71). In elderly, drug-related toxicity was in 32.7% reason to discontinue imatinib versus 5.1% in non-elderly (p = 0.001, OR 13.5, 95% CI: 2.8-65.0). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 24 months in elderly and 33 months in non-elderly (p = 0.10). Median overall survival (OS) was 34 months and 59 months respectively (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly GIST patients with localised disease receive less surgery and adjuvant treatment, irrespective of comorbidity and performance score. Drug-related toxicity results more often in treatment discontinuation. This possibly results in poor outcome.

Co-ordinated overexpression of SIRT1 and STAT3 is associated with poor survival outcome in gastric cancer patients

In many gastric cancer patients, the disease is diagnosed in an advanced stage and therefore the mortality levels are high. Because there is a need to identify novel early diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, we tested whether SIRT1 and STAT3 are good candidates. Towards this, we used patient tissues representing different stages of gastric cancer including gastric pre-cancerous lesions, early gastric cancer, and advanced gastric cancer, and probed SIRT1, STAT3 and phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) levels using immunohistochemistry. Our results revealed upregulated expression of SIRT1 in all stages of gastric cancer compared with noncancerous gastric mucosa, suggesting that high SIRT1 levels are likely involved in establishing gastric neoplasticity. However, STAT3 and pSTAT3 levels remained low until the gastric mucosa reached the tumor stage. Moreover, co-ordinated high expression of SIRT1 and STAT3 predicted poor overall survival for advanced gastric cancer patients. In addition, through analysis of gastric cancer patients from the TCGA dataset, we identified SIRT2 as an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer patients. We postulate that SIRT1 and STAT3 are potential early diagnostic and prognostic markers of gastric cancer. Our study also shows that SIRT1 acts a gatekeeper during gastric tumorigenesis.

Concomitant stromal tumor and early cancer of the stomach: What should be done?

Concomitant gastric stromal tumor (GST) and gastric cancer (GC) is uncommon; even more uncommon is a concomitant GST and early stage GC (EGC). Tumor resection by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for concomitant GST and EGC has not been reported. We sought to define the clinical importance of detection of concomitant GST and EGC during the first esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and compare the clinical outcomes of ESD versus radical surgery for the treatment of concomitant GST and EGC. Our investigation was a retrospective cohort study. Patients with concomitant GST and EGC who underwent ESD or radical surgery were enrolled at the university-affiliated hospital from January 2005 to January 2015. The detection rate of concomitant GST and EGC during the first EGD was 3/25 (12%). Among 25 patients, 14 underwent ESD and 11 underwent surgery. Mean operation time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the ESD group than the surgery group. There were no significant differences in terms of rates of en bloc resection, complete resection, and early complications. Late complications were more common in the surgery group than in the ESD group. The median follow-up duration was 58.9 months. Three- or 5-year overall survival rates were 100% for both groups and no patient died of EGC and GST. There was no local recurrence in the 2 groups; however, 3 metachronous EGC lesions were found during the follow-up period in the ESD group as follows: the simultaneous occurrence of GST and EGC was uncommon; the detection rate of concomitant GST and EGC was very low at the first EGD; and ESD appeared to be a safe, efficient, and popular treatment option for concomitant GST and EGC, that met the ESD absolute indication, and the outcomes were comparable to those achieved with surgery.