Short-term outcome in patients treated with cytoreduction and HIPEC compared to conventional colon cancer surgery

Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastasis of colorectal cancer: long-term follow-up results at a single institution in Korea

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the 7-year follow-up results of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) for peritoneal metastasis (PM) of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We performed 54 cases of CRS and IPC in 53 patients with PM of colorectal cancer from December 2011 to December 2013. We prospectively collected data and analyzed peritoneal carcinomatosis grade, completeness of cytoreduction, and long-term follow-up (median, 10 [range, 2-92] months) results.

RESULTS

The mean peritoneal cancer index was 15 (1 ~ 35), and complete cytoreduction was possible in 35 (64.8%) patients. Excluding the four patients who died, 11 (22.4%) out of the 49 patients were alive at the time of the last follow-up, and the overall median survival period was 10.3 months. The overall 2- and 5-year survival rates were 31% and 17%, respectively. Patients with complete cytoreduction had a median survival period of 22.6 months, which was significantly longer than that for patients without complete cytoreduction (3.5 months) (P < 0.001). The 5-year survival rate for patients with complete cytoreduction was 24%, and four patients were still alive without disease.

CONCLUSIONS

CRS and IPC show a 5-year survival rate of 17% in patients with PM of colorectal cancer. A possibility of long-term survival is observed in a selected group. Multidisciplinary team evaluation for careful patient selection and CRS training program to achieve complete cytoreduction are significantly important factors in improving survival rate.

Optimizing risk factors influence Intensive Care stay after Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy? An observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

It may be necessary to admit patients receiving Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) to the intensive care unit (ICU). They were required to evaluate the length of ICU stay (LOS) following HIPEC, as well as their survival rates and risk factors that influence LOS.

METHODS

74 HIPEC patients were observed after being admitted to the ICU. Their assignments were made based on their LOS at the ICU. Short stay group, patients who stayed in the ICU for three days or less (S-group) and patients who stayed for three days or longer (L-group).

RESULTS

Survival rates for both groups were comparable. After HIPEC, they exhibited intraoperative hypotension (P = 0.015), hyopthermia (P = 0.014), and hyperglycemia (P = 0.010). Additionally, patients in group L underwent longer surgeries (P = 0.013), lost more blood (P = 0.043), and required more transfusions (P = 0.001). Subjects in group-L had higher SOFA, fentanyl, and vasopressor requirements (all P 0.001), higher ALT and AST levels, disrupted K, lower Na, and higher INR levels (all P 0.001), as well as a higher APACHE II score (P = 0.007). Preoperative BUN had an independent risk factor for LOS of 0.861; (95% CI), (0.742- 0.999); P = 0.048; and crystalloid transfusion had an independent risk factor of 1.000; (95% CI), (0.999- 1.000); P = 0.003.

CONCLUSIONS

Transfusions of crystalloids and BUN were independent risk factors for extended LOS. ICU LOS had no impact on survival. All measures should be taken to control hemostasis in vulnerable HIPEC participants.

The impact of postoperative complications following cytoreductive surgery combined with oxaliplatin based heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) has become the mainstream treatment for peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin. This extensive treatment is known for its increased morbidity rate. In this study, the impact of postoperative complications on survival was evaluated in a high-volume centre.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Between November 2016 through October 2018, all 106 patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin treated with CRS + HIPEC with oxaliplatin were evaluated. Data on patient characteristics, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI), operative procedure, post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade III or higher) and survival were collected. In-hospital postoperative complications were analysed for their association with patient characteristics, tumour load (PCI), and operative procedure with logistic regression analyses. Survival was analysed with the Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 106 patients, 78% had an un-eventful in-hospital recovery. Of those patients who experienced complications, 52% patients had one complication and 48% had more than one. The median follow-up time was 33.8 months. Median survival was 22.4 months (95% CI 12.2-NR) for patients who experienced complications and not reached for those who did not. Survival was significantly associated with complications (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.0) as well as with PCI (HR 1.1, 95% CI 1.1-1.2) in univariate analyses. A stepwise Cox regression analysis showed both PCI and complications had an independent negative impact on survival.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative complications, independently of tumour load, led to reduced survival in patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin when treated with CRS + HIPEC with oxaliplatin.

What matters to you? An investigation of patients' perspectives on and acceptability of prehabilitation in major cancer surgery

OBJECTIVE

To understand perspectives on and acceptability of prehabilitation among patients undergoing complex abdominal cancer surgery (cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy).

METHODS

Seventy-nine patients admitted to a Danish colorectal or ovarian cancer centre participated in qualitative semi-structured interviews and/or registered their prehabilitation activities based on preoperative recommendations presented in a leaflet. Malterud's principles of systematic text condensation were used to analyse the interview data, and descriptive statistics were used to describe the activity registrations.

RESULTS

Five domains clarify central aspects of the patients' perspectives on and acceptability of prehabilitation: the preoperative period, attitudes towards prehabilitation, the actual prehabilitation performed, motivation to take action and the need for support.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery are interested in and positive towards prehabilitation, but it has to be on their terms. The patients need support and supervision, but it has to be provided in a setting and in a way that are in line with the patient's preferences, resources and values. Thus, patient involvement is necessary to create prehabilitation programmes that are feasible and fit into patients' everyday lives.

Nasogastric- vs. percutaneous gastrostomy tube for prophylactic gastric decompression after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Objectives

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with postoperative gastroparesis and ileus. In 2015, our practice shifted from using percutaneous gastrostomy tubes (PGT), to nasogastric tubes (NGT) for prophylactic gastric decompression after CRS-HIPEC. This study aimed to compare these methods for length of stay (LOS) and associated complications.

Methods

Patients that underwent CRS-HIPEC for peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer between 2014 and 2019 were included. Cases were grouped based on receiving NGT or PGT postoperatively. Multivariable linear regression determined the independent effect of decompression method on LOS, thereby adjusting for confounders.

Results

In total, 179 patients were included in the analyses. Median age was 64 years [IQR:54–71]. Altogether, 135 (75.4%) received a NGT and 44 (24.6%) received a PGT. Gastroparesis occurred significantly more often in the PGT group (18.2 vs. 7.4%, p=0.039). Median LOS was significantly shorter for patients with a NGT (15 [IQR:12–19] vs. 18.5 [IQR:17–25.5], p<0.001). PGT was independently associated with longer LOS in multivariable analysis (Beta=4.224 [95%CI 1.243–7.204]). There was no difference regarding aspiration, pneumonia and postoperative mortality between groups.

Conclusions

NGT should be preferred over PGT for gastric decompression after CRS-HIPEC as it is associated with fewer gastroparesis and shorter LOS.

Impact of extent of disease on 1-year healthcare costs in patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases: retrospective observational cohort study

Background

The goal of this retrospective observational study was to determine the impact of the extent of peritoneal disease on 1‐year healthcare costs in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) who undergo cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). The extent of peritoneal disease, expressed by the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), directly affects the complexity of CRS + HIPEC and ultimately survival outcomes. The impact of the PCI on treatment‐related healthcare costs remains unknown.

Methods

Data from patients with colorectal PM who underwent CRS + HIPEC between January 2012 and November 2017 were extracted retrospectively from an institutional database. Patients were divided into four subgroups with PCI scores ranging from 0 to 20. Treatment‐related costs up to 1 year after CRS + HIPEC were obtained from the financial department. Differences in costs and survival outcomes were compared using the χ² test and Kruskal−Wallis H test.

Results

Seventy‐three patients were included (PCI 0–5, 22 patients; PCI 6–10, 19 patients; PCI 11–15, 17 patients; PCI 16–20, 15 patients). Median (i.q.r.) costs were significantly increased for the PCI 11–15 and PCI 16–20 groups (€51 029 (42 500–58 575) and €46 548 (35 194–60 533) respectively) compared with those for the PCI 0–5 and PCI 6–10 groups (€33 856 (25 293–42 235) and €39 013 (30 519–51 334) respectively) (P = 0·009).

Conclusion

Treatment‐related healthcare costs are significantly increased among patients with extensive tumour burden (PCI score 10 or above) who undergo CRS + HIPEC for the treatment of colorectal PM.

Investigating the experiences, thoughts, and feelings underlying and influencing prehabilitation among cancer patients: a qualitative perspective on the what, when, where, who, and why

Purpose: To investigate the experiences, thoughts, and feelings that underlie and influence prehabilitation among cancer patients due to undergo major abdominal surgery.Materials and methods: Prior to their surgery, sixteen patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal or ovarian origin due to undergo major surgery received oral information and a leaflet with preoperative recommendations. They subsequently participated in individual, semi-structured interviews. Malterud's principles of systematic text condensation were used to analyse the interviews, and the concept of action competence inspired and framed the discussion.Results: Although the patients found themselves in an unpredictable and uncontrollable situation, they nevertheless knew what was important to them. These factors were contextualised in five themes that reflected the experiences, thoughts, and feelings that underlay and influenced their actions: "Perception of preparation," "The two-sided preoperative period," "Home or facility-based prehabilitation," "Stakeholders in prehabilitation," and "Reasons for taking action".Conclusions: The patients demonstrated action competence in relation to their preoperative preparation. However, in relation to the kind of prehabilitation that required lifestyle changes, their action competence needed to be developed and supported. To do so, it is necessary to ask questions that cover the patients' perspectives of the what, when, where, who, and why of prehabilitation.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPatients undergoing major, abdominal cancer surgery have very clear opinions about what are important to them during the preoperative period, and this is not only limited to prehabilitation-related actions.In order to develop patients' action competence in relation to prehabilitation, patients need more support and supervision from health professionals.Qualitative in-depth knowledge concerning the what, when, where, who, and why of prehabilitation should be taken into account in the development of future prehabilitation programmes.

Peritoneal Cancers and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is an aggressive, potentially curative approach used to treat locoregional disease associated with primary and secondary malignancies of the peritoneum. It involves resection of all macroscopic disease larger than 2.5 mm, followed by instillation of hyperthermic chemotherapy directly into the peritoneum for higher drug exposure to microscopic disease. In select patients with primary peritoneal mesothelioma, pseudomyxoma peritonei, colorectal adenocarcinoma, appendiceal adenocarcinoma, or ovarian cancer, with no extra-abdominal metastasis and limited involvement of the peritoneum, the procedure can be performed to increase overall survival.

Hepatic resection and blood transfusion increase morbidity after cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for colorectal carcinomatosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is an effective but complex treatment for peritoneal metastasis (PM). Our objective was to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality following CRS-HIPEC.

METHODS

Retrospective study of prospectively collected data of patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for PM arises from colorectal cancer between January 2008 and December 2017. Perioperative variables were correlated with morbidity outcomes using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients underwent CRS-HIPEC, and overall morbidity and mortality were 31.3% and 4.5% respectively. Major morbidity rate was 19.4%; 7.5% of patients were re-operated. Intraoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.01), liver resection (p < 0.01), and intestinal anastomosis (p < 0.01) were associated with a higher morbidity in univariate analysis. A multivariate analysis identified blood transfusion and liver resection as independent risk factors (OR 3.66, IC 1.13-16.54; OR 4.33, IC 1.17-11.46, respectively). Extension of visceral resection did not correlate with morbidity. Patients with lymph-node infiltration had a higher major complication rate (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

CRS-HIPEC is a feasible treatment for colorectal PM with an acceptable morbi-mortality rate in experienced centers. In our study, digestive anastomosis, perioperative blood transfusion, hepatic resection, and lymph-node infiltration were associated with higher morbidity rates.

Surgeons' Ability to Predict the Extent of Surgery Prior to Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Background

The extent of surgery (ES) during cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) is a well-known risk factor for major postoperative morbidity. Interestingly, the reliability of surgeons to predict the ES prior to CRS + HIPEC is unknown.

Methods

In this prospective, observational cohort study, five surgeons predicted the ES prior to surgery in all consecutive patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) who were scheduled for CRS + HIPEC between March 2018 and May 2019. After the preoperative work-up for CRS + HIPEC was completed, all surgeons independently predicted, for each individual patient, the resection or preservation of 22 different anatomical structures and the presence of a stoma post-HIPEC according to a standardized ES form. The actual ES during CRS + HIPEC was extracted from the surgical procedure report and compared with the predicted ES. Overall and individual positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) for each anatomical structure were calculated.

Results

One hundred and thirty-one ES forms were collected from 32 patients who successfully underwent CRS + HIPEC. The number of resections was predicted correctly 24 times (18.3%), overestimated 57 times (43.5%), and underestimated 50 times (38.2%). Overall PPVs for the different anatomical structures ranged between 33.3 and 87.8%. Overall, NPVs ranged between 54.9 and 100%, and an NPV > 90% was observed for 12 anatomical structures.

Conclusions

Experienced surgeons seem to be able to better predict the anatomical structures that remain in situ after CRS + HIPEC, rather than predict the resections that were necessary to achieve a complete cytoreduction.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-08237-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Curative versus palliative treatments for colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The objective of this study was to provide an up-to-date summary of the current evidence that may be useful for updating guidelines. We comprehensively searched the published literatures and conferences for studies that compared curative with palliative treatments in colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis. The primary outcomes considered in this study were three- and five-year overall survival rates. We pooled data across studies and estimated summary effect sizes. Overall, patients who received curative treatments had improved three-year survival (hazard ratio (HR), 2.19 [95% CI, 1.83 to 2.62]) and five-year survival (HR, 2.22 [95% CI, 1.83 to 2.69]) compared with those who received palliative treatments. Patients who received curative treatments had an increased risk of treatment-related morbidity (odds ratio (OR), 2.90 [95% CI, 2.02 to 4.17]), but there was no significant difference in treatment-related mortality between patients who received curative treatments and those who received palliative treatments (OR, 1.46 [CI, 0.62 to 3.47]). Curative treatments improved overall survival in colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis and did not increase the risk of treatment-related mortality. Curative treatments were associated with a higher risk of treatment-related morbidity. These data highlight the importance for further investigation aimed at prevention of treatment-associated morbidity.